Robbinghood

Robbinghood Price Today & AI Analysis

Robbinghood
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 14, 2026

6fkhFEPL1KjipJkAuJg6gCQmHsnvwfhJXUyjV2Tspump

$0.041303

+5.68%

FDV $13,022

LiveContract:6fkhFEPL1KjipJkAuJg6gCQmHsnvwfhJXUyjV2TspumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,097Market cap:$13,022

More tokens on Solana

David

David

David Attenbara

$0.05386814.2%
MC $3.9K
DEGX

DEGX

Degxifi

$0.0001060.1%
MC $105.9K
MOGMAN

MOGMAN

Sam Mogman

$0.0413705.8%
MC $13.7K
250

250

Just Buy $250 Worth

$0.0412781.4%
MC $12.8K
POPBULL

POPBULL

Popbull

$0.0568488.7%
MC $6.8K
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.6715.8%
MC $2.67B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Robbinghood

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 14, 06:17 PM
FDV

$389,074

Liquidity

$67,748

Holders

2,097

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Robbinghood (Robbinghood) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: 6fkhFEPL1KjipJkAuJg6gCQmHsnvwfhJXUyjV2Tspump) with a total supply of ~999.97M tokens and a current FDV of ~$389K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 1,421% 24h price surge, but the on-chain data reveals severe red flags: 74.8% sell pressure, extremely shallow liquidity ($67.75K), a holder base that was completely flat at 140 for 30 days before exploding +93% in 24h, missing top-holder data, and unknown update authority. The token is unverified, has no contract description, and exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
1,421% 24h price spike from a near-zero base — extreme volatility event
Holder count was frozen at exactly 140 for 30 consecutive days, then surged +1,957 in 24h — highly anomalous
74.8% sell pressure vs 25.2% buy pressure over 24h despite the price spike
Only $67.75K total liquidity against $389K FDV — severe slippage risk
Top holder data unavailable; supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data gap raises concerns
No sniper data available; update authority unknown; contract unverified

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is showing extreme sell pressure (74.8% of 24h volume) with only $67.75K liquidity. The most recent hourly candle (18:00 UTC) shows a dramatic collapse from open $0.0000313 to high $0.0000771 then close $0.0000771 — but the prior candle (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000771 and closed at $0.0000313, a sharp bearish reversal. The current reported price of $0.000389 is significantly above all three OHLC candle ranges, suggesting either a data lag or a very recent spike. With 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers and $723K in sell volume vs $243K buy volume, short-term downside pressure is dominant.

Target low$0.000015
Target high$0.000117
Support: $0.0000157 (candle 3 low), $0.0000313 (candle 1/3 open, candle 2 close)
Resistance: $0.0000771 (candle 1 high / candle 2 open), $0.0001177 (candle 3 high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without sustained buy-side demand, meaningful utility, or a growing organic holder base, the token is unlikely to maintain elevated prices. The 30-day holder stagnation followed by a sudden 24h surge is a classic pump pattern. Liquidity is too shallow to support price discovery at current FDV levels.

Catalysts
  • Any large holder exit would collapse price given $67.75K liquidity
  • Continued sell pressure from the 3,679 sellers active in the last 24h
  • Absence of verified contract or project fundamentals limits organic demand
  • If top-holder data becomes available and reveals extreme concentration, further downside likely

Bullish factors

  • 1,421% 24h price surge demonstrates strong speculative momentum
  • Holder count grew +1,957 (+93%) in 24h, indicating new market participants entering
  • 4,865 buy transactions in 24h shows active trading interest
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of community presence

Bearish factors

  • 74.8% sell pressure — sellers dominate by nearly 3:1 ratio
  • Only $67.75K total liquidity; any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage
  • Holder count was completely flat at 140 for 30 days — suggests artificial or dormant early phase
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract, no description, unknown update authority
  • OHLC candles show sharp intraday reversals consistent with pump-and-dump activity
  • 14,698 sell transactions vs 4,865 buy transactions in 24h
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top-holder data, unknown update authority, unavailable sniper data, and the extreme volatility making price targets unreliable. The OHLC candles cover only 3 hours and show prices far below the current reported price, suggesting rapid intraday moves that are difficult to model.

Robbinghood call history

Full track record →
Jul 14bearish
24h-77.4%
7d-92.4%
30d-97.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (16:00–18:00 UTC on 2026-07-14). Candle 3 (16:00): O=$0.0000313, H=$0.0001177, L=$0.0000156, C=$0.0000753 — a wide-range bullish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting initial volatility and recovery. Candle 2 (17:00): O=$0.0000771, H=$0.0000771, L=$0.0000702, C=$0.0000313 — a strong bearish candle, opening at the high and closing near the low (bearish engulfing/marubozu character), indicating aggressive selling. Candle 1 (18:00): O=$0.0000313, H=$0.0000771, L=$0.0002595, C=$0.0000771 — NOTE: the Low ($0.0002595) is higher than the High ($0.0000771) in the raw data, which is a data anomaly likely indicating a data feed error or inverted field. Treating this candle's data with caution. The current reported price of $0.000389 is approximately 5x above the highest candle high ($0.0001177), suggesting a very recent spike not yet captured in the OHLC data.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 25%Sell 75%

Short-term price action shows a violent spike (+1,421% 24h) from a near-zero base, but the available candles show sharp reversals. The 30-day historical holder data shows complete stagnation until the last 24h. Medium-term trend is effectively sideways/undefined given the token's dormant history.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000771 (candle 2 open / candle 1 close)
Major$0.0000156 (candle 3 low — recent absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001177 (candle 3 high)
Major$0.000389 (current reported price — recent spike high)

The candle data only covers 3 hours and shows prices well below the current reported price of $0.000389. The candle range lows ($0.0000156–$0.0000702) represent the most recent established support zone. The current price level has no prior resistance reference in the available data, making it a speculative high. A reversion toward the $0.0000313–$0.0000771 range is technically plausible given the sell pressure.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing on candle 2 (17:00 UTC): opened at high, closed near low — strong selling signal
  • Wide-range candle with long lower wick on candle 3 (16:00 UTC): initial volatility with partial recovery
  • Data anomaly on candle 1 (18:00 UTC): Low > High field values — possible data feed error
  • Current price ($0.000389) is ~5x above the highest recorded candle high ($0.0001177) — parabolic extension
  • Volume spike coinciding with price spike — classic pump pattern

Total holders2,097
24h Δ+1957
7d Δ+1957
30d Δ+1957
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at exactly 140 for all 30 days of historical data (June 14 – July 13, 2026), then exploded by +1,957 holders (+93%) in a single 24-hour window coinciding with the 1,421% price spike. This is a near-perfect correlation between the price pump and holder acquisition, strongly suggesting the holder growth is driven by speculative FOMO rather than organic adoption. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure, confirming all growth occurred in the last 24 hours.

The holder trend is deeply anomalous. A perfectly flat holder count of 140 for 30 consecutive days (zero net change on every single day) is statistically improbable for an organically traded token — it suggests the token was either dormant, held by a small coordinated group, or the data was not updating. The sudden +1,957 holder surge in 24h coinciding with a 1,421% price spike is a textbook pump pattern. New holders entering at the top of a pump face extreme risk of loss, especially given the $67.75K liquidity and dominant sell pressure.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

Top holder data unavailable — no top 20 holder list provided

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the data source returned no top 20 holders, and supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of perfect distribution. The distribution category breakdown (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) further confirms the holder classification data is missing or not computed. Given the 30-day dormancy at 140 holders and the pump pattern, it is highly likely that a small number of early wallets hold a disproportionate share of supply. The true concentration risk is unknown but presumed HIGH. Investors should treat this as a very concentrated token until proven otherwise.

Liquidity$67,750
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$243,630
Sell$723,350
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,180
Unique sellers3,679

Liquidity is critically shallow at $67.75K against a $389K FDV — a ratio of approximately 1:5.7. This means any holder attempting to exit a position worth more than a few thousand dollars will face severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$967K is approximately 14.3x the total liquidity, indicating extreme turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): $723.35K in sell volume vs $243.63K in buy volume, with 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers. The pair trades on PumpSwap (8y7wwhTi3Y29cgHYKnruBrm231rhq1Z2QdmHbUQEio1V), which is consistent with a PumpFun-launched token. Market health is poor — the token is being distributed into thin liquidity.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,970,215.39
FDV$389,074.17

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The total supply is ~999.97M tokens (standard PumpFun supply). The FDV is $389K at the current price of $0.000389. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. Mutable is set to false, which is a mild positive indicator (metadata cannot be changed), but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token was launched on PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically means the bonding curve mechanism was used. However, without explicit confirmation that mint and freeze authorities are renounced, rug risk from authorities must be classified as unknown. The unverified contract and lack of description add to the opacity.

Volatility
high

1,421% 24h price surge from a near-zero base. Only 3 hours of OHLC data available, showing intraday swings of 7x. Current price ($0.000389) is ~5x above the highest candle high in available data. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and risk management nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $67.75K against $389K FDV. 24h volume of ~$967K is 14.3x the liquidity pool. Any exit of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. Shallow PumpSwap pool with no evidence of additional liquidity sources.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. The token was held by only 140 wallets for 30 consecutive days with zero change, strongly implying a small, coordinated group controls a large portion of supply. Supply concentration metrics report 0% which is a data gap, not genuine distribution.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but circumstantial evidence is strong: 30-day dormancy at 140 holders, followed by a coordinated pump. 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers with $723K sell volume vs $243K buy volume strongly suggests early holders are dumping into new buyers.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Mutable=false is a mild positive. Contract is unverified. PumpFun launch typically involves bonding curve mechanics, but without explicit authority renouncement confirmation, risk remains elevated.

Key risks

  • Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 30-day holder freeze at 140 → sudden +1,957 holder surge coinciding with 1,421% price spike
  • 74.8% sell pressure with 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers — active distribution into thin liquidity
  • Only $67.75K liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful exit
  • Top holder data completely unavailable — true concentration risk unknown but presumed very high
  • Unknown update authority and unverified contract — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
  • Mint and freeze authority status unconfirmed
  • No project description, no verified contract — zero fundamental backing
  • OHLC data anomaly (candle 1 Low > High) suggests possible data feed manipulation or errors

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false metadata reduces risk of metadata manipulation
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist — some level of public presence
  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some baseline structure
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • 4,865 buy transactions in 24h shows some genuine market interest
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown concentration, and strong pump-and-dump signals makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

Robbinghood exhibits nearly every hallmark of a coordinated pump-and-dump: 30 days of complete dormancy at 140 holders, a sudden 1,421% price spike, overwhelming sell pressure (74.8%), missing top-holder data, shallow liquidity, and an unverified contract. While short-term momentum traders may find opportunities in the volatility, the structural evidence strongly favors continued distribution and price decline. There is no identifiable fundamental value proposition.

Bull case (low)

Viral memecoin momentum sustains buying pressure, new retail FOMO drives continued holder growth, and the token achieves a higher FDV milestone (e.g., $1M+) before the inevitable correction.

  • Continued viral social media attention driving new buyer inflows
  • Memecoin market cycle favoring speculative assets
  • Community formation around the 'Robbinghood' narrative (Robin Hood theme)
  • Additional liquidity added to the pool reducing slippage risk

Base case

Price retraces 70–85% from current levels over the next 24–72 hours as sell pressure continues, settling into a low-liquidity, low-activity state similar to its pre-pump condition. A small residual community may remain.

  • Sell pressure remains dominant as early holders continue exiting
  • New buyer inflows slow as the initial FOMO wave subsides
  • Liquidity remains shallow, amplifying downside moves
  • No major catalyst (exchange listing, partnership) emerges to sustain demand
  • Token does not get rugged outright (authorities not exercised maliciously)

Bear case (high)

Early holders (the original 140-wallet group) complete their distribution, liquidity is drained, and the price collapses 90%+ back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000015–$0.000031 range).

  • 74.8% sell pressure already dominant in 24h data
  • 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers — 3:1 distribution ratio
  • Only $67.75K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • No fundamental value, no verified contract, no utility
  • 30-day dormancy pattern consistent with coordinated pump setup

GeneratedJul 14, 06:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers only 3 hourly candles (16:00–18:00 UTC 2026-07-14). Historical holder data covers June 14 – July 13, 2026 (30 days). Top holder and sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis token metadata API (mint, supply, FDV, authority fields)
  • Moralis price API (USD price, 24h change)
  • Moralis OHLC candles API (3 hourly candles, 2026-07-14)
  • Moralis trading analytics API (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Moralis holder metrics API (total holders, acquisition method, distribution)
  • Moralis historical holders API (30-day daily series)
  • Moralis top holders API (returned no data)
  • Moralis sniper analysis API (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — true concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed from sniper metrics
  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Candle 1 (18:00 UTC) contains a data anomaly where Low > High — this candle's data is unreliable
  • Current reported price ($0.000389) is significantly above all available OHLC candle ranges, suggesting a very recent spike not yet reflected in candle data
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — this is almost certainly a data gap, not genuine distribution
  • The 30-day holder series showing exactly 140 with zero change every day may reflect a data collection issue rather than true on-chain state

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in unverified memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. This token exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics consistent with pump-and-dump schemes. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,970,215.39

Key Risks

•Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 30-day holder freeze at 140 → sudden +1,957 holder surge coinciding with 1,421% price spike
•74.8% sell pressure with 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers — active distribution into thin liquidity
•Only $67.75K liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful exit
•Top holder data completely unavailable — true concentration risk unknown but presumed very high

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for Robbinghood. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data is concerning: 3,679 unique sellers vs 1,180 unique buyers in 24h, with $723.35K in sell volume vs $243.63K in buy volume. This 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio suggests early participants or insiders are distributing into the pump-driven demand. The 30-day holder freeze at 140 wallets followed by a sudden +1,957 holder surge is consistent with a coordinated pump event where early holders are now exiting.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Likely distributing — the extreme sell pressure (74.8%) and 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly suggest early holders are taking profits into the 1,421% price spike. The 30-day dormancy period at 140 holders suggests a small, coordinated group held the token before the pump.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Robbinghood (Robbinghood)?

The token is showing extreme sell pressure (74.8% of 24h volume) with only $67.75K liquidity. The most recent hourly candle (18:00 UTC) shows a dramatic collapse from open $0.0000313 to high $0.0000771 then close $0.0000771 — but the prior candle (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000771 and closed at $0.0000313, a sharp bearish reversal. The current reported price of $0.000389 is significantly above all three OHLC candle ranges, suggesting either a data lag or a very recent spike. With 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers and $723K in sell volume vs $243K buy volume, short-term downside pressure is dominant. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000015 to $0.000117.

Is Robbinghood a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown concentration, and strong pump-and-dump signals makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

How are Robbinghood holders trending?

Robbinghood currently has 2,097 holders and is growing (24h: 1957, 7d: 1957, 30d: 1957). The holder trend is deeply anomalous. A perfectly flat holder count of 140 for 30 consecutive days (zero net change on every single day) is statistically improbable for an organically traded token — it suggests the token was either dormant, held by a small coordinated group, or the data was not updating. The sudden +1,957 holder surge in 24h coinciding with a 1,421% price spike is a textbook pump pattern. New holders entering at the top of a pump face extreme risk of loss, especially given the $67.75K liquidity and dominant sell pressure.

What does sniper activity look like for Robbinghood?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Robbinghood?

Extreme pump-and-dump pattern: 30-day holder freeze at 140 → sudden +1,957 holder surge coinciding with 1,421% price spike • 74.8% sell pressure with 3,679 sellers vs 1,180 buyers — active distribution into thin liquidity • Only $67.75K liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful exit

← Back to all predictions

Track Robbinghood