Wethamphetamine Price Today & AI Analysis

METHSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 11, 2026

$0.0₄5944

+10.56% 24h

Contract

Live

6CsmCtDAhRcbp3G4KiinKC2JjLJ9BpR7isqcgZefqLym

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,319

Market cap

$59,441

At a $1M market cap, $METH would be $0.001000 (16.8x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is METH a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about METH

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

memecoinjust a memecoin$0.000212-3.6%MC $212.4K

FEYNFeyn$0.0₄5285-5.7%MC $51.4K

CHUDChudTheBuilder$0.000131-1.8%MC $131.1K

HYPERCATHYPERCAT$0.0₄6110-9.5%MC $40.0K

PikaJewPikaJew$0.0₅6177-24.0%MC $6.0K

PumptachePump Baby$0.000794+1491.2%MC $782.1K

Wethamphetamine: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-11 04:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$65,624.00

How concentrated is Wethamphetamine ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Wethamphetamine?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Wethamphetamine liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-11 04:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $65,624.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-11 04:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 11, 04:17 AM UTC

FDV

$2,005,366

Liquidity

$65,624.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Wethamphetamine (METH) is a Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with roughly $65.6K total liquidity and a $2.01M fully diluted valuation. The token exhibits extreme volatility, with price up 672.6% over 24h but down ~27.3% in the most recent hour, and hourly candle ranges routinely spanning 50-100%+. Volume is high relative to liquidity ($671.99K buy / $615.80K sell in 24h vs $65.62K liquidity pool), a classic signature of a thinly-liquid, highly speculative meme coin experiencing a violent pump with active two-sided trading. No holder distribution or sniper data is available from upstream sources, which is a material transparency gap for a token of this risk profile.

Key points

24h volume ($1.29M combined) is nearly 20x total liquidity ($65.62K), indicating extreme turnover and fragility relative to pool depth
Price moved +672.5% in 24h but reversed -27.3% in the last hour alone, showing violent whipsaw action typical of low-liquidity meme tokens
No holder or sniper concentration data available, removing key risk-screening signals investors would normally rely on
Contract verification, mint/freeze authority, and update authority status are all unknown, adding governance/rug uncertainty

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-6 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle shows a sharp -27.3% pullback after a parabolic run from ~$0.0000654 (candle 12 low) to a high of $0.00315641 (candle 23), with price now retracing to $0.00200537. Given the extreme run-up and thin liquidity, further mean-reversion or consolidation is likely near-term unless fresh buy volume reappears.

Target low

$0.00120000

Target high

$0.00230000

Support: $0.00164896 (candle 24 open), $0.00132992 (candle 23 low), $0.00088000 (mid-range consolidation zone from candles 15-16)
Resistance: $0.00220564 (candle 24 high), $0.00315641 (candle 23 high, 24h high), $0.00399352 (candle 19 high, prior local spike)

Medium term · 1-3 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the lack of holder and sniper data, and the pool's shallow $65.62K liquidity, which makes the token susceptible to both continued speculative squeezes and rapid collapse if large holders exit. Sustainability of the current FDV ($2.01M) depends heavily on whether buy pressure (52.2% of 24h volume) persists.

Catalysts

Continued social media/Twitter-driven attention could sustain buy pressure
Any large holder selling into thin liquidity could trigger a cascading price collapse
Liquidity additions or removals from the Raydium CPMM pool would materially change slippage and volatility dynamics

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely short OHLC history (24 hourly candles), absence of holder/whale and sniper data, unknown contract verification and authority status, and a liquidity pool that is small relative to trading volume — all of which make the token highly unpredictable and susceptible to manipulation or sudden repricing.

METH call history

Full track record →

Sep 11bearish@ $0.00201

24h-53.2%

7d-89.6%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 6CsmCt...qLym
Total Supply: 999,997,397.30 METH

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.62K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open rug-pull or supply-inflation risk
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key screening signals for concentration and early-buyer dump risk
Extreme volatility with a 672.5% 24h gain followed by a -27.3% one-hour reversal, suggesting the token may be in a speculative bubble/correction phase

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles, METH based near $0.0000654-0.000277 for the first ~14 hours, then entered a parabolic uptrend starting around candle 19 (23:00 UTC), spiking from $0.000125 to a peak of $0.00315641 in candle 23 before pulling back to close at $0.00200372 in the final candle. Volume expanded dramatically alongside the move, peaking at 720,694 (candle 23) and 216,111 (candle 22), roughly 30-100x the volume seen in the quiet early candles (~1,400-10,000 range).

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) trend is sharply upward (+672.5%), driven by a late-session parabolic breakout, but the short-term (most recent 1h) trend has reversed hard to the downside (-27.3%), suggesting the rally is losing momentum and entering a corrective/distribution phase.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00164896

Major support

$0.00088000

Immediate resistance

$0.00220564

Major resistance

$0.00315641

Immediate support sits at the candle 24 open ($0.00164896), aligning near the candle 23 low ($0.00132992). Major support lower down is the consolidation zone around $0.00088000-0.00098000 seen in candles 11-12 before the breakout. Immediate resistance is the current candle's high ($0.00220564), with major resistance at the 24h peak of $0.00315641 (candle 23 high).

Notable patterns

Parabolic breakout candle (candle 23: open $0.0014357, high $0.0031564, a >120% intra-candle range) suggesting a squeeze/FOMO event
Sharp reversal/pullback candle immediately following the peak (candle 24 showing rejection from $0.00220564 down toward $0.00154660 before settling at $0.00200372), indicating profit-taking
Wide-ranging, high-volume candles throughout (e.g., candle 11: high $0.000203 to low $0.0000874, a >50% range) typical of low-liquidity, high-volatility meme token trading

Liquidity

$65,624.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $65.62K against 24h trading volume of roughly $1.29M combined (buy+sell) represents a volume-to-liquidity ratio near 20x, indicating the pool is extremely shallow relative to trading activity. This creates high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and makes the token highly susceptible to sharp price swings from relatively small capital flows — consistent with the observed intra-hour price swings exceeding 100%. Net flow is mildly positive (52.2% buy vs 47.8% sell volume), with more unique buyers (2,459) than sellers (2,042), suggesting broad-based speculative interest, but the margin is thin and could flip quickly given the shallow pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,997,397.30 METH

FDV

$2,005,366

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +672.5% followed by a -27.3% reversal in the last hour demonstrates extreme volatility; hourly candles frequently show 50-100%+ intra-candle ranges.
Liquidityhigh
Only $65.62K total liquidity against ~$1.29M in 24h combined volume creates a roughly 20x turnover ratio, meaning large trades will incur significant slippage and the pool could be easily drained or manipulated.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.62K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open rug-pull or supply-inflation risk
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key screening signals for concentration and early-buyer dump risk
Extreme volatility with a 672.5% 24h gain followed by a -27.3% one-hour reversal, suggesting the token may be in a speculative bubble/correction phase
Token description referencing 'tokenizing the on-chain drug market' is a subjective, unverified narrative that could attract regulatory or reputational risk and does not reflect any confirmed utility

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($671.99K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($615.80K), suggesting net positive short-term demand
More unique buyers (2,459) than sellers (2,042) in the last 24h, indicating broad participation rather than a single large actor dominating flow
Active two-sided trading (4,979 buys vs 3,856 sells) suggests a liquid, functioning market rather than a frozen or dead pool

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand the potential for rapid, severe losses. It is not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation, and position sizing should assume the possibility of near-total loss given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and absence of holder/sniper transparency data.

METH is a highly speculative Solana meme token that just experienced a violent, volume-driven parabolic rally (+672.5% in 24h) on a shallow $65.62K liquidity pool, now showing signs of reversal (-27.3% in the last hour). The absence of holder distribution, sniper, and authority-status data makes this a high-uncertainty, high-risk trade suited only for speculative capital that can tolerate total loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum resumes and new capital continues flowing in (buy volume already exceeds sell volume 52.2% to 47.8%), the token could retest or exceed its 24h high of $0.00315641, especially if social media attention (Twitter presence noted) continues driving speculative interest.

Sustained net buy pressure and growing unique buyer count (2,459 buyers vs 2,042 sellers in 24h)
Continued viral/social attention amplifying speculative FOMO
No evidence yet of liquidity being pulled from the Raydium pool

Base Case

Price likely consolidates in a wide range between the immediate support (~$0.00165) and recent resistance (~$0.00315641) over the next 24-48 hours as the market digests the parabolic move, with continued high volatility and no clear directional resolution until liquidity conditions or new catalysts (or holder data) become available.

No major liquidity removal or addition occurs in the near term
Trading volume moderates from peak levels but remains elevated relative to the pre-breakout baseline
No new information emerges on mint/freeze authority status or holder concentration that would materially change risk perception

Bear Case

High probability

The sharp -27.3% pullback in the most recent hour, combined with an extremely shallow liquidity pool and unknown authority/holder concentration, suggests the token could be entering a distribution phase where early buyers or insiders exit into retail demand, potentially crashing price back toward pre-breakout levels ($0.0001-0.0003 range).

Parabolic price action (4x in ~4 hours) is a classic precursor to sharp mean-reversion in low-liquidity tokens
Unknown mint/freeze authority status raises rug-pull risk
Thin $65.62K liquidity means even moderate selling could crash price significantly
Total absence of holder/sniper transparency data prevents confirming a healthy, distributed holder base

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 11, 04:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-11 04:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata
Raydium CPMM pair price and liquidity data
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 most recent hours)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (endpoint retired) — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values per methodology constraints
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals could not be computed from sniper-specific metrics
Contract verification status, mint authority, freeze authority, and update authority are all listed as unknown in metadata, limiting rug-risk assessment
Only 24 hours of hourly OHLC history was available, limiting the ability to assess longer-term trend structure
Native price and 24h dollar price change were listed as unknown, limiting cross-validation of USD price figures

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, particularly in low-liquidity meme tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Wethamphetamine (METH) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Wethamphetamine (METH)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Wethamphetamine ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Wethamphetamine?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Wethamphetamine liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-11 04:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $65,624.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Wethamphetamine (METH)?

Is METH a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand the potential for rapid, severe losses. It is not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation, and position sizing should assume the possibility of near-total loss given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and absence of holder/sniper transparency data.

What are the key risks of holding METH?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.62K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status, leaving open rug-pull or supply-inflation risk • No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key screening signals for concentration and early-buyer dump risk