Stanks Price Today & AI Analysis

STANKSSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 14, 2026

$0.0₅6121

-0.50% 24h

Contract

Live

7TRk8xVyE2gg6nf9osbct8g6uVsHdc1mYzzhwdPzo6da

Chain

Solana

Holders

653

Market cap

$6,117

At a $1M market cap, $STANKS would be $0.001001 (163x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is STANKS a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

2.8%1 sniper, 66 bundlers, 4 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about STANKS

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

Splash DogMelkiy$0.0₅3067-2.8%MC $2.9K

LMAOLarge Milkers All Over$0.0₅2390+1.5%MC $2.4K

NTS1NTS-1$0.0₅2782+0.6%MC $2.6K

GOKHSHTEINThe White Bull$0.0₅5260-2.7%MC $5.2K

BABYTOADThe Baby Toad Pepe$0.0₅3808+1.2%MC $3.7K

ZECZcash$1,225.94-6.4%MC $125.92M

Stanks: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-14 22:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$33,931.00

How concentrated is Stanks ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Stanks?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Stanks liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-14 22:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,931.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-14 22:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 14, 10:16 PM UTC

FDV

$274,607

Liquidity

$33,931.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

STANKS is a newly-surged Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CLMM pool with an extremely thin $33.93K liquidity pool against a $274.61K FDV. The token experienced an extraordinary 24h price increase of 4472%, driven by a parabolic single-hour candle that spiked to $0.000554 before retracing to $0.000276 as of the latest data — a pattern consistent with a pump that is already showing signs of fading (volume down ~83% hour-over-hour). Critical data gaps exist: no holder distribution data, no sniper wallet data, and unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, all of which materially limit confidence in any bullish thesis.

Key points

Massive but likely unsustainable 24h price spike (4472%) already showing retracement
Very thin liquidity ($33.93K) relative to daily volume (>$1.7M combined buy+sell) and FDV ($274.61K)
Complete absence of holder and sniper data, an unusual transparency gap for assessing distribution risk
Unknown authority renouncement status, leaving rug-pull potential unquantified
Marginally positive buy-side skew (51.9% buy volume, more buyers than sellers) despite the broader risk picture

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Given the fading volume, retracement from the candle-1 high, and rejection at $0.000336 in candle 2, near-term price action likely stays choppy-to-lower unless fresh buy volume returns. The extreme 24h % change is a lagging artifact of the initial spike and is unlikely to repeat.

Target low

$0.000150

Target high

$0.000340

Support: $0.000202, $0.0000060
Resistance: $0.000336, $0.000554

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With only two candles of history and no holder or sniper data, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustainability depends on whether liquidity deepens beyond the current $33.93K and whether buy pressure (currently 51.9%) can hold above sell pressure as the initial pump excitement fades.

Catalysts

Any liquidity additions to the Raydium CLMM pool reducing slippage risk
Continued organic buyer interest (24h buyers 4,964 vs sellers 3,695) versus a shift toward net selling
Verification (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority status, which could sharply reduce or increase perceived rug risk
Social/twitter-driven attention cycles typical of newly launched meme-style tokens

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($889.54K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($822.86K)
Unique buyers (4,964) outnumber unique sellers (3,695) in the last 24h
Active social presence (Twitter link) suggests some community attention

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity ($33.93K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Volume collapsed ~83% between the two most recent hourly candles, suggesting fading interest
Candle pattern shows a blow-off top with rejection at lower highs, a classic pump-and-dump signature
Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status leave rug-pull risk unquantified
No holder or sniper data available to confirm distribution health or insider selling risk

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles are available, holder and sniper data are entirely absent, and authority/verification status is unknown. This is a newly-pumped, thinly-liquid token with extremely limited historical data, so any forward price view carries low confidence and high uncertainty.

STANKS call history

Full track record →

Sep 14bearish@ $0.000275

24h-92.0%

7d-95.4%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7TRk8x...o6da
Total Supply: 999,999,991.76 STANKS

Key Risks

Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezing
Extremely thin liquidity ($33.93K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and exit risk
Parabolic 24h price move (4472%) followed by an already-visible retracement, characteristic of pump-and-dump dynamics
No holder concentration or sniper data available to verify distribution health, a significant transparency gap

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle [1] (21:00 UTC) shows an extreme range: opened at $0.0000060, spiked intrahour to a high of $0.000554 (a ~92x move from open), then pulled back to close at $0.000329 — a huge upper-wick candle indicative of a parabolic pump followed by a sharp partial retrace, on volume of $1.53M. Candle [2] (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000329, made a marginally higher high of $0.000336, then sold down to a low of $0.000202 before closing at $0.000276, on much lower volume of $260.8K. This is effectively a bearish/consolidating candle relative to candle 1, showing sellers took control after the initial spike and volume collapsed by ~83% hour-over-hour.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term (last hour) price action is declining from the candle-1 close of $0.000329 to the candle-2 close of $0.000276, a pullback of roughly 16%. Medium-term (24h), the token is up an extraordinary 4472%, reflecting a fresh, violent launch-style pump rather than an established trend — the 'uptrend' label reflects the 24h reference move but should be read as a single explosive event, not sustained momentum.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000202 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000060 (candle 1 open, pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000336 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000554 (candle 1 high, all-time high on this data)

The candle 1 high of $0.000554 represents the peak of the initial pump and is the major resistance to watch for any renewed breakout. Candle 2's high of $0.000336 is a closer, immediate resistance that was already rejected once. On the downside, $0.000202 (candle 2 low) is immediate support; a break below could see a retest toward the pre-pump base near $0.0000060, though such a full retrace would require a near-total collapse of current demand.

Notable patterns

Long upper-wick candle on candle 1 consistent with a blow-off top / pump-and-dump signature
Sharp volume decay (~83%) between candle 1 and candle 2 suggesting fading momentum
Lower high and lower close on candle 2 versus candle 1's intrahour peak, early sign of seller control
Extremely wide single-hour trading range (low $0.0000060 to high $0.000554) typical of a low-liquidity new listing

Liquidity

$33,931.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $33.93K is extremely thin relative to the $274.61K FDV and the enormous $889.54K/$822.86K in 24h buy/sell volume — implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of roughly 50x in a single day. This mismatch signals that large trades will incur severe slippage and that the reported volume is likely churning through a very shallow Raydium CLMM pool, making the pool highly susceptible to sharp price swings in both directions. Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51.9% vs 48.1%), and buyer count (4,964) outpaces seller count (3,695), pointing to a modest net inflow bias, but the wafer-thin liquidity base means even this apparent buy-side edge could reverse violently on a handful of large sell orders.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,991.76 STANKS

FDV

$274,607

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from a candle-1 low of $0.0000060 to a high of $0.000554 (over 90x intrahour) and then retraced sharply, with a further swing down to $0.000202 in the following hour. This magnitude of volatility is extreme even by meme-token standards.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $33.93K against a $274.61K FDV and daily volumes exceeding $800K on both buy and sell sides, meaning large orders will move price dramatically and exiting a sizeable position could be very difficult.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezing
Extremely thin liquidity ($33.93K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and exit risk
Parabolic 24h price move (4472%) followed by an already-visible retracement, characteristic of pump-and-dump dynamics
No holder concentration or sniper data available to verify distribution health, a significant transparency gap
Fading volume (down ~83% hour-over-hour) suggesting waning organic demand right after the initial spike

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume modestly exceeds sell volume (51.9% vs 48.1%), and buyers outnumber sellers (4,964 vs 3,695), showing some net demand
Token has an active social (Twitter) presence suggesting at least some community engagement
Total supply is fixed at ~1B tokens with no evidence (nor disproof) of ongoing large-scale minting in the data provided

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits the hallmark signature of a newly launched, thinly-liquid meme coin that has just undergone a violent pump with early signs of reversal. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, and position sizing should be minimal given the unresolved authority-renouncement status and total absence of holder/sniper verification data.

STANKS presents a high-risk, high-volatility speculative trade rather than an investable asset in the traditional sense. The extreme 24h pump, thin liquidity, and total absence of holder/sniper/authority verification data mean any position should be treated as a short-duration speculative bet, not a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum resumes and new liquidity/attention flows in (e.g., viral social traction), the token could retest or exceed the candle-1 high of $0.000554, rewarding early re-entrants on continued speculative demand.

Sustained or renewed buyer dominance (currently 4,964 buyers vs 3,695 sellers in 24h)
Growing Twitter/social engagement drawing fresh capital
Liquidity providers adding depth to the Raydium pool, reducing slippage and enabling larger safe entries/exits

Base Case

Price likely trades in a wide, volatile range between roughly $0.000150 and $0.000340 over the next 24-48 hours as the market digests the initial pump, with volume continuing to normalize downward from the initial spike absent a new catalyst.

No major new liquidity injections or authority-related negative disclosures occur in the near term
Buy/sell volume stays roughly balanced (currently 51.9%/48.1%) without a decisive directional shift
Social attention neither accelerates dramatically nor evaporates entirely in the short window

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues its already-visible retracement as the initial pump exhausts, volume keeps declining, and early buyers/snipers exit into the shallow liquidity, driving price back toward pre-pump levels near $0.0000060–$0.000202.

83% volume decay already observed between the two most recent candles
Classic blow-off-top candle pattern with long upper wick and subsequent lower high
Unresolved authority/rug risk that could trigger panic selling if negative information emerges
Extremely thin liquidity amplifying any sell pressure into sharp price declines

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 14, 10:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-14 22:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles available) from Raydium CLMM pair
Trading analytics: 24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution data was available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with empty/placeholder values per methodology, not real measurements
No sniper wallet data was available, so smart money/sniper signals could not be computed and are marked unknown
Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend analysis and pattern reliability
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, preventing a definitive tokenomics rug-risk rating
24h $ price change, native price, and 6h % change were not provided, limiting cross-validation of the reported 4472% figure

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may be inaccurate, adversarially supplied, or subject to rapid change. Cryptocurrency markets, especially newly launched low-liquidity tokens, carry a substantial risk of total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Stanks (STANKS) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Stanks (STANKS)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Stanks ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Stanks?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Stanks liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-14 22:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,931.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Stanks (STANKS)?

Is STANKS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits the hallmark signature of a newly launched, thinly-liquid meme coin that has just undergone a violent pump with early signs of reversal. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, and position sizing should be minimal given the unresolved authority-renouncement status and total absence of holder/sniper verification data.

What are the key risks of holding STANKS?

Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezing • Extremely thin liquidity ($33.93K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and exit risk • Parabolic 24h price move (4472%) followed by an already-visible retracement, characteristic of pump-and-dump dynamics