gpt-6-seven Price Today & AI Analysis

GPT-67SolanaAnalysis as of Sep 13, 2026

$0.0₅2201

Contract

Live

4gG4khJQYos6PXMNEf2DY8zCSzkPZMTqYpVQgHqepump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$2,200

At a $1M market cap, $GPT-67 would be $0.001000 (455x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GPT-67 a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GPT-67

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

$mart$mart money$0.0₅2661+0.0%MC $2.7K

GoatedHappy 3 years$0.0₅2181+0.0%MC $2.2K

OGFLOKIThe Original Floki$0.0₅3898+0.0%MC $3.9K

MASONMASON VERSLUIS$0.0₄1795+0.0%MC $7.9K

PAMPpamp$0.0₅2582+0.0%MC $2.5K

FrongusFrongus$0.000223+439.8%MC $215.3K

gpt-6-seven: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-13 06:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$472,740.00

How concentrated is gpt-6-seven ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling gpt-6-seven?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is gpt-6-seven liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-13 06:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $472,740.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-13 06:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 13, 06:16 AM UTC

FDV

$124,394,142

Liquidity

$472,740.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

GPT-67 (4gG4khJQYos6PXMNEf2DY8zCSzkPZMTqYpVQgHqepump) is a nascent PumpSwap-listed Solana token that has experienced an extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (reported +290,361% over 24h) from sub-cent levels to $0.1244. The token has only ~5 hourly candles of visible history, a fully diluted valuation of ~$124.4M against total liquidity of just ~$472.7K, and no holder or sniper data available for verification. This combination of parabolic price action, thin liquidity, and opaque holder distribution is characteristic of a high-risk, early-stage pump.fun/PumpSwap launch.

Key points

Extreme 24h price move (+290,361%) from near-zero base, indicating a brand-new or just-graduated pump.fun token
FDV ($124.4M) is roughly 263x total liquidity ($472.7K), a severe liquidity-to-valuation mismatch
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key tools for assessing concentration/rug risk
Strong nominal buy pressure (81.1% buy volume share) but this is common in early hype phases and can reverse quickly
Metadata fields (update authority, mutability, verification) are all unknown, adding to due-diligence blind spots

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has gone parabolic over the last 5 hourly candles, rising from ~$0.0000419 to $0.1244, with each candle printing a higher high and higher low - a classic early-pump structure. Momentum remains positive on the 1h (+33%) and 5m (+2.3%) timeframes, but the 24h change figure (+290,361%) signals the move started from a near-zero base, making the percentage largely meaningless for forward projection. Given thin liquidity (~$472.7K) relative to FDV (~$124.4M), sharp reversals are highly likely once early buyers/snipers begin taking profit.

Target low

0.07

Target high

0.16

Support: 0.1153 (candle 4 low/open), 0.0854 (candle 3 close), 0.0552 (candle 2 close)
Resistance: 0.1244 (candle 5 high, current ATH), 0.1154 (candle 4 high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Tokens that experience 100x+ intraday moves on shallow liquidity pools very frequently mean-revert sharply as early holders and snipers exit. Without holder concentration data to confirm distribution, and with liquidity far too small to support the current FDV, the base-rate expectation for such moves is a significant retracement over the following days unless sustained organic volume and liquidity growth materialize.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or CEX/DEX listings could sustain momentum
Continued social/Twitter-driven attention could extend the hype cycle
Conversely, any large holder or sniper exit (unverifiable with current data) could trigger a fast unwind
Broader memecoin/AI-themed token market sentiment on Solana

Bullish factors

Buy volume dominance at 81.1% of 24h volume ($601.42K bought vs $139.76K sold)
More unique buyers (3,036) than sellers (2,918) in 24h
Consecutive higher-high, higher-low candle structure over the last 5 hours
Active social presence (Twitter link present)

Bearish factors

Liquidity of only ~$472.7K cannot support a ~$124.4M FDV, implying high slippage and fragility
No holder or sniper data available to confirm distribution is healthy
Price rose from near-zero, a pattern often associated with pump.fun-style speculative launches prone to sharp reversals
Metadata (mint/freeze authority, verification, mutability) all unknown, preventing rug-risk confirmation
Extremely short trading history (5 hourly candles) gives no reliable trend confirmation

Confidence: low. Only 5 hourly candles are available, there is no holder or sniper data to validate distribution risk, and the 24h % change figure appears anomalous (from a near-zero base), all of which severely limit the reliability of any directional forecast.

GPT-67 call history

Full track record →

Sep 13neutral@ $0.124

24h—

7d—

30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4gG4kh...pump
Total Supply: 999,966,784.85 GPT-67

Key Risks

Extreme, likely unsustainable price appreciation (+290,361% reported 24h change) increases probability of sharp reversal
Severe liquidity-to-FDV mismatch (~$472.7K vs ~$124.4M) creates high slippage and fragility
No holder concentration data available to confirm distribution safety
No sniper data available to assess bot accumulation or dump risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 5 available hourly candles, price rocketed from an open of $0.0000419 (candle 1) to a close of $0.1244 (candle 5), representing a near-vertical parabolic advance. Candle 1 shows a huge range (low $0.0000419 to high $0.0542) suggesting initial price discovery/bonding-curve migration, followed by four consecutive candles each closing near their high with higher highs and higher lows - a strong bullish continuation pattern typical of early pump.fun graduations. Volume was heaviest in candle 1 (~310K) and candle 3 (~188K), tapering in candle 5 (~62K), hinting early momentum may be fading slightly even as price extends.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both the immediate hourly structure and the broader 5-hour window show a strong uptrend with no closed red candles among the last 5 bars. However, the trend is only hours old and lacks the depth of history to confirm durability.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

81%

Sell

19%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.1153

Major support

0.0552

Immediate resistance

0.1244

Major resistance

unknown - price is at all-time high with no prior resistance established

Because the token has only 5 hours of trading data and is currently trading at its all-time high, resistance levels are undefined above the current price. Support levels are derived from the open/close of prior consolidating candles: $0.1153 (candle 4 open) as immediate support, and $0.0552 (candle 2 close) as a deeper support zone from the earlier consolidation phase.

Notable patterns

Higher highs and higher lows across all 5 candles (parabolic uptrend)
Large-range candle 1 consistent with a bonding-curve migration or initial liquidity event
Volume divergence: price rising while volume tapers off in later candles
Near-vertical price action indicative of a low-liquidity pump rather than gradual accumulation

Liquidity

$472,740.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $472.74K is very shallow relative to a fully diluted valuation of $124.39M (a ~263:1 FDV-to-liquidity ratio), meaning any moderately sized trade could cause significant price impact/slippage. 24h volume shows a clear buy-side skew ($601.42K bought vs $139.76K sold, 81.1%/18.9% split) with a modest net positive edge in unique participants (3,036 buyers vs 2,918 sellers). This indicates net inflow and active retail interest, but the shallow liquidity pool means this apparent strength is fragile and could reverse abruptly if large holders exit or buy pressure fades.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,966,784.85 GPT-67

FDV

$124.39M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from near-zero to $0.1244 within 5 hourly candles, including a +33% move in the most recent hour alone; this level of volatility is extreme even by memecoin standards.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only ~$472.74K against a $124.39M FDV creates a severe imbalance; large trades in either direction could move price substantially, and liquidity could be pulled with little warning.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme, likely unsustainable price appreciation (+290,361% reported 24h change) increases probability of sharp reversal
Severe liquidity-to-FDV mismatch (~$472.7K vs ~$124.4M) creates high slippage and fragility
No holder concentration data available to confirm distribution safety
No sniper data available to assess bot accumulation or dump risk
Unverified mint/freeze authority and contract metadata status
Extremely short trading history (only 5 hourly candles) prevents robust trend validation

Mitigating factors

Buy volume and buyer count currently exceed sell volume and seller count (81.1% buy share; 3,036 vs 2,918 unique participants)
Active social presence (Twitter) suggests some organic community attention
Mint address suffix consistent with pump.fun origin, which often (but not always) renounces authorities by default at launch

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unverified tokenomics, absence of holder/sniper data, and extreme, likely unsustainable price action.

GPT-67 exhibits classic characteristics of an early-stage, high-volatility PumpSwap/pump.fun-style launch: a massive intraday price spike on very thin liquidity, strong nominal buy-side dominance, but a near-total absence of verifiable holder, sniper, and authority data. Any position here is a speculative bet on continued momentum and social attention rather than a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued social/Twitter-driven hype and sustained buy-side dominance (currently 81.1% of 24h volume) attract fresh capital and liquidity, allowing price to consolidate above recent support ($0.1153) and push toward new highs.

Sustained retail buyer interest (3,036 buyers vs 2,918 sellers in 24h)
Additional liquidity provisioning reducing slippage risk
Broader AI-themed memecoin narrative driving speculative inflows
Successful maintenance of higher-high/higher-low candle structure

Base Case

Price experiences a volatile consolidation phase with sharp swings in both directions as early profit-taking meets residual buying interest, likely settling below the current all-time-high while remaining well above the initial near-zero starting point.

No major liquidity withdrawal occurs in the near term
Buy/sell volume balance normalizes closer to 50/50 as hype cools
Social attention persists at a moderate level without a fresh catalyst
No new holder or sniper data emerges to materially change the risk picture

Bear Case

High probability

Early buyers, snipers, or concentrated holders (unverifiable due to missing data) begin taking profit after a ~300,000% run-up, triggering a rapid price collapse back toward or below the $0.0552-$0.0854 range seen just hours earlier, exacerbated by the shallow $472.74K liquidity pool.

Extreme overbought conditions after a parabolic move with tapering volume in the most recent candle
Liquidity too thin to absorb concentrated selling
Absence of holder/sniper transparency raising rug/dump probability
Typical mean-reversion behavior of pump.fun-style tokens after initial spikes

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 13, 06:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-13 06:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
PumpSwap DEX price and pair data
Hourly OHLCV candle data (5 most recent candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution or growth data available - holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values per methodology constraints
No sniper data available - sniper concentration and PnL metrics could not be computed
Only 5 hourly candles provided, insufficient for robust technical trend confirmation
Token metadata fields (update authority, mutability, verification status) are all unknown, preventing full tokenomics risk verification
Reported 24h % price change (+290,361%) appears distorted by a near-zero starting price and should be interpreted with caution rather than as a literal sustained growth rate

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency and memecoin trading, especially for newly launched, low-liquidity tokens, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is gpt-6-seven (GPT-67) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell gpt-6-seven (GPT-67)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is gpt-6-seven ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling gpt-6-seven?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is gpt-6-seven liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-13 06:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $472,740.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for gpt-6-seven (GPT-67)?

Is GPT-67 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unverified tokenomics, absence of holder/sniper data, and extreme, likely unsustainable price action.

What are the key risks of holding GPT-67?

Extreme, likely unsustainable price appreciation (+290,361% reported 24h change) increases probability of sharp reversal • Severe liquidity-to-FDV mismatch (~$472.7K vs ~$124.4M) creates high slippage and fragility • No holder concentration data available to confirm distribution safety