ABU

Abu Shalab Price Today & AI Analysis

ABUSolanaAnalysis as of Oct 4, 2026

Price

$0.000398

+110.97% 24h

Contract

Live
6hTLdzZaaCjmqtn7RtaEMQsCbXT5Pg8q76tRViEGpump

Chain

Holders

1,302

Market cap

$384,093

Ask Unhosted AI about ABU

Continue in chat

More tokens on Solana

Abu Shalab: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-10-04 00:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,302

Top 10 supply share

17.30%

Reported liquidity

$31,097.00
How concentrated is Abu Shalab ownership?
As of 2026-10-04 00:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.30% of supply. It reports 1,302 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Abu Shalab?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-04 00:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $465,211.00 in buys and $446,053.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Abu Shalab liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +186.77%, from $13,340.86 (2026-10-03 01:00 UTC) to $38,258.16 (2026-10-04 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-10-04 00:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-10-03 01:00 UTC$13,340.86
2026-10-03 02:00 UTC$12,786.06
2026-10-03 03:00 UTC$15,239.33
2026-10-03 04:00 UTC$18,855.37
2026-10-03 05:00 UTC$20,901.02
2026-10-03 06:00 UTC$22,747.93
2026-10-03 07:00 UTC$22,191.07
2026-10-03 08:00 UTC$20,569.69
2026-10-03 09:00 UTC$26,295.97
2026-10-03 10:00 UTC$26,880.33
2026-10-03 11:00 UTC$23,529.17
2026-10-03 12:00 UTC$25,789.14
2026-10-03 13:00 UTC$22,371.12
2026-10-03 14:00 UTC$20,705.19
2026-10-03 15:00 UTC$20,780.92
2026-10-03 16:00 UTC$22,938.00
2026-10-03 17:00 UTC$21,496.21
2026-10-03 18:00 UTC$21,205.22
2026-10-03 19:00 UTC$21,507.57
2026-10-03 20:00 UTC$22,754.12
2026-10-03 21:00 UTC$23,639.11
2026-10-03 22:00 UTC$25,409.00
2026-10-03 23:00 UTC$38,762.60
2026-10-04 00:00 UTC$38,258.16

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Report snapshot

as of Oct 4, 12:15 AM UTC

FDV

$384,093

Liquidity

$31,097.00

Holders

1,302

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Abu Shalab (ABU) is a pump.fun-origin memecoin trading on PumpSwap with a ~$384K FDV and only ~$31.1K liquidity. Price rose ~111% in 24h, including a ~62% 1h move, driven by a single high-volume spike candle. Liquidity is thin relative to valuation.

Key points

  • FDV $384.09K vs liquidity $31.10K (about 12:1)
  • 24h volume ~$911K is roughly 29x liquidity
  • Top-10 supply share 17.3% across 1,302 holder addresses
  • Authority and sniper data unavailable

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-72 hours

neutral

After a parabolic spike, price is consolidating near $0.000397. Retracement toward the pre-spike range is plausible, but momentum remains strong. Outcomes are highly uncertain.

Target low

$0.00022

Target high

$0.00062

Support

$0.00035, $0.00023, $0.00017

Resistance

$0.00044, $0.00062

Medium term · 1-4 weeks

neutral

Outcome depends on narrative persistence of a viral-influencer meme. Such tokens often fade quickly; no fundamentals are in the data.

Catalysts

  • Continued social virality
  • Liquidity growth
  • Exchange or aggregator exposure

Bullish factors

  • 24h change +111%
  • Buy pressure 51.1%; 17,440 buys vs 10,074 sells
  • Volume spike of ~$235.6K in the 23:00 candle
  • Top-10 share only 17.3%

Bearish factors

  • Liquidity just $31.1K
  • Parabolic move prone to mean reversion
  • Large upper wick on spike candle (high $0.000625 vs close $0.000436)
  • Authority status unknown

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles, thin liquidity, and a news-driven meme; no authority, sniper, or holder-history data.

ABU call history

Full track record →

Oct 4neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
6hTLdz...pump
Total Supply
966,013,430.62

Key Risks

  • Very thin liquidity relative to FDV
  • Parabolic price move after a viral event
  • Unknown mint/freeze authorities
  • No sniper or early-holder data

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Price opened the window near $0.000146, fell to a low of about $0.0000555, then climbed to roughly $0.00031 by 10:00. It ranged between $0.00017 and $0.00029 for hours, then spiked in the 23:00 candle (high $0.000625, close $0.000436) on $235.6K volume. The latest candle pulled back to close at $0.000397.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The 24h trend is up, with a mid-day range-bound phase and a late breakout. The data covers only 24 hours, so a medium-term trend cannot be established.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00035

Major support

$0.00017

Immediate resistance

$0.00044

Major resistance

$0.00062

The support levels come from the last candle low ($0.000349) and the prior consolidation range (~$0.00017). The resistance levels come from the last close area and the spike high.

Notable patterns

  • Volume-driven breakout candle at 23:00 with a long upper wick
  • Higher highs from 03:00 to 10:00
  • Range consolidation between 13:00 and 22:00
  • Post-spike pullback candle

Liquidity

Liquidity

$31,097.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Net flow is about +$19K in favor of buys, which is roughly balanced. Volume is ~29x liquidity, and liquidity is ~8% of FDV, so slippage and price impact are significant. Buyers (2,595) and sellers (2,498) are nearly equal, suggesting active two-way trading.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

966,013,430.62

FDV

$384.09K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved +111% in 24h, with hourly swings of 50%+ in some candles.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Liquidity is $31.1K against a $384K FDV; exits would be costly.

  • Concentrationmedium

    The top-10 share is 17.3%; the rest of the distribution and wallet labels are unavailable.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Very thin liquidity relative to FDV
  • Parabolic price move after a viral event
  • Unknown mint/freeze authorities
  • No sniper or early-holder data
  • Meme narrative dependence

Mitigating factors

  • Balanced buy/sell flow
  • Top-10 share of 17.3%
  • Active trading across 2,595 buyers and 2,498 sellers

Suitable for

Only for speculative traders who accept total loss. Not financial advice.

A high-momentum, thin-liquidity meme with real trading activity but little verifiable structural information. Treat it as a speculative trade at best.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The viral narrative continues, liquidity grows, and price retests and breaks the $0.00062 high.

  • Continued social attention
  • Sustained net buying
  • Liquidity growth

Base Case

Volatile consolidation with a gradual downward drift as volume normalizes.

  • Volume declines from the spike
  • Liquidity stays low
  • No major new catalyst

Bear Case

High probability

Attention fades and price retraces to the $0.00017-$0.00023 range or lower on thin liquidity.

  • Mean reversion after the spike
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying sell-offs
  • Unverified authorities

Analysis details

Generated

Oct 4, 12:15 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-10-04 00:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata
  • Hourly OHLC candles (24)
  • Trading analytics
  • Holder aggregates (current snapshot)

Limitations

  • No sniper data
  • No mint/freeze authority data
  • No holder history or wallet classification
  • Only 24 hours of candles

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Informational analysis only, not financial advice. Memecoins carry a high risk of total loss.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Abu Shalab ownership?

As of 2026-10-04 00:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.30% of supply. It reports 1,302 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Abu Shalab?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-04 00:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $465,211.00 in buys and $446,053.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Abu Shalab liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +186.77%, from $13,340.86 (2026-10-03 01:00 UTC) to $38,258.16 (2026-10-04 00:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Abu Shalab (ABU)?

After a parabolic spike, price is consolidating near $0.000397. Retracement toward the pre-spike range is plausible, but momentum remains strong. Outcomes are highly uncertain. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-72 hours), with a target range of $0.00022 to $0.00062.

Is ABU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. Only for speculative traders who accept total loss. Not financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding ABU?

Very thin liquidity relative to FDV • Parabolic price move after a viral event • Unknown mint/freeze authorities

← Back to all predictions

Questions about ABU?