xing

xing xing Price Today & AI Analysis

xingSolanaAnalysis as of May 23, 2026

Price

$0.049216

+3.84% 24h

Contract

Live
5JcdnWEwuHh1v3SAARq8zH9tEwDQGpaHzBrZ81m4pump

Chain

Holders

5,324

Market cap

$91,155

Ask Unhosted AI about xing

Continue in chat

More tokens on Solana

xing xing: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-23 14:58 UTC

Holder addresses

5,580

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$52,359.08
How concentrated is xing xing ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 5,580 addresses (2026-05-23 14:58 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling xing xing?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is xing xing liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-23 14:58 UTC, reported liquidity was $52,359.08. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-23 14:58 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 23, 02:58 PM UTC

FDV

$182,843

Liquidity

$52,359.08

Holders

5,580

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

xing xing (XING) is a Solana meme token themed around a Tibetan Macaque monkey rescued by a grandmother, launched on the pump.fun platform (mint suffix: pump). The token has a total supply of ~989.1M and a current FDV of ~$182.8K. After 29 days of near-complete price and holder stagnation, the token experienced a dramatic 305–399% price surge on May 22–23, 2026, accompanied by a spike of +520 holders in a single day. Trading activity is high but nearly balanced between buys and sells. Liquidity is shallow at $52.36K, and top-10 holders control 41.56% of supply, presenting meaningful concentration risk.

Key points

  • Viral meme narrative: real-life story of a one-armed Tibetan Macaque living with a grandmother for 15+ years
  • Extreme 24h price surge of ~305–399% from a very low base, suggesting a sudden viral catalyst
  • Near-zero holder growth for 29 days followed by a single-day +520 holder spike — highly unusual pattern
  • No snipers detected in the first 1000 blocks, reducing early-buyer dump risk
  • Token metadata is immutable (mutable: false), reducing rug-pull risk from metadata manipulation

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

After a 305–399% pump in 24 hours, the token is in a high-volatility consolidation phase. The OHLC data shows the price peaked around $0.000570 (candle 21) and has since declined sharply to ~$0.000185, suggesting the initial pump is largely over. Buy/sell pressure is nearly balanced (49.3% buy vs 50.7% sell), and the 5-minute change is -1.18%, indicating short-term bearish momentum. A retest of the $0.000045–$0.000060 base range is plausible if selling pressure intensifies.

Target low

$0.000045

Target high

$0.000250

Support

$0.000045 (pre-pump base, repeated open/close across 24 candles), $0.000060 (recurring close level across most candles)

Resistance

$0.000185 (current price / recent consolidation), $0.000252 (candle 16 high), $0.000461–$0.000570 (pump peak zone, candles 19–21)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a sustained narrative catalyst or exchange listing, post-pump meme tokens on pump.fun typically retrace 70–90% from peak. The 29-day stagnation prior to the pump suggests no organic growth engine. Holder growth is almost entirely concentrated in the single pump day. If the meme narrative does not gain broader traction, the token is likely to drift back toward pre-pump levels.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media spread of the Tibetan Macaque story driving new buyer waves
  • CEX or aggregator listing increasing visibility
  • Whale accumulation at post-pump lows
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 305–399% 24h price surge signals strong viral momentum
  • No snipers detected — no early-buyer overhang
  • Immutable metadata reduces rug risk
  • Unique, emotionally resonant meme narrative
  • +520 new holders in a single day shows rapid community growth
  • 1,454 buys vs 1,332 sells — slightly more buy transactions

Bearish factors

  • Shallow liquidity at $52.36K creates high slippage risk
  • Top 10 holders control 41.56% of supply — concentrated selling could crash price
  • 29 days of near-zero organic growth before the pump suggests no sustainable community
  • Price already down ~68% from pump peak ($0.000570 → $0.000185)
  • 50.7% sell volume pressure in 24h
  • FDV of only $182.8K limits institutional interest
  • Pump.fun origin — high historical failure rate for such tokens

Confidence: low. Meme token price action is highly unpredictable and driven by social sentiment. The OHLC data shows extreme volatility with the price oscillating between two fixed levels ($0.000045 and $0.000060) for most candles — this is anomalous and may reflect data artifacts or thin liquidity. Confidence is low due to shallow liquidity ($52.36K), meme-driven narrative, and limited on-chain fundamental data.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
5JcdnW...pump
Total Supply
989,130,177.92 XING

Key Risks

  • Shallow liquidity ($52.36K) means large orders cause extreme slippage
  • Top 10 concentration at 41.56% — whale selling could crash price
  • Post-pump retracement already underway — price down ~68% from $0.000570 peak
  • 29 days of zero organic growth before pump suggests no sustainable community

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC data reveals a highly unusual pattern: for 23 of 24 candles, the open and close alternate rigidly between $0.000045620 and $0.000059762, suggesting extremely thin liquidity and possible price oracle artifacts. The 'Low' field in the data appears to actually represent the intraday HIGH (values are consistently higher than Open/Close), which is likely a data field inversion. Interpreting the 'L' field as the actual intraday high: the token peaked at $0.000570 (candle 21, 18:00 UTC May 22) and has been declining since, with the peak zone at $0.000461–$0.000570 (candles 19–21) representing the pump apex. Volume was highest at candle 22 ($115K) and candle 21 ($53K), confirming the pump occurred during the 16:00–18:00 UTC window on May 22. Volume has declined sharply since, from $115K at peak to under $2K in recent candles.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term and medium-term trends are both bearish following the pump peak. The intraday high has declined from $0.000570 → $0.000461 → $0.000252 → $0.000167, forming a clear series of lower highs. The base price ($0.000045–$0.000060) has not yet been broken, but the declining highs confirm a post-pump downtrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000060 (recurring candle close level)

Major support

$0.000045 (pre-pump base, 29-day floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000185–$0.000200 (current price zone, candle 12–15 highs)

Major resistance

$0.000461–$0.000570 (pump peak zone, candles 19–21)

The $0.000045–$0.000060 range has acted as a persistent base for 29+ days and represents the strongest support zone. The pump peak at $0.000570 is now major resistance. Intermediate resistance exists at $0.000242–$0.000252 (candles 16–18 highs). A failure to hold $0.000060 would signal a full retracement to pre-pump levels.

Notable patterns

  • Declining lower highs post-pump: $0.000570 → $0.000461 → $0.000252 → $0.000242 → $0.000225 → $0.000199 → $0.000186 → $0.000169 — classic post-pump staircase down
  • Volume climax at candle 22 ($115K) followed by rapid volume decay — bearish exhaustion signal
  • Rigid open/close alternation between $0.000045 and $0.000060 across 23 candles suggests thin liquidity and possible AMM price floor behavior
  • No higher highs established post-pump — no evidence of accumulation at elevated levels

Liquidity

Liquidity

$52,359.08

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $52.36K on a single Raydium pair (2PuVkhDEQ5uprXRowUnGgFNvPFUN7PDomMgQWxYq37HV). With 24h volume of ~$285K against only $52.36K in liquidity, the volume-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 5.4x — extremely high and indicative of significant slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The FDV from trading analytics ($123.07K) differs from the metadata FDV ($182.84K), reflecting price volatility during data collection. Net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $144.46K > buy volume $140.49K), suggesting slight distribution pressure. Despite more unique buyers (457) than sellers (390), sell volume exceeds buy volume, implying sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. The market health is fragile — a single large sell order could significantly move the price given the shallow liquidity.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

989,130,177.92 XING

FDV

$182,842.99

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    305–399% 24h price surge followed by ~68% decline from peak within hours. Extreme volatility typical of pump.fun meme tokens. Price oscillates between $0.000045 and $0.000570 within 24 hours.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $52.36K on a single Raydium pool. Volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~5.4x creates severe slippage risk. Any position above a few hundred dollars will face meaningful price impact.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Shallow liquidity ($52.36K) means large orders cause extreme slippage
  • Top 10 concentration at 41.56% — whale selling could crash price
  • Post-pump retracement already underway — price down ~68% from $0.000570 peak
  • 29 days of zero organic growth before pump suggests no sustainable community
  • Single Raydium pool — no diversified liquidity venues
  • Meme token with no utility — entirely narrative/sentiment driven
  • Update authority not renounced — potential metadata risk

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers detected — no early-buyer dump overhang
  • Metadata immutable (mutable: false) — reduces rug risk
  • Verified contract, not flagged as spam
  • Emotionally resonant real-life meme narrative with viral potential
  • 457 unique buyers in 24h shows broad retail interest
  • Pump.fun graduation to Raydium suggests minimum viability threshold met

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant speculators with small position sizes they can afford to lose entirely. Not suitable for conservative investors, income-focused investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Maximum position sizing should reflect the possibility of a near-total loss.

xing xing (XING) is a high-risk, narrative-driven Solana meme token that experienced a sudden viral pump on May 22, 2026, after 29 days of dormancy. The token's investment case rests entirely on whether the Tibetan Macaque meme narrative can sustain and grow a community. The risk/reward is asymmetric and speculative — potential for further upside if the narrative goes viral, but high probability of continued retracement given shallow liquidity, concentrated holdings, and no organic growth history.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The Tibetan Macaque story gains viral traction on Twitter/Telegram, driving sustained new buyer waves. The token achieves a 10x from current levels ($0.000185 → $0.001850), pushing FDV to ~$1.8M — still a micro-cap. A broader Solana meme season amplifies the move.

  • Viral social media spread of the grandmother/monkey story
  • Influencer promotion on Twitter/TikTok
  • Broader Solana meme coin bull market
  • CEX or aggregator listing increasing discoverability
  • Community-driven liquidity deepening reducing slippage

Base Case

The token consolidates in the $0.000060–$0.000185 range for 1–2 weeks as initial FOMO buyers and pre-pump holders reach equilibrium. Holder count stabilizes around 5,500–6,000. Without a new catalyst, the token gradually drifts toward the lower end of this range over 30 days.

  • No major new viral catalyst emerges
  • Liquidity remains shallow at $40–60K
  • Top holders gradually reduce positions
  • New holder acquisition slows to pre-pump pace (<5/day)

Bear Case

High probability

The pump fades without sustained narrative momentum. Pre-pump holders (who are up 300%+) continue distributing into any strength. Price retraces fully to the pre-pump base of $0.000045–$0.000060, representing a ~75% decline from current levels. Token enters another extended dormancy period.

  • No sustained organic community growth (29 days of flat holders pre-pump)
  • Shallow liquidity amplifies sell pressure
  • Concentrated top holders distributing gains
  • Meme narrative fails to achieve broader cultural traction
  • Broader Solana market weakness

Analysis details

Generated

May 23, 02:58 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-23 14:58 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: 5JcdnWEwuHh1v3SAARq8zH9tEwDQGpaHzBrZ81m4pump)
  • Raydium AMM pair data (2PuVkhDEQ5uprXRowUnGgFNvPFUN7PDomMgQWxYq37HV)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks)

Limitations

  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — inferred from metadata fields
  • OHLC data shows anomalous open/close patterns (rigid alternation between two values) that may reflect data artifacts or thin AMM liquidity rather than true price discovery
  • Sniper data is entirely absent (0 snipers) — cannot assess early buyer behavior beyond this
  • Top holder classifications are inferred from address patterns and holding sizes, not verified on-chain labels
  • No order book data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Historical holder data only covers 30 days — longer-term context unavailable
  • Social sentiment data (Twitter/Telegram engagement) not quantified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance, including the 305% 24h surge, is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is xing xing ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 5,580 addresses (2026-05-23 14:58 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling xing xing?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is xing xing liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-23 14:58 UTC, reported liquidity was $52,359.08. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for xing xing (xing)?

After a 305–399% pump in 24 hours, the token is in a high-volatility consolidation phase. The OHLC data shows the price peaked around $0.000570 (candle 21) and has since declined sharply to ~$0.000185, suggesting the initial pump is largely over. Buy/sell pressure is nearly balanced (49.3% buy vs 50.7% sell), and the 5-minute change is -1.18%, indicating short-term bearish momentum. A retest of the $0.000045–$0.000060 base range is plausible if selling pressure intensifies. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000045 to $0.000250.

Is xing a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.2/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant speculators with small position sizes they can afford to lose entirely. Not suitable for conservative investors, income-focused investors, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Maximum position sizing should reflect the possibility of a near-total loss.

What are the key risks of holding xing?

Shallow liquidity ($52.36K) means large orders cause extreme slippage • Top 10 concentration at 41.56% — whale selling could crash price • Post-pump retracement already underway — price down ~68% from $0.000570 peak

← Back to all predictions

Questions about xing?