Mansa Musa Price Today & AI Analysis

KINGSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 20, 2026

$0.0₅3229

-1.77% 24h

Contract

Live

4kdX3qeL1t8CoVLVM6XDygTBWz8XfWLRSuLJmojJpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

385

Market cap

$3,195

At a $1M market cap, $KING would be $0.001011 (313x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is KING a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 18

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.13%2 bundlers, 11 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about KING

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TROLLASStrollass$0.0₅2117+0.0%MC $2.1K

RamRam$0.0₅2450+0.0%MC $2.4K

モモ太Momota-kun$0.0₅3058+0.0%MC $3.1K

MikeMikeOSS$0.0₅1929+0.0%MC $1.9K

ANMONDThe Black Koh-i-Noor$0.0₅4369+0.0%MC $4.2K

EterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

Mansa Musa: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-20 05:19 UTC

Holder addresses

958

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$38,789.04

How concentrated is Mansa Musa ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 958 addresses (2026-07-20 05:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Mansa Musa?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Mansa Musa liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-20 05:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $38,789.04. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-20 05:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 20, 05:19 AM UTC

FDV

$88,504

Liquidity

$38,789.04

Holders

958

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Mansa Musa (KING) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$88.5K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 168.6% price surge in 24 hours, but this spike is accompanied by severe red flags: overwhelming sell pressure (69.2% of volume), a razor-thin liquidity pool of only $38.79K, and a deeply suspicious holder history showing exactly 19 holders for 30 consecutive days before an explosive jump to 958 holders in the last 24 hours. The contract is unverified, update authority is unknown, and top holder data is unavailable. This profile is consistent with a coordinated pump event.

Key points

168.6% price surge in 24 hours on a PumpSwap pair
Holder count jumped from 19 (static for 30 days) to 958 in under 24 hours — highly anomalous
Sell pressure dominates at 69.2% of 24h volume ($40.97K sells vs $18.27K buys)
Total liquidity is only $38.79K against an $88.5K FDV — extreme slippage risk
No top holder data, no sniper data, unverified contract, unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is in a classic pump-and-dump pattern. The 5-candle OHLC series shows prices ranging from ~$0.0000331 to ~$0.0000743, with the current price at ~$0.0000885 sitting well above the recent candle range — suggesting the pump occurred after the last recorded candles. With 69.2% sell pressure, 1,249 sells vs 799 buys, and only $38.79K in liquidity, a sharp reversion is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000033

Target high

$0.000095

Support: $0.0000381 (candle [2] low), $0.0000337 (candle [4] low), $0.0000331 (candle [5] open/low)
Resistance: $0.0000885 (current price / 24h high area), $0.0000743 (candle [1] low — likely a data anomaly / wick high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without genuine organic holder growth, sustained liquidity, or verifiable team/project fundamentals, medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The 30-day holder stagnation at 19 wallets followed by a sudden spike is a hallmark of artificial pump activity. If the pump unwinds, price could revert to pre-pump levels near $0.000033 or lower.

Catalysts

Sustained organic community growth beyond the initial pump wave
Liquidity deepening above $500K to reduce slippage risk
Verified contract and renounced authorities to build trust
Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

Strong 168.6% 24h price appreciation indicates speculative momentum
878 unique wallets active in 24h shows broad short-term interest
Token is on PumpSwap, a well-known Solana launchpad with some organic discovery flow
Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of post-launch manipulation

Bearish factors

69.2% sell pressure ($40.97K sells vs $18.27K buys) — sellers dominate
Only $38.79K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order will crater the price
Holder count was exactly 19 for 30 consecutive days, then jumped 98% in 24h — highly suspicious of artificial/coordinated activity
No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Unverified contract and unknown update authority
6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics contradicts the 168.6% figure — data anomaly signals possible manipulation or very recent listing
FDV of $88.5K is extremely small — vulnerable to single-wallet price manipulation

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, unknown update authority, no sniper data, extremely thin liquidity, and the anomalous holder history. The 6h and 24h price change fields both show 0% in the analytics despite a 168.6% 24h change reported in the price section — suggesting data inconsistency that further reduces analytical confidence.

KING call history

Full track record →

Jul 20bearish@ $0.0000885

24h-78.9%

7d-92.5%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4kdX3q...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 KING

Key Risks

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of 19 holders → 958 holders in 24h coinciding with 168.6% price spike
Overwhelming sell pressure: 69.2% of 24h volume is sells ($40.97K vs $18.27K buys)
Critically shallow liquidity ($38.79K) — high slippage and exit risk
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vectors unconfirmed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 5 available hourly OHLC candles (01:00–05:00 UTC on 2026-07-20) show a price range of approximately $0.0000331 to $0.0000743. Note: Candle [1] has an anomalous OHLC where L ($0.0000743) > O ($0.0000418) and L > H, suggesting a data feed error or inverted low/high labeling for that candle. Ignoring the anomaly, the sequence shows: candle [5] opened at $0.0000331 and closed at $0.0000376; candle [4] showed a bullish move from $0.0000373 open to $0.0000408 close with a low of $0.0000337; candle [3] opened and peaked at $0.0000418 then closed lower at $0.0000397 (bearish); candle [2] recovered from $0.0000381 to close at $0.0000418. The overall pattern across these 5 candles is a modest uptrend from ~$0.0000331 to ~$0.0000418, but the current price of $0.0000885 is far above this range, indicating the major pump occurred outside or after this candle window.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action shows a sharp upward spike (+168.6% in 24h) consistent with a pump event. The 5-candle OHLC window captures only the early phase of the move. Medium-term trend is effectively sideways/unknown given the 30-day holder stagnation and lack of prior trading history data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

31%

Sell

69%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000418 (recent candle cluster high / prior resistance-turned-support)

Major support

$0.0000331 (candle [5] open — lowest point in the 5-candle window)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000885 (current price / 24h pump high)

Major resistance

$0.0000885–$0.000095 (current pump zone — no prior price history above this level)

The token has no meaningful price history prior to the last 5 candles. The pump has pushed price to $0.0000885, approximately 2.1x above the recent candle range top of ~$0.0000418. A failure to hold above $0.0000418 would signal a full pump reversal toward the $0.0000331–$0.0000337 zone.

Notable patterns

Pump-and-dump price pattern: 30 days of dormancy followed by explosive single-day spike
Bearish volume divergence: volume declining as price rises in the candle window
Sell-side dominance: 1,249 sell transactions vs 799 buy transactions in 24h
Possible data anomaly in candle [1]: L > H values suggest inverted or corrupted OHLC feed
Price far extended above 5-candle OHLC range — no technical support between $0.0000418 and $0.0000885

Liquidity

$38,789.04

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $38.79K on a single PumpSwap pair (CGgFNxxp54Rgwp74GeE1JGoJuPB6Y9ETma2xxPNcNbDP). With an FDV of $88.5K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 43.8% — while this sounds reasonable, the absolute dollar amount is tiny. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $40.97K in sells vs $18.27K in buys, a ratio of approximately 2.24:1. There are 593 unique sellers vs 493 unique buyers, confirming broad distribution pressure. The market health is poor — this is a shallow, sell-dominated market with high slippage risk for any position of meaningful size.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 KING

FDV

$88,503.70

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
168.6% single-day price spike with 69.2% sell pressure. Price is far extended above recent candle range with no technical support between $0.0000418 and $0.0000885. Extreme volatility in both directions is likely.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $38.79K on a single PumpSwap pair. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. Exit liquidity for larger positions is essentially nonexistent.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of 19 holders → 958 holders in 24h coinciding with 168.6% price spike
Overwhelming sell pressure: 69.2% of 24h volume is sells ($40.97K vs $18.27K buys)
Critically shallow liquidity ($38.79K) — high slippage and exit risk
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vectors unconfirmed
Unverified contract — no independent code audit possible
Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
No sniper data — early buyer behavior unknown
Data anomalies (0% 6h/24h change vs 168.6% reported) suggest possible data feed manipulation or very recent listing edge case
Extremely low FDV ($88.5K) makes price trivially easy to manipulate

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false metadata prevents post-launch metadata changes
Token is on PumpSwap, a known platform with some baseline discovery legitimacy
878 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of participation
Possible spam flagged as false by data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their capital. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The risk profile is consistent with a potential pump-and-dump scheme.

Mansa Musa (KING) presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile. The token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a coordinated pump event: 30 days of dormancy at 19 holders, a sudden 168.6% price spike, overwhelming sell pressure (69.2%), and critically thin liquidity. While short-term momentum traders may have profited from the initial pump, the risk/reward for new entrants is deeply unfavorable. The absence of top holder data, unknown authority status, and unverified contract make this token unsuitable for any risk-managed investment strategy.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The pump attracts sustained viral attention on social media, driving continued retail FOMO. Liquidity deepens organically, the team delivers on stated roadmap promises, and the token establishes itself as a recognizable Solana meme brand similar to other culturally-themed tokens.

Viral social media momentum sustaining beyond the initial pump
Liquidity pool growth from new market makers
Verified contract and renounced authorities building community trust
Broader Solana meme season driving speculative capital into micro-cap tokens

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 40–60% from the pump high as early buyers take profits, stabilizing at a new, lower equilibrium. It persists as a low-liquidity micro-cap meme token with a small but active community, trading in a volatile range without achieving significant market cap growth.

Some portion of the 958 new holders are genuine community members who hold through the retracement
Liquidity remains at current levels (~$38.79K) without significant additions or removals
No major negative catalyst (rug pull, authority exploit) occurs
Broader Solana market remains stable

Bear Case

High probability

The pump unwinds rapidly as early holders (who held through the 30-day dormancy) distribute their supply into retail buyers. Price reverts to pre-pump levels (~$0.000033) or lower. Liquidity drains, leaving late buyers with illiquid, near-worthless positions.

69.2% sell pressure already dominant in 24h trading
30-day holder stagnation pattern consistent with insider pre-positioning
Only $38.79K liquidity — insufficient to absorb coordinated selling
No verifiable fundamentals, unverified contract, unknown authorities

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 20, 05:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-20 05:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: 4kdX3qeL1t8CoVLVM6XDygTBWz8XfWLRSuLJmojJpump)
PumpSwap pair data (CGgFNxxp54Rgwp74GeE1JGoJuPB6Y9ETma2xxPNcNbDP)
Hourly OHLC candles (5 candles, 2026-07-20 01:00–05:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and acquisition data
Historical holder series (30 days, daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Sniper analysis returned no data — early buyer behavior is unknown
Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
Contract is unverified — no code audit is possible
Only 5 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
6h and 24h price change fields show 0% in analytics despite 168.6% reported in price section — data inconsistency noted
Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap, not genuine distribution
Holder distribution categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) all show 0 — data gap
Historical holder data shows exactly 19 holders for 30 days with zero variance — may reflect data collection start date rather than true history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mansa Musa (KING) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Mansa Musa (KING)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Mansa Musa ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 958 addresses (2026-07-20 05:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Mansa Musa?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Mansa Musa liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-20 05:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $38,789.04. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Mansa Musa (KING)?

Is KING a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their capital. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The risk profile is consistent with a potential pump-and-dump scheme.

What are the key risks of holding KING?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of 19 holders → 958 holders in 24h coinciding with 168.6% price spike • Overwhelming sell pressure: 69.2% of 24h volume is sells ($40.97K vs $18.27K buys) • Critically shallow liquidity ($38.79K) — high slippage and exit risk