MINT

Mintlands Price Today & AI Analysis

MINTSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.000193

+286.20% 24h

Contract

Live
7pax2o5X7aWSCYm3xfAeMvhB7aXdzdWzuA6yycuAoeoZ

Chain

Solana

Holders

750

Market cap

$184,092

More tokens on Solana

FEELSGOODFEELSGOODFeels Good Man$0.002093-31.9%MC $2.09MPURRPPURRPpurrpetual$0.000451+55.8%MC $451.0KPMXPMXPMX$0.000902+44.9%MC $891.6Kpillpillpill$0.002515+73.0%MC $2.43MDJTDJTTrump Media & Technology Group Corp. Common Stock - Backpack Securities$9.08+0.0%MC $388.9KRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

Mintlands: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 00:15 UTC

Holder addresses

750

Top 10 supply share

30.47%

Reported liquidity

$21,098.00
How concentrated is Mintlands ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 00:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.47% of supply. It reports 750 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Mintlands?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 00:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $315,857.00 in buys and $303,321.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Mintlands liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +142.25%, from $8,708.85 (2026-09-25 22:00 UTC) to $21,097.59 (2026-09-26 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 00:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 22:00 UTC$8,708.85
2026-09-25 23:00 UTC$18,596.55
2026-09-26 00:00 UTC$21,097.59

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about MINT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 12:16 AM UTC

FDV

$184,092

Liquidity

$21,098.00

Holders

750

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Mintlands (MINT) is a very recently launched Solana token trading on PumpSwap, positioned as an 'MMORPG launchpad' where creator fees fund in-game town economies. The token has seen an extreme +286% 24h price surge to $0.0001926, but operates with only $21.10K in total liquidity against a $184.09K FDV, and critical data points - mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history - are all unavailable, leaving major risk questions unresolved.

Key points

  • Explosive +286% 24h price move on very thin ($21.10K) liquidity
  • Top-10 holders control 30.47% of the 955.78M token supply (750 total holder addresses in current snapshot)
  • No sniper data, no holder history, and unknown mint/freeze authority status create significant analytical blind spots
  • Recent volume collapse (~92% drop between the last two hourly candles) despite marginal new price highs, a bearish divergence signal

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has risen nearly 50x within the last 3 observed hourly candles to $0.0001926, but the most recent candle shows a sharp ~92% drop in volume even as price ticked to a marginal new high, a bearish divergence. Given the extremely shallow $21.10K liquidity pool, short-term price action is likely to remain highly volatile in either direction, with elevated risk of a sharp pullback toward the $0.000145 support or a continuation if fresh buy volume returns.

Target low

$0.0000327 (deep retracement toward candle 2 low)

Target high

$0.000213 (retest of candle 3 high / resistance)

Support

$0.000145, $0.0000327

Resistance

$0.000205-$0.000213

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With only ~3 hours of trading history available, there is no reliable medium-term technical basis for a directional call. The token's fate over coming days will likely hinge on whether liquidity deepens beyond the current $21.10K, whether the top-10 holders (30.47% of supply) begin distributing, and whether authority/rug-risk questions (currently unknown) get resolved with transparent verification.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions or removals from the $21.10K pool
  • Resolution of mint/freeze authority status (renounced vs. not)
  • Behavior of top-10 holders (30.47% of supply) - continued holding vs. distribution
  • Sustained volume vs. the volume collapse seen in the most recent candle
  • Any project updates related to the stated MMORPG launchpad utility

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($315.86K) exceeds sell volume ($303.32K), a modest net inflow
  • 24h unique buyers (2,578) exceed unique sellers (2,305)
  • Strong short-term uptrend with price up ~50x across the 3 available candles
  • Stated utility narrative (MMORPG launchpad) plus existing Twitter/website presence

Bearish factors

  • Sharp ~92% volume decline in the most recent candle despite marginal new price highs (bearish divergence)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.10K) makes the token prone to violent swings and potential rapid price collapse
  • Top-10 holders control 30.47% of supply with unknown identity/intent
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown - cannot rule out future dilution or account freezes
  • No sniper data available to gauge early-buyer dump risk
  • Parabolic +286% 24h move is characteristic of pump-and-dump patterns common on new PumpSwap launches

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because only 3 hourly candles are available (a very short lookback), sniper and holder-history data are entirely absent, and authority/rug-risk status is unknown. The extreme recent volatility (+286% in 24h) and thin liquidity make any price projection highly speculative.

MINT call history

Full track record →

Sep 26neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7pax2o...oeoZ
Total Supply
955,780,347.7 MINT

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.10K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unresolved mint/freeze authority status - cannot confirm the token is safe from further minting or account freezing
  • Top-10 wallets hold 30.47% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their intentions
  • Explosive +286% 24h price move with 65x intra-candle range signals extreme speculative/possibly manipulated trading, common in pump-and-dump patterns on new PumpSwap launches

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000037, spiked to a high of $0.0000701, then closed lower at $0.0000352 - a long upper wick suggesting early rejection at highs. Candle 2 (23:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000352, ranged between a low of $0.0000327 and a high of $0.000205, and closed near the top at $0.000150 - a strong bullish candle with volume spiking to $508.6K, the highest of the three. Candle 3 (00:00 UTC) opened at $0.000150, made a marginally higher high of $0.000213, dipped to $0.000145, and closed at $0.000193, on much lower volume ($42.9K) - showing continued upward drift but with fading volume, a potential early warning of momentum exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both the short-term (last few hours) and only-available medium-term window show a steep uptrend, with price rising from roughly $0.0000037 to $0.000193 - nearly a 50x move within the 3 observed candles. However, with only 3 candles of data, 'medium-term' trend classification is highly provisional and should not be treated as an established multi-day pattern.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000145 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000327 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000213 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000205 (candle 2 high, effectively same zone as immediate resistance)

With only 3 candles of price history, support/resistance levels are provisional. Immediate support sits at the candle 3 low of $0.000145; a break below could target the candle 2 low near $0.0000327, which would represent a severe (~83%) retracement from current levels. On the upside, resistance clusters around $0.000205-$0.000213, the highs of candles 2 and 3; a decisive breakout above this zone with strong volume would be needed to confirm continuation, whereas the current low-volume push into this zone is a caution flag.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick rejection candle at the start of the move (candle 1)
  • Strong bullish marubozu-like candle with outsized volume (candle 2)
  • Bearish volume divergence: price makes marginal new high in candle 3 while volume collapses ~92% from candle 2
  • Extremely wide intra-candle ranges (up to ~6x within a single hour) typical of a low-liquidity, newly launched pair

Liquidity

Liquidity

$21,098.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $21.10K is extremely shallow relative to 24h volumes of $315.86K buy / $303.32K sell (combined ~$619K), implying the pool is being churned roughly 29x its depth in a single day - a classic sign of high volatility and high slippage risk on any meaningfully sized trade. Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51.0% vs 49.0%), producing a modest net inflow, and buyer count (2,578) modestly exceeds seller count (2,305), both consistent with the sharp price spike. However, with liquidity this thin, even moderate sell pressure from a top-10 holder (who collectively control ~30.5% of supply) could sharply move price or make exit difficult for smaller holders.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

955,780,347.7 MINT

FDV

$184.09K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +286.2% with hourly candles showing an intra-hour range from a low of $0.0000032747 to a high of $0.000213 (roughly 65x swing) within the last 3 hours alone. This is extreme, speculative volatility typical of a very recent PumpSwap launch.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $21.10K against 24h volume near $619K combined and an FDV of $184.09K. This shallow pool means large trades will incur significant slippage and the token is vulnerable to rapid price collapse if liquidity is pulled or a large holder exits.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 30.47% of total supply. Top-100 concentration and wallet classification data are unavailable, so the true concentration picture (e.g., team/insider wallets) cannot be fully assessed, but the known top-10 figure alone is high relative to the thin liquidity.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.10K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unresolved mint/freeze authority status - cannot confirm the token is safe from further minting or account freezing
  • Top-10 wallets hold 30.47% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their intentions
  • Explosive +286% 24h price move with 65x intra-candle range signals extreme speculative/possibly manipulated trading, common in pump-and-dump patterns on new PumpSwap launches
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be assessed at all
  • No holder history available, so trend direction of holder base (growing organically vs. bot-driven) is unverifiable

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($315.86K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($303.32K), suggesting net demand at present
  • Buyer count (2,578) exceeds seller count (2,305) in the last 24h
  • Project has basic social presence (Twitter, website) and a stated use case (MMORPG launchpad) rather than being fully anonymous with no narrative

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, unverifiable holder history, and extreme recent volatility, this token is not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking stable, fundamentals-driven exposure.

Mintlands (MINT) is a newly-launched, extremely low-liquidity PumpSwap token that has experienced a parabolic +286% 24h price move on thin ($21.10K) liquidity. The data available supports only a very short (3-hour) technical picture, a single-snapshot holder count (750 addresses, top-10 holding 30.47% of supply), and no sniper, authority, or holder-history data. This combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder trends) makes this a highly speculative, high-risk asset suitable only for traders comfortable with total loss of capital.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side demand continues (24h buyers already exceed sellers, 2,578 vs 2,305) and the MMORPG launchpad narrative gains traction with genuine utility and community growth, the token could sustain its momentum and attract deeper liquidity, reducing slippage risk and supporting further price appreciation from the current $0.0001926.

  • Continued net buy volume and buyer-count dominance
  • Delivery on the stated MMORPG launchpad utility and creator-fee economic model
  • Growth in liquidity depth beyond the current $21.10K
  • Positive resolution of authority/verification unknowns

Base Case

The token likely continues to exhibit high volatility in both directions as it consolidates after its initial parabolic move, with price oscillating within or near the $0.000145-$0.000213 range observed in the last two candles, contingent on whether new volume materializes or continues to fade.

  • No major liquidity removal occurs in the near term
  • Top-10 holders do not immediately dump their 30.47% stake
  • Volume either stabilizes or continues its recent declining trend, capping further upside

Bear Case

Medium probability

Given the ~92% volume collapse in the most recent candle despite marginal new price highs, combined with top-10 holders controlling 30.47% of supply and unresolved mint/freeze authority risk, the token could see a sharp reversal or rug-pull-style liquidity withdrawal, potentially retracing toward or below the candle-2 low of $0.0000327 (an ~83% drawdown from current price).

  • Bearish volume divergence already visible in the last candle
  • Extremely thin liquidity relative to volume and FDV, enabling large price swings from modest-sized trades
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open dilution/freeze risk
  • Concentrated top-10 holder base (30.47%) with no visibility into intent
  • Parabolic price pattern historically associated with pump-and-dump dynamics

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 12:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 00:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap price and pair data
  • Hourly OHLC candles (3 most recent)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend and pattern reliability
  • No sniper data was available at all - sniper concentration, PnL, and dump-risk are entirely unknown
  • No holder history exists - growth/trend/correlation claims for holders could not be substantiated and are placeholder zeros
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability were all reported as unknown - rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed
  • No wallet classification or notable-holder labeling data was available, so whale behavior (accumulating/distributing) could not be determined beyond the raw top-10 concentration percentage
  • 24h % change figures reference a very sharp move that may reflect a very recent, thinly-traded launch, amplifying data noise

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partial on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially newly launched and thinly-liquid ones like this, carry a high risk of total loss. Data gaps (sniper, holder history, authority status) mean significant risks may exist that are not reflected here. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Mintlands ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 00:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.47% of supply. It reports 750 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Mintlands?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 00:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $315,857.00 in buys and $303,321.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Mintlands liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +142.25%, from $8,708.85 (2026-09-25 22:00 UTC) to $21,097.59 (2026-09-26 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Mintlands (MINT)?

Price has risen nearly 50x within the last 3 observed hourly candles to $0.0001926, but the most recent candle shows a sharp ~92% drop in volume even as price ticked to a marginal new high, a bearish divergence. Given the extremely shallow $21.10K liquidity pool, short-term price action is likely to remain highly volatile in either direction, with elevated risk of a sharp pullback toward the $0.000145 support or a continuation if fresh buy volume returns. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000327 (deep retracement toward candle 2 low) to $0.000213 (retest of candle 3 high / resistance).

Is MINT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 86/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, unverifiable holder history, and extreme recent volatility, this token is not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking stable, fundamentals-driven exposure.

What are the key risks of holding MINT?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.10K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unresolved mint/freeze authority status - cannot confirm the token is safe from further minting or account freezing • Top-10 wallets hold 30.47% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their intentions

← Back to all predictions

Track MINT