m/ep

Memetically-Engineered Product Price Today & AI Analysis

m/epSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.047514

+56.58% 24h

Contract

Live
6mEf9TXKfFwAd3xSGXRDq3cMb3q8H4R8wEqWsqWxpump

Chain

Holders

827

Market cap

$73,281

More tokens on Solana

Memetically-Engineered Product : holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 12:15 UTC

Holder addresses

827

Top 10 supply share

20.91%

Reported liquidity

$13,209.00
How concentrated is Memetically-Engineered Product ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 12:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.91% of supply. It reports 827 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Memetically-Engineered Product ?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 12:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $336,954.00 in buys and $331,794.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Memetically-Engineered Product liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +798.82%, from $1,469.54 (2026-09-26 09:00 UTC) to $13,208.53 (2026-09-26 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 12:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 09:00 UTC$1,469.54
2026-09-26 10:00 UTC$16,781.60
2026-09-26 11:00 UTC$17,323.24
2026-09-26 12:00 UTC$13,208.53

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about m/ep

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 12:16 PM UTC

FDV

$73,281

Liquidity

$13,209.00

Holders

827

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

m/ep (Memetically-Engineered Product) is a very small, brand-new PumpSwap/Pump.fun-style memecoin with a $73.28K fully diluted valuation and only $13.21K of total liquidity. The token has seen an extremely volatile last 4 hours of trading — a >30x intraday spike followed by a sharp retracement — accompanied by heavy volume relative to its liquidity pool. Only current-snapshot holder data (827 addresses, top-10 holding 20.91% of supply) is available; there is no holder history, wallet classification, or sniper dataset to corroborate distribution trends or early-buyer behavior. Mint/freeze authority status is unverifiable from the data provided.

Key points

  • Extreme short-term volatility: +56.6% over 24h but -40.5% in the most recent 1h and -5.4% in the last 5m
  • Liquidity is very thin ($13.21K) relative to 24h volume (~$669K combined buy+sell), implying high slippage and price impact risk
  • No sniper, holder-history, or authority-verification data exists, materially limiting risk certainty
  • Top-10 holders control ~20.9% of supply — a moderate, not extreme, concentration on current snapshot alone

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-6 hours

bearish

Price has already retraced sharply from its intraday high of $0.000219 (candle 3) down to $0.0000751 (candle 4 close), a decline of roughly 66% from peak. The most recent 1h (-40.5%) and 5m (-5.4%) changes show continued downward momentum after the initial spike. Absent fresh buy demand, further downside toward the $0.0000687 intra-candle low or below is plausible.

Target low

$0.0000450

Target high

$0.0000950

Support

$0.0000687 (candle 4 low), $0.0000383 (candle 1 open/low)

Resistance

$0.000130 (candle 3/4 open area), $0.000219 (candle 3 high, recent peak)

Medium term · 1-7 days

neutral

With only 4 hourly candles of data and a token that appears to be days-old (pump.fun style launch on PumpSwap), medium-term directional confidence is very low. Sustained direction will depend on whether buy volume (currently 50.4% of 24h volume) can hold up as the initial speculative spike fades, and whether liquidity depth improves.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions to the $13.21K pool that would reduce slippage and support price stability
  • Continued social/twitter-driven attention given the token's single listed social link
  • Broader memecoin market sentiment/rotation on Solana
  • Risk of rapid abandonment typical of low-liquidity pump.fun-style tokens if volume dries up

Bullish factors

  • 24h price change is still positive (+56.6%) despite the recent pullback
  • Buy volume ($336.95K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($331.79K) over 24h, and buyer count (2,805) exceeds seller count (2,416)
  • High trading activity (7,207 buys / 5,572 sells in 24h) suggests active speculative interest

Bearish factors

  • Sharp -40.5% 1h decline and -5.4% 5m decline signal the pump is unwinding
  • Thin liquidity ($13.21K) relative to volume creates high volatility and slippage risk, making sustained price support difficult
  • No verified mint/freeze authority status or sniper data to rule out rug/dump risk
  • Extremely small market cap/FDV ($73.28K) is characteristic of high-risk, short-lived meme launches

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, volume and price have been extremely erratic (30x move then ~66% retracement within hours), and there is no sniper or holder-history data to validate whether the initial pump was organic or coordinated. FDV ($73K) and liquidity ($13.2K) are both very small, making price highly susceptible to single large trades.

m/ep call history

Full track record →

Sep 26bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
6mEf9T...pump
Total Supply
975,258,358.08 m/ep

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($13.21K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Violent, unexplained price spike (~57x) followed by a ~66% crash within a few hours, suggesting speculative/manipulated trading rather than fundamentals-driven demand
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available to assess early-buyer dumping or wallet concentration trends beyond a single current snapshot

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 4 available hourly candles, price opened at $0.00000383, spiked violently to a high of $0.000219 in candle 3 (roughly a 57x move from candle 1's low), then fell back to close at $0.0000751 in candle 4 — a decline of about 66% from the candle 3 high. Volume peaked in candle 2 ($427K) during the initial pump, then declined sharply in candle 4 ($28.8K) as the move faded, indicating waning participation on the pullback.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term (last 1-2 candles) shows a clear downtrend as price retraces from the spike high. Medium-term (across all 4 candles) still nets an uptrend since the close is far above the starting price, but the trajectory has clearly reversed direction most recently.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000687 (candle 4 intracandle low)

Major support

$0.0000283 (candle 2 low) / $0.00000383 (candle 1 low/open)

Immediate resistance

$0.000130 (candle 3-4 open/close zone)

Major resistance

$0.000219 (candle 3 high, all-time high in visible data) / $0.000434 (candle 1 high, likely a wick anomaly)

The token's brief trading history is dominated by one huge spike-and-fade cycle. The candle 1 high ($0.000434) occurred on very low volume relative to the move and may represent a wick/outlier; the more meaningful resistance is the candle 3 high ($0.000219) which coincided with peak volume. Current price ($0.0000751) sits well below both, closer to the lower half of the observed range, testing candle 4's low of $0.0000687 as nearest support.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top / spike-and-fade: rapid multi-x rally (candle 1→3) followed by sharp reversal (candle 3→4)
  • Large upper wicks on candles 1-3 indicating repeated rejection at higher prices
  • Declining volume on the pullback candle, consistent with exhaustion rather than a fresh bearish catalyst

Liquidity

Liquidity

$13,209.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $13.21K is extremely shallow relative to the reported 24h combined volume of roughly $668.7K (a volume/liquidity ratio exceeding 50x), which means even modestly sized trades can move the price dramatically — consistent with the observed intraday spike-and-crash in the OHLC candles. Buy volume ($336.95K) and buyer count (2,805) both modestly exceed sell volume ($331.79K) and seller count (2,416), producing a slight net inflow bias (50.4%/49.6% split), but this thin margin is not enough to offset the structural liquidity risk. Any large sell order relative to the $13.21K pool could cause severe slippage or a rapid price collapse.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

975,258,358.08 m/ep

FDV

$73.28K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from a low of ~$0.00000383 to a high of ~$0.000219 (roughly 57x) within a few hours, then collapsed ~66% from that peak, with -40.5% in the most recent hour alone. This is extreme, casino-like volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $13.21K total liquidity against ~$669K in 24h combined volume means the pool cannot absorb large trades without severe price impact; slippage risk is rated high.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control 20.91% of supply per the current snapshot, which alone is moderate, but top-100 concentration, holder history, and wallet classification are unavailable, so the true concentration risk (including possible hidden clusters or insider wallets) cannot be reliably assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($13.21K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Violent, unexplained price spike (~57x) followed by a ~66% crash within a few hours, suggesting speculative/manipulated trading rather than fundamentals-driven demand
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available to assess early-buyer dumping or wallet concentration trends beyond a single current snapshot
  • Very small FDV ($73.28K) typical of early-stage, high-failure-rate memecoin launches
  • Token description ('beff said memecoins are dumb') and other creator-supplied fields are unverified and could contain manipulative framing; per methodology any embedded instruction-like content would be treated as a manipulation signal, though none was explicitly detected as a command in this dataset

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($336.95K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($331.79K), and buyer count exceeds seller count, showing some residual net demand
  • Top-10 concentration of 20.91% is not extreme by memecoin standards on the current snapshot
  • High trade counts (7,207 buys, 5,572 sells) indicate the token has attracted real, active retail attention rather than being completely illiquid or dead

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. Unsuitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking stable, fundamentals-backed exposure, given the unverified authorities, shallow liquidity, and extreme observed volatility.

m/ep is a micro-cap, newly-active memecoin on PumpSwap that just experienced a dramatic pump-and-partial-dump cycle within a few hours. The very small liquidity base, unknown authority status, and complete absence of sniper/holder-history data mean this token carries very high, largely unquantifiable risk. Any position should be sized as high-risk speculation only.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Renewed social/community momentum (leveraging its Twitter presence) reignites buy volume, and the near-even buy/sell split combined with buyer count exceeding seller count (2,805 vs 2,416) tips further toward net accumulation, pushing price back toward or above the recent $0.000130-$0.000219 range.

  • Sustained or growing social media attention could attract fresh speculative buyers
  • Slight positive net flow (50.4% buy vs 49.6% sell) over 24h could continue if sentiment stays positive
  • Low FDV ($73.28K) leaves theoretical room for rapid re-rating on renewed interest, typical of pump.fun-style tokens

Base Case

Price continues to be highly volatile and range-bound within the recent extremes ($0.0000687 to $0.000130) as the market digests the initial spike, with liquidity remaining shallow and no durable trend establishing itself absent new catalysts.

  • No major liquidity additions occur in the near term, keeping slippage risk high
  • No verifiable resolution of the mint/freeze authority unknowns occurs
  • Trading activity (buys/sells in the thousands per day) persists at a level similar to the current 24h snapshot without a strong directional bias

Bear Case

High probability

The blow-off-top pattern already visible in the candles (57x spike then 66% retracement, -40.5% in the last hour) continues, compounded by the extremely shallow $13.21K liquidity pool, leading to further sharp declines or a near-total liquidity drain as speculative interest fades.

  • Rapidly decreasing volume on the pullback candle ($28.8K vs $427K at peak) signals fading participation
  • Thin liquidity means any concentrated selling (whether from top-10 holders holding 20.91% of supply, or unverified early buyers) could crash the price with minimal capital
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves a residual, unquantified rug risk
  • Classic pump.fun-style tokens frequently see rapid abandonment after initial hype fades

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 12:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 12:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • USD price and 24h/short-interval price change data
  • 4 most recent hourly OHLCV candles from PumpSwap pair 3jwZSgx2NuNdeWkSUtrRzPNmUPdDRSt2A8qSygxob3Mi
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 supply share)

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was provided at all, preventing any assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history exists — only a single current snapshot (827 holders, 20.91% top-10 share), so growth trends, accumulation/distribution behavior, and price correlation cannot be assessed
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, preventing any rug-risk-from-authorities conclusion
  • Top-100 holder concentration and notable holder classifications are unavailable
  • Only 4 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend and pattern analysis to a very short window
  • Token metadata fields (name, symbol, description) are creator-supplied and unverified, and were treated strictly as untrusted evidence

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap memecoins, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Memetically-Engineered Product ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 12:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.91% of supply. It reports 827 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Memetically-Engineered Product ?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 12:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $336,954.00 in buys and $331,794.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Memetically-Engineered Product liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +798.82%, from $1,469.54 (2026-09-26 09:00 UTC) to $13,208.53 (2026-09-26 12:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Memetically-Engineered Product (m/ep)?

Price has already retraced sharply from its intraday high of $0.000219 (candle 3) down to $0.0000751 (candle 4 close), a decline of roughly 66% from peak. The most recent 1h (-40.5%) and 5m (-5.4%) changes show continued downward momentum after the initial spike. Absent fresh buy demand, further downside toward the $0.0000687 intra-candle low or below is plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.0000450 to $0.0000950.

Is m/ep a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital. Unsuitable for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking stable, fundamentals-backed exposure, given the unverified authorities, shallow liquidity, and extreme observed volatility.

What are the key risks of holding m/ep?

Extremely thin liquidity ($13.21K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Violent, unexplained price spike (~57x) followed by a ~66% crash within a few hours, suggesting speculative/manipulated trading rather than fundamentals-driven demand • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track m/ep