76

p76token Price Prediction 2026

76
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 14, 2026

7T1F8ERfwBgrArR8QMBQw1naPv9YfBvDdrTdx3MBibb3

$22.28

FDV $1,692

LiveContract:7T1F8ERfwBgrArR8QMBQw1naPv9YfBvDdrTdx3MBibb3Chain:SolanaHolders:263Market cap:$1,692

More tokens on Solana

Indy

Indy

Indy

$0.0518921.9%
MC $1.9K
TEXE

TEXE

TOILET.EXE

$0.0515740.0%
MC $1.5K
Tyrannosaurus

Tyrannosaurus

ティラノサウルス

$0.0522910.0%
MC $2.0K
UVO

UVO

Unidentified Virus Object

$0.0519340.0%
MC $1.9K
HOMEBOY

HOMEBOY

homeboy

$0.0532391.5%
MC $3.2K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about 76

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 14, 10:48 PM
FDV

$163,305

Liquidity

$0

Holders

420

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

p76token (symbol: 76, mint: 7T1F8ERfwBgrArR8QMBQw1naPv9YfBvDdrTdx3MBibb3) is an ultra-low-supply Solana memecoin with a total formatted supply of only ~76 tokens (75.999349), marketed as the first memecoin minted via the p-token batch instruction (0xFF). It launched within the last 24 hours, accumulating all 420 holders and 100% of its holder base in that window. The token trades on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 and carries an extremely high-risk profile due to its novelty, near-zero reported on-chain liquidity, extreme price volatility (8,399% 24h move), mutable metadata, and non-renounced update authority.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Ultra-scarce supply of ~76 tokens (76 whole units, 6 decimals) — a deliberate tribute to Solana's 76 validator set
Claims to be the first memecoin minted via p-token batch instruction (0xFF) on Solana
Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks — unusually clean launch
All 420 holders and 100% of holder growth occurred within the last 24 hours — brand new token
Balanced buy/sell pressure (~49.5% buy vs 50.5% sell) with nearly equal buyer/seller counts

Price Prediction

neutral

Short term

neutral
1–24 hours

The token is exhibiting extreme intraday volatility with OHLC candles showing wild swings between ~$10.35 and ~$1,760.51 within a single hour (candle [1]). The current quoted price of $2,148.76 is dramatically above recent candle closes of $10.35–$25.41, suggesting the price feed may reflect a thin-liquidity spike rather than a stable market price. Short-term direction is highly uncertain and likely to remain violently volatile. Reported on-chain liquidity is $0.00, making any price target speculative.

Target low$10.35
Target high$2,148.76
Support: $10.35 (recurring candle low / close across multiple hours), $15.01 (candle [5] low), $25.28 (candle [6] close / recurring open-close level)
Resistance: $88.07 (candle [3] low, acted as intraday resistance), $285.17 (candle [2] low), $1,760.51 (candle [1] extreme low wick — likely a data anomaly or thin-liquidity spike)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token is less than 24 hours old, has zero reported liquidity, a mutable contract with non-renounced update authority, and a supply of only ~76 tokens, medium-term price sustainability is highly questionable. Without sustained community growth, exchange listings, or utility development, the token is likely to experience significant price decay as early speculators exit.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media traction around the p-token / 0xFF narrative
  • Solana or Anza ecosystem acknowledgment of the technical novelty
  • Listing on aggregators or DEX screeners driving discovery
  • Failure to attract new holders beyond the initial 420 would accelerate decline

Bullish factors

  • Zero snipers detected — no early predatory actors holding large bags to dump
  • Balanced buy/sell pressure (49.5% vs 50.5%) suggests organic two-sided market
  • Unique technical narrative (first p-token batch instruction memecoin) may attract niche Solana developer community
  • 949 unique buyers in 24h shows broad initial interest
  • Ultra-scarce supply (~76 tokens) creates psychological scarcity premium

Bearish factors

  • Reported on-chain liquidity is $0.00 — any sell pressure could be catastrophic
  • Update authority NOT renounced (F3FjaJfcyp1igqKrqVaR8njASNt96xVEz2HFDAZx7umg) and metadata is mutable — rug risk exists
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with zero historical holder data prior to launch day
  • OHLC candle structures are anomalous, suggesting extremely thin and manipulable market
  • All 420 holders acquired within 24h — no long-term conviction holders exist yet
  • FDV of $163,304 (per metadata) vs $0 liquidity is a severe mismatch
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) reported total liquidity of $0.00 making price discovery unreliable; (2) OHLC data showing impossible-looking candle structures (e.g., open > high in candle [1], lows far below opens/closes) suggesting data feed anomalies or extreme thin-market conditions; (3) the token is less than 24 hours old with no historical price baseline; (4) the 24h price change of 8,399% is not reproducible from the OHLC data provided.

Deep Analysis

Six hourly candles are available (2026-05-14 17:00–22:00 UTC). The candle data exhibits highly anomalous OHLC structures: in multiple candles, the Low is far above the High (e.g., candle [1]: O=$25.41, H=$25.41, L=$1,760.51, C=$10.35), which is technically impossible in standard OHLC notation and likely indicates inverted or mis-labeled fields, or extreme thin-liquidity price spikes being captured as wicks. Treating the data at face value: the recurring open/close values of ~$10.35 and ~$25.41 appear to be the dominant trading range, with extreme outlier prints at $88.07, $121.21, $285.17, and $1,760.51 representing thin-market spike events. Volume is highly irregular: candle [6] had only $455.68 volume, candle [3] had $20,661, candle [5] had $24,652, candle [4] had $97,341, candle [1] had $65,559, and candle [2] had the highest at $199,247 — suggesting a volume surge in the 21:00 hour followed by decline.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
neutral

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 50%Sell 51%

The token is oscillating between two dominant price levels (~$10.35 and ~$25.41) across all six candles, with no clear directional trend. The alternating open/close pattern between these two levels suggests a ping-pong market with no sustained momentum in either direction. The extreme spike prints are likely thin-liquidity artifacts rather than genuine trend signals.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$10.35 (recurring candle open/close floor across 5 of 6 candles)
Major$10.35 (only established support level given <24h history)
Resistance
Immediate$25.41 (recurring candle open/close ceiling)
Major$88.07 (lowest of the anomalous spike prints, candle [3])

The $10.35 and $25.41 levels are the only reliable technical levels given the token's age. These two prices appear repeatedly as opens and closes, suggesting they represent actual executed trade prices at liquidity boundaries. Levels above $88 are likely thin-liquidity artifacts and should not be treated as reliable resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Alternating open/close between $10.35 and $25.41 across all 6 candles — suggests a two-price ping-pong market with very thin order book
  • Anomalous OHLC structure (Low > High in multiple candles) — indicates data feed issues or extreme thin-market spike captures
  • Volume spike in candle [2] ($199,247) followed by declining volume — classic launch-day volume fade pattern
  • No higher highs or lower lows established — pure sideways chop within a narrow band

Total holders420
24h Δ+426
7d Δ+426
30d Δ+426
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

All 420 holders (reported as +426 net, implying ~6 early exits) entered within the last 24 hours, coinciding with the token's launch and its 8,399% reported price surge. Holder growth and price action are perfectly correlated as both began simultaneously at token launch. The historical holder series shows zero holders for all 30 prior days, confirming the token did not exist before May 14, 2026.

The token launched within the last 24 hours. The historical holder data shows 0 holders for every day from April 14 to May 13, 2026, confirming this is a brand-new token. All 420 current holders entered on launch day. The +426 net change with 420 current holders implies approximately 6 wallets exited after initially acquiring. Growth is technically 'accelerating' from zero, but this is purely a launch-day phenomenon — there is no multi-period trend to analyze. Holder distribution shows 160 whales, 49 sharks, 168 dolphins, 47 fish, and 18 octopus classifications, suggesting a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for a token with only ~76 total supply units.

Top 10 hold27.32%
Top 100 hold82.23%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

HLnpSz9h2S4hiLQ43rnSD9XkcUThA7B8hQMKmDaiTLcC

Individual whale — largest single holder at 6.42% (4.875386 tokens), likely an early buyer or insider

6.42%

6g7F3o1EoWuepvu4oF2yLdeGoTUbZRog7sw2DT2LzM9v

Individual whale — second largest at 3.49% (2.648721 tokens)

3.49%

7bsTkeWcSPG6nzsbXucxV89YUULoSExNJdX2WqfLHwZ4

Individual whale — 3.13% (2.382449 tokens)

3.13%

8is95AMJTgbei7uLnPw7heo1EBH6nnLyei7HG3R5kWVU

Individual whale — 2.48% (1.88413 tokens)

2.48%

4iD83DYUbfcLx1A6V1D5uHbpZdQaZnYYXHywq6NNG4rs

Individual whale — 2.12% (1.611763 tokens)

2.12%

The top 10 holders control 27.32% of supply and the top 100 control 82.23%, leaving only ~17.77% of supply distributed beyond the top 100 wallets. Given the total supply is only ~76 tokens, individual holdings are fractional (the largest holder has 4.875 tokens). No addresses match known CEX hot wallets, DEX liquidity pools, or burn addresses based on available data — all top holders appear to be individual wallets that acquired via swap on launch day. The concentration is notable but not extreme given the ultra-small supply. The 18% of supply outside top 100 across 320+ holders reflects very small fractional positions. Sentiment is mixed: no clear accumulation or distribution pattern is established given the <24h history.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported by trading analytics)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$200,610
Sell$204,500
Net flow
balanced

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers949
Unique sellers764

The trading analytics report $0.00 total liquidity despite $405,110 in combined 24h volume — this is a critical red flag. It likely means the Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (3F9bGuFAn4qjcDYmJY2cFoGjcFkL4BR6619QCoP8cp4H) has had liquidity added and removed, or the liquidity measurement is lagged/broken. With zero reported liquidity depth, any meaningful trade would face catastrophic slippage. The 24h volume of ~$405K across 5,530 total transactions (2,931 buys + 2,599 sells) from 966 unique wallets suggests genuine trading activity, but the price of $2,148.76 per token against $0 liquidity is internally inconsistent. The buy/sell balance is nearly perfect (49.5%/50.5%), which could indicate wash trading or a genuinely two-sided speculative market. Slippage risk is rated HIGH given zero reported liquidity.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply75.999349 tokens (76 whole units, 6 decimals)
FDV$163,304.68 (per metadata; trading analytics reports $0.00 FDV — inconsistency noted)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token description claims 'All authorities revoked,' but on-chain metadata shows: (1) Update Authority is F3FjaJfcyp1igqKrqVaR8njASNt96xVEz2HFDAZx7umg — this is NOT a burn address (not 11111...111) and is NOT labeled as renounced, meaning metadata can still be modified; (2) Mutable: true — confirms the token metadata can be changed by the update authority holder; (3) Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data — the description's claim of revocation cannot be verified from available on-chain data alone. The discrepancy between the project's claim ('all authorities revoked') and the on-chain reality (mutable metadata, active update authority) is a significant concern. The ultra-small supply of ~76 tokens is a unique tokenomic design that creates artificial scarcity but also makes the market extremely thin and manipulable. 0% team allocation is claimed but unverifiable.

Volatility
high

The token experienced an 8,399% price move in 24 hours and shows intraday swings from $10.35 to $1,760.51 within a single hour. The 5-minute change of -21.86% and 1-hour change of +56.42% confirm extreme volatility. This is consistent with a brand-new, ultra-thin-liquidity memecoin.

Liquidity
high

Total reported liquidity is $0.00 despite $405K in 24h volume. This means any position of meaningful size cannot be exited without catastrophic slippage. The Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool may have had liquidity withdrawn or the data feed is broken.

Concentration
medium

Top 10 holders control 27.32% of supply; top 100 control 82.23%. The largest single holder has 6.42%. While concentrated, the ultra-small total supply (~76 tokens) means even small fractional holdings represent significant percentage ownership. No single entity appears to hold a majority.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks. This is a positive signal — no early predatory bots hold large positions ready to dump. However, early swap buyers from the first hours could still exit profitably.

Authority
high

Despite the project claiming 'all authorities revoked,' the on-chain update authority (F3FjaJfcyp1igqKrqVaR8njASNt96xVEz2HFDAZx7umg) is active and metadata is mutable (Mutable: true). Mint and freeze authority status are unverified. This contradicts the project's own claims and represents a meaningful rug/manipulation risk.

Key risks

  • Zero reported on-chain liquidity ($0.00) makes exit extremely difficult and price highly manipulable
  • Mutable metadata and active update authority contradict the 'all authorities revoked' claim
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — no track record, no sustained community, no utility
  • Extreme price volatility (8,399% in 24h) with anomalous OHLC data suggesting thin-market manipulation
  • All 420 holders entered within 24h — no long-term conviction base; mass exit risk is high
  • FDV inconsistency ($163K in metadata vs $0 in analytics) suggests unreliable data feeds
  • Ultra-small supply (~76 tokens) makes the market trivially easy to manipulate with small capital

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers detected — no predatory early accumulation
  • Balanced buy/sell pressure (49.5%/50.5%) suggests two-sided market rather than one-sided pump
  • 949 unique buyers in 24h shows broad initial interest, not just a few wallets
  • Unique technical narrative (first p-token 0xFF memecoin) may sustain niche community interest
  • Ultra-scarce supply creates genuine scarcity premium if demand persists
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi/memecoin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment, understand thin-liquidity markets, and are actively monitoring positions. Completely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position. This is a high-conviction gamble, not an investment.

p76token is a pure speculative memecoin play built on a niche technical narrative (first p-token batch instruction mint on Solana). Its investment case rests entirely on viral community adoption and the novelty of its launch mechanism. The token has no utility, no verified authority revocation, zero liquidity depth, and a <24h history. It is a high-risk/high-reward lottery ticket for memecoin speculators only.

Bull case (low)

The p-token / 0xFF narrative goes viral within the Solana developer and memecoin community. Solana or Anza ecosystem influencers amplify the story. Liquidity is added to the Meteora pool, enabling price discovery. The ultra-scarce supply (~76 tokens) drives a psychological scarcity premium, pushing per-token prices significantly higher as new buyers compete for fractional positions.

  • Viral social media traction on Twitter/X around the technical novelty
  • Solana/Anza ecosystem acknowledgment or endorsement
  • Sustained liquidity provision enabling stable price discovery
  • Growing holder count beyond 420 with strong retention

Base case

The token maintains a small but active speculative community. Liquidity remains thin but non-zero. Price oscillates violently between $10–$100 per token as speculators trade the narrative. Holder count grows modestly to 500–1,000 over the next week but fails to achieve mainstream memecoin status. The token survives but does not achieve significant value appreciation.

  • Some liquidity is maintained in the Meteora pool
  • The p-token narrative retains niche appeal within Solana developer circles
  • No authority exploit occurs
  • Holder count grows modestly but does not achieve viral adoption

Bear case (high)

Liquidity remains at or near zero. Early holders (all of whom entered within 24h) begin exiting simultaneously, causing a price collapse with no buyers to absorb sell pressure. The mutable metadata and active update authority are exploited. The token fades into obscurity as the next memecoin narrative captures attention.

  • Zero liquidity depth making exits impossible at fair prices
  • Failure to grow holder base beyond initial 420 speculators
  • Authority risk materializing (metadata changes, mint/freeze actions)
  • Memecoin attention span exhaustion — narrative fades within days

GeneratedMay 14, 10:48 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-14T22:00 UTC. Token is less than 24 hours old.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: 7T1F8ERfwBgrArR8QMBQw1naPv9YfBvDdrTdx3MBibb3)
  • Price feed and 24h analytics from trading data provider
  • Hourly OHLC candles (6 candles, May 14 2026 17:00–22:00 UTC)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data (3F9bGuFAn4qjcDYmJY2cFoGjcFkL4BR6619QCoP8cp4H)

Limitations

  • Token is less than 24 hours old — all analysis is based on launch-day data only with no historical baseline
  • Reported total liquidity of $0.00 is inconsistent with $405K in 24h volume — data feed reliability is questionable
  • OHLC candle structures contain anomalies (Low > High in multiple candles) suggesting data feed issues or extreme thin-market conditions
  • Mint authority and freeze authority revocation status cannot be confirmed from provided data despite project claims
  • Sniper data is entirely absent (0 snipers) — cannot assess early smart money behavior beyond this fact
  • The quoted price of $2,148.76 is dramatically inconsistent with OHLC candle closes of $10.35–$25.41 — price feed reliability is uncertain
  • No social sentiment data, developer activity metrics, or community size data available beyond holder count
  • FDV reported as $163,304.68 in metadata but $0.00 in trading analytics — significant data inconsistency

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past performance and launch-day metrics are not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply75.999349 tokens (76 whole units, 6 decimals)

Key Risks

•Zero reported on-chain liquidity ($0.00) makes exit extremely difficult and price highly manipulable
•Mutable metadata and active update authority contradict the 'all authorities revoked' claim
•Token is less than 24 hours old — no track record, no sustained community, no utility
•Extreme price volatility (8,399% in 24h) with anomalous OHLC data suggesting thin-market manipulation

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Medium risk

No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks of this token's existence, which is a notable positive signal. This means no bots or early predatory wallets front-ran the launch to accumulate large positions for immediate dumping. However, with zero sniper data, PnL state and sell-through rate cannot be determined. The absence of snipers may reflect the token's technical novelty (p-token batch instruction) making it harder for standard sniper bots to detect and act upon at launch.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
medium

0% — zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 420 holders who entered within the first 24h acquired tokens via swap (439 swap acquisitions, -19 via transfer net), suggesting organic market buying rather than airdrop or insider distribution. Early buyer sentiment appears speculative given the memecoin nature and extreme price volatility.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for p76token (76)?

The token is exhibiting extreme intraday volatility with OHLC candles showing wild swings between ~$10.35 and ~$1,760.51 within a single hour (candle [1]). The current quoted price of $2,148.76 is dramatically above recent candle closes of $10.35–$25.41, suggesting the price feed may reflect a thin-liquidity spike rather than a stable market price. Short-term direction is highly uncertain and likely to remain violently volatile. Reported on-chain liquidity is $0.00, making any price target speculative. Short-term outlook is neutral (1–24 hours), with a target range of $10.35 to $2,148.76.

Is 76 a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi/memecoin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment, understand thin-liquidity markets, and are actively monitoring positions. Completely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position. This is a high-conviction gamble, not an investment.

How are 76 holders trending?

p76token currently has 420 holders and is growing (24h: 426, 7d: 426, 30d: 426). The token launched within the last 24 hours. The historical holder data shows 0 holders for every day from April 14 to May 13, 2026, confirming this is a brand-new token. All 420 current holders entered on launch day. The +426 net change with 420 current holders implies approximately 6 wallets exited after initially acquiring. Growth is technically 'accelerating' from zero, but this is purely a launch-day phenomenon — there is no multi-period trend to analyze. Holder distribution shows 160 whales, 49 sharks, 168 dolphins, 47 fish, and 18 octopus classifications, suggesting a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for a token with only ~76 total supply units.

What does sniper activity look like for 76?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: medium.

What are the key risks of holding 76?

Zero reported on-chain liquidity ($0.00) makes exit extremely difficult and price highly manipulable • Mutable metadata and active update authority contradict the 'all authorities revoked' claim • Token is less than 24 hours old — no track record, no sustained community, no utility

← Back to all predictions

Track 76