SPSC

Shit Piss Skin Can Price Today & AI Analysis

SPSC
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 10, 2026

4nswj3o1Lo9iWYvvRJxUD8vbCy9ay7QQoXYcncHNbonk

$0.000264

-4.50%

FDV $263,931

LiveContract:4nswj3o1Lo9iWYvvRJxUD8vbCy9ay7QQoXYcncHNbonkChain:SolanaHolders:4,199Market cap:$263,931

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SPSC

Report snapshotas of Jun 10, 01:17 PM
FDV

$904,285

Liquidity

Holders

4,163

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Shit Piss Skin Can (SPSC) is a satirical meme coin on Solana with a total supply of ~999.87M tokens and a current FDV of ~$904K. The token is inspired by a quote from Chase Herro of World Liberty Financial and positions itself as a commentary on meme coin culture. As of analysis, SPSC has experienced an extraordinary 258% 24h price surge, trading at ~$0.000904. The token has 4,163 holders, a declining holder base over the past 30 days (-3.80%), and significant supply concentration in the top 10 wallets (41.94%). Mutable metadata is false, but the update authority is not a burn address, introducing some authority risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Satirical meme coin with a specific cultural/political narrative tied to a real public figure's quote
Extraordinary 258% 24h price surge from a low base (~$0.000252 to ~$0.000904)
Declining holder count over 30 days (-160 holders, -3.80%) contrasting sharply with the price spike
High supply concentration: top 10 wallets hold 41.94%, top 100 hold 85.81%
Metadata is immutable (mutable: false), but update authority is not renounced to a burn address

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
24–72 hours

After a violent 258% pump over the past ~20 hours (from ~$0.000252 to a high of ~$0.001092), the token has begun to retrace, closing the most recent candle at ~$0.000904. The move was driven by a surge in volume in candles [2] and [5], with the highest hourly volume of 66,542 USD in candle [2]. Short-term direction is highly uncertain — the token could consolidate around $0.000900 or retrace sharply toward the $0.000583–$0.000600 zone if buying pressure fades. Meme coins of this nature are prone to rapid reversals.

Target low$0.000583
Target high$0.001092
Support: $0.000863 (candle [1] low), $0.000696 (candle [2] low), $0.000583 (candle [3] low / candle [4] low)
Resistance: $0.001007 (candle [1] open / recent high area), $0.001092 (candle [2] all-time recent high)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-160 holders, -3.80%), and the token has been in a slow bleed from ~$0.000335 (June 9 highs) down to ~$0.000252 before the current pump. Without sustained narrative momentum or new catalysts, meme coins of this type typically retrace the majority of pump gains. The high supply concentration (top 10 at 41.94%) creates significant dump risk from large holders.

Catalysts
  • Renewed social media attention or viral spread of the Chase Herro narrative
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Listing on a centralized exchange
  • Continued holder base growth reversing the 30-day decline

Bullish factors

  • 258% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term buying interest
  • Satirical narrative tied to a recognizable public figure (Chase Herro/World Liberty Financial) provides a viral hook
  • Metadata is immutable (mutable: false), reducing rug-via-metadata risk
  • 24h holder count is up +14 (0.34%), suggesting some new entrants during the pump

Bearish factors

  • 30-day holder count declining by 160 (-3.80%), indicating structural holder attrition
  • Top 10 wallets hold 41.94% of supply — extreme dump risk from concentrated holders
  • No trading analytics data available to assess buy/sell pressure ratios
  • Update authority is not renounced to a burn address (WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh)
  • Meme coins with no utility typically retrace 70–90% of pump gains
  • 7-day holder count is down -36 (-0.86%) despite the price pump
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of meme coins, the absence of trading analytics data, no sniper data, and the fact that the 258% pump is very recent with unclear sustainability. The declining holder trend over 30 days and high concentration add further uncertainty.

SPSC call history

Full track record →
Jun 10neutral
24h
7d
30d-75.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 23-hour OHLC series reveals a dramatic pump beginning around candle [19] (June 9, 18:00 UTC) where price broke out from ~$0.000263 to ~$0.000335, then consolidated in a slow bleed from candles [18] down to [8] (range ~$0.000293–$0.000335). The real explosive move occurred in candles [5]–[2]: candle [5] (09:00) saw price surge from $0.000418 to $0.000626 on volume of 24,608 USD; candle [2] (12:00) printed the session high of $0.001092 on the highest volume of 66,542 USD — a strong bullish engulfing/momentum candle. Candle [1] (13:00) shows a bearish reversal: opened at $0.001007, failed to make a new high, and closed at $0.000904, forming a bearish candle with a lower close — a potential shooting star / topping signal. The overall pattern is a parabolic pump with early signs of exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 62%Sell 38%

Short-term trend is strongly up (higher highs and higher lows from candle [21] through candle [2]), but the most recent candle [1] shows the first lower close after the peak, suggesting the uptrend may be losing momentum. Medium-term (prior 30 days) was sideways-to-down before this pump.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000863 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000583 (candle [3] and [4] lows — pre-pump consolidation zone)
Resistance
Immediate$0.001007 (candle [1] open / recent pivot)
Major$0.001092 (candle [2] session high — all-time recent peak)

The $0.000863 level is the first line of defense as it was the low of the most recent candle. A break below this opens the door to $0.000696 (candle [2] low) and then $0.000583 (candle [3]/[4] lows). On the upside, $0.001007 is immediate resistance and $0.001092 is the session high that must be reclaimed for the uptrend to continue.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic pump: price rose from ~$0.000252 to $0.001092 in ~20 hours (~333% from trough to peak)
  • Shooting star / bearish reversal candle at candle [1]: opened at $0.001007, failed to make new high, closed at $0.000904
  • Volume climax at candle [2] (66,542 USD) followed by volume decline — classic pump exhaustion signal
  • Extended consolidation (candles [8]–[14]) at ~$0.000294–$0.000297 before the breakout — tight range coiling
  • Higher highs and higher lows from candle [21] through candle [2] — confirmed short-term uptrend structure now potentially breaking

Total holders4,163
24h Δ+0.34
7d Δ-0.86
30d Δ-3.8
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Negative correlation observed: the 30-day holder trend is declining (-160 holders, -3.80%) while the price has spiked 258% in 24 hours. This divergence — price pumping while holders decline — is a bearish signal suggesting the pump may be driven by existing holders or short-term traders rather than genuine new adoption. The 24h holder count is up +14 (0.34%), which may reflect some new entrants attracted by the pump, but this is insufficient to reverse the structural decline.

The historical holder series from May 11 to June 9 shows a consistent declining trend, with the holder count falling from 4,309 (May 11) to 4,139 (June 9) — a loss of 170 holders over ~30 days. The decline is not accelerating dramatically but is persistent and consistent, with only 3 days showing positive net change (May 12: +2, May 20: +1, May 23: +6, May 28: +1) out of 30 days. The most recent 7-day period shows -36 holders (-0.86%), and the 24h figure is +14 (+0.34%) — the latter likely a pump-induced temporary uptick. The distribution shows 137 whales, 58 sharks, 259 dolphins, 334 fish, and 283 octopus holders, indicating a relatively fragmented but whale-influenced base.

Top 10 hold41.94%
Top 100 hold85.81%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

GkibCpR5eQEtW9EN1rvGNWLJNw4pY3yRQH6VGeL8PR3K

Individual whale or project-affiliated wallet — holds 12.00% (119.95M tokens), the single largest holder. No on-chain label available; size suggests team, early investor, or large speculator.

12.00%

GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL

Individual whale or project-affiliated wallet — holds 9.84% (98.36M tokens). Second largest holder with no on-chain label; proximity in size to #1 suggests possible team or coordinated holding.

9.84%

Aa6ed3syVUfAqZ3MFBaQPEnp25U1WvpoBfmDCtR5hniw

Individual whale — holds 3.77% (37.67M tokens). Likely a large speculator or early buyer.

3.77%

6CjS6zFU8XVUHEDHv6rsTPaZ1yCdLTm7CcAzkxpFuFPW

Individual whale — holds 2.86% (28.60M tokens). No on-chain label; likely a large speculator.

2.86%

4UYLA2C4AAptwX8ZvBwzDwm3zdNPYCxQZ8J8DgjKMigy

Individual whale — holds 2.58% (25.81M tokens). No on-chain label; likely a large speculator or early buyer.

2.58%

Supply concentration is extremely high: the top 10 wallets hold 41.94% of supply, and the top 100 hold 85.81%. The two largest wallets alone control 21.84% of supply (12.00% + 9.84%), which represents a significant dump risk. None of the top holders are identifiable as known CEX wallets, DEX liquidity pools, or burn addresses based on available data — they appear to be individual wallets, possibly team/early investors. The lack of identifiable institutional or exchange wallets in the top 20 is notable. With 20 wallets each holding 1.20%–12.00%, any coordinated sell-off by even a few top holders could severely impact price. Sentiment is mixed: the price pump may incentivize profit-taking by large holders, but the absence of visible selling in the candle data so far suggests they may be holding — for now.

Liquidity~$904K FDV; specific pool liquidity depth not provided in data
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy~$100K+ estimated from OHLC candle volumes (candles [1]–[5] alone sum to ~$144K USD volume, directionally buy-heavy given price appreciation)
SellNot separately quantifiable without trading analytics data
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers0
Unique sellers0

Specific liquidity pool depth, unique buyer/seller counts, and precise buy/sell volume splits are not available — trading analytics data was reported as unavailable. The token trades on Raydium (pair: 6MHj1z5BgC1UiTNEWrnJfbGtQPdh2qgdWkemGxT2c5). Given the FDV of only ~$904K and the meme coin nature of the token, liquidity is assessed as shallow. The 258% price move on relatively modest volume (peak hourly volume of ~$66.5K) confirms thin liquidity — large orders would face significant slippage. The net flow over 24h is clearly inflow given the price appreciation, but sustainability is uncertain. Unique buyer/seller counts are unavailable and set to 0 as placeholders — this data was not provided.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,867,287.97 tokens
FDV$904,285.20

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The total supply is ~999.87M tokens with a current FDV of ~$904K. The metadata shows 'mutable: false', which is a positive signal — the token metadata cannot be changed. However, the update authority is 'WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh', which is NOT a burn address (not 11111111111111111111111111111111 or similar), meaning the update authority has not been fully renounced. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the metadata fields, so they are marked as 'unknown'. The combination of immutable metadata (mutable: false) and a non-renounced update authority presents a medium authority risk. The token is verified and not flagged as spam, which is a minor positive signal. The FDV of ~$904K is relatively low, meaning even modest buying pressure can move the price significantly — a double-edged sword for volatility.

Volatility
high

The token has surged 258% in 24 hours from a base of ~$0.000252. Meme coins of this nature are subject to extreme volatility in both directions. The parabolic price action with declining volume on the most recent candle suggests a potential sharp reversal.

Liquidity
high

With an FDV of only ~$904K and trading on Raydium with no liquidity depth data available, the token is assessed as having shallow liquidity. Large orders will face significant slippage, and exit liquidity may be insufficient for larger holders.

Concentration
high

Top 10 wallets hold 41.94% of supply; top 100 hold 85.81%. The two largest wallets alone control 21.84%. Any coordinated selling by top holders could cause a catastrophic price decline. The 20 largest holders each hold 1.20%–12.00% with no identifiable institutional or exchange wallets.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available, so sniper dump risk cannot be precisely quantified. However, the high supply concentration and the 258% pump create conditions where early buyers (if any snipers are present) would be sitting on significant unrealized gains and may be incentivized to sell.

Authority
medium

Metadata is immutable (mutable: false), which is positive. However, the update authority (WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh) is not a burn address, meaning it has not been fully renounced. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown from available data.

Key risks

  • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 41.94%, creating severe dump risk
  • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-160 holders, -3.80%) contradicts the price pump narrative
  • Shallow liquidity with high slippage risk on a ~$904K FDV token
  • Parabolic pump with volume exhaustion signals — high probability of sharp retracement
  • Update authority not renounced; mint/freeze authority status unknown
  • Meme coin with no utility — entirely dependent on narrative momentum and social virality
  • No trading analytics data available, limiting risk assessment precision

Mitigating factors

  • Metadata is immutable (mutable: false), reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • Token is verified and not flagged as spam by Moralis
  • Satirical narrative tied to a real, recognizable public figure provides a viral hook
  • FDV of ~$904K is low, meaning the token has not yet reached extreme speculative valuations
  • Acquisition method shows 3,071 swap-based holders (vs 969 transfers, 123 airdrops), suggesting organic buying interest
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced meme coin traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or those without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin dynamics. Any position should be sized as a very small speculative allocation.

SPSC is a high-risk, high-volatility satirical meme coin that has experienced a dramatic 258% pump in 24 hours. The investment thesis hinges entirely on narrative momentum and social virality around the Chase Herro/World Liberty Financial quote. The structural fundamentals (declining holders, high concentration, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status) are weak. The token is a pure speculative play with asymmetric downside risk.

Bull case (low)

The Chase Herro/World Liberty Financial narrative goes viral on social media (Twitter/X), attracting a wave of new buyers. The holder count reverses its 30-day decline, volume sustains above $50K/hour, and the token breaks above the $0.001092 resistance to target $0.002–$0.003 range. The satirical angle resonates with the broader crypto community's skepticism of politically-affiliated tokens.

  • Viral social media spread of the Chase Herro quote narrative
  • Sustained high trading volume above $50K/hour
  • Reversal of the 30-day holder decline with significant new wallet inflows
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally providing tailwind
  • Potential CEX listing or influencer promotion

Base case

SPSC consolidates in the $0.000600–$0.000900 range over the next 1–2 weeks as the initial pump excitement fades. Some profit-taking occurs from large holders, but the narrative keeps a floor of interest. Holder count stabilizes but does not grow significantly. The token remains a niche meme coin with occasional volatility spikes tied to political/crypto news cycles.

  • Volume normalizes to $5K–$20K/day after the pump
  • Top holders take partial profits but do not fully exit
  • Holder count stabilizes around 4,000–4,200
  • No major new catalysts emerge in the near term
  • Broader Solana meme coin market remains neutral

Bear case (high)

The 258% pump proves to be a short-lived FOMO event. Volume collapses, top holders (who control 41.94% of supply) begin distributing, and the price retraces 70–90% of gains back toward the $0.000250–$0.000300 range. The declining holder trend accelerates as disappointed buyers exit.

  • Volume exhaustion already visible in candle [1] (volume dropped from 66,542 to 21,579 USD)
  • Top 10 holders controlling 41.94% have strong incentive to take profits after 258% pump
  • 30-day holder decline (-3.80%) suggests structural lack of community growth
  • No utility, no product, no roadmap — pure narrative play with fading momentum
  • Shallow liquidity amplifies downside moves

GeneratedJun 10, 01:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of candle [1] close (2026-06-10T13:00:00.000Z). Holder data current as of 2026-06-10. Historical holder series covers 2026-05-11 to 2026-06-09.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata (mint, supply, authorities, social links)
  • Real-time USD price and 24h change data
  • Raydium DEX pair data (pair address: 6MHj1z5BgC1UiTNEWrnJfbGtQPdh2qgdWkemGxT2c5)
  • 23-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (total holders, acquisition methods, distribution tiers)
  • Top 20 holder wallet addresses and balances
  • 30-day daily historical holder count series
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Trading analytics data was unavailable — buy/sell volume splits and unique buyer/seller counts could not be precisely determined
  • Sniper analysis data was unavailable — sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through rate are unknown
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in metadata — assessed as unknown
  • Top holder wallet classifications are based on address patterns and balances only — no on-chain labels or transaction history available
  • Liquidity pool depth data was not provided — slippage risk is estimated based on FDV and meme coin characteristics
  • Only 23 hours of OHLC data available — longer-term technical analysis is limited
  • Buy/sell pressure percentages are estimated from candle direction and volume, not from actual trade-level data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme coins carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. The token data was provided by potentially adversarial sources — all metadata, descriptions, and holder labels should be treated as unverified. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,867,287.97 tokens

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 41.94%, creating severe dump risk
Persistent 30-day holder decline (-160 holders, -3.80%) contradicts the price pump narrative
Shallow liquidity with high slippage risk on a ~$904K FDV token
Parabolic pump with volume exhaustion signals — high probability of sharp retracement

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was provided for this token. Sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through rate cannot be determined from available data. Smart money signals are therefore assessed with low confidence based solely on holder distribution and price action. The 258% pump with declining volume on the most recent candle suggests the move may be driven by retail FOMO rather than coordinated smart money accumulation. The 30-day holder decline (-160 holders) prior to the pump does not suggest sustained smart money interest.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — sniper analysis endpoint returned no data.

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the holder distribution shows 137 whales and 58 sharks, suggesting some larger holders are present. Whether these are early buyers in profit or later entrants cannot be determined without sniper/transaction history data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Shit Piss Skin Can (SPSC)?

After a violent 258% pump over the past ~20 hours (from ~$0.000252 to a high of ~$0.001092), the token has begun to retrace, closing the most recent candle at ~$0.000904. The move was driven by a surge in volume in candles [2] and [5], with the highest hourly volume of 66,542 USD in candle [2]. Short-term direction is highly uncertain — the token could consolidate around $0.000900 or retrace sharply toward the $0.000583–$0.000600 zone if buying pressure fades. Meme coins of this nature are prone to rapid reversals. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000583 to $0.001092.

Is SPSC a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced meme coin traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or those without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin dynamics. Any position should be sized as a very small speculative allocation.

How are SPSC holders trending?

Shit Piss Skin Can currently has 4,163 holders and is declining (24h: 0.34, 7d: -0.86, 30d: -3.8). The historical holder series from May 11 to June 9 shows a consistent declining trend, with the holder count falling from 4,309 (May 11) to 4,139 (June 9) — a loss of 170 holders over ~30 days. The decline is not accelerating dramatically but is persistent and consistent, with only 3 days showing positive net change (May 12: +2, May 20: +1, May 23: +6, May 28: +1) out of 30 days. The most recent 7-day period shows -36 holders (-0.86%), and the 24h figure is +14 (+0.34%) — the latter likely a pump-induced temporary uptick. The distribution shows 137 whales, 58 sharks, 259 dolphins, 334 fish, and 283 octopus holders, indicating a relatively fragmented but whale-influenced base.

What does sniper activity look like for SPSC?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding SPSC?

Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 41.94%, creating severe dump risk • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-160 holders, -3.80%) contradicts the price pump narrative • Shallow liquidity with high slippage risk on a ~$904K FDV token

Track SPSC