How concentrated is CAPYBARA ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 663 holder addresses (2026-07-02 15:19 UTC).

Are large holders selling CAPYBARA?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is CAPYBARA liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $40,237.36 (2026-07-02 15:19 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

CAPYBARA Price Today & AI Analysis

CAPYBARASolanaAnalysis as of Jul 2, 2026

$0.0₅2111

Contract

Live

4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

157

Market cap

$2,110

At a $1M market cap, $CAPYBARA would be $0.001001 (474x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is CAPYBARA a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 15

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about CAPYBARA

3 free answers a day

CAPYBARA: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-07-02 15:19 UTC

Holder addresses

663

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$40,237.36

How concentrated is CAPYBARA ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 663 holder addresses (2026-07-02 15:19 UTC).
Are large holders selling CAPYBARA?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is CAPYBARA liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $40,237.36 (2026-07-02 15:19 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-02 15:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 2, 03:19 PM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

$40,237.36

Holders

663

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

CAPYBARA (CAPYBARA) is an extremely new, highly speculative meme token on Solana launched via PumpSwap (mint: 4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpump). The token exhibits deeply anomalous on-chain data: a total formatted supply of 1, a fully diluted valuation of effectively $0, and holder metrics that are internally inconsistent — the historical series shows 21 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero change, yet the current snapshot reports 663 holders with +642 added in the last hour. This strongly suggests a data anomaly, token relaunch, or tracking artifact rather than organic growth. Trading analytics reveal extreme sell-side dominance (88.8% sell pressure, $728.93K sell volume vs $92.33K buy volume in 24h), a -26.96% price decline in 24h, and only $40.24K in total liquidity. The contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown. This token carries very high risk.

Key points

Extreme sell pressure: 88.8% of 24h volume is sells ($728.93K sell vs $92.33K buy)
Deeply anomalous holder data: 21 holders flat for 30 days then +642 in 1 hour — likely a relaunch or data artifact
Total formatted supply of 1 with near-zero FDV ($70.10K) — unusual tokenomics
Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk
Only $40.24K liquidity against $821K+ daily trading volume — extreme slippage risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

Price is in sharp decline. The most recent hourly candle (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001416, spiked to a high of $0.0001416, and closed at $0.0000696 — a ~51% intra-candle drop. The prior candle (14:00 UTC) showed extreme volatility: open $0.0000357, high $0.0002564, low $0.0000105, close $0.0001383. With 88.8% sell pressure and only $40.24K liquidity, further downside is the path of least resistance.

Target low

$0.000010

Target high

$0.000141

Support: $0.0000533 (candle [1] low), $0.0000105 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.0001416 (candle [1] open/high), $0.0002564 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without a fundamental catalyst, reversal of community interest, or significant liquidity injection, the token is likely to continue declining. The sell-through dynamic (11,174 sells vs 1,384 buys in 24h) and shallow liquidity make sustained recovery unlikely in the near term.

Catalysts

Unexpected viral social media traction from the Discord community (discord.gg/uxento)
New liquidity provision or market-making activity
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats

Bullish factors

Brief 5-minute price uptick of +5.33% suggests some residual buy interest
High transaction count (12,558 total trades in 24h) shows active market participation
Candle [2] showed a massive intra-candle range suggesting speculative interest at lower prices

Bearish factors

88.8% sell pressure ($728.93K sells vs $92.33K buys) in 24h
-26.96% price decline in 24h
Only $40.24K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order will crater the price
Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
Anomalous holder data undermines confidence in token legitimacy
Zero price change reported for 1h, 6h, and 24h intervals (contradicts the -26.96% 24h figure) — data inconsistency raises red flags

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) anomalous holder data that may reflect a data tracking issue rather than real on-chain activity; (3) total supply of 1 (formatted) is highly unusual and may indicate non-standard token mechanics; (4) extreme volatility in the available candles makes any price target highly uncertain.

CAPYBARA call history

Full track record →

Jul 2bearish@ $0.0000689

24h-95.0%

7d-96.8%

30d-97.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4JR9Vb...pump
Total Supply: 1 (formatted) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact of non-standard decimals (0 decimals) or a token with unusual supply mechanics

Key Risks

Unknown mint authority — potential for unlimited supply inflation
Unknown freeze authority — potential for account freezing
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata can be changed
Extreme sell pressure (88.8%) indicating active distribution/dump

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.0000357, H=$0.0002564, L=$0.0000105, C=$0.0001383 — a massive bullish-looking candle with an enormous upper wick and lower wick, indicating extreme volatility and indecision/pump-and-dump dynamics. Volume was $681,079. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0001416, H=$0.0001416, L=$0.0000533, C=$0.0000696 — opened at the prior close level, immediately sold off with no upward movement (high equals open), closing near the low. Volume dropped to $131,612. This bearish candle confirms distribution after the prior spike.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The two available candles show a clear pump-and-dump pattern: a violent spike to $0.0002564 followed by immediate distribution back to $0.0000696. The trend is firmly downward from the peak. Insufficient data exists for a reliable medium-term trend assessment, but the sell pressure metrics confirm a downtrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

11%

Sell

89%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000533 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000105 (candle [2] low — all-time low in available data)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001416 (candle [1] open/high)

Major resistance

$0.0002564 (candle [2] all-time high in available data)

The key support zone is $0.0000533–$0.0000105, representing the lows of both available candles. Resistance sits at $0.0001416 (the open of candle [1], which acted as a ceiling) and the spike high of $0.0002564. Given the sell pressure, a retest of the $0.0000105 low is plausible.

Notable patterns

Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer on candle [2]: massive upper wick relative to body signals rejection of higher prices
Bearish continuation candle [1]: open equals high (no upward movement), closes near low — classic distribution/sell-off candle
Pump-and-dump price action: spike from $0.0000105 to $0.0002564 (+2,347%) followed by rapid collapse to $0.0000696 (-73% from peak)
Volume climax on candle [2] followed by volume dry-up on candle [1] — typical exhaustion pattern

Liquidity

$40,237.36

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $40.24K against a 24h trading volume of ~$821K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 20:1. This means the pool is being churned at 20x its depth daily, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is strongly negative: $728.93K in sell volume vs $92.33K in buy volume represents a net outflow of approximately $636.6K in 24h. The seller-to-buyer ratio of 2,989 unique sellers vs 353 unique buyers (~8.5:1) confirms broad distribution. The PumpSwap pair (ANdek8R37WB9spAaaqQC8Xq1pDfBba8AY1Uh8n1ThX9s) is the sole liquidity venue. Any large sell order will cause catastrophic price impact given the $40.24K pool depth. Market health is poor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted) — highly anomalous; likely a display artifact of non-standard decimals (0 decimals) or a token with unusual supply mechanics

FDV

$70,100 (per trading analytics) / $0.00 (per metadata) — inconsistency noted

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price swung from $0.0000105 to $0.0002564 (+2,347%) and back to $0.0000696 within 2 hours. 24h decline of -26.96%. Extreme intraday volatility makes position sizing and exit timing nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Only $40.24K in total liquidity against $821K+ daily volume (20:1 ratio). Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will experience severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position could move the price catastrophically.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Unknown mint authority — potential for unlimited supply inflation
Unknown freeze authority — potential for account freezing
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata can be changed
Extreme sell pressure (88.8%) indicating active distribution/dump
Critically shallow liquidity ($40.24K) creating catastrophic slippage risk
Anomalous holder data suggesting possible token relaunch, migration, or data manipulation
Unverified contract — no independent code audit
Non-standard tokenomics (supply of 1, 0 decimals) that are difficult to analyze
Pump-and-dump price action pattern in available OHLC data
Discord-only community launch with no established track record

Mitigating factors

Token is flagged as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
Active trading with 3,094 unique wallets in 24h suggests genuine market participation
Listed on PumpSwap with a real liquidity pool (not a pure rug setup)
Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist, suggesting some level of public presence

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of unknown authorities, mutable contract, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and anomalous data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

CAPYBARA is a high-risk, newly launched (or recently relaunched) meme token on Solana with deeply anomalous on-chain characteristics. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, relying on short-term momentum and community hype rather than fundamentals. The overwhelming sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unknown contract authorities, and pump-and-dump price action make this an extremely unfavorable risk/reward proposition for most investors.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Short-term speculative pump driven by viral Discord/social media traction. If the Uxento community generates significant buzz and new buyers flood in, the token could re-test its recent high of $0.0002564 or beyond, given the low market cap (~$70K FDV).

Viral social media campaign from discord.gg/uxento community
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Influencer promotion driving new buyer inflow
Low FDV ($70.10K) providing room for speculative upside if narrative catches on

Base Case

Token continues to bleed value as sell pressure outpaces buying interest. Price stabilizes somewhere in the $0.000010–$0.000050 range as the initial speculative frenzy exhausts itself, with low trading volume and a small residual holder base. Token neither recovers significantly nor goes completely to zero in the near term.

Sell pressure gradually normalizes as early holders finish distributing
A small core community from Discord maintains minimal buy support
No new negative catalysts (mint event, rug pull, contract exploit)
Liquidity pool remains intact on PumpSwap

Bear Case

High probability

Continued distribution by early holders into thin liquidity causes price to collapse toward or below the candle [2] low of $0.0000105. If mint authority is not renounced, new supply could be minted, further diluting holders. Token could effectively go to zero.

88.8% sell pressure continues as early holders exit
Shallow $40.24K liquidity cannot absorb ongoing sell pressure
Unknown/unrenounced mint authority creates dilution risk
Mutable contract allows metadata changes that could undermine trust
Anomalous holder data may indicate coordinated manipulation rather than genuine community

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 2, 03:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-02 15:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain metadata (mint: 4JR9VbDsqv4jCGeH62dcdg1MM3Fnth3NqgZ7cMnLpump)
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: ANdek8R37WB9spAaaqQC8Xq1pDfBba8AY1Uh8n1ThX9s)
Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles available)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Moralis token analytics API

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend identification
Holder data is deeply anomalous (21 holders flat for 30 days, then +642 in 1 hour) — reliability is questionable
Top holder data unavailable — whale map analysis is severely limited
Sniper data unavailable — smart money signals cannot be fully assessed
Total supply of 1 (formatted) with 0 decimals is non-standard and may indicate data display issues
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority are all unknown — cannot confirm renouncement status
FDV inconsistency ($0.00 in metadata vs $70.10K in analytics) suggests data pipeline issues
Price change percentages for 1h/6h/24h all show 0% despite clear price movement — likely a data feed lag or error
No verified contract — no independent code audit available
Token description references a Discord server which could not be independently verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The anomalous data characteristics of this token make analysis particularly uncertain. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price action is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CAPYBARA a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 15, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell CAPYBARA?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 15, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for CAPYBARA (CAPYBARA)?

Is CAPYBARA a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of unknown authorities, mutable contract, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and anomalous data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

What are the key risks of holding CAPYBARA?

Unknown mint authority — potential for unlimited supply inflation • Unknown freeze authority — potential for account freezing • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — metadata can be changed