CAPYBARA

CAPYBARA Price Prediction 2026

CAPYBARA
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 2, 2026

4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpump

$0.051973

FDV $1,972

LiveContract:4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpumpChain:SolanaHolders:197Market cap:$1,972

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CAPYBARA

Report snapshotas of Jul 2, 03:19 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$40,237

Holders

663

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

CAPYBARA (CAPYBARA) is an extremely new, highly speculative meme token on Solana launched via PumpSwap (mint: 4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpump). The token exhibits deeply anomalous on-chain data: a total formatted supply of 1, a fully diluted valuation of effectively $0, and holder metrics that are internally inconsistent — the historical series shows 21 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero change, yet the current snapshot reports 663 holders with +642 added in the last hour. This strongly suggests a data anomaly, token relaunch, or tracking artifact rather than organic growth. Trading analytics reveal extreme sell-side dominance (88.8% sell pressure, $728.93K sell volume vs $92.33K buy volume in 24h), a -26.96% price decline in 24h, and only $40.24K in total liquidity. The contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown. This token carries very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme sell pressure: 88.8% of 24h volume is sells ($728.93K sell vs $92.33K buy)
Deeply anomalous holder data: 21 holders flat for 30 days then +642 in 1 hour — likely a relaunch or data artifact
Total formatted supply of 1 with near-zero FDV ($70.10K) — unusual tokenomics
Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk
Only $40.24K liquidity against $821K+ daily trading volume — extreme slippage risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price is in sharp decline. The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001416, spiked to a high of $0.0001416, and closed at $0.0000696 — a ~51% intra-candle drop. The prior candle (14:00 UTC) showed extreme volatility: open $0.0000357, high $0.0002564, low $0.0000105, close $0.0001383. With 88.8% sell pressure and only $40.24K liquidity, further downside is the path of least resistance.

Target low$0.000010
Target high$0.000141
Support: $0.0000533 (candle [1] low), $0.0000105 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.0001416 (candle [1] open/high), $0.0002564 (candle [2] high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without a fundamental catalyst, reversal of community interest, or significant liquidity injection, the token is likely to continue declining. The sell-through dynamic (11,174 sells vs 1,384 buys in 24h) and shallow liquidity make sustained recovery unlikely in the near term.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media traction from the Discord community (discord.gg/uxento)
  • New liquidity provision or market-making activity
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats

Bullish factors

  • Brief 5-minute price uptick of +5.33% suggests some residual buy interest
  • High transaction count (12,558 total trades in 24h) shows active market participation
  • Candle [2] showed a massive intra-candle range suggesting speculative interest at lower prices

Bearish factors

  • 88.8% sell pressure ($728.93K sells vs $92.33K buys) in 24h
  • -26.96% price decline in 24h
  • Only $40.24K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order will crater the price
  • Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
  • Anomalous holder data undermines confidence in token legitimacy
  • Zero price change reported for 1h, 6h, and 24h intervals (contradicts the -26.96% 24h figure) — data inconsistency raises red flags
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) anomalous holder data that may reflect a data tracking issue rather than real on-chain activity; (3) total supply of 1 (formatted) is highly unusual and may indicate non-standard token mechanics; (4) extreme volatility in the available candles makes any price target highly uncertain.

CAPYBARA call history

Full track record →
Jul 2bearish
24h-95.0%
7d-96.8%
30d-97.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.0000357, H=$0.0002564, L=$0.0000105, C=$0.0001383 — a massive bullish-looking candle with an enormous upper wick and lower wick, indicating extreme volatility and indecision/pump-and-dump dynamics. Volume was $681,079. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0001416, H=$0.0001416, L=$0.0000533, C=$0.0000696 — opened at the prior close level, immediately sold off with no upward movement (high equals open), closing near the low. Volume dropped to $131,612. This bearish candle confirms distribution after the prior spike.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 11%Sell 89%

The two available candles show a clear pump-and-dump pattern: a violent spike to $0.0002564 followed by immediate distribution back to $0.0000696. The trend is firmly downward from the peak. Insufficient data exists for a reliable medium-term trend assessment, but the sell pressure metrics confirm a downtrend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000533 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000105 (candle [2] low — all-time low in available data)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001416 (candle [1] open/high)
Major$0.0002564 (candle [2] all-time high in available data)

The key support zone is $0.0000533–$0.0000105, representing the lows of both available candles. Resistance sits at $0.0001416 (the open of candle [1], which acted as a ceiling) and the spike high of $0.0002564. Given the sell pressure, a retest of the $0.0000105 low is plausible.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer on candle [2]: massive upper wick relative to body signals rejection of higher prices
  • Bearish continuation candle [1]: open equals high (no upward movement), closes near low — classic distribution/sell-off candle
  • Pump-and-dump price action: spike from $0.0000105 to $0.0002564 (+2,347%) followed by rapid collapse to $0.0000696 (-73% from peak)
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by volume dry-up on candle [1] — typical exhaustion pattern

Total holders663
24h Δ+642
7d Δ+642
30d Δ+642
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The +642 holder spike occurred simultaneously with the price pump-and-dump event visible in the OHLC candles. This suggests the holder growth is directly correlated with the speculative trading event rather than organic community building. As price declined -26.96% in 24h, the holder count appears to have stabilized (all growth occurred in the same 1-hour window).

Holder data is deeply anomalous. The historical series shows exactly 21 holders with zero net change for every single day from June 2 through July 1, 2026 — 30 consecutive days of complete stasis. Then, in the current snapshot, total holders jump to 663 (+642, +97%). This pattern is inconsistent with normal organic growth and strongly suggests either: (1) the token was relaunched or migrated to a new mint address very recently, with the historical data reflecting a prior/dormant state; (2) a data tracking artifact or API inconsistency; or (3) a coordinated holder-count inflation event. The distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration of 0% further suggest the holder classification system has not yet processed this token's current state. These anomalies significantly reduce confidence in any holder-based analysis.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data artifact — either the holder classification system has not indexed this token yet, or the token's unusual total supply of 1 (formatted) is causing calculation errors. With a total formatted supply of 1 and 663 reported holders, the supply distribution mechanics are unclear and potentially non-standard. The absence of whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus classifications (all 0) reinforces that the on-chain data pipeline has not fully processed this token. Given the extreme sell pressure (88.8%) and the pump-and-dump price action, it is reasonable to infer that a small number of early holders are distributing to a larger number of retail participants, but this cannot be confirmed from available data. Distribution health is flagged as 'very_concentrated' as a precautionary assessment given the data gaps and anomalous supply structure.

Liquidity$40,240
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$92,330
Sell$728,930
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers353
Unique sellers2,989

Liquidity is critically shallow at $40.24K against a 24h trading volume of ~$821K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 20:1. This means the pool is being churned at 20x its depth daily, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is strongly negative: $728.93K in sell volume vs $92.33K in buy volume represents a net outflow of approximately $636.6K in 24h. The seller-to-buyer ratio of 2,989 unique sellers vs 353 unique buyers (~8.5:1) confirms broad distribution. The PumpSwap pair (ANdek8R37WB9spAaaqQC8Xq1pDfBba8AY1Uh8n1ThX9s) is the sole liquidity venue. Any large sell order will cause catastrophic price impact given the $40.24K pool depth. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact of non-standard decimals (0 decimals) or a token with unusual supply mechanics
FDV$70,100 (per trading analytics) / $0.00 (per metadata) — inconsistency noted

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics data for CAPYBARA raises multiple red flags. The total formatted supply is reported as 1 with 0 decimals, which is highly unusual — this may indicate the token uses a non-standard supply structure, or that the supply display is an artifact of the 0-decimal configuration. The FDV is reported as $0.00 in metadata but $70.10K in trading analytics — an inconsistency. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is mutable (Mutable: true), meaning the token metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown, which is a significant risk factor — if mint authority is not renounced, new supply could be minted at any time. The contract is unverified. The description references a Discord server (discord.gg/uxento), which is the primary community channel. Combined, these factors result in a HIGH rug risk from authorities assessment.

Volatility
high

Price swung from $0.0000105 to $0.0002564 (+2,347%) and back to $0.0000696 within 2 hours. 24h decline of -26.96%. Extreme intraday volatility makes position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Only $40.24K in total liquidity against $821K+ daily volume (20:1 ratio). Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will experience severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position could move the price catastrophically.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, but the anomalous supply structure (total supply of 1, formatted) and the 30-day stasis followed by sudden +642 holder spike suggest highly concentrated early ownership. Distribution data shows 0 whales/sharks/dolphins — likely a data gap rather than genuine distribution.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the 8.5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio (2,989 sellers vs 353 buyers) and 88.8% sell pressure strongly imply early participants are dumping on retail. The pump-and-dump candle pattern confirms this dynamic.

Authority
high

Contract is mutable (Mutable: true), update authority is unknown, and mint/freeze authority status is unknown. This means the token creator could potentially change metadata, mint new supply, or freeze accounts. Unverified contract adds further risk.

Key risks

  • Unknown mint authority — potential for unlimited supply inflation
  • Unknown freeze authority — potential for account freezing
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata can be changed
  • Extreme sell pressure (88.8%) indicating active distribution/dump
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($40.24K) creating catastrophic slippage risk
  • Anomalous holder data suggesting possible token relaunch, migration, or data manipulation
  • Unverified contract — no independent code audit
  • Non-standard tokenomics (supply of 1, 0 decimals) that are difficult to analyze
  • Pump-and-dump price action pattern in available OHLC data
  • Discord-only community launch with no established track record

Mitigating factors

  • Token is flagged as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • Active trading with 3,094 unique wallets in 24h suggests genuine market participation
  • Listed on PumpSwap with a real liquidity pool (not a pure rug setup)
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist, suggesting some level of public presence
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of unknown authorities, mutable contract, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and anomalous data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

CAPYBARA is a high-risk, newly launched (or recently relaunched) meme token on Solana with deeply anomalous on-chain characteristics. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, relying on short-term momentum and community hype rather than fundamentals. The overwhelming sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unknown contract authorities, and pump-and-dump price action make this an extremely unfavorable risk/reward proposition for most investors.

Bull case (low)

Short-term speculative pump driven by viral Discord/social media traction. If the Uxento community generates significant buzz and new buyers flood in, the token could re-test its recent high of $0.0002564 or beyond, given the low market cap (~$70K FDV).

  • Viral social media campaign from discord.gg/uxento community
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Influencer promotion driving new buyer inflow
  • Low FDV ($70.10K) providing room for speculative upside if narrative catches on

Base case

Token continues to bleed value as sell pressure outpaces buying interest. Price stabilizes somewhere in the $0.000010–$0.000050 range as the initial speculative frenzy exhausts itself, with low trading volume and a small residual holder base. Token neither recovers significantly nor goes completely to zero in the near term.

  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes as early holders finish distributing
  • A small core community from Discord maintains minimal buy support
  • No new negative catalysts (mint event, rug pull, contract exploit)
  • Liquidity pool remains intact on PumpSwap

Bear case (high)

Continued distribution by early holders into thin liquidity causes price to collapse toward or below the candle [2] low of $0.0000105. If mint authority is not renounced, new supply could be minted, further diluting holders. Token could effectively go to zero.

  • 88.8% sell pressure continues as early holders exit
  • Shallow $40.24K liquidity cannot absorb ongoing sell pressure
  • Unknown/unrenounced mint authority creates dilution risk
  • Mutable contract allows metadata changes that could undermine trust
  • Anomalous holder data may indicate coordinated manipulation rather than genuine community

GeneratedJul 2, 03:19 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of candle [1] close (2026-07-02T15:00 UTC). Holder historical data current through 2026-07-01. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — severely limited for technical analysis.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: 4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: ANdek8R37WB9spAaaqQC8Xq1pDfBba8AY1Uh8n1ThX9s)
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles available)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Moralis token analytics API

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend identification
  • Holder data is deeply anomalous (21 holders flat for 30 days, then +642 in 1 hour) — reliability is questionable
  • Top holder data unavailable — whale map analysis is severely limited
  • Sniper data unavailable — smart money signals cannot be fully assessed
  • Total supply of 1 (formatted) with 0 decimals is non-standard and may indicate data display issues
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority are all unknown — cannot confirm renouncement status
  • FDV inconsistency ($0.00 in metadata vs $70.10K in analytics) suggests data pipeline issues
  • Price change percentages for 1h/6h/24h all show 0% despite clear price movement — likely a data feed lag or error
  • No verified contract — no independent code audit available
  • Token description references a Discord server which could not be independently verified

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The anomalous data characteristics of this token make analysis particularly uncertain. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price action is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact of non-standard decimals (0 decimals) or a token with unusual supply mechanics

Key Risks

Unknown mint authority — potential for unlimited supply inflation
Unknown freeze authority — potential for account freezing
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata can be changed
Extreme sell pressure (88.8%) indicating active distribution/dump

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. What can be inferred from trading analytics: 2,989 unique sellers vs 353 unique buyers in 24h (a ratio of ~8.5:1) strongly suggests early participants and/or insiders are distributing heavily into retail buyers. The 11,174 sell transactions vs 1,384 buy transactions reinforces this distribution narrative.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no results.

Cannot be determined from available data. The absence of sniper data, combined with the anomalous holder history (21 holders flat for 30 days), suggests this token may have been relaunched or migrated recently. Early buyers from the initial 21-holder period are uncharacterized.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for CAPYBARA (CAPYBARA)?

Price is in sharp decline. The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001416, spiked to a high of $0.0001416, and closed at $0.0000696 — a ~51% intra-candle drop. The prior candle (14:00 UTC) showed extreme volatility: open $0.0000357, high $0.0002564, low $0.0000105, close $0.0001383. With 88.8% sell pressure and only $40.24K liquidity, further downside is the path of least resistance. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000010 to $0.000141.

Is CAPYBARA a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of unknown authorities, mutable contract, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and anomalous data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are CAPYBARA holders trending?

CAPYBARA currently has 663 holders and is growing (24h: 642, 7d: 642, 30d: 642). Holder data is deeply anomalous. The historical series shows exactly 21 holders with zero net change for every single day from June 2 through July 1, 2026 — 30 consecutive days of complete stasis. Then, in the current snapshot, total holders jump to 663 (+642, +97%). This pattern is inconsistent with normal organic growth and strongly suggests either: (1) the token was relaunched or migrated to a new mint address very recently, with the historical data reflecting a prior/dormant state; (2) a data tracking artifact or API inconsistency; or (3) a coordinated holder-count inflation event. The distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration of 0% further suggest the holder classification system has not yet processed this token's current state. These anomalies significantly reduce confidence in any holder-based analysis.

What does sniper activity look like for CAPYBARA?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding CAPYBARA?

Unknown mint authority — potential for unlimited supply inflation • Unknown freeze authority — potential for account freezing • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata can be changed

Track CAPYBARA