PIKAMOON

Pikamoon Price Today & AI Analysis

PIKAMOONSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 19, 2026

Price

$0.000139

+202.85% 24h · FDV $139,094

Contract

Live
5j7SzcK7419k7jsqE8VN1bjxpeRm7iXWW4umBraeXzoM

Chain

Solana

Holders

999

Market cap

$139,094

More tokens on Solana

WOWWOWWoW Gold$0.002126+705.7%MC $2.13MPRISMCATPRISMCATPrism Cat$0.000113+143.5%MC $109.5Kjellyjellyjellyjellyjelly-my-jelly$0.0583+5.1%MC $58.30MJEANPHILJEANPHILJean Phil$0.000584+1172.9%MC $566.5KQUBTQUBTQuantum Computing - Backpack Securities$8.76+3.8%MC $133.5KZECZECZcash$1,568.94+8.3%MC $160.58M

Pikamoon: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-19 20:15 UTC

Holder addresses

999

Top 10 supply share

30.42%

Reported liquidity

$17,451.00
How concentrated is Pikamoon ownership?
As of 2026-09-19 20:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.42% of supply. It reports 999 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Pikamoon?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 20:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $407,409.00 in buys and $391,191.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pikamoon liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -11.97%, from $20,039.58 (2026-09-19 19:00 UTC) to $17,641.54 (2026-09-19 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-19 20:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-19 19:00 UTC$20,039.58
2026-09-19 20:00 UTC$17,641.54

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about PIKAMOON

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 19, 08:16 PM UTC

FDV

$139,094

Liquidity

$17,451.00

Holders

999

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Pikamoon (PIKAMOON) is a Solana token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool that has seen an extreme +202.85% price spike over the past 24 hours/1 hour, currently priced at $0.000139 with a fully diluted valuation of $139.09K. Total liquidity is very shallow at just $17.45K, and the most recent hourly candle shows a lower high and declining volume versus the prior spike, hinting at fading momentum. Critical risk data - mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, verified contract status, and holder history - are all unavailable, leaving substantial unknowns in the risk picture. Top-10 holders control 30.42% of the 999-address holder base based on a single current snapshot.

Key points

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($17.45K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$800K combined)
  • +202.85% price spike in the last 24h/1h followed by an early pullback signal
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status - a major information gap
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, limiting confidence in concentration and dump-risk analysis

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · next 1-6 hours

bearish

Momentum from the parabolic spike appears to be fading, with the most recent candle showing a lower high and lower close on declining volume. Given the extreme prior move (+202.85%) and shallow liquidity, a continued pullback or high volatility chop toward the $0.000041-$0.0000064 support zone is more likely than an immediate continuation to new highs, though sharp reversals remain possible given the pool's thinness.

Target low

$0.0000064

Target high

$0.000213

Support

$0.0000410, $0.0000064

Resistance

$0.000213, $0.000334

Medium term · 1-7 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of history and no data beyond 24h, a reliable medium-term directional call cannot be made. The token's trajectory will likely hinge on whether the current buy-side interest (51% buy pressure, more unique buyers than sellers) persists or whether early spike buyers begin exiting into thin liquidity.

Catalysts

  • Sustained or renewed social/twitter-driven attention could reignite buying
  • Any liquidity additions to the $17.45K pool would reduce slippage and could stabilize price
  • Continued high sell volume relative to buys would confirm distribution and further downside
  • Lack of confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement remains an overhang that could deter larger buyers

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($407.41K) exceeds sell volume ($391.19K), a 51/49 split favoring buyers
  • Unique buyers (3,091) outnumber unique sellers (2,551) in the last 24h
  • Token has an active Twitter social presence, which can sustain retail attention

Bearish factors

  • Most recent candle shows a lower high and lower close versus the prior spike candle, with volume down ~80%
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($17.45K) relative to volume creates high risk of sharp drawdowns
  • +202.85% 24h move is a magnitude typical of pump-and-dump patterns that often mean-revert
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract add structural uncertainty

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to an extremely limited data set: only 2 hourly candles, no multi-day price history, no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown authority/contract verification status. The token's extreme volatility and thin liquidity ($17.45K) make any price prediction inherently speculative and unreliable.

PIKAMOON call history

Full track record →

Sep 19bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
5j7Szc...XzoM
Total Supply
999,987,909.94 PIKAMOON

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.45K) relative to daily volume (~$800K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Explosive, erratic price action (+202.85% in 24h, huge intra-hour wicks) typical of pump-and-dump or low-cap speculative trading
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper coverage data, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000077, spiked to a high of $0.000334 (a ~43x intra-candle move), dipped to a low of $0.0000064, and closed at $0.000174 on volume of $713.2K - an extremely volatile candle with a long upper wick suggesting a rapid pump followed by partial rejection. Candle 2 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.000174, made a lower high of $0.000213, dropped to a low of $0.000041, and closed at $0.000139 on much lower volume of $139.6K, indicating fading momentum and a pullback from the prior candle's highs.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action shows a clear reversal from the parabolic spike in candle 1 to a lower-high, lower-close pattern in candle 2, suggesting the initial pump is losing steam. With only two candles of data, no reliable medium-term trend can be established; it is best characterized as sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000410 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000064 (candle 1 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000213 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000334 (candle 1 high)

With only two candles available, support/resistance zones are drawn directly from their highs and lows. Immediate resistance sits at $0.000213 (candle 2's high), with a major resistance ceiling at the candle 1 spike high of $0.000334. On the downside, immediate support is the candle 2 low of $0.000041, with major support at the candle 1 low of $0.0000064 - a level that, if retested, would represent a near-total round-trip of the recent pump.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic spike with long upper wick on candle 1, indicative of a pump followed by rejection at highs
  • Lower high formed on candle 2 relative to candle 1's high, an early bearish reversal signal
  • Declining volume on the pullback candle versus the initial spike candle, consistent with fading momentum
  • Extremely wide high-low range within single hourly candles, reflecting a highly illiquid, thinly-traded market

Liquidity

Liquidity

$17,451.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $17.45K is extremely shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of roughly $798.6K combined (buy+sell), implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of over 45x in a single day. This mismatch is a strong indicator of high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and suggests the pool could be easily manipulated or drained. Buy volume ($407.41K, 51.0% pressure) modestly exceeds sell volume ($391.19K, 49.0%), and unique buyers (3,091) outnumber unique sellers (2,551), pointing to a mild net inflow bias, consistent with the sharp price spike. However, with liquidity this thin, large buy or sell orders can move price dramatically in either direction, and the current price action already shows extreme intraday volatility.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,987,909.94 PIKAMOON

FDV

$139.09K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved +202.85% in 24h/1h, with the most recent hourly candle showing an open of $0.0000077 spiking to a high of $0.000334 before closing at $0.000174, then the following candle ranging from $0.000041 to $0.000213 and closing at $0.0000139 (note: closes reflect roughly 20-60% intra-candle drawdowns from highs). This extreme volatility indicates a highly speculative, likely thinly-traded and possibly manipulated market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $17.45K against 24h volume near $800K, a turnover ratio that signals a shallow pool prone to high slippage and potential rapid drainage or manipulation.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control 30.42% of supply, which is a data point, but top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and holder history are unavailable, so the full concentration picture and whether whales are accumulating or distributing cannot be assessed with confidence.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.45K) relative to daily volume (~$800K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Explosive, erratic price action (+202.85% in 24h, huge intra-hour wicks) typical of pump-and-dump or low-cap speculative trading
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper coverage data, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed
  • Top-10 holders control 30.42% of a 999-address holder base with no historical trend to confirm stability or growing distribution
  • Missing verified contract status and mutability flags reduce confidence in the token's structural integrity

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51% vs 49%) and unique buyers (3,091) exceed unique sellers (2,551), suggesting net demand rather than one-sided dumping in the immediate term
  • Holder base of 999 addresses shows some distribution rather than extreme concentration in a handful of wallets, though this cannot be confirmed as healthy without top-100 data or history

Suitable for

Only suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital; unsuitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate-risk exposure given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and extreme volatility.

Pikamoon (PIKAMOON) is exhibiting classic thin-liquidity, high-volatility micro-cap behavior: a +202.85% price spike within the last 24h/1h followed by early signs of a pullback, set against only $17.45K in total liquidity and a $139.09K fully diluted valuation. Key structural data - mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history - are all unavailable, leaving major risk factors unresolved. This is a highly speculative, data-poor situation suitable only for risk-seeking traders.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum persists (24h buy pressure at 51% with more unique buyers than sellers) and social attention via Twitter continues to draw new capital into the shallow pool, price could push toward or beyond the recent high of $0.000334, especially given the ease with which such thin liquidity can be moved by relatively small capital inflows.

  • Continued net positive buy/sell volume split
  • Growing holder base (999 addresses) providing some demand support
  • Low absolute FDV ($139K) leaves room for rapid re-rating on renewed hype
  • Social media (Twitter) presence could catalyze renewed attention

Base Case

Price continues to chop with high volatility within the observed range ($0.0000064-$0.000334) as the market digests the initial spike, with no clear sustained trend establishing itself given the extremely limited data window and shallow liquidity conditions.

  • No major new liquidity is added or removed from the pool
  • Buy/sell volume stays roughly balanced (currently 51/49)
  • No resolution yet on mint/freeze authority status to shift sentiment decisively either way

Bear Case

Medium probability

The parabolic spike unwinds as early buyers and any concentrated top-10 holders (30.42% of supply) take profits into the thin $17.45K liquidity pool, driving price back toward or below the candle 1 low of $0.0000064, effectively erasing the entire recent gain.

  • Lower high/lower close and declining volume in the most recent candle signal fading momentum
  • Extremely shallow liquidity makes the token vulnerable to cascading sell pressure
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status raises the possibility of undisclosed dilution or control risk
  • Top-10 holders controlling 30.42% of supply could exert outsized price impact if they exit

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 19, 08:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-19 20:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change intervals)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were available, preventing robust technical trend analysis beyond immediate support/resistance
  • No sniper data was available, so sniper concentration, PnL, and dump-risk metrics could not be computed and were marked unknown/zero per methodology
  • Holder aggregates provided only a current snapshot (999 holders, 30.42% top-10 concentration) with no historical data, preventing growth trend, accumulation/distribution, or wallet classification analysis
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, and mutability were all unknown, preventing a rug-risk determination from authorities
  • No top-100 holder concentration data was available
  • Update authority data was unknown and, per methodology, would not establish mint/freeze permissions even if known

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Pikamoon ownership?

As of 2026-09-19 20:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 30.42% of supply. It reports 999 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Pikamoon?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 20:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $407,409.00 in buys and $391,191.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pikamoon liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -11.97%, from $20,039.58 (2026-09-19 19:00 UTC) to $17,641.54 (2026-09-19 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pikamoon (PIKAMOON)?

Momentum from the parabolic spike appears to be fading, with the most recent candle showing a lower high and lower close on declining volume. Given the extreme prior move (+202.85%) and shallow liquidity, a continued pullback or high volatility chop toward the $0.000041-$0.0000064 support zone is more likely than an immediate continuation to new highs, though sharp reversals remain possible given the pool's thinness. Short-term outlook is bearish (next 1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.0000064 to $0.000213.

Is PIKAMOON a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Only suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with potential total loss of capital; unsuitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate-risk exposure given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, and extreme volatility.

What are the key risks of holding PIKAMOON?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.45K) relative to daily volume (~$800K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Explosive, erratic price action (+202.85% in 24h, huge intra-hour wicks) typical of pump-and-dump or low-cap speculative trading • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes

← Back to all predictions

Track PIKAMOON