BBALL

Beachball underwater Price Today & AI Analysis

BBALL
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 29, 2026

4AJiHGU2DTgD6NSGKTmQvqX92qawyTuVbfcskFBrpump

$0.041105

+8.02%

FDV $11,033

LiveContract:4AJiHGU2DTgD6NSGKTmQvqX92qawyTuVbfcskFBrpumpChain:SolanaHolders:316Market cap:$11,033

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about BBALL

Report snapshotas of May 29, 01:17 AM
FDV

$61,050

Liquidity

$39,678

Holders

360

Snipers

37

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

BBALL (Beachball underwater) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana memecoin with mint address 4AJiHGU2DTgD6NSGKTmQvqX92qawyTuVbfcskFBrpump. The token is extremely early-stage, with only 360 total holders and a fully diluted valuation of ~$61K–$82K. It launched with minimal activity for most of May 2026, then experienced a sharp holder and volume surge on May 25–29. The token is currently down ~39% in 24h after a volatile spike, with heavy sell pressure (82.6% of volume). The description links to a tweet by @blknoiz06, a known crypto influencer, which may explain the sudden interest. Authority status is partially unclear but the token is marked immutable (mutable: false).

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Linked to influential crypto Twitter account @blknoiz06 (tweet reference in description)
Extremely rapid holder growth: +334 holders in 7 days (+93%) from a near-dormant base of ~25
PumpSwap-listed with $39.68K liquidity — very thin for the volatility observed
20 snipers identified in first 1000 blocks, majority in profit, indicating early insider activity
Token marked immutable (mutable: false), reducing metadata rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–48 hours

After a violent pump-and-dump candle on May 29 (H: $0.0001106, C: $0.0000611), the token is in sharp retracement. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 82.6% of 24h volume ($83.2K sells vs $17.6K buys). The 5m change of +18.5% suggests a brief bounce but the hourly trend is -37.6%. Expect continued downward pressure unless new catalysts emerge.

Target low$0.000034
Target high$0.000083
Support: $0.000047 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000034 (hourly candle [2] open / near-launch low)
Resistance: $0.000083 (hourly candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.000110 (hourly candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Without sustained organic demand, new exchange listings, or continued influencer attention, the token is likely to bleed back toward its pre-spike levels (~$0.000025–$0.000035). The holder base is very small (360) and the token was dormant for most of May. A recovery above $0.000110 would require significant new buying pressure.

Catalysts
  • Renewed @blknoiz06 social media engagement or retweet
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • New exchange or aggregator listing
  • Organic community formation and utility narrative

Bullish factors

  • Influencer-linked narrative (blknoiz06 tweet) could re-ignite interest
  • Rapid holder growth (+242 in 24h, +334 in 7d) shows viral potential
  • 5m price bounce of +18.5% suggests some residual buying interest
  • Most snipers are in profit, meaning they haven't fully dumped yet

Bearish factors

  • 82.6% sell pressure in 24h ($83.2K sells vs $17.6K buys)
  • -39.3% price decline in 24h
  • Only $39.68K total liquidity — extremely thin, high slippage risk
  • Token was dormant for ~3 weeks before spike, suggesting no organic base
  • 360 total holders is extremely low; community is nascent and fragile
  • Top 10 holders control 43.14% of supply
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, the token has a very short active trading history, and price action is driven almost entirely by social sentiment rather than fundamentals. Prediction confidence is low.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (00:00 UTC): O=$0.0000348, H=$0.0001106, L=$0.0000340, C=$0.0000832 — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with a 225% range from low to high, closing near the upper half. This is a classic pump candle. Candle [1] (01:00 UTC): O=$0.0000817, H=$0.0000817, L=$0.0000476, C=$0.0000611 — a bearish candle opening at the prior close, with no upper wick (open = high), closing well below open. This is a strong bearish continuation candle following the pump, indicating distribution. The pattern is a classic 'pump and dump' two-candle sequence.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 17%Sell 83%

The short-term trend is clearly bearish following the pump candle. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the token was dormant for weeks before the spike and is now retracing sharply. No sustained uptrend structure exists.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000047 (Candle [1] low)
Major$0.000034 (Candle [2] open/low — near-launch price floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000083 (Candle [1] open = Candle [2] close)
Major$0.000110 (Candle [2] all-time high)

The $0.000047 level is the most recent swing low and first line of defense. A break below $0.000034 would suggest a full retracement to pre-pump levels. Resistance at $0.000083 aligns with the prior candle's open and the current price ceiling. The $0.000110 all-time high is a distant target requiring significant new demand.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump two-candle sequence (massive bullish spike followed by bearish distribution candle)
  • Bearish engulfing on hourly timeframe (Candle [1] opens at prior close and closes significantly lower)
  • No upper wick on Candle [1] (open = high) — immediate selling from the open, no recovery attempt
  • Volume collapse: 90% drop from pump candle to follow-up candle, confirming lack of sustained buying interest

Total holders360
24h Δ+67
7d Δ+93
30d Δ+94
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth strongly correlates with the price spike. The token had ~25 holders from May 1–22 (completely dormant), then jumped to 27 on May 24, 102 on May 25 (+75 in one day, +74%), 112 on May 26, 110 on May 27, 157 on May 28 (+47, +30%), and 360 at time of analysis (+203 in ~24h, +67%). The explosive holder growth on May 25 and May 28–29 directly coincides with the price pump, suggesting the influencer tweet drove both metrics simultaneously.

Holder growth is clearly accelerating and is entirely driven by the recent viral event. The token was dormant with ~21–26 holders from April 29 through May 22 — over three weeks of zero organic growth. The sudden surge from 25 to 360 holders in ~4 days (+1,340%) is extraordinary but fragile. Most new holders acquired via swap (351 of 360), confirming speculative buying rather than organic distribution. The 30d growth of 94% is almost entirely concentrated in the last 4 days. Holder distribution shows 124 whales and 124 dolphins, suggesting many new entrants bought meaningful positions during the pump. Accelerating growth is a positive signal, but the dormant history and pump-driven nature of the surge make sustainability questionable.

Top 10 hold43.14%
Top 100 hold91.82%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

5RDLAJdW1e9on3Z82jgeqhreztsbUiN1QEqibYGsCsmY

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the pair address listed in price data)

17.42%

2AMthgnzM1o4aZeBwNyW78SS1yqtLFJZB4uY47TWfFft

Individual whale / early holder

3.92%

G5855yJZHgPaqwNhadzaqJCbyguxZcRXLtoD9Y3R9B6V

Individual whale / early holder

3.64%

FKW8L1hPFBg3HaevWuP1m93fXdfD58JQxrthNh6745ga

Individual whale / early holder

3.56%

3Qw1fzZGTJf6nxKC1XoM37uuJQuyhrRNoL1wMR8vq1Fm

Individual whale / early holder

3.01%

The top holder (17.42%, address 5RDLAJdW1e9on3Z82jgeqhreztsbUiN1QEqibYGsCsmY) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address, which is expected and not a concern. Excluding the LP, the top 9 individual holders control ~25.7% of supply. Holders 2–10 each hold 1.94%–3.92%, suggesting a relatively even distribution among large holders rather than a single dominant whale. However, top 100 wallets control 91.82% of supply, indicating the broader holder base (360 total) is highly concentrated. With only 360 holders and 91.82% in top 100, the average non-top-100 holder controls a tiny fraction. Sentiment is mixed: the pump attracted new buyers but heavy sell volume suggests many are already exiting.

Liquidity$39,680
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$17,560
Sell$83,200
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers221
Unique sellers679

Liquidity is critically thin at $39.68K on a single PumpSwap pool (5RDLAJdW1e9on3Z82jgeqhreztsbUiN1QEqibYGsCsmY). The FDV of $61K–$82K is barely above the liquidity pool value, meaning any significant sell order will cause extreme price impact. The 24h sell volume of $83.2K already exceeds total liquidity, confirming that the pump was driven by rapid in-and-out trading rather than deep market support. The buyer-to-seller ratio is stark: 221 unique buyers vs 679 unique sellers (3:1 seller dominance), with 616 buy transactions vs 1,460 sell transactions. Net flow is clearly outflow. The market health is poor — this is a highly speculative, illiquid token with significant slippage risk for any position larger than a few hundred dollars.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,984,444.41
FDV$61,050.47

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (standard Pump.fun issuance). The FDV at current price is ~$61K, extremely low. The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is NOT the system program (111...1) or a known burn address, meaning the update authority has NOT been renounced to a burn address. However, the token is marked 'mutable: false', which means the metadata itself cannot be changed, reducing one vector of rug risk. Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the metadata, so they are marked unknown. The Pump.fun launchpad typically burns mint authority upon bonding curve completion, but this cannot be confirmed from the data provided. The non-renounced update authority and unknown mint/freeze status warrant a medium authority risk rating. The token is not verified and has no social links beyond the tweet reference in the description.

Volatility
high

The token moved from $0.000034 to $0.000110 and back to $0.000061 within 2 hours — a 225% range. 24h price change is -39.3%. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and token stage.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $39.68K on a single PumpSwap pool. Sell orders above ~$1K–$2K will cause significant slippage. The 24h sell volume of $83.2K already exceeded total liquidity, indicating the pool is being rapidly drained.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 43.14% of supply (excluding LP at 17.42%, top 9 individuals hold ~25.7%). Top 100 wallets hold 91.82% of supply across only 360 total holders. A coordinated exit by top holders could collapse the price.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were active in the first 1000 blocks. 17 of 20 are in profit (PnL ranging from +4.1% to +116.9%). Unknown remaining balances mean residual dump risk exists, but aggregate sell proceeds so far are modest ($2,800 total across all snipers), suggesting most haven't fully exited yet.

Authority
medium

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) has not been renounced to a burn address. Token is marked mutable:false (metadata cannot change), which partially mitigates this. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown from available data. Pump.fun tokens typically have mint authority burned, but this is unconfirmed.

Key risks

  • Extreme illiquidity ($39.68K pool) with high slippage on any meaningful trade
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 82.6% of 24h volume is sells, 679 sellers vs 221 buyers
  • Token was dormant for 3+ weeks before pump — no organic community or utility
  • Top 100 wallets hold 91.82% of supply with only 360 total holders
  • 17 of 20 snipers still potentially holding unrealized positions
  • Non-renounced update authority; mint/freeze authority status unknown
  • Entire price action appears driven by a single influencer tweet reference, not fundamentals
  • No verified contract, no social links, no website — minimal transparency

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked mutable:false — metadata cannot be altered
  • Influencer association (blknoiz06) provides some narrative momentum
  • Most snipers have only sold small amounts, suggesting no coordinated dump yet
  • Rapid holder growth (+334 in 7d) shows genuine viral interest
  • PumpSwap listing provides at least some on-chain liquidity and price discovery
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, those unfamiliar with Solana DeFi, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. This is a high-risk, low-liquidity memecoin with no verified fundamentals.

BBALL is a pure memecoin speculation play tied to an influencer tweet reference. Its value proposition is entirely narrative-driven (blknoiz06 association) with no underlying utility, verified team, or organic community. The token experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern within its first active trading hours, and is now in sharp retracement. The investment thesis is speculative: either the influencer narrative re-ignites and drives a second wave of buying, or the token fades back to near-zero as the initial excitement dissipates.

Bull case (low)

The @blknoiz06 tweet gains renewed attention or the influencer directly promotes BBALL, triggering a second wave of buying. The holder base expands beyond 1,000, liquidity deepens, and the token establishes a price floor above $0.000083. A broader Solana memecoin market rally amplifies gains.

  • Direct influencer promotion or acknowledgment of BBALL
  • Broader Solana memecoin season driving speculative capital into micro-cap tokens
  • Organic community formation around the 'Beachball underwater' narrative
  • New DEX listings or aggregator inclusion increasing visibility

Base case

BBALL stabilizes in the $0.000040–$0.000070 range over the next 1–2 weeks as initial excitement fades but a small community of ~400–600 holders remains. Occasional social media mentions provide brief price spikes but no sustained trend. The token remains a micro-cap speculative asset with high volatility and low liquidity.

  • No major new influencer promotion but no complete abandonment either
  • Holder base grows modestly to 400–600 over the next 2 weeks
  • Liquidity remains thin ($20K–$50K range) with high slippage
  • Price oscillates between $0.000034 support and $0.000083 resistance

Bear case (high)

The influencer narrative fades without further engagement. Remaining snipers and early holders exit, collapsing the thin $39.68K liquidity pool. The token returns to its pre-pump price range ($0.000025–$0.000035) or lower, with holders unable to exit without severe slippage.

  • No follow-up from @blknoiz06 or the broader crypto community
  • Continued sell pressure from 679 active sellers and 17 profitable snipers
  • Thin liquidity amplifying downward price moves
  • No utility, no team transparency, no roadmap to sustain interest

GeneratedMay 29, 01:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-05-29T01:00:00Z (most recent hourly candle). Holder data reflects snapshot at time of analysis. Historical holder series covers April 29 – May 28, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and OHLC data (2 hourly candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (360 holders, top 20 balances)
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks, 20 snipers with PnL data)
  • Token description/social reference (blknoiz06 tweet link)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Sniper token balances and total sniped USD amounts are unknown, limiting precise sniper concentration calculation
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
  • Token has extremely short active trading history (active only since ~May 25, 2026)
  • No social media metrics, community size data, or developer information available
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($61,050) and trading analytics ($81,650) — likely reflects price movement between data pulls
  • 30-day holder history shows dormancy for most of the period, limiting trend analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,984,444.41

Key Risks

Extreme illiquidity ($39.68K pool) with high slippage on any meaningful trade
Overwhelming sell pressure: 82.6% of 24h volume is sells, 679 sellers vs 221 buyers
Token was dormant for 3+ weeks before pump — no organic community or utility
Top 100 wallets hold 91.82% of supply with only 360 total holders

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
Medium risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1000 blocks. Of the 20, 17 show positive realized PnL percentages (ranging from +4.1% to +116.9%), 2 are slightly negative (-9.1%, -9.5%), and 1 is more significantly negative (-15.1%). The majority of snipers are in profit, meaning they entered early at very low prices and have been selling into the pump. Total sell proceeds across all snipers are modest ($2,800 aggregate), suggesting most snipers either hold small positions or have not fully exited. The high proportion of profitable snipers indicates the pump benefited early buyers, but also means there is residual sell pressure from those who haven't fully exited.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
medium

20 snipers identified in first 1000 blocks; exact token balances unknown, but sell activity ranges from $2 to $1,264 per sniper. Estimated aggregate sniper concentration is low-to-moderate given unknown remaining balances.

Cautiously positive — most early buyers (snipers) are in profit and appear to be gradually taking profits rather than panic selling. The top sniper (7Y9xcTxdD3JbqwHSWFfzaEeQuaE8yuHpEtHjKmzqwza2) realized +116.9% PnL on $179 sold. However, unknown remaining balances mean the full extent of potential sell pressure is unclear.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Beachball underwater (BBALL)?

After a violent pump-and-dump candle on May 29 (H: $0.0001106, C: $0.0000611), the token is in sharp retracement. Sell pressure is overwhelming at 82.6% of 24h volume ($83.2K sells vs $17.6K buys). The 5m change of +18.5% suggests a brief bounce but the hourly trend is -37.6%. Expect continued downward pressure unless new catalysts emerge. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–48 hours), with a target range of $0.000034 to $0.000083.

Is BBALL a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand memecoin dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, those unfamiliar with Solana DeFi, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. This is a high-risk, low-liquidity memecoin with no verified fundamentals.

How are BBALL holders trending?

Beachball underwater currently has 360 holders and is growing (24h: 67, 7d: 93, 30d: 94). Holder growth is clearly accelerating and is entirely driven by the recent viral event. The token was dormant with ~21–26 holders from April 29 through May 22 — over three weeks of zero organic growth. The sudden surge from 25 to 360 holders in ~4 days (+1,340%) is extraordinary but fragile. Most new holders acquired via swap (351 of 360), confirming speculative buying rather than organic distribution. The 30d growth of 94% is almost entirely concentrated in the last 4 days. Holder distribution shows 124 whales and 124 dolphins, suggesting many new entrants bought meaningful positions during the pump. Accelerating growth is a positive signal, but the dormant history and pump-driven nature of the surge make sustainability questionable.

What does sniper activity look like for BBALL?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: medium.

What are the key risks of holding BBALL?

Extreme illiquidity ($39.68K pool) with high slippage on any meaningful trade • Overwhelming sell pressure: 82.6% of 24h volume is sells, 679 sellers vs 221 buyers • Token was dormant for 3+ weeks before pump — no organic community or utility

Track BBALL