betbolt

BetBolt Price Today & AI Analysis

betboltSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.042457

-49.29% 24h · FDV $23,587

Contract

Live
7NDC4UXwdPNTV6MTSWtNenS7rQY92vkJzoBAzeikpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

462

Market cap

$23,587

More tokens on Solana

ArchiArchiArchibald_brown$0.000297+507.5%MC $287.9KCCOPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF - Backpack Securities$90.05+2.8%MC $321.2KsPL.001sPL.001First Life on Mars$0.000134+172.2%MC $122.4KAAVEAAVEAave Token$149.03+1.6%MC $622.4KButtcoinButtcoinButtcoin$0.0150+15.1%MC $15.04MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

BetBolt: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 00:45 UTC

Holder addresses

462

Top 10 supply share

32.47%

Reported liquidity

$7,649.00
How concentrated is BetBolt ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 00:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 32.47% of supply. It reports 462 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling BetBolt?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 00:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $606,124.00 in buys and $603,293.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is BetBolt liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -64.74%, from $21,706.20 (2026-09-22 16:00 UTC) to $7,653.22 (2026-09-23 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 00:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 16:00 UTC$21,706.20
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$13,381.93
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$6,159.39
2026-09-22 19:00 UTC$9,935.48
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$7,466.90
2026-09-22 21:00 UTC$7,039.57
2026-09-22 22:00 UTC$7,103.99
2026-09-22 23:00 UTC$7,357.61
2026-09-23 00:00 UTC$7,653.22

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about betbolt

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 12:46 AM UTC

FDV

$23,587

Liquidity

$7,649.00

Holders

462

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

BetBolt (betbolt) is a very small, newly-launched Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$23.6K and total liquidity of only ~$7.65K. The token has experienced extreme volatility, collapsing roughly 49% in the last 24h after an apparent parabolic spike-and-crash pattern visible in the hourly candles (price ran from ~$0.0000034 to ~$0.00034 then collapsed back to ~$0.0000225 within a few hours). Current holder count is 462 addresses with top-10 wallets controlling 32.47% of supply. No historical holder data, sniper data, or mint/freeze authority data is available, which severely limits confidence in this analysis.

Key points

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$7.65K) relative to a $23.6K FDV, implying high slippage and fragility
  • Massive single-day volatility with a spike to $0.00034 followed by a ~93% collapse within hours, then partial stabilization near $0.0000246
  • Near 50/50 buy/sell pressure (50.1% buy vs 49.9% sell) over 24h despite the price crash, suggesting balanced but frantic two-sided trading rather than one-sided dumping
  • No sniper data, no mint/freeze authority data, and no holder history available — significant transparency gaps
  • Top-10 holders control 32.47% of the 462-address holder base, a moderate concentration signal on a very small holder set

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48h

bearish

Price has stabilized somewhat over the last ~5 hours after a violent spike-and-crash, trading in a tight ~$0.0000201-$0.0000250 band on very thin volume (hourly volume fell from >$860K to under $1K). The 5m change is slightly negative (-1.83%) while 1h is positive (+7.1%), indicating choppy, low-conviction price action typical of post-pump consolidation. Given the collapsed 24h volume trend and thin liquidity, further downside or continued high volatility is more likely than a sustained recovery in the immediate term.

Target low

0.0000180

Target high

0.0000280

Support

0.0000201 (candle 6 low), 0.0000153 (candle 4 low)

Resistance

0.0000250 (candle 9 high), 0.0000700 (candle 4 high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

Without sustained volume, holder growth data, or authority verification, a medium-term directional call carries low confidence. The token's survival likely depends on whether new liquidity and buyers return after the initial pump-and-dump cycle; many similarly thin-liquidity PumpSwap launches either fade to near-zero or attempt secondary pumps.

Catalysts

  • Potential renewed social/twitter-driven speculative interest given the token's viral naming theme
  • Any increase in liquidity depth beyond the current ~$7.65K
  • Continued balanced buy/sell flow could indicate a base is forming, but this is unconfirmed

Bullish factors

  • Buy volume ($606.12K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($603.29K) over 24h, a roughly balanced-to-marginally-bullish flow despite the price crash
  • More unique buyers (3,547) than sellers (3,332) in the last 24h
  • 1h price change is positive (+7.1%), suggesting short-term stabilization/bounce attempt

Bearish factors

  • 24h price down ~49.3%, indicating a severe pump-and-dump pattern already in progress
  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$7.65K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Sharp volume decay from >$860K in a single hour to under $1K, showing fading interest/participation
  • 5m price change is negative (-1.83%), hinting momentum may still be rolling over

Confidence: low. Data covers only 9 hourly candles and a single 24h snapshot with no historical holder trend, no sniper data, and no authority verification. The extreme volatility already observed makes any forward projection highly uncertain.

betbolt call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7NDC4U...pump
Total Supply
959,930,723.57 betbolt (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$7.65K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms such as further minting or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a visible blow-off-top pattern in the first two hourly candles
  • Already down ~49.3% in 24h with a documented spike-and-crash cycle, indicating the token may be in a post-pump decay phase

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 9 hourly candles show a classic pump-and-dump: candle 1 opens at $0.00000338 and spikes intra-candle to a high of $0.000231 before closing at $0.000221 on huge volume ($299.9K). Candle 2 pushes to an all-time high of $0.000338 but closes much lower at $0.0000764 (long upper wick, huge $862K volume) — a strong reversal/blow-off signal. Candles 3-5 show continued sharp decline and high volatility (low of $0.0000153 in candle 4) with volume collapsing from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands. Candles 6-9 show progressively smaller ranges and volume shrinking to under $5K per hour, indicating the frenzy has largely subsided and price is consolidating between $0.0000201 and $0.0000250.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

After the violent initial pump and crash, the last four candles (6-9) show a tightening, low-volume consolidation with small higher lows (0.0000171 to 0.0000225), suggesting short-term stabilization, but the medium-term trend from the peak remains firmly down given the ~93% drawdown from the candle-2 high.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000201 (candle 6 low)

Major support

$0.0000153 (candle 4 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000250 (candle 9 high)

Major resistance

$0.0000764 (candle 2 close) / $0.000231-$0.000338 (candle 1-2 highs)

The token is currently trading near the low end of its post-crash range. A break above $0.0000250 could test resistance near $0.0000700 where candle 4 opened, but reclaiming the $0.0001+ zone would require a major renewed volume surge given the extreme distance from current price to the candle 1-2 highs.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top / long upper-wick candle at candle 2 (high $0.000338 vs close $0.0000764) signaling exhaustion
  • Sharp reversal pump-and-dump structure across candles 1-4
  • Volume climax followed by steep decay (classic post-pump fade)
  • Recent narrow-range consolidation candles (6-9) with shrinking volume, suggesting indecision at low levels

Liquidity

Liquidity

$7,649.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $7.65K against a 24h combined trading volume exceeding $1.2M (buy+sell) indicates the pool is being turned over more than 150x daily — an extremely thin liquidity base relative to trading activity, which produces high slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized trade and makes the price highly susceptible to manipulation or sharp swings (as evidenced by the ~49% 24h price move and the intra-day spike to $0.000338 before crashing). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%), and buyer count (3,547) modestly exceeds seller count (3,332), suggesting broad-based two-sided retail activity rather than a single large actor dumping, but the shallow liquidity pool remains the dominant risk factor for market health.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

959,930,723.57 betbolt (6 decimals)

FDV

$23,587 (per metadata) / $23.59K (per analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of -49.3% and an intra-day spike-to-crash from ~$0.0000034 to $0.000338 and back down to ~$0.0000246 demonstrate extreme volatility typical of newly-launched, thinly-traded meme tokens.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$7.65K against a FDV of ~$23.6K and daily volume over $1.2M means large trades will incur significant slippage and the pool could be drained or manipulated with relatively small capital.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 32.47% of supply among 462 total holder addresses. No top-100 concentration or wallet classification data is available, so the full concentration picture (including whether top-10 wallets are insiders, exchanges, or LPs) cannot be verified.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$7.65K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms such as further minting or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a visible blow-off-top pattern in the first two hourly candles
  • Already down ~49.3% in 24h with a documented spike-and-crash cycle, indicating the token may be in a post-pump decay phase
  • Moderate holder concentration (32.47% in top 10) among a small base of only 462 holders, with no visibility into who these wallets are
  • No historical holder trend data to confirm whether the community is growing or shrinking

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($606.12K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($603.29K), and buyer count exceeds seller count, indicating some continued two-sided demand rather than pure one-sided dumping
  • Recent hourly candles (6-9) show a narrowing, lower-volume consolidation range, suggesting the most violent volatility phase may be subsiding
  • 462 distinct holder addresses suggests some degree of distribution beyond a handful of wallets, though this is not conclusive given data gaps

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly seeking exposure to nascent, low-liquidity meme tokens who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, and extreme observed volatility.

BetBolt is a brand-new, highly speculative PumpSwap meme token that has already undergone a dramatic pump-and-dump cycle within its first few tracked hours, now trading down ~49% in 24h with thin liquidity (~$7.65K) and numerous unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper wallets, holder history). Any position here is a high-risk speculative bet on renewed social/viral momentum rather than a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Renewed viral/social interest (leveraging its topical 'Bonnie Blue' naming theme) drives a fresh wave of buyers, and balanced current buy/sell flow (50.1%/49.9%) with more buyers (3,547) than sellers (3,332) develops into sustained accumulation, pushing price back toward the $0.00007-$0.0001+ zone seen in candles 2-4.

  • Sustained or renewed social media virality tied to the token's meme premise
  • Growing liquidity beyond the current $7.65K, which would reduce slippage and attract larger buyers
  • Continued net-positive buyer/seller count ratio persisting over multiple days

Base Case

Price continues to consolidate in a tight, low-liquidity range (roughly $0.0000180-$0.0000280) with periodic volatility spikes on low volume, reflecting a token that has passed its initial hype peak and is searching for a new equilibrium without clear directional conviction.

  • No major new liquidity injections or viral catalysts occur in the near term
  • Buy/sell flow remains roughly balanced as observed in the 24h data
  • No adverse authority actions (e.g., minting, freezing) occur, though this cannot be verified with current data

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues its post-pump decay as initial speculative interest fades entirely, volume keeps collapsing (already down from $862K/hr to under $1K/hr), and any early holders/snipers who bought near the bottom of candle 1 exit into low liquidity, driving price toward or below the $0.0000153 major support and potentially toward zero.

  • Volume has already decayed by over 99% from its peak, suggesting fading organic interest
  • Extremely shallow liquidity makes the token vulnerable to further sharp drawdowns from even modest sell pressure
  • Unresolved authority risk (mint/freeze unknown) could allow supply dilution or other adverse contract actions
  • No confirmed holder growth trend to counteract the pump-and-dump narrative already visible in the candles

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 12:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 00:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (9 most recent hours) from PumpSwap pair 3fV8S6Cm9dRLBXmtY8dqzBwFokzUef3pdN1XU2hkUHJN
  • Trading analytics: 24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, liquidity, FDV
  • Codex holder aggregates: current holder count and top-10 supply concentration snapshot

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No mint authority, freeze authority, or contract verification data was available, preventing rug-risk assessment from authorities
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d) was available, preventing holder growth/trend analysis
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification/labeling data was available, preventing detailed whale/notable-holder analysis
  • Only 9 hourly candles were provided, limiting technical analysis to a very short lookback window immediately following what appears to be the token's launch
  • Token metadata fields (verified contract, spam flag, mutability, master edition) were all unknown, limiting due-diligence depth

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency and meme-token investments carry substantial risk of total loss, particularly for tokens with shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, and extreme observed volatility such as BetBolt. Conduct independent due diligence and verify authority/contract status directly on-chain before making any decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is BetBolt ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 00:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 32.47% of supply. It reports 462 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling BetBolt?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 00:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $606,124.00 in buys and $603,293.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is BetBolt liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -64.74%, from $21,706.20 (2026-09-22 16:00 UTC) to $7,653.22 (2026-09-23 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for BetBolt (betbolt)?

Price has stabilized somewhat over the last ~5 hours after a violent spike-and-crash, trading in a tight ~$0.0000201-$0.0000250 band on very thin volume (hourly volume fell from >$860K to under $1K). The 5m change is slightly negative (-1.83%) while 1h is positive (+7.1%), indicating choppy, low-conviction price action typical of post-pump consolidation. Given the collapsed 24h volume trend and thin liquidity, further downside or continued high volatility is more likely than a sustained recovery in the immediate term. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48h), with a target range of 0.0000180 to 0.0000280.

Is betbolt a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders explicitly seeking exposure to nascent, low-liquidity meme tokens who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, and extreme observed volatility.

What are the key risks of holding betbolt?

Extremely low liquidity (~$7.65K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms such as further minting or account freezing • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a visible blow-off-top pattern in the first two hourly candles

← Back to all predictions

Track betbolt