BLACKINU

The Black Inu Price Today & AI Analysis

BLACKINU
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 14, 2026

48fHqiTPfQQeic1b2YvQuxaCRLckeDDKv33JSrikpump

$0.054129

+13.54%

FDV $4,121

LiveContract:48fHqiTPfQQeic1b2YvQuxaCRLckeDDKv33JSrikpumpChain:SolanaHolders:301Market cap:$4,121

More tokens on Solana

UNIPUMP

UNIPUMP

Unipump

$0.05429611.2%
MC $4.3K
CR7

CR7

CR7

$0.00034611.0%
MC $345.6K
Instagram

Instagram

Instagram Coin

$0.0599902.7%
MC $9.5K
DukyRich

DukyRich

DukyRich

$0.05504610.1%
MC $4.9K
KEVUN

KEVUN

Kevun Wersh

$0.05779411.3%
MC $7.8K
neet

neet

NotInEmploymentEducationTraining

$0.041312.7%
MC $41.30M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about BLACKINU

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 14, 01:19 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$59,658

Holders

1,190

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

BLACKINU (The Black Inu) is a Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 (indivisible, 0 decimals), currently priced at ~$0.000377 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$376.70K. The token exhibits extreme anomalies: a 180.5% 24h price surge, a reported +1,088 holder jump (91%) in the last hour that is identical across all time windows (1h/24h/7d/30d), and a historical holder series showing exactly 102 holders for 30 consecutive days before a sudden spike to 1,190. These data inconsistencies are severe red flags suggesting data manipulation, wash trading, or a coordinated pump. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of 1 token with 0 decimals — highly unusual tokenomics that make standard holder/concentration metrics meaningless
Holder count was frozen at exactly 102 for 30 consecutive days, then jumped +1,088 (91%) in a single hour — a statistical impossibility under organic growth
180.5% price spike in 24h with only $59.66K total liquidity against $998K+ in 24h volume — extreme slippage and manipulation risk
Top holder data is entirely unavailable and supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data is either suppressed or broken
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — token parameters can be changed at any time

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a 180.5% pump on thin liquidity ($59.66K pool). The most recent hourly candle (01:00 UTC) opened at $0.000241, spiked to $0.000422, then collapsed to close at $0.0000494 — an 80% intra-candle crash. The current price of $0.000377 is well above that close, suggesting the price feed may be lagged or a second pump is underway. With sell pressure at 50.9% and only $59.66K liquidity, any meaningful sell order will crater the price.

Target low$0.000042
Target high$0.000422
Support: $0.000237 (prior candle open / close zone), $0.000049 (candle [1] close / candle [2] open), $0.000042 (candle [2] all-time low in data)
Resistance: $0.000377 (current price / recent high area), $0.000422 (candle [1] intraday high — strongest resistance)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Without verified fundamentals, social presence, or organic holder growth, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The 30-day holder stagnation at 102 followed by a suspicious single-hour spike suggests artificial activity. Once pump momentum fades, the token is likely to retrace toward its pre-pump range near $0.000042–$0.000134.

Catalysts
  • Any whale or early holder exit on thin liquidity would cause rapid price collapse
  • Mutable metadata change could signal a rug pull
  • Absence of community/social links means no organic demand driver

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h volume (~$998K) relative to market cap suggests high speculative interest
  • Nearly equal buyer/seller counts (3,938 buys vs 3,866 sells) and 1,814 unique buyers show broad participation in the short term
  • 5m price change of +6.24% indicates very recent upward momentum

Bearish factors

  • Candle [1] shows an 80% intra-hour collapse from high ($0.000422) to close ($0.0000494)
  • Only $59.66K total liquidity — catastrophically shallow for $998K+ daily volume
  • Holder history frozen at 102 for 30 days then +1,088 in one hour is a manipulation signal
  • No social links, no description, unverified contract, mutable metadata
  • Top holder data suppressed — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • 180.5% pump on a token with no fundamentals is a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severe data anomalies (frozen holder history, missing top holder data, 0% concentration figures), unknown update authority, mutable metadata, and only 2 OHLC candles available. The price feed itself shows inconsistencies between the reported current price and the most recent candle close.

BLACKINU call history

Full track record →
Jul 14bearish
24h-98.8%
7d-99.1%
30d-99.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (00:00 UTC): O=$0.0000494, H=$0.000301, L=$0.0000422, C=$0.000237 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, closing near the high (bullish engulfing / hammer structure). Candle [1] (01:00 UTC): O=$0.000241, H=$0.000422, L=$0.0000494, C=$0.0000494 — a bearish shooting star / gravestone doji, opening near the prior close, spiking to $0.000422, then collapsing entirely to close at the low ($0.0000494). This is a textbook pump-and-dump candle pattern. The current reported price of $0.000377 sits well above candle [1]'s close, which is a significant discrepancy.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

Short-term trend is bearish based on candle [1]'s catastrophic close at the session low after a spike high. The medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of data and 30 days of price stagnation prior.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000237 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close zone)
Major$0.000042 (candle [2] absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000377 (current price / recent high area)
Major$0.000422 (candle [1] intraday spike high)

The $0.000042 level represents the absolute floor seen in the data. The $0.000237 zone is a key pivot — it was both the open of candle [1] and the close of candle [2]. The $0.000422 level is the only meaningful resistance, being the intraday spike high. Given the shallow liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / gravestone doji on candle [1] — strong bearish reversal signal at the top
  • Bullish hammer on candle [2] — preceded the pump but now invalidated by candle [1]'s collapse
  • Bearish volume divergence: lower volume on higher price spike
  • Pump-and-dump candle sequence: rapid spike followed by full retracement to session low

Total holders1,190
24h Δ+1088
7d Δ+1088
30d Δ+1088
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The reported +1,088 holder increase is identical across the 1h, 24h, 7d, and 30d windows — a statistical impossibility under organic growth. This strongly suggests the holder spike is artificial, coordinated, or a data artifact. The historical series shows exactly 102 holders for every single day from 2026-06-14 through 2026-07-13 (30 consecutive days of zero change), followed by a sudden jump to 1,190. This pattern does not correlate with genuine price-driven adoption; instead it mirrors the price pump timing, suggesting manufactured activity.

Holder data is deeply anomalous. The 30-day historical series shows a perfectly flat 102 holders with zero net change on every single day, then a single-hour explosion to 1,190 (+1,088, +91%). The identical growth figure across all time windows (1h = 24h = 7d = 30d = +1,088) is a mathematical red flag — it is impossible for organic holder growth to be identical across all four time horizons simultaneously. This pattern is consistent with: (1) a coordinated airdrop or bot-generated wallet creation, (2) data manipulation, or (3) a wash-trading scheme. The supply distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and 0% top-10/top-100 concentration further indicate the holder data is unreliable or suppressed.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The reported supply concentration of 0% for both top 10 and top 100 holders is inconsistent with any real token distribution and likely reflects a data error or deliberate suppression. Given the total supply is 1 token (0 decimals), the token is by definition held by a single wallet at any given time, making standard concentration metrics meaningless. The distribution is classified as 'very_concentrated' by default given the indivisible single-token supply structure. Whale sentiment cannot be assessed without holder data.

Liquidity$59,660
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$490,680
Sell$507,700
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,814
Unique sellers1,226

Liquidity is critically shallow at $59.66K against $998.38K in 24h trading volume — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 16.7x. This means the pool is being turned over more than 16 times per day, which is characteristic of wash trading or a highly manipulated market. Any trade of meaningful size will cause extreme slippage. The net flow is marginally negative (sell volume $507.70K > buy volume $490.68K, a $17K net outflow), suggesting slight selling pressure dominates. While there are more unique buyers (1,814) than sellers (1,226), the higher sell volume per seller indicates sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. The PumpSwap pair (AA5G9jDU3MX2Gs6ZvgSzEmmENSqqhmAzyFRU41sDonHd) is the sole liquidity venue, creating single-point-of-failure risk.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals — indivisible)
FDV$376,700

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

BLACKINU has a total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimals, making it completely indivisible. This is an extremely unusual tokenomics structure — it means the token cannot be split, and all trading activity involves fractional representations or wrapped versions rather than the token itself. The metadata is marked as mutable with an unknown update authority, meaning token parameters could be changed at any time by whoever controls the update authority. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data (update authority is listed as 'unknown'). The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authorities, no social links, no description, and an unverified contract creates a high rug risk profile. The FDV of $376.70K is entirely speculative given the absence of fundamentals.

Volatility
high

180.5% 24h price surge followed by an 80% intra-candle collapse (candle [1]: H=$0.000422 to C=$0.0000494). Extreme price swings on thin liquidity make this token highly dangerous for any position size.

Liquidity
high

Only $59.66K total liquidity against $998K+ daily volume (16.7x turnover ratio). A single moderate sell order could move the price 20–50%+. Single DEX venue (PumpSwap) with no backup liquidity.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. The token has a total supply of 1 indivisible unit, making standard concentration analysis impossible. The 30-day frozen holder count at 102 followed by a suspicious +1,088 spike suggests artificial distribution.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the anomalous holder spike (+1,088 in one hour, identical across all time windows) and pump-and-dump candle pattern strongly suggest coordinated early buyer activity with high dump risk.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. No verified contract. Token parameters can be changed at any time, enabling rug pulls or token freezes.

Key risks

  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
  • Holder data anomaly: 102 holders frozen for 30 days then +1,088 in one hour — strong manipulation signal
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($59.66K) vs massive volume ($998K+) — extreme slippage and wash trading risk
  • No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero accountability
  • Total supply of 1 indivisible token — non-standard structure that breaks conventional analysis
  • Pump-and-dump candle pattern: shooting star with 80% intra-candle collapse
  • Top holder data suppressed — cannot assess true concentration or insider risk
  • Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) — no fallback if pool is drained

Mitigating factors

  • High 24h transaction count (3,938 buys, 3,866 sells) and 2,101 unique wallets suggest some genuine market participation
  • Nearly balanced buy/sell pressure (49.1% / 50.9%) could indicate two-sided market rather than pure one-directional dump
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap, providing at least some on-chain price discovery
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder data, unknown authorities, mutable metadata, and pump-and-dump price action makes it appropriate only for highly experienced traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their capital and who are treating any position as pure speculation with money they can afford to lose entirely.

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Bull case (low)

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

—

Base case

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

—

Bear case (low)

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

—

GeneratedJul 14, 01:19 AM
Data freshnessOHLC data current to 2026-07-14T01:00 UTC. Historical holder data current to 2026-07-13. Price data reflects real-time feed at time of analysis.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana mint account)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (AA5G9jDU3MX2Gs6ZvgSzEmmENSqqhmAzyFRU41sDonHd)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable)
  • Sniper analysis data (unavailable)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — concentration and whale analysis cannot be performed
  • Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Holder metrics show severe anomalies (identical growth across all time windows) suggesting data unreliability
  • Total supply of 1 indivisible token breaks standard tokenomics analysis frameworks
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed
  • Price feed shows discrepancy between reported current price ($0.000377) and most recent candle close ($0.0000494)
  • No social links or project description available for qualitative assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The token analyzed exhibits multiple extreme risk factors including possible manipulation, wash trading, and rug pull vectors. Past price performance does not predict future results. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry the risk of total capital loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals — indivisible)

Key Risks

•Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
•Holder data anomaly: 102 holders frozen for 30 days then +1,088 in one hour — strong manipulation signal
•Critically shallow liquidity ($59.66K) vs massive volume ($998K+) — extreme slippage and wash trading risk
•No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero accountability

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for BLACKINU. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The absence of sniper data, combined with the token's anomalous holder metrics (102 holders frozen for 30 days, then +1,088 in one hour) and missing top holder information, makes it impossible to assess early buyer behavior with confidence. The trading pattern — high volume on thin liquidity with nearly balanced buy/sell pressure — is consistent with wash trading rather than genuine smart money accumulation.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper or top holder data available. The suspicious holder spike and wash-trading-like volume pattern suggest early participants may be coordinating a pump rather than holding for long-term value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Black Inu (BLACKINU)?

The token just posted a 180.5% pump on thin liquidity ($59.66K pool). The most recent hourly candle (01:00 UTC) opened at $0.000241, spiked to $0.000422, then collapsed to close at $0.0000494 — an 80% intra-candle crash. The current price of $0.000377 is well above that close, suggesting the price feed may be lagged or a second pump is underway. With sell pressure at 50.9% and only $59.66K liquidity, any meaningful sell order will crater the price. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000042 to $0.000422.

Is BLACKINU a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder data, unknown authorities, mutable metadata, and pump-and-dump price action makes it appropriate only for highly experienced traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their capital and who are treating any position as pure speculation with money they can afford to lose entirely.

How are BLACKINU holders trending?

The Black Inu currently has 1,190 holders and is growing (24h: 1088, 7d: 1088, 30d: 1088). Holder data is deeply anomalous. The 30-day historical series shows a perfectly flat 102 holders with zero net change on every single day, then a single-hour explosion to 1,190 (+1,088, +91%). The identical growth figure across all time windows (1h = 24h = 7d = 30d = +1,088) is a mathematical red flag — it is impossible for organic holder growth to be identical across all four time horizons simultaneously. This pattern is consistent with: (1) a coordinated airdrop or bot-generated wallet creation, (2) data manipulation, or (3) a wash-trading scheme. The supply distribution data (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and 0% top-10/top-100 concentration further indicate the holder data is unreliable or suppressed.

What does sniper activity look like for BLACKINU?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding BLACKINU?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector • Holder data anomaly: 102 holders frozen for 30 days then +1,088 in one hour — strong manipulation signal • Critically shallow liquidity ($59.66K) vs massive volume ($998K+) — extreme slippage and wash trading risk

← Back to all predictions

Track BLACKINU