BULLDERS

Ansem Bullders Price Prediction 2026

BULLDERS
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 5, 2026

6kMcUKLubWNtXSH33aisVF3cQ2otD9Fz7L8E7U2ipump

$0.051675

FDV $1,673

LiveContract:6kMcUKLubWNtXSH33aisVF3cQ2otD9Fz7L8E7U2ipumpChain:SolanaHolders:84Market cap:$1,673

More tokens on Solana

OCTAVIUS

OCTAVIUS

Octavius The Octopus

$0.0534480.0%
MC $2.9K
$JUAN

$JUAN

Overtime Cat

$0.0515730.0%
MC $1.5K
trenchcat

trenchcat

trenchcat

$0.0517332.5%
MC $1.7K
AnsemIRL

AnsemIRL

Ansems Bagworker IRL

$0.0521938.0%
MC $2.2K
BANDIT

BANDIT

Justice For Bandit

$0.0515560.0%
MC $1.6K
SKHY

SKHY

SK Hynix - Backpack Securities

$160.075.7%
MC $3.06M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about BULLDERS

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 5, 06:19 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$51,401

Holders

856

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

BULLDERS (Ansem Bullders) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana meme token (mint: 6kMcUKLubWNtXSH33aisVF3cQ2otD9Fz7L8E7U2ipump) with a total formatted supply of 1 and a current price of ~$0.000163. The token has experienced an explosive 160% 24h price surge but exhibits numerous severe red flags: the contract is unverified and mutable, update authority is unknown, top holder data is entirely unavailable, supply concentration metrics report 0% (data anomaly), and the historical holder count was frozen at exactly 9 for 30 consecutive days before jumping to 856 in the last hour — a pattern consistent with a dormant token suddenly being promoted or manipulated. Liquidity is shallow at $51.4K against a $176K FDV. This token carries very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 160% 24h price pump with near-perfectly balanced buy/sell pressure (~49.6%/50.4%)
Holder count was static at 9 for 30+ days, then surged by +848 in a single hour — highly anomalous
No top holder data available, supply concentration reports 0% — data is either missing or obfuscated
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug/upgrade risk cannot be ruled out
Total formatted supply of 1 with $0.00 FDV reported in metadata — tokenomics data is inconsistent

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a 160% 24h gain and a 62.9% 5-minute spike. The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) opened at $0.0001137, reached a high of $0.0001819, then closed sharply lower at $0.0000432 — a massive bearish rejection wick. Candle [2] then recovered from $0.0000432 to close at $0.0001117. This whipsaw action with high volume ($205K and $396K respectively) signals extreme volatility and likely distribution. Short-term bias is bearish given the rejection from the $0.000182 high.

Target low$0.000042
Target high$0.000182
Support: $0.000097 (candle [1] low), $0.000043 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open)
Resistance: $0.000135 (candle [2] high), $0.000182 (candle [1] all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

With shallow liquidity ($51.4K), a mutable unverified contract, unknown update authority, no top holder transparency, and a holder base that appeared from nowhere in one hour, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Sustained price appreciation requires organic demand and trust — both are absent here. The token is highly susceptible to a rapid dump once early buyers take profit.

Catalysts
  • Any whale or early holder exit could collapse price given $51.4K liquidity
  • Mutable contract could be updated adversarially
  • Lack of social links or verified identity removes any fundamental support

Bullish factors

  • 160% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • 3,417 buys vs 3,190 sells in 24h — slightly more buy transactions
  • 1,383 unique buyers vs 1,066 unique sellers — net buyer count is positive
  • Rapid holder growth from 9 to 856 in one hour shows sudden interest

Bearish factors

  • Candle [1] shows a severe bearish rejection wick from $0.000182 high to $0.0000432 close
  • Sell volume ($330.9K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($326.2K) in 24h
  • Shallow liquidity of $51.4K creates extreme slippage risk for any meaningful exit
  • Holder count was frozen at 9 for 30 days — suggests artificial or dormant token
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority is a critical rug risk
  • No top holder transparency — impossible to assess distribution or dump risk
  • Price % change shows 0% for 1h, 6h, and 24h in analytics despite 160% 24h change — data inconsistency raises reliability concerns
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, top holder data is missing entirely, sniper data is unavailable, and key tokenomics fields are inconsistent. The data is insufficient to make a high-confidence price prediction.

BULLDERS call history

Full track record →
Jul 5bearish
24h-98.9%
7d-98.9%
30d-99.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.0000432, H=$0.0001352, L=$0.0000428, C=$0.0001117 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting buyers stepped in at the lows. Volume was $396.8K. Candle [1] (18:00 UTC): O=$0.0001137, H=$0.0001819, L=$0.0000972, C=$0.0000432 — a severe bearish engulfing/shooting star candle. Price reached a new high of $0.0001819 then collapsed to close at $0.0000432, nearly erasing all of candle [2]'s gains. Volume was $205.9K. This two-candle sequence shows a classic pump-and-dump wick pattern: rapid markup followed by aggressive distribution.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 50%Sell 50%

Short-term trend is down based on the bearish close of candle [1] at $0.0000432 after a high of $0.0001819. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of data and 30 days of near-zero activity prior.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000097 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000043 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open — key pivot)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000135 (candle [2] high)
Major$0.000182 (candle [1] all-time high in available data)

The $0.000043 level is the most critical support — it was both the open of candle [2] and the close of candle [1]. A break below this level would signal full reversal of the pump. The $0.000182 level represents the peak of the pump and will act as strong resistance on any recovery attempt.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1] — strong reversal signal at the top
  • Bullish recovery candle [2] followed immediately by bearish distribution candle [1] — classic pump-and-dump two-candle sequence
  • Declining volume on price peak — bearish divergence
  • 62.9% 5-minute spike suggests possible wash trading or coordinated pump activity

Total holders856
24h Δ+848
7d Δ+848
30d Δ+848
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was static at exactly 9 for the entire 30-day historical period (June 5 – July 4, 2026), then surged by +848 (99% growth) in a single hour on July 5, coinciding precisely with the 160% price pump. This is a near-perfect correlation between the price spike and holder surge, but the pattern is anomalous rather than organic — it suggests a coordinated event (promotion, bot activity, or airdrop) rather than natural adoption.

The holder history is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days, the holder count was frozen at exactly 9 with zero net change each day. Then, in a single hour, 848 new holders appeared — representing 99% of the current holder base. This is not consistent with organic growth. Possible explanations include: (1) a coordinated pump campaign that drove rapid new wallet creation/purchases, (2) bot-driven wallet inflation to create the appearance of adoption, or (3) a token that was dormant and then suddenly promoted. The acquisition data shows 854 of 856 holders acquired via swap, which is consistent with a rapid trading event. This holder pattern is a significant red flag.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no top 20 holders. Supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data anomaly rather than a genuine reflection of distribution (a token cannot have 0% concentration across its top 100 holders). The absence of this data is itself a red flag, as it prevents any assessment of whale positioning, dump risk, or insider holdings. The distribution is classified as 'very_concentrated' as a precautionary default given the data gap and the token's anomalous holder history. Investors should treat the lack of transparency here as a significant risk factor.

Liquidity$51,400
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$326,240
Sell$330,920
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,383
Unique sellers1,066

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $51.4K against a 24h trading volume of ~$657K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 12.8x. This means the pool is being turned over many times per day, creating extreme slippage risk for any position of meaningful size. The FDV of $176.3K is 3.4x the available liquidity, further highlighting the fragility of the market. Net 24h flow is marginally negative (sell volume $330.9K vs buy volume $326.2K), indicating slight net outflow. While there are more unique buyers (1,383) than sellers (1,066), the sell volume is higher, suggesting sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. The pair trades on PumpSwap (8VGvStvKB1KrYEFobfyAA5x3VWQChNNYSfjp8NeMJe3c), which is consistent with a newly launched or promoted meme token.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — metadata reports total supply as 1 with 0 decimals, which is highly unusual and may indicate a data formatting issue or a non-standard token structure
FDV$176,290 (per trading analytics) — note: metadata reports FDV as $0.00, an inconsistency

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics data for BULLDERS contains multiple red flags and inconsistencies. The total supply is reported as '1' with 0 decimals in metadata, yet the token trades at $0.000163 with a $176K FDV — this is internally inconsistent and suggests either a data formatting error or a non-standard token structure. The metadata FDV is reported as $0.00 while trading analytics show $176.3K. The contract is explicitly marked as unverified and mutable. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' — this means the token's metadata and potentially its program logic can be changed by an unknown party. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. Given the mutable contract, unknown update authority, and unverified status, the rug risk from authorities is rated HIGH. There are no social links, no description, and no verified identity associated with this token.

Volatility
high

160% 24h price surge followed by a shooting-star candle dropping from $0.000182 to $0.0000432 in a single hour. 62.9% 5-minute spike. Extreme intraday volatility makes position sizing and exit timing extremely difficult.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $51.4K against $657K in 24h volume (12.8x turnover ratio). Any sell order of meaningful size will face severe slippage. Exiting a position quickly at market price is likely to result in significant losses.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. Supply concentration reports 0% which is a data anomaly. The original 9 holders who held the token for 30 dormant days represent unknown but potentially very high concentration. Cannot assess dump risk from insiders.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available. The 30-day dormancy period with only 9 holders strongly suggests insider/early positioning. These original holders could dump at any time given the 160% price appreciation. Dump risk from early holders is very high.

Authority
high

Contract is unverified and mutable. Update authority is unknown. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. An unknown party could potentially modify the token's metadata, freeze accounts, or mint additional supply. This represents maximum authority risk.

Key risks

  • Unknown update authority on a mutable, unverified contract — potential for rug pull or malicious modification
  • 30-day holder freeze at 9 wallets followed by sudden +848 holder surge — highly anomalous, suggests coordinated manipulation
  • No top holder data available — impossible to assess insider dump risk
  • Shallow liquidity ($51.4K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Bearish shooting-star candle at price peak suggests active distribution by early holders
  • Inconsistent tokenomics data (supply=1, FDV=$0 in metadata vs $176K in analytics) — data integrity concerns
  • No social links, no description, no verified identity — zero accountability

Mitigating factors

  • More unique buyers (1,383) than sellers (1,066) in 24h suggests some genuine demand
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair
  • 24h buy/sell volume is relatively balanced (49.6%/50.4%), not a one-sided dump yet
  • Possible spam flag is 'false' per metadata
Suitable for: This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure. Given the very high risk score (9.2/10), the anomalous holder pattern, unknown authorities, and shallow liquidity, this token exhibits multiple characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Any capital allocated should be treated as fully at risk of total loss.

BULLDERS is a high-risk, speculative meme token on Solana that has experienced a sharp 160% price pump but exhibits numerous red flags including: a 30-day dormant period with only 9 holders, a sudden +848 holder surge in one hour, unknown update authority on a mutable contract, missing top holder data, and shallow $51.4K liquidity. The token lacks any verifiable fundamentals, social presence, or transparent tokenomics. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for most participants.

Bull case (low)

Continued momentum trading drives further price appreciation if the pump attracts broader attention. If the 1,383 unique buyers from the past 24h continue to hold and new buyers enter, price could retest the $0.000182 high and potentially break above it.

  • Sustained social media momentum or influencer promotion
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Organic community formation around the 856 new holders
  • Buy volume maintaining above sell volume

Base case

The token experiences continued high volatility with gradual price decay as early holders distribute into retail demand. Volume declines over 24-72 hours as momentum fades, and price settles significantly below the $0.000182 peak, likely in the $0.000043–$0.000097 range.

  • Early holders take partial profits but don't fully exit immediately
  • New buyer demand gradually weakens as the pump narrative fades
  • No new catalysts or promotions emerge to sustain momentum
  • Liquidity remains shallow, amplifying downside moves

Bear case (high)

The original 9 insider holders dump their positions into the 848 new buyers, collapsing the price back toward zero. The shallow $51.4K liquidity means even moderate sell pressure could cause a 70-90% price decline. The mutable contract could also be exploited.

  • Insider/early holder profit-taking after 160% pump
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure
  • Mutable contract with unknown authority being exploited
  • Lack of any fundamental value or community support
  • Bearish shooting-star candle already signaling distribution

GeneratedJul 5, 06:19 PM
Data freshnessOHLC data current to 2026-07-05T18:00 UTC. Holder data reflects changes as of the most recent hour. Historical holder series covers June 5 – July 4, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap trading pair data (pair: 8VGvStvKB1KrYEFobfyAA5x3VWQChNNYSfjp8NeMJe3c)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (2 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and acquisition data
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable)
  • Sniper analysis data (unavailable)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess concentration or insider risk
  • Sniper analysis data unavailable — cannot assess early buyer PnL or sell-through rate
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data anomaly
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority status
  • Total supply reported as '1' in metadata with inconsistent FDV figures — tokenomics data reliability is questionable
  • Price % change fields show 0% for 1h/6h/24h despite 160% 24h change — possible API data inconsistency
  • No historical price data beyond 2 candles available for trend analysis

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total capital loss. The data analyzed contains multiple anomalies and missing fields that limit analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — metadata reports total supply as 1 with 0 decimals, which is highly unusual and may indicate a data formatting issue or a non-standard token structure

Key Risks

•Unknown update authority on a mutable, unverified contract — potential for rug pull or malicious modification
•30-day holder freeze at 9 wallets followed by sudden +848 holder surge — highly anomalous, suggests coordinated manipulation
•No top holder data available — impossible to assess insider dump risk
•Shallow liquidity ($51.4K) creates extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for BULLDERS. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The sudden appearance of 848 new holders in a single hour (from a 30-day baseline of 9) is itself a signal — it may indicate a coordinated promotion, bot activity, or airdrop-style distribution rather than organic accumulation. Without sniper data, it is impossible to assess early buyer profitability or sell-through rates.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden holder surge suggests early holders (the original 9) may have been insiders or bots positioning before a coordinated pump.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Ansem Bullders (BULLDERS)?

The token just posted a 160% 24h gain and a 62.9% 5-minute spike. The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) opened at $0.0001137, reached a high of $0.0001819, then closed sharply lower at $0.0000432 — a massive bearish rejection wick. Candle [2] then recovered from $0.0000432 to close at $0.0001117. This whipsaw action with high volume ($205K and $396K respectively) signals extreme volatility and likely distribution. Short-term bias is bearish given the rejection from the $0.000182 high. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000042 to $0.000182.

Is BULLDERS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for most investors. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline should consider any exposure. Given the very high risk score (9.2/10), the anomalous holder pattern, unknown authorities, and shallow liquidity, this token exhibits multiple characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Any capital allocated should be treated as fully at risk of total loss.

How are BULLDERS holders trending?

Ansem Bullders currently has 856 holders and is growing (24h: 848, 7d: 848, 30d: 848). The holder history is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days, the holder count was frozen at exactly 9 with zero net change each day. Then, in a single hour, 848 new holders appeared — representing 99% of the current holder base. This is not consistent with organic growth. Possible explanations include: (1) a coordinated pump campaign that drove rapid new wallet creation/purchases, (2) bot-driven wallet inflation to create the appearance of adoption, or (3) a token that was dormant and then suddenly promoted. The acquisition data shows 854 of 856 holders acquired via swap, which is consistent with a rapid trading event. This holder pattern is a significant red flag.

What does sniper activity look like for BULLDERS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding BULLDERS?

Unknown update authority on a mutable, unverified contract — potential for rug pull or malicious modification • 30-day holder freeze at 9 wallets followed by sudden +848 holder surge — highly anomalous, suggests coordinated manipulation • No top holder data available — impossible to assess insider dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track BULLDERS