ZGAP

Zero Gap Price Today & AI Analysis

ZGAPSolanaAnalysis as of Oct 25, 2026

Price

$0.045392

+1404.49% 24h

Contract

Live
5KtxmGhFfy6QaoU3Qtu2ouweqq1qfXfNZHg3CJH7y6ea

Chain

Holders

443

Market cap

$117,468

At a $1M market cap, $ZGAP would be $0.000459 (8.51x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ZGAP a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell
  • A ring of wallets trading with each other drives the volume.
  • The owner can still mint new supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ZGAP

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Solana

Zero Gap: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-10-25 16:15 UTC

Holder addresses

443

Top 10 supply share

21.42%

Reported liquidity

$9,757.00
How concentrated is Zero Gap ownership?
As of 2026-10-25 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 21.42% of supply. It reports 443 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Zero Gap?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-25 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $174,089.00 in buys and $164,328.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Zero Gap liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +62.92%, from $5,989.00 (2026-10-25 14:00 UTC) to $9,757.00 (2026-10-25 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-10-25 16:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-10-25 14:00 UTC$5,989.00
2026-10-25 15:00 UTC$10,754.00
2026-10-25 16:00 UTC$9,757.00

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Report snapshot

as of Oct 25, 04:15 PM UTC

FDV

$117,468

Liquidity

$9,757.00

Holders

443

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Zero Gap (ZGAP) is a Token-2022 token on a Meteora DAMM pool, priced at $0.0000539 with an FDV of about $117K and only $9.76K of liquidity. Price is up 1404% in 24h. Unhosted's scam check gives a CAUTION verdict (40/100), flagging FLOW_RING_DOMINATED: a ring of wallets trading with each other drives the volume, so the reported volume may not reflect organic demand. The mint authority is still ACTIVE, so more supply can be minted. The token settings show no transfer fee, hook or permanent delegate.

Key points

  • Pitch: five chains, one price, kept in sync by an arbitrage bot, with 30% of net profit going to buybacks (unverified claim from the description)
  • Unhosted's scam check: CAUTION 40/100, with volume driven by a ring of wallets
  • Mint authority ACTIVE; freeze authority renounced
  • Liquidity of $9.76K against $338K of 24h volume

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-72h

bearish

After a parabolic move, the latest candle closed well below its high and the price fell 12.6% in 5m. Thin liquidity and ring-driven volume make a sharp mean reversion likely, though the outcome is highly uncertain.

Target low

$0.000015

Target high

$0.00008

Support

$0.0000430, $0.0000268, $0.0000239

Resistance

$0.0000703, $0.0000772

Medium term · 1-4 weeks

neutral

There is too little history to project a medium-term direction. Any outcome depends on whether real, non-circular demand appears and whether the buyback claim is borne out.

Catalysts

  • Evidence of real buybacks
  • Liquidity growth
  • Any use of the active mint authority

Bullish factors

  • Buy pressure 51.4%, with 986 buyers vs 658 sellers
  • Strong momentum, with 1h change of +30.7%
  • Sellability OK from the token settings; no transfer fee or hook

Bearish factors

  • Volume dominated by a ring of wallets
  • Mint authority active
  • Liquidity of only $9.76K
  • A 1404% pump with a -12.6% 5m move

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles, a tiny pool, and volume flagged as ring-driven.

ZGAP call history

Full track record →

Oct 25bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
5KtxmG...y6ea
Total Supply
2,178,464,288.54

Key Risks

  • Volume dominated by a ring of wallets (Unhosted's scam check: CAUTION 40/100)
  • Mint authority active, so supply can be diluted
  • Very thin liquidity
  • Parabolic pump and likely reversal

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles. [1] went from 0.00000358 to a high of 0.0000280 and closed at 0.0000268. [2] ran from 0.0000268 to a high of 0.0000703 and closed at 0.0000622 on the highest volume (238K). [3] opened at 0.0000622, hit 0.0000772, and closed at 0.0000539 on lower volume (38K), leaving a long upper wick.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend is up on higher highs, but the last candle shows rejection. There is no medium-term history.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000430

Major support

$0.0000239

Immediate resistance

$0.0000703

Major resistance

$0.0000772

Levels are taken from the 3 available candles and are weak.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper wick (shooting-star-like) on the latest candle
  • Higher highs followed by a lower close
  • Volume spike then fade

Liquidity

Liquidity

$9,757.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Net buy volume is about $9.8K, which is roughly equal to total liquidity. 2,071 buys vs 1,597 sells. Volume is 35x liquidity and flagged as ring-dominated, so these figures may be inflated. Exits will have high slippage.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

2,178,464,288.54

FDV

$117.47K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    +1404% in 24h, a 5m move of -12.6%, and a 1h move of +30.7%.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $9.76K of liquidity against $117K FDV.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top 10 hold 21.42% of supply; other distribution data is unavailable.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Volume dominated by a ring of wallets (Unhosted's scam check: CAUTION 40/100)
  • Mint authority active, so supply can be diluted
  • Very thin liquidity
  • Parabolic pump and likely reversal
  • The arbitrage and buyback claims are unverified

Mitigating factors

  • Freeze authority renounced
  • No transfer fee, hook or permanent delegate; sellability from the token settings is fine
  • Top-10 share of 21.42% is not extreme

Suitable for

Only for speculators who can afford to lose their entire stake. This is not financial advice.

A speculative micro-cap with a catchy narrative, but volume looks circular, liquidity is minimal and the mint is still active. The risk is asymmetric against buyers.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Real buybacks and organic demand grow liquidity and sustain the price.

  • Verified buybacks
  • Liquidity growth
  • Mint authority renounced

Base Case

The price retraces sharply from the spike and stays volatile at low liquidity.

  • No major liquidity additions
  • Hype fades
  • No mint abuse

Bear Case

High probability

The pump unwinds as ring volume dries up, with large slippage on exits.

  • Ring-driven volume
  • Thin liquidity
  • Active mint authority

Analysis details

Generated

Oct 25, 04:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-10-25 16:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata
  • Price and hourly OHLC (3 candles)
  • Trading analytics
  • Unhosted's scam check
  • Holder aggregates

Limitations

  • Only 3 candles
  • No sniper data
  • No holder history or wallet classification
  • Volume flagged as ring-driven
  • Top-100 share unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Informational analysis only, not financial advice. Do your own research.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Zero Gap (ZGAP) a scam?

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own. A ring of wallets trading with each other drives the volume. The owner can still mint new supply. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Zero Gap (ZGAP)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Zero Gap ownership?

As of 2026-10-25 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 21.42% of supply. It reports 443 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Zero Gap?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-25 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $174,089.00 in buys and $164,328.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Zero Gap liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +62.92%, from $5,989.00 (2026-10-25 14:00 UTC) to $9,757.00 (2026-10-25 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Zero Gap (ZGAP)?

After a parabolic move, the latest candle closed well below its high and the price fell 12.6% in 5m. Thin liquidity and ring-driven volume make a sharp mean reversion likely, though the outcome is highly uncertain. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-72h), with a target range of $0.000015 to $0.00008.

Is ZGAP a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Only for speculators who can afford to lose their entire stake. This is not financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding ZGAP?

Volume dominated by a ring of wallets (Unhosted's scam check: CAUTION 40/100) • Mint authority active, so supply can be diluted • Very thin liquidity

New reports on Solana

All new tokens →

← Back to all predictions

Questions about ZGAP?