SIX DOORS Price Today & AI Analysis

DOORSSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 20, 2026

$0.0₅3103

Contract

Live

443HdXFos5TKz3RCTXhRaBRoSFccTLmKyVMGnau1pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

167

Market cap

$3,102

At a $1M market cap, $DOORS would be $0.001000 (322x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is DOORS a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about DOORS

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

HUGHUG$0.0₅3911-0.1%MC $3.9K

MrSueThe Wheelchair Fish$0.0₅3661+0.0%MC $3.7K

SINSinners$0.0₅2504+0.0%MC $2.5K

MINECOINMinecoin$0.0₅8452+0.0%MC $8.5K

PeePee Token$0.0₅2319+0.0%MC $2.3K

uniuni$0.009481-63.9%MC $9.48M

SIX DOORS: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-20 01:17 UTC

Holder addresses

2,853

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$93,397.63

How concentrated is SIX DOORS ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,853 addresses (2026-06-20 01:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling SIX DOORS?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is SIX DOORS liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-20 01:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $93,397.63. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-20 01:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 20, 01:17 AM UTC

FDV

$1,013,179

Liquidity

$93,397.63

Holders

2,853

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

DOORS (SIX DOORS) is a Solana meme/narrative token launched on PumpSwap (mint: 443HdXFos5TKz3RCTXhRaBRoSFccTLmKyVMGnau1pump). The token experienced an explosive 1,665% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from near-zero to ~$0.00101. Holder count grew from a dormant base of 74 to 2,853 in roughly 24 hours — a 97% increase — suggesting a viral or coordinated launch event. Liquidity is thin at ~$93.4K against a $1.02M FDV, and top holder data is unavailable, making concentration risk impossible to quantify precisely. The OHLC data shows extreme intraday volatility with candle anomalies. This is a very high-risk, early-stage speculative token.

Key points

Explosive 1,665% 24h price surge from near-zero levels
Holder base grew from 74 dormant wallets to 2,853 in ~24 hours (+2,779 net)
Balanced buy/sell pressure (50%/50%) with 9,268 buys vs 8,581 sells across 4,887 unique wallets
Thin liquidity of ~$93.4K vs $1.02M FDV creates high slippage risk
Token was dormant for ~30 days before sudden activation — unusual launch pattern

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1–24 hours

neutral

The token has already surged 1,665% in 24h and is showing extreme volatility. The 1h candle shows a +400% move, but the 6h and 24h percentage changes are reported as 0%, suggesting data inconsistency or a very recent pump. With only $93.4K in liquidity and perfectly balanced buy/sell pressure, the short-term direction is highly uncertain. A retracement is plausible given the magnitude of the move, but momentum could persist briefly if social catalysts continue.

Target low

$0.00040

Target high

$0.00180

Support: $0.000715 (candle [1] low), $0.000065 (candle [3] low), $0.000014 (candle [1] close / candle [3] close)
Resistance: $0.000956 (candle [4] high area), $0.001013 (current price / FDV-implied), $0.001800 (extension target if momentum holds)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Meme tokens with this profile — dormant for 30 days, sudden viral pump, thin liquidity, no verified contract, unknown update authority — historically revert sharply after initial excitement fades. Without sustained community development, utility, or liquidity deepening, the medium-term outlook is bearish.

Catalysts

Sustained social media momentum on Twitter/Telegram
Liquidity pool deepening attracting larger traders
Listing on a centralized exchange
Broader Solana meme season continuation

Bullish factors

1,665% 24h price surge signals strong initial momentum
2,779 new holders acquired in ~24 hours shows rapid community growth
Balanced buy/sell pressure (50/50) suggests genuine two-sided market rather than pure dump
4,887 unique wallets trading in 24h indicates broad participation
Mutable=false reduces some manipulation risk

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity ($93.4K) relative to FDV ($1.02M) — ratio of ~9:1 FDV/liquidity
Token was dormant for ~30 days (74 holders, zero activity) before sudden pump — suspicious pattern
No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Update authority unknown — cannot confirm authority renouncement
Unverified contract with unknown update authority
OHLC candles show extreme intraday swings (e.g., candle [1] range from $0.000014 to $0.000716)
6h and 24h price change reported as 0% conflicts with 24h $change data — possible data feed anomaly

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 4 hourly OHLC candles available with apparent data anomalies (O/H/L ordering inconsistencies), (2) no top holder data available, (3) no sniper data available, (4) the token was dormant for ~30 days before this pump, making historical pattern analysis unreliable, and (5) extreme volatility makes any price target highly speculative.

DOORS call history

Full track record →

Jun 20neutral@ $0.00101

24h—

7d—

30d-99.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 443HdX...pump
Total Supply: 999,999,939.40

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($93.4K) creates high slippage and exit risk
30-day dormancy before pump is a major red flag — possible coordinated pump scheme
No top holder data — concentration risk is a black box
Unknown update authority — cannot confirm rug protection

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available (2026-06-19 22:00 through 2026-06-20 01:00 UTC). NOTE: The OHLC data contains apparent anomalies — in candles [1] and [2], the Low values are higher than the Open values, which is technically impossible (Low should be the session minimum). This suggests either a data feed error or inverted field labeling. Interpreting the data as provided: Candle [4] (22:00): O=$0.0000145, H=$0.0000956, L=$0.0000145, C=$0.0000889 — bullish, strong upward move. Candle [3] (23:00): O=$0.0000862, H=$0.0000862, L=$0.0000655, C=$0.0000145 — bearish reversal, doji-like with close near lows. Candle [2] (00:00): O=$0.0000145, H=$0.0000862, L=$0.000180, C=$0.0000862 — anomalous data. Candle [1] (01:00): O=$0.0000862, H=$0.0000862, L=$0.000716, C=$0.0000145 — anomalous data. The current price of ~$0.00101 is significantly above all candle values shown, suggesting the major pump occurred after these candles or the candle data is lagged/incomplete.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 1,665% 24h price surge, but the available candle data predates the current price level. Medium-term trend is sideways-to-unknown given 30 days of dormancy prior to this event. No sustained trend can be established from 4 candles.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000715 (candle low region)

Major support

$0.000014 (candle session lows — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.001013 (current price level)

Major resistance

$0.001800 (1.78x extension from current)

Support levels are derived from the OHLC session lows in the available candles. The $0.000014 level represents the pre-pump base price. The $0.000715 level appears as a notable low in the candle data. Resistance is estimated from the current price and a 1.78x extension. Given data anomalies in the OHLC feed, these levels should be treated as approximate.

Notable patterns

Extreme volume surge from near-zero to $3M+ in 24h — classic pump pattern
30-day dormancy followed by sudden activation — unusual for organic growth
Candle [4] shows bullish engulfing-like structure (open at low, close near high)
Candle [3] shows bearish reversal (open at high, close near low)
OHLC data anomalies detected (Low > Open in candles [1] and [2]) — possible data feed error
Price at time of analysis ($0.00101) is ~14x above the highest candle close shown — suggests major move occurred outside the 4-candle window

Liquidity

$93,397.63

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at ~$93.4K on PumpSwap (pair FMswbGnnkRbnBuA8p4xhUvLnnN3VY2zvFCyG8GvceJZd), representing only ~9.2% of the $1.02M FDV. This creates extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The 24h trading volume of ~$3.04M is approximately 32.6x the available liquidity — an extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio that indicates the pool is being churned rapidly. Buy/sell pressure is perfectly balanced at 50%/50% ($1.52M each), which is unusual and may suggest wash trading or a market-making bot maintaining equilibrium. There are more unique buyers (4,410) than sellers (3,005), which is mildly bullish on a participant basis, but the equal dollar volumes suggest sellers are transacting in larger average sizes. Any large sell order would face severe slippage given the shallow pool depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,939.40

FDV

$1,013,178.81

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
1,665% price surge in 24 hours with 400% move in a single hour. Extreme intraday volatility with candle swings spanning 5-50x ranges. Mean reversion risk is very high after such a move.
Liquidityhigh
Only $93.4K in liquidity against $1.02M FDV (9.2% ratio). 24h volume is 32.6x the liquidity pool size. Large positions cannot be exited without severe slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($93.4K) creates high slippage and exit risk
30-day dormancy before pump is a major red flag — possible coordinated pump scheme
No top holder data — concentration risk is a black box
Unknown update authority — cannot confirm rug protection
Unverified smart contract
1,665% pump in 24h creates extreme mean-reversion risk
Perfectly balanced 50/50 buy/sell volume may indicate wash trading
All holder growth (97%) occurred in last 24h — no organic baseline

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
PumpFun launchpad origin typically burns mint authority upon graduation
Balanced buyer/seller count (4,410 vs 3,005) shows broad participation
4,887 unique wallets traded in 24h — not a single-wallet pump
Social links present (Telegram, Twitter, website) — some community infrastructure

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple characteristics of a high-risk pump event.

DOORS is a high-risk, early-stage Solana meme token that experienced a viral pump event after 30 days of complete dormancy. The investment case is purely speculative — there is no verifiable utility, the contract is unverified, liquidity is thin, and the dormancy-then-pump pattern raises serious concerns about coordination. The only bullish case rests on momentum continuation and community growth. The bear case — which is historically the most common outcome for tokens with this profile — involves rapid retracement as early holders distribute into the pump.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continuation: The viral narrative ('broken website', 'different dimensions') gains traction on Crypto Twitter and Telegram, driving sustained new buyer inflow. Liquidity deepens as market makers enter, reducing slippage. The token achieves a 2x-5x from current levels ($0.002–$0.005) before finding a new equilibrium.

Sustained social media virality on Twitter/Telegram
Liquidity pool growth attracting larger traders
Broader Solana meme season providing tailwind
Early holders choosing to hold rather than distribute
CEX listing or influencer promotion

Base Case

Volatile consolidation: The token experiences significant volatility over the next 1-2 weeks, with price oscillating between $0.0003 and $0.0015. Some early holders sell, new buyers absorb at lower levels, and the token finds a temporary equilibrium at a fraction of the pump peak. Long-term survival depends on community development that is not yet evident.

Some but not all early holders distribute
New buyer demand partially offsets selling pressure
Liquidity remains at current thin levels
No major catalysts (positive or negative) emerge in the near term
Social community remains loosely active

Bear Case

High probability

Pump-and-dump reversion: Early holders (the 74 dormant wallets) sell into the pump, liquidity is insufficient to absorb selling pressure, and the price retraces 80-95% from current levels within days. The token returns to near-zero activity.

Early holders with near-zero cost basis distributing into pump
Thin liquidity amplifying downward price impact
No fundamental value or utility to support price
Typical meme token lifecycle — pump followed by rapid decline
Wash trading hypothesis: if 50/50 volume is artificial, real demand may be much lower

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 20, 01:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-20 01:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain metadata (mint: 443HdXFos5TKz3RCTXhRaBRoSFccTLmKyVMGnau1pump)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (FMswbGnnkRbnBuA8p4xhUvLnnN3VY2zvFCyG8GvceJZd)
Hourly OHLC candles (4 candles, 2026-06-19T22:00 to 2026-06-20T01:00 UTC)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
Historical holder series (30 days daily)
Holder distribution metrics
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 4 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
OHLC candle data contains apparent anomalies (Low > Open in candles [1] and [2]) suggesting possible data feed errors
Top 20 holder data unavailable — whale concentration cannot be assessed
Sniper data unavailable — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate unknown
Update authority status unknown — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
6h and 24h price change percentages reported as 0% conflict with other price data — possible API inconsistency
Token has only ~24 hours of meaningful trading history — all trend analysis is extremely short-term
Supply concentration shows top10=0% and top100=0% which likely reflects data unavailability rather than actual distribution

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially early-stage meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and third-party APIs which may contain errors or inconsistencies. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SIX DOORS (DOORS) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell SIX DOORS (DOORS)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is SIX DOORS ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,853 addresses (2026-06-20 01:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling SIX DOORS?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is SIX DOORS liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-20 01:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $93,397.63. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for SIX DOORS (DOORS)?

Is DOORS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple characteristics of a high-risk pump event.

What are the key risks of holding DOORS?

Extremely thin liquidity ($93.4K) creates high slippage and exit risk • 30-day dormancy before pump is a major red flag — possible coordinated pump scheme • No top holder data — concentration risk is a black box