swordcat

cat wif sword Price Today & AI Analysis

swordcatSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

Price

$0.000369

+659.78% 24h

Contract

Live
5tCju6YNxHq5zrA6tGndr6F7TK42mpUFmeE31cSFpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,464

Market cap

$354,007

More tokens on Solana

KITTYKITTYHello Kitty$0.005138-15.3%MC $5.14M$WIF$WIFdogwifhat$0.2348-6.4%MC $234.51MHEISENBERGHEISENBERGHeisenberg$0.052900-95.1%MC $2.9KHEISENBERGHEISENBERGHeisenberg$0.052749-95.4%MC $2.7KMAGACOINMAGACOINMAGA Coin$0.001534+2978.5%MC $1.53Me/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.008889+103.9%MC $8.74M

cat wif sword: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-28 11:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,464

Top 10 supply share

18.14%

Reported liquidity

$28,490.00
How concentrated is cat wif sword ownership?
As of 2026-09-28 11:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.14% of supply. It reports 1,464 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling cat wif sword?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 11:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $339,774.00 in buys and $319,188.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is cat wif sword liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +885.45%, from $3,328.62 (2026-09-28 08:00 UTC) to $32,802.02 (2026-09-28 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 11:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 08:00 UTC$3,328.62
2026-09-28 09:00 UTC$8,819.45
2026-09-28 10:00 UTC$23,612.85
2026-09-28 11:00 UTC$32,802.02

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about swordcat

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 11:18 AM UTC

FDV

$354,007

Liquidity

$28,490.00

Holders

1,464

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

cat wif sword (swordcat) is a newly launched, extremely low-liquidity Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap. Price has moved parabolically over the last 4 hourly candles (from ~$0.0000053 to ~$0.000367), a ~659.8% 24h gain, but with only $28.49K total liquidity and a $354K FDV, this is a highly speculative, illiquid micro-cap. No mint/freeze authority data, no sniper coverage, and only a current-snapshot holder count (1,464 addresses, top-10 = 18.14%) are available — most standard risk-mitigating checks cannot be verified.

Key points

  • Explosive short-term price action (+659.8% 24h, +697.5% 1h) on very thin ($28.49K) liquidity
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 18.14% is moderate on a snapshot basis, but no historical holder or classification data exists to confirm distribution health
  • No sniper data available at all — sniper-driven dump risk is completely unknown, not low
  • Mint/freeze authority status is unverified/unknown, leaving rug-pull mechanics an open question
  • Description references an external Discord invite, a common vector for social-engineering/scam promotion in meme tokens

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

After a parabolic +659.8% 24h move and +697.5% in the last hour, the token is showing early signs of exhaustion with a -6.4% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes. Given the extremely thin $28.49K liquidity pool, price is highly susceptible to violent swings in either direction on relatively small trade sizes.

Target low

$0.00024

Target high

$0.00045

Support

$0.000241 (candle 4 intraperiod low), $0.000034 (candle 3 low, deeper support)

Resistance

$0.000453 (candle 4 high, most recent local top), $0.000366 (candle 3 close)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Parabolic moves of this magnitude on sub-$30K liquidity pools for freshly launched meme tokens typically mean-revert sharply once early buyers and any sniper-style wallets take profit. Without sustained new buyer inflow and liquidity growth, a retracement toward earlier candle levels (or lower) is the more probable path.

Catalysts

  • Continued organic buyer interest and community growth via Discord/Twitter could sustain momentum
  • Any liquidity addition or listing on aggregators could reduce slippage risk and attract more volume
  • Conversely, profit-taking by early holders (top 10 control 18.14% of supply) could trigger a sharp reversal
  • Total absence of sniper/authority data means an unexpected rug-style event cannot be ruled out

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy pressure (51.6%) slightly exceeds sell pressure (48.4%), with more unique buyers (2,748) than sellers (1,916)
  • Strong recent volume ($339.77K buy / $319.19K sell in 24h) relative to a small liquidity pool suggests active speculative interest
  • Sequential higher highs across all 4 available candles until the most recent slight pullback

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow $28.49K liquidity makes the token vulnerable to large slippage and rapid price collapse on modest sell orders
  • 5m price change is already negative (-6.4%), hinting at momentum stalling after the parabolic run
  • No verified mint/freeze authority renouncement — rug risk cannot be ruled out
  • Top-10 holders control 18.14% of supply with zero visibility into whether they are accumulating or preparing to distribute
  • No sniper data exists to assess early-buyer dump risk, which is common in freshly launched pump.fun/PumpSwap tokens

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, there is no holder history, no sniper data, and no verified authority status. The extreme, recent parabolic move combined with a razor-thin liquidity pool makes any price projection highly uncertain.

swordcat call history

Full track record →

Sep 28neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
5tCju6...pump
Total Supply
960,268,389.53 (formatted, 6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.49K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and price-manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +659.8% 24h price move with early signs of stalling (-6.4% in last 5m), typical of unsustainable pump-and-dump patterns
  • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk on a freshly launched token
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available (2026-09-28 08:00–11:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.0000053 and closed at $0.0000159 on volume of $89.2K. Candle 2 extended the rally to a high of $0.0000733 before closing at $0.0000372 (V: $174.4K). Candle 3 saw an explosive breakout, spiking to a high of $0.000366 and closing near the high at $0.000257 (V: $334.1K) — the largest volume candle. Candle 4 pushed to a new high of $0.000453 before pulling back to close at $0.000366 (V: $202.1K), showing an upper wick that suggests some rejection at the highs.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

All four available candles show a clear sequence of higher highs and higher lows, consistent with a strong, likely unsustainable, short-term uptrend typical of a fresh meme-token pump. The most recent candle's upper wick and the -6.4% 5m move suggest the rally may be losing steam.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000241 (low of most recent candle)

Major support

$0.0000339 (low of candle 3, pre-breakout base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000453 (high of most recent candle)

Major resistance

$0.000366 (prior candle close, potential re-test zone if price falls back before resuming up)

With only 4 candles of history, support/resistance is provisional. The $0.000241–$0.000366 zone represents the most recent trading range and is the key battleground; a break below $0.0000339 would signal a return to pre-breakout levels.

Notable patterns

  • Sequential higher highs and higher lows across all 4 candles (parabolic breakout structure)
  • Large upper wick on the most recent candle (high $0.000453 vs close $0.000366) suggesting seller pressure/rejection at highs
  • Volume expansion accompanying the breakout candle (candle 3), consistent with a momentum-driven spike rather than gradual accumulation

Liquidity

Liquidity

$28,490.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $28.49K against a 24h trading volume exceeding $658K (buy + sell combined) and an FDV of $354K represents an extreme liquidity-to-volume and liquidity-to-FDV mismatch. This combination — thin pool depth with heavy volume — implies large realized slippage for any meaningfully sized trade and a high risk of sharp price dislocations in either direction. The 24h buy volume ($339.77K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($319.19K), and unique buyers (2,748) outnumber unique sellers (1,916), pointing to a net inflow bias, but this must be weighed against the shallow liquidity base that amplifies both upside and downside moves.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

960,268,389.53 (formatted, 6 decimals)

FDV

$354,007

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +659.8% and 1h change of +697.5%, followed by a -6.4% pullback in the last 5 minutes, indicates extreme volatility consistent with a freshly launched, thinly-traded meme token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $28.49K against 24h combined volume over $658K and an FDV of $354K, creating high slippage risk and vulnerability to sharp price swings from moderate-sized trades.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a snapshot top-10 concentration of 18.14% is available with no historical trend or wallet classification; top-100 concentration and holder growth history are not available, so true concentration risk cannot be fully assessed and should not be assumed low.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.49K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and price-manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +659.8% 24h price move with early signs of stalling (-6.4% in last 5m), typical of unsustainable pump-and-dump patterns
  • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk on a freshly launched token
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • Only snapshot-level holder data (1,464 addresses, 18.14% top-10 share) with no history, preventing any trend-based risk judgment
  • Description references an external Discord invite link, a common distribution channel for promotional hype or coordinated pump activity in meme tokens

Mitigating factors

  • 24h unique buyers (2,748) outnumber unique sellers (1,916), and buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume, indicating some net organic demand rather than pure one-sided dumping
  • Volume has scaled with price across the observed candles rather than appearing purely as a single wash-trade spike

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can accept the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking any degree of capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, absence of sniper/holder-history data, and extreme recent volatility.

swordcat is a high-risk, high-volatility meme token that has just experienced a parabolic pump on razor-thin liquidity. The setup exhibits classic characteristics of an early-stage speculative meme coin: explosive price action, heavy volume relative to pool depth, and critical data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) that prevent a full risk clearance. Any position should be sized accordingly and treated as a high-variance speculative bet, not a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued social/community momentum (via Discord and Twitter) combined with net-positive buyer flow (2,748 buyers vs 1,916 sellers in 24h) sustains interest, attracts additional liquidity, and price consolidates at or above current levels before another leg up.

  • Sustained buy-side dominance in unique wallet counts and volume
  • Additional liquidity provisioning reducing slippage and attracting larger participants
  • Viral social momentum typical of successful meme-coin launches

Base Case

Price experiences a volatile consolidation/pullback phase, giving back a meaningful portion of the recent gains while remaining well above the pre-pump base, as the market digests the rapid move and liquidity providers/traders reassess fair value.

  • No major authority-related negative event (e.g., minting or freezing) occurs during the observation window
  • Trading volume remains elevated but liquidity does not meaningfully deepen in the short term
  • Neither strong sustained buying nor coordinated dumping dominates; the market finds a temporary equilibrium

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move exhausts quickly — as already hinted by the -6.4% 5-minute pullback and upper-wick rejection on the latest candle — and early holders/undisclosed snipers take profit against the shallow $28.49K liquidity pool, causing a sharp price collapse back toward or below the pre-breakout range ($0.0000053–$0.0000372).

  • Extremely thin liquidity amplifying any sell pressure
  • Unknown sniper positioning that could unwind rapidly
  • Typical mean-reversion behavior following near-700% hourly spikes in low-cap meme tokens
  • No verified renouncement of mint/freeze authority, leaving room for adverse supply actions

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 11:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 11:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, social links)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change feed
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (4 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis feed (returned no data for this token)

Limitations

  • Only 4 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend confirmation
  • No sniper data was available at all, preventing assessment of early-buyer/sniper dump risk
  • No mint or freeze authority verification was provided, so rug risk from authorities is unverifiable
  • Holder data is a single snapshot with no historical time series, precluding growth/trend or accumulation/distribution analysis
  • No wallet classification or labeling data exists to identify notable holders, exchanges, or insiders
  • Verified contract, mutability, and master edition metadata flags were all marked unknown

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, authority status, holder history). Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity meme tokens, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is cat wif sword ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 11:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.14% of supply. It reports 1,464 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling cat wif sword?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 11:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $339,774.00 in buys and $319,188.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is cat wif sword liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +885.45%, from $3,328.62 (2026-09-28 08:00 UTC) to $32,802.02 (2026-09-28 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for cat wif sword (swordcat)?

After a parabolic +659.8% 24h move and +697.5% in the last hour, the token is showing early signs of exhaustion with a -6.4% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes. Given the extremely thin $28.49K liquidity pool, price is highly susceptible to violent swings in either direction on relatively small trade sizes. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00024 to $0.00045.

Is swordcat a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can accept the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking any degree of capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, absence of sniper/holder-history data, and extreme recent volatility.

What are the key risks of holding swordcat?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($28.49K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and price-manipulation potential • Parabolic +659.8% 24h price move with early signs of stalling (-6.4% in last 5m), typical of unsustainable pump-and-dump patterns • Complete absence of sniper data, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk on a freshly launched token

← Back to all predictions

Track swordcat