CLAW

clawpump.tech Price Today & AI Analysis

CLAWSolanaAnalysis as of May 20, 2026

Price

$0.0139

+6.12% 24h

Contract

Live
739dnZEG4yaBWFsY8L8ZwrfhGG6dhtCSercW8Umspump

Chain

Holders

5,072

Market cap

$13,732,599

Ask Unhosted AI about CLAW

Continue in chat

More tokens on Solana

clawpump.tech: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-20 00:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,153

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$134,476.32
How concentrated is clawpump.tech ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,153 addresses (2026-05-20 00:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling clawpump.tech?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is clawpump.tech liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-20 00:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $134,476.32. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-20 00:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 20, 12:17 AM UTC

FDV

$2,174,769

Liquidity

$134,476.32

Holders

1,153

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

CLAW (clawpump.tech) is a Solana-based utility token powering an agentic gateway that enables AI agents to launch tokens on pump.fun without paying gas fees. The platform sponsors token creation, collects trading fees hourly, and distributes 65% of all revenue to agents. The token is trading at ~$0.00217 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$2.17M and total liquidity of $134.48K. It has seen a sharp 67.7% 24h price surge driven by high sell-side volume, suggesting speculative momentum rather than organic accumulation. Supply is heavily concentrated, with the top 10 holders controlling 73.22% and the top 100 controlling 97% of supply.

Key points

  • Gasless AI-agent token launchpad on Solana via pump.fun integration
  • 65% revenue share distributed directly to AI agents
  • Supports SOL and USDC (x402 protocol) for launches
  • MultiDEX arbitrage and social skills for agents built-in
  • Verified contract, mutable=false metadata, active social presence (Twitter, website)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

After a 67.7% surge in 24h, the token is showing early signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (candle [1]) shows a very low volume of $44.50 vs. the prior hour's $7,585, and the 1h price change is already -11.42%. Sell pressure dominates at 65.9% of 24h volume ($79.1K sells vs. $40.98K buys). A retracement toward the $0.00183–$0.00175 range is likely in the near term.

Target low

$0.00165

Target high

$0.00230

Support

$0.00208 (candle [2] low), $0.00178 (candle [5] close), $0.00149 (candle [9] open / multi-candle base)

Resistance

$0.00217 (current price / candle [1] high), $0.00246 (candle [2] high), $0.00277 (candle [3] high — spike top)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term outlook is neutral-to-cautious. Holder growth over 30 days is modest at +7.5% (net +86 holders), and the historical series shows high volatility in holder counts with several large single-day drops (e.g., -77 on May 7, -42 on May 17). If the platform gains traction with AI agent launches and revenue sharing, renewed buying interest could emerge. However, the extreme supply concentration and dominant sell pressure are structural headwinds.

Catalysts

  • AI agent adoption driving platform revenue and token demand
  • New DEX listings or liquidity additions
  • Broader Solana memecoin/AI narrative momentum
  • Sustained holder growth above 1,200+

Bullish factors

  • 67.7% 24h price appreciation showing strong momentum
  • Unique AI-agent utility narrative with revenue sharing model
  • Verified contract and non-mutable metadata reduce rug risk
  • Holder count up +44 in 24h, showing fresh interest
  • Total liquidity of $134.48K is reasonable for a micro-cap

Bearish factors

  • 65.9% sell pressure ($79.1K sells vs $40.98K buys) in 24h
  • 1h price already down -11.42% from the spike top
  • Top 10 holders control 73.22% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Top 100 holders control 97% — near-total concentration
  • No sniper data available; early buyer behavior unknown
  • Thin liquidity relative to FDV creates high slippage risk
  • Historical holder count is volatile and net growth over 30d is modest

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) no top holder data available to assess whale behavior, (2) no sniper data to evaluate early buyer pressure, (3) the token is very early-stage with thin liquidity ($134.48K), and (4) the 24h price spike appears speculative with sell pressure dominating. The OHLC data covers only ~22 hours, limiting trend analysis.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
739dnZ...pump
Total Supply
999,990,276.36 CLAW

Key Risks

  • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 = 73.22%, top 100 = 97%
  • Dominant sell pressure: 65.9% of 24h volume is sells ($79.1K vs $40.98K buys)
  • Shallow liquidity ($134.48K) creates high slippage and dump vulnerability
  • Update authority not renounced — potential for future changes

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22-hour OHLC series reveals a clear two-phase structure. Candles [22]–[16] (02:00–09:00 UTC May 19) show a flat, low-volume base around $0.00128–$0.00130 with negligible volume (under $500 each), indicating dormancy. From candle [15] onward, price begins a gradual grind upward. The breakout accelerates sharply in candle [5] (20:00 UTC, +$19.8K volume) and candle [3] (22:00 UTC, +$35.3K volume, high of $0.002773 — the session spike top). Candle [2] (23:00 UTC) shows a bearish reversal: open $0.002297, high $0.002462, close $0.002083 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern on high volume ($7,585). Candle [1] (00:00 UTC May 20) shows a tiny-bodied candle with minimal volume ($44.50), suggesting momentum exhaustion at the top.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically an uptrend given the 67.7% 24h gain, but the most recent candles signal a potential reversal. The medium-term (30-day holder data context) shows a sideways-to-volatile pattern with no sustained directional trend in holders or price data beyond the 22h window.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

34%

Sell

66%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00208 (candle [2] close / recent swing low)

Major support

$0.00149 (candle [9] open — pre-breakout consolidation base)

Immediate resistance

$0.00217 (current price / candle [1] high)

Major resistance

$0.00277 (candle [3] spike high — session top)

The $0.00208 level is the first meaningful support, being the close of the high-volume bearish candle [2]. Below that, the $0.00175–$0.00178 zone (candles [4]–[5]) offers secondary support. The pre-breakout base at $0.00128–$0.00130 is major support if the move fully retraces. On the upside, $0.00246 (candle [2] high) and $0.00277 (candle [3] spike) are key resistance levels.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing at candle [2] top — high-volume reversal signal
  • Volume climax at candle [3] ($35.3K) followed by rapid volume collapse — distribution pattern
  • Flat base accumulation (candles [22]–[16]) before breakout — classic pump setup
  • Higher highs and higher lows from candle [15] to candle [3], then lower close on candle [2]
  • Doji-like exhaustion candle [1] with near-zero volume ($44.50) at session high

Liquidity

Liquidity

$134,476.32

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $134.48K on PumpSwap (pair CqC3Hz1VLgRtoy8Kcahif6vxAcYNyQVM7SWxLXCQAfcK) is shallow relative to the $2.17M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of roughly 6.2%. This means any meaningful sell order could cause significant price impact. Slippage risk is high for trades above a few thousand dollars. The 24h net flow is clearly negative: $79.1K in sells vs. $40.98K in buys, with 204 unique sellers vs. only 79 unique buyers and 462 sell transactions vs. 160 buy transactions. This 2.9:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio and 65.9% sell pressure confirm net outflow conditions despite the price spike, suggesting the pump was driven by a small number of large buy orders rather than broad accumulation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,990,276.36 CLAW

FDV

$2,174,768.88

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token surged 67.7% in 24h from a low base, with intra-session swings from $0.00128 to $0.00277 (a 116% range). Hourly candles show extreme volatility with volume spikes and rapid reversals. The 1h change is already -11.42% from the top.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $134.48K on a single DEX (PumpSwap). The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~6.2%. Large orders will face severe slippage, and a coordinated sell could rapidly drain the pool.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 = 73.22%, top 100 = 97%
  • Dominant sell pressure: 65.9% of 24h volume is sells ($79.1K vs $40.98K buys)
  • Shallow liquidity ($134.48K) creates high slippage and dump vulnerability
  • Update authority not renounced — potential for future changes
  • No sniper data — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unknown
  • Volatile holder count history with large single-day drops (-77 on May 7)
  • Token is very early-stage with limited price history (22h of OHLC data)
  • AI-agent narrative is speculative; platform adoption unproven

Mitigating factors

  • Verified contract reduces immediate fraud risk
  • Metadata marked 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be changed
  • Unique and differentiated utility narrative (AI agent gasless launchpad)
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis)
  • 65% revenue share model creates potential token demand if platform succeeds
  • Holder count growing +44 in 24h, showing fresh market interest
  • Token launched on pump.fun — mint authority likely burned post-graduation (unconfirmed)

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who understand memecoin and micro-cap dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (1–3% of portfolio maximum). Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders without active monitoring, or anyone unable to absorb a total loss of capital.

CLAW is a high-risk, high-speculation micro-cap token tied to an AI-agent launchpad narrative on Solana. The token has a genuine utility proposition (gasless AI agent token launches, revenue sharing), but is currently trading on speculative momentum following a 67.7% pump. The extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 73.22%), dominant sell pressure, and shallow liquidity make this a very high-risk play. The bull case depends entirely on platform adoption and the AI-agent narrative sustaining interest.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

CLAW becomes the go-to token for AI agent infrastructure on Solana. The clawpump.tech platform gains meaningful adoption, generating consistent trading fees that are distributed to agents, creating real token demand. The 65% revenue share model attracts AI developers, driving organic holder growth and buy pressure. A broader AI-agent narrative on Solana lifts all boats.

  • Sustained AI agent adoption on clawpump.tech platform
  • Growing platform revenue driving token buybacks or demand
  • Broader Solana AI-agent narrative momentum
  • New exchange listings increasing liquidity and visibility
  • Holder base expanding beyond 1,500+ with reduced concentration

Base Case

CLAW consolidates in the $0.00150–$0.00210 range following the pump, with gradual holder growth tied to platform development milestones. Liquidity remains thin, price is volatile, and the token trades as a speculative AI-narrative play with occasional pumps and retracements. FDV stays in the $1.5M–$2.5M range.

  • Platform continues development and maintains social presence
  • No major whale dumps in the near term
  • Solana ecosystem remains active and supportive of new token launches
  • Holder count stabilizes around 1,100–1,300
  • Liquidity gradually improves as trading volume attracts more LPs

Bear Case

High probability

The 67.7% pump was a coordinated or organic speculative spike that is now reversing. Whales (top 10 = 73.22% of supply) begin distributing into retail buyers attracted by the price move. Liquidity drains rapidly, price collapses back toward the pre-pump base of $0.00128 or lower. Platform fails to gain traction, and the AI-agent narrative fades.

  • Whale distribution into the price spike (73.22% top-10 concentration)
  • Continued sell pressure dominance (65.9% of volume)
  • Shallow liquidity unable to absorb selling pressure
  • No confirmed platform revenue or adoption metrics
  • Holder count reversal if price retraces sharply

Analysis details

Generated

May 20, 12:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-20 00:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana token mint: 739dnZEG4yaBWFsY8L8ZwrfhGG6dhtCSercW8Umspump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (CqC3Hz1VLgRtoy8Kcahif6vxAcYNyQVM7SWxLXCQAfcK)
  • 22-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • 30-day historical holder metrics
  • Token distribution breakdown (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus)
  • Supply concentration data (top 10, top 100)

Limitations

  • No top holder address data available — whale classification is impossible
  • No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate unknown
  • Only 22 hours of OHLC data — insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend confirmation
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — inferred from context only
  • No platform revenue or adoption metrics available to validate utility claims
  • Single DEX liquidity source (PumpSwap) — no cross-DEX data
  • 30-day holder history shows high volatility, limiting trend reliability

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is clawpump.tech ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,153 addresses (2026-05-20 00:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling clawpump.tech?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is clawpump.tech liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-20 00:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $134,476.32. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for clawpump.tech (CLAW)?

After a 67.7% surge in 24h, the token is showing early signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (candle [1]) shows a very low volume of $44.50 vs. the prior hour's $7,585, and the 1h price change is already -11.42%. Sell pressure dominates at 65.9% of 24h volume ($79.1K sells vs. $40.98K buys). A retracement toward the $0.00183–$0.00175 range is likely in the near term. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.00165 to $0.00230.

Is CLAW a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.2/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who understand memecoin and micro-cap dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (1–3% of portfolio maximum). Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders without active monitoring, or anyone unable to absorb a total loss of capital.

What are the key risks of holding CLAW?

Extreme supply concentration: top 10 = 73.22%, top 100 = 97% • Dominant sell pressure: 65.9% of 24h volume is sells ($79.1K vs $40.98K buys) • Shallow liquidity ($134.48K) creates high slippage and dump vulnerability

← Back to all predictions

Questions about CLAW?