JINS

Aladdin X Jin Price Today & AI Analysis

JINSSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 22, 2026

Price

$0.053897

FDV $3,890

Contract

Live
7AZPFMALNAMu4sLP7h7N15u8ZqeNhooYQNV98Jh8pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

96

Market cap

$3,890

More tokens on Solana

RCRCRed Cross$0.052972+0.0%MC $3.0KBernhardBernhardBernhard$0.052577+0.0%MC $2.5KCOLLECTORCOLLECTORTHE COLLECTOR$0.052121+0.0%MC $2.1K🟥🟩🟥🟩🟥🟩🟪🟦🟨🟧$0.052602+0.0%MC $2.6KChadMogmanChadMogmanChad Mogman$0.051763+0.0%MC $1.8KEVOEVOEvorum$0.056903+2.0%MC $690.3K

Aladdin X Jin: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-22 05:49 UTC

Holder addresses

270

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$35,748.35
How concentrated is Aladdin X Jin ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 270 addresses (2026-06-22 05:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Aladdin X Jin?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Aladdin X Jin liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-22 05:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $35,748.35. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-22 05:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about JINS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 22, 05:49 AM UTC

FDV

$61,566

Liquidity

$35,748.35

Holders

270

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

JINS (Aladdin X Jin) is an extremely early-stage Solana memecoin/game token launched on PumpSwap with a mint address ending in 'pump'. The token has a fully diluted valuation of ~$61.6K and total liquidity of only $35.75K. It launched with 12 holders for roughly a month before a sudden explosion to 270+ holders in a single day (June 21, 2026), coinciding with a violent price spike to $0.000209 followed by an 80%+ crash. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 81% of 24h volume. The token is extremely high risk.

Key points

  • Launched on PumpSwap with a 'pump' suffix mint address — typical of PumpFun-style launches
  • Dormant for ~30 days with only 12 holders before a sudden single-day explosion to 270+ holders
  • Extreme price volatility: spiked to $0.000209 then crashed ~70% within hours
  • 81% sell pressure in 24h with 3,810 sells vs 1,330 buys
  • Top holder and supply concentration data unavailable — significant transparency gap
  • Elaborate game/utility narrative in description, but contract is unverified and authority status is unknown

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is in a sharp post-spike downtrend. After peaking at $0.000209 (candle 15), price has fallen ~70% to the current $0.0000616. The most recent candle (candle 1) shows a bearish close at the low of the range ($0.0000616), and sell pressure is 81% of 24h volume. Short-term bias is strongly bearish unless a new catalyst emerges.

Target low

$0.000026

Target high

$0.000078

Support

$0.000039 (candle 5/6 lows), $0.000025 (candle 7 low), $0.000018 (candle 14 all-time low in data)

Resistance

$0.000078 (candle 13 high), $0.000112 (candle 14 open / candle 15 close), $0.000124 (candle 14 high), $0.000209 (candle 15 all-time high in data)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

With only $35.75K in liquidity, 270 holders, no verified contract, unknown authority status, and a token that was dormant for 30 days before a single-day pump-and-dump pattern, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Sustained recovery would require genuine ecosystem development, exchange listings, or renewed community interest — none of which are evidenced in the data.

Catalysts

  • Actual game launch or playable demo release
  • Verified contract and renounced authorities
  • Significant liquidity addition to reduce slippage risk
  • Broader Solana memecoin/gaming sector rally

Bullish factors

  • Price has recovered slightly in the last 1h (+1.96%) and 5m (+1.36%) suggesting some short-term buying interest
  • 6h price change of +90.9% shows the token can move violently upward
  • Holder count grew 96% in 24h indicating new participant interest
  • Elaborate game narrative could attract speculative interest if marketed effectively
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist suggesting some project infrastructure

Bearish factors

  • 81% sell pressure (3,810 sells vs 1,330 buys) in 24h
  • Price down -33% in 24h after a violent spike-and-crash pattern
  • Only $35.75K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Token was dormant for 30 days with only 12 holders before the pump
  • Top holder concentration data unavailable — cannot assess dump risk
  • Unverified contract and unknown authority status
  • FDV of only $61.6K suggests minimal market confidence
  • Classic pump-and-dump candle pattern visible in OHLC data

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: missing top holder data, unknown mint/freeze authority status, extremely thin liquidity ($35.75K), no sniper data, and a token that has only been actively traded for ~1 day. Price action is highly erratic and driven by very few participants.

JINS call history

Full track record →

Jun 22bearish
24h-50.4%
7d-92.9%
30d-95.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7AZPFM...pump
Total Supply
999,985,160.83 JINS

Key Risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: price spiked 11x then crashed 70%+ in hours — classic exit liquidity event
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 81% of 24h volume is sells (3,810 sells vs 1,330 buys)
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($35.75K) — high slippage on any meaningful trade
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 15-candle hourly OHLC series tells a clear pump-and-dump story. Candle 15 (oldest in set, 15:00 UTC June 21) shows an explosive move: O=$0.0000305, H=$0.000209, C=$0.000113 — a massive upper wick indicating heavy selling into the spike. Candle 14 (16:00) opened at $0.000113, spiked to $0.000124, then crashed to close at $0.0000336 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star with enormous volume ($61.6K). Candles 13–11 show continued lower highs and lower lows as the dump progressed. Candles 10–7 form a base around $0.000025–$0.000043. Candle 6 (00:00 June 22) shows a recovery attempt from $0.0000265 to close at $0.0000394. Candles 5–2 show a gradual recovery with higher lows and higher closes. Candle 1 (most recent, 05:00) opens at $0.0000642 and closes at $0.0000616 — a slight bearish close suggesting the recovery may be stalling.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The dominant trend since the candle 15 peak at $0.000209 is a strong downtrend. The short-term shows a partial recovery from the $0.000025 lows but price remains ~70% below the spike high. The medium-term trend is clearly down from the all-time high in the dataset.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

19%

Sell

81%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000039 (candles 5–6 lows, ~$0.0000267–$0.0000391 range)

Major support

$0.000018–$0.000025 (candle 14 absolute low of $0.0000188 and candle 7 low of $0.0000253)

Immediate resistance

$0.000078 (candle 13 high of $0.0000783)

Major resistance

$0.000124–$0.000209 (candle 14 high and candle 15 all-time high in dataset)

The token faces heavy overhead resistance from the pump zone ($0.000078–$0.000209). Immediate support sits around $0.000039 from the recent consolidation lows. A break below $0.000025 would signal a retest of the absolute lows near $0.000018.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing at candle 15–14: massive upper wick on candle 15 followed by gap-down open and crash on candle 14 — classic pump-and-dump top
  • Lower highs and lower lows from candle 15 through candle 7 — confirmed downtrend
  • Volume exhaustion: volume dropped from $131.6K (candle 15) to $1.5K–$5K in recent candles
  • Weak recovery candles 6–2 with modest volume suggesting lack of conviction
  • Candle 1 bearish close at the low of its range — potential stall in recovery

Liquidity

Liquidity

$35,748.35

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $35.75K on a single PumpSwap pool (4Efoxqe3avhLeZWV7ucKzFLHN8rzqx22RWkha7sAzzB4). With an FDV of $61.6K, liquidity represents ~58% of FDV which sounds reasonable but in absolute terms $35.75K is extremely thin — any moderate sell order will cause significant slippage. The 24h sell volume of $219.6K is 6.1x the buy volume of $51.4K, representing a massive net outflow. Unique sellers (1,157) outnumber unique buyers (324) by 3.6:1. The sell/buy ratio of 81%/19% is one of the most bearish readings possible. Market health is poor: the token is experiencing a liquidity crisis as early holders exit and insufficient new capital enters to absorb the selling pressure.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,985,160.83 JINS

FDV

$61,565.78

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price swung from $0.000018 to $0.000209 and back to $0.0000616 within ~15 hours — a range of 11x. 24h change is -33%. Extreme volatility typical of micro-cap pump events.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $35.75K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Any meaningful position size will face severe slippage. 24h sell volume ($219.6K) is 6x total liquidity, indicating the pool is being rapidly drained.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: price spiked 11x then crashed 70%+ in hours — classic exit liquidity event
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 81% of 24h volume is sells (3,810 sells vs 1,330 buys)
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($35.75K) — high slippage on any meaningful trade
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation or account freezing
  • Unverified contract — no independent security audit
  • 12 original holders held for 30 days before pump — likely sitting on large gains and distributing
  • Top holder concentration data unavailable — cannot assess dump risk from whales
  • Token dormant for 30 days suggests no organic development or community prior to pump
  • FDV of only $61.6K — extremely speculative nano-cap with no established market

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable:false — metadata cannot be altered
  • Social links exist (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggesting some project infrastructure
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
  • Elaborate game/utility narrative could attract genuine interest if developed
  • Some recovery from lows (+1.96% in 1h) suggests not completely abandoned
  • 249 of 270 holders acquired via swap (not airdrop) — some genuine buyer interest

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who understand the extreme risks of nano-cap PumpFun tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are using only a tiny fraction of their portfolio. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

JINS is an extremely high-risk nano-cap token that has just experienced a classic pump-and-dump event. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, relying on either a second pump wave or genuine game development materializing. The overwhelming evidence from on-chain data points to a token in active distribution by early holders, with insufficient liquidity and community to sustain current prices.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The game narrative gains traction, the project delivers a playable demo or verifiable development milestone, and the token attracts a genuine gaming community. A second wave of interest drives holders above 1,000 and liquidity above $500K.

  • Actual game launch or verifiable development progress
  • Verified contract and renounced authorities building trust
  • Significant liquidity addition reducing slippage risk
  • Broader Solana gaming/memecoin sector momentum
  • Influencer or community-driven marketing campaign

Base Case

The token stabilizes at a lower price ($0.000025–$0.000045) after the initial pump exhausts, trades with low volume and thin liquidity for weeks, and slowly bleeds as early holders continue to distribute. No major catalysts emerge in the near term.

  • Some residual buying interest from the gaming narrative keeps the token alive
  • Early holders distribute gradually rather than all at once
  • Liquidity remains above $10K preventing complete illiquidity
  • No major positive or negative catalyst in the next 30 days
  • Holder count stabilizes around 200–300 with minimal new entrants

Bear Case

High probability

The pump-and-dump cycle completes, early holders finish distributing, liquidity drains below $10K, and the token returns to near-zero with the original 12 holders holding worthless bags. The game narrative is never developed.

  • 81% sell pressure continues as early holders exit
  • Liquidity pool drains as sellers overwhelm buyers
  • No verifiable game development or utility delivery
  • Holder count declines as disappointed buyers exit
  • Unknown authority status creates trust deficit

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 22, 05:49 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-22 05:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority, mutability)
  • Real-time price feed (USD and WSOL pair on PumpSwap)
  • 15 hourly OHLC candles (June 21–22, 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics (total, acquisition method, distribution tiers)
  • 30-day historical holder series (daily)
  • Top holders list (unavailable — data gap noted)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable — data gap noted)

Limitations

  • Top 20 holders data unavailable — cannot assess actual supply concentration or whale behavior
  • Sniper analysis data unavailable — cannot quantify early buyer concentration or PnL
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug risk from authorities
  • Contract unverified — no security audit available
  • Only 15 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Token has only been actively traded for ~1 day — extremely limited price history
  • Supply concentration metrics showing 0% for top10/top100 likely reflect data unavailability
  • Game/utility claims in description are unverified and provided by the token creator
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement status

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. JINS exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics including a pump-and-dump price pattern, unknown authority status, unverified contract, and critically shallow liquidity. Investing in this token carries extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Aladdin X Jin ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 270 addresses (2026-06-22 05:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Aladdin X Jin?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Aladdin X Jin liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-22 05:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $35,748.35. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Aladdin X Jin (JINS)?

The token is in a sharp post-spike downtrend. After peaking at $0.000209 (candle 15), price has fallen ~70% to the current $0.0000616. The most recent candle (candle 1) shows a bearish close at the low of the range ($0.0000616), and sell pressure is 81% of 24h volume. Short-term bias is strongly bearish unless a new catalyst emerges. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000026 to $0.000078.

Is JINS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who understand the extreme risks of nano-cap PumpFun tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are using only a tiny fraction of their portfolio. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

What are the key risks of holding JINS?

Pump-and-dump pattern: price spiked 11x then crashed 70%+ in hours — classic exit liquidity event • Overwhelming sell pressure: 81% of 24h volume is sells (3,810 sells vs 1,330 buys) • Critically shallow liquidity ($35.75K) — high slippage on any meaningful trade

← Back to all predictions

Track JINS