UNICEF

UNICEF Price Today & AI Analysis

UNICEFSolanaAnalysis as of May 14, 2026

Price

$0.053736

Contract

Live
3t4GiENDepWKkGicwDoMz2V2fWDZXHLAoJ3ZrpZQpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

268

Market cap

$3,733

More tokens on Solana

MAYMAYMay We All Win This Month$0.052489+0.0%MC $2.5KJimothyJimothyMutant creature Jimothy$0.052308+0.0%MC $2.3KMINEMINEMineSwap$0.052716+0.0%MC $2.5KBULLCALFBULLCALFBULL-CALF$0.044607+51.1%MC $46.1Kleashleashleash$0.052343+0.0%MC $2.3Ke/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.0126+706.8%MC $12.43M

UNICEF: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-14 20:48 UTC

Holder addresses

407

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$21,420.66
How concentrated is UNICEF ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 407 addresses (2026-05-14 20:48 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling UNICEF?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is UNICEF liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-14 20:48 UTC, reported liquidity was $21,420.66. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-14 20:48 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about UNICEF

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 14, 08:48 PM UTC

FDV

$59,490

Liquidity

$21,420.66

Holders

407

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

UNICEF (3t4GiENDepWKkGicwDoMz2V2fWDZXHLAoJ3ZrpZQpump) is an unverified Solana meme/pump token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.9M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$59.5K–$75.1K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 862% 24h price surge, but this is accompanied by severe sell pressure (72.8% of 24h volume), extremely shallow liquidity ($21.4K), and a dramatic collapse in holder count from a peak of ~2,215 to just 407 today — a loss of over 1,800 holders. The token carries very high risk and exhibits multiple red flags consistent with a pump-and-dump lifecycle.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price pump of +862% on PumpSwap, now showing sharp reversal signals (-25.7% in the last hour)
  • Liquidity is critically shallow at only $21.4K, making large trades highly susceptible to slippage
  • Holder count collapsed from ~2,215 peak to 407 current — a loss of ~82% of holders over 30 days
  • Top 10 wallets hold 37.65% of supply; top 100 hold 90.85%, indicating extreme concentration
  • 20 snipers identified at launch; majority of snipers who sold realized profits, suggesting informed early buyers exited

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is already reversing sharply from its pump peak. The 1h price change is -25.7% and the 5m change is -10.3%, indicating momentum has flipped decisively bearish. With 72.8% sell pressure, only $21.4K in liquidity, and 506 sellers vs 236 buyers in 24h, further downside is highly probable in the near term. The OHLC data shows the price peaked around candle [1]'s high of ~$0.0000515 and has since collapsed back toward the $0.0000044–$0.000006 range.

Target low

$0.000003

Target high

$0.000010

Support

$0.0000044 (recent candle low, candles [1]–[3]), $0.0000058 (cluster of lows in candles [9]–[10]), $0.0000060 (multiple closes in candles [11]–[13])

Resistance

$0.0000067 (candle [7] high), $0.0000071 (candle [15] high), $0.0000515 (candle [1] spike high — extreme resistance)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The 30-day holder trend is deeply negative — from ~2,215 holders at peak to 407 today. The token has no verified contract, no described utility, and no on-chain fundamentals to support sustained price appreciation. Unless a new catalyst emerges (community revival, listing, viral attention), the medium-term outlook is continued price decay toward near-zero.

Catalysts

  • Unexpected viral social media attention (Twitter/X)
  • New exchange listing or partnership announcement
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
  • Whale accumulation at depressed prices

Bullish factors

  • Massive 24h price surge (+862%) demonstrates speculative demand can appear rapidly
  • 24h holder count increased +190 (+47%), suggesting new buyers are entering
  • Token is on PumpSwap, which can attract momentum traders
  • Some snipers still holding (not fully exited), reducing immediate sell pressure from that cohort

Bearish factors

  • 72.8% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($104.4K sells vs $38.96K buys)
  • Price already reversing: -25.7% in 1h, -10.3% in 5m
  • Liquidity critically shallow at $21.4K — any moderate sell order will crater price
  • Holder count down ~82% from peak (2,215 → 407 over 30 days)
  • Top 100 wallets hold 90.85% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Unverified contract, no utility description, possible pump-and-dump pattern
  • Multiple snipers with large realized profits (up to +59.4%) have already exited

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of this token (862% 24h move), very thin liquidity making price easily manipulated, missing sniper cost-basis data, and the speculative/meme nature of the asset with no fundamental backing. Price targets are directional estimates only.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
3t4GiE...pump
Total Supply
999,934,586.75

Key Risks

  • Catastrophic liquidity: $21.4K total — a single whale exit could collapse the price
  • Extreme sell pressure: 72.8% of 24h volume is selling; 506 sellers vs 236 buyers
  • Holder count collapsed 82% from peak (2,215 → 407) — mass exodus already occurred
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status — potential rug risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 16 hourly candles reveal a token that traded in a tight range of ~$0.0000044–$0.0000071 for most of the observed period (candles [4]–[16]), then experienced a dramatic spike in candle [1] where the high reached ~$0.0000515 — approximately 10x the prior range. This spike candle has an anomalous structure: Open $0.00000477, High $0.0000515, Low $0.00000436, Close $0.00000436, suggesting a wick-heavy pump-and-dump candle where price was briefly pushed to extreme highs before collapsing back. Volume in candle [1] was $42.4K and candle [2] was $102.9K — the two highest volume candles — confirming the pump event. Prior candles showed very low volume ($13–$499), consistent with a dormant or thinly traded token.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term trend is sharply bearish following the pump spike reversal. The medium-term trend is also bearish, as the token has been making lower lows and lower highs from candle [15] through [4], with the spike in candle [1] appearing to be an exhaustion move rather than a genuine breakout. The current price of ~$0.0000595 (per trading analytics) is above the candle range shown, suggesting the analytics price reflects the spike high while candles show the collapse back.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

27%

Sell

73%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000044 (candle [1]–[3] lows)

Major support

$0.0000058 (candles [9]–[10] cluster)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000067 (candle [7] high)

Major resistance

$0.0000515 (candle [1] spike high)

The immediate support at ~$0.0000044 represents the post-spike low. A break below this level would likely accelerate selling toward the $0.000003 range. The major resistance at $0.0000515 is the spike high and is extremely unlikely to be retested without a new catalyst. The $0.0000067–$0.0000071 zone (candles [7] and [15]) represents intermediate resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump spike candle: extreme upper wick in candle [1] with close near the open — classic exhaustion/rejection
  • Lower highs and lower lows from candles [15] through [4] prior to the spike — pre-pump downtrend
  • Volume climax at pump peak (candles [1]–[2]) followed by volume collapse — distribution pattern
  • Doji-like candles in candles [12]–[13] with identical O/H/L/C — extremely low liquidity/no real price discovery
  • Bear engulfing structure post-spike: candle [1] close well below open after reaching extreme high

Liquidity

Liquidity

$21,420.66

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $21.4K on a single PumpSwap pool (5VFdymuA7T5mS1QQBrvB5KrE5cEBaSKS621h1jVJtvJS). The FDV of $75.1K vs $21.4K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~28.5%, which is low for a micro-cap. Any sell order above ~$2K–$5K would cause significant slippage. The 24h trading data is deeply concerning: sell volume ($104.4K) is 2.68x buy volume ($38.96K), with 506 unique sellers vs only 236 unique buyers. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). The total of 1,532 sell transactions vs 1,000 buy transactions further confirms distribution pressure. This market structure is consistent with a token in active distribution/dump phase following a price pump.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,934,586.75

FDV

$59,489.64

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    862% 24h price surge followed by -25.7% in 1h reversal. Extreme intraday volatility with a spike candle showing 10x price range within a single hour. 5m change already -10.3%.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $21.4K on a single PumpSwap pool. Slippage risk is extreme for any position above a few hundred dollars. Liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~28.5%.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Catastrophic liquidity: $21.4K total — a single whale exit could collapse the price
  • Extreme sell pressure: 72.8% of 24h volume is selling; 506 sellers vs 236 buyers
  • Holder count collapsed 82% from peak (2,215 → 407) — mass exodus already occurred
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status — potential rug risk
  • Pump-and-dump price pattern: 862% spike already reversing sharply (-25.7% in 1h)
  • Top 100 wallets control 90.85% of supply — extreme concentration
  • No utility, no description, no verified team — pure speculative asset
  • Snipers with large unrealized profits may dump remaining holdings

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable:false, reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline trading infrastructure
  • 24h holder count increased +190, showing some new demand during the pump
  • Some snipers are underwater (-8.7% to -34.5%), reducing their incentive to dump immediately
  • FDV is micro-cap ($59.5K), limiting absolute dollar loss exposure for small positions

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in high-risk micro-cap speculation, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have the tools to monitor on-chain activity in real time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with pump-and-dump dynamics on Solana.

UNICEF token is a high-risk micro-cap meme token on Solana's PumpSwap that has experienced a classic pump-and-dump price pattern. The 862% 24h surge is already reversing, liquidity is critically thin, and the 30-day holder trend shows an 82% collapse from peak. There is no identifiable utility, verified team, or fundamental value proposition. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative, with the bear case being the most probable outcome.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A new wave of viral social media attention (Twitter/X) or a broader Solana meme coin rally drives renewed speculative demand. New buyers push holder count above 1,000 and liquidity deepens. The token establishes a higher base above $0.000006 and makes another run toward the spike high.

  • Viral social media catalyst on Twitter/X (token has Twitter link)
  • Broader Solana ecosystem meme coin rally
  • Whale accumulation at depressed post-pump prices
  • Community-driven marketing campaign

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000003–$0.000006 range after the pump fully deflates, with a small residual community of 200–400 holders. Trading volume drops to near zero, and the token enters a prolonged period of price stagnation or slow decay. Occasional small pumps may occur but fail to reach prior highs.

  • Sell pressure gradually exhausts itself as weak hands exit
  • A small core of holders remains committed to the token
  • No new major catalyst emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains thin but does not fully disappear
  • Price finds a floor near the pre-pump range of $0.0000044–$0.000006

Bear Case

High probability

The pump fully reverses as sellers overwhelm thin liquidity. Remaining snipers and early buyers exit, holder count continues declining, and the token returns to near-zero prices. Liquidity is withdrawn from the PumpSwap pool, making the token effectively untradeable.

  • Continued 72.8% sell pressure exhausts buy-side liquidity
  • Sniper profit-taking from remaining unrealized gains
  • Holder count resumes decline after pump-chaser exits
  • Liquidity pool withdrawal by LP providers
  • No fundamental catalyst to sustain price above pump levels

Analysis details

Generated

May 14, 08:48 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-14 20:48 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, supply, authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data (price, volume, liquidity, buy/sell analytics)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (16 candles)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (total holders, acquisition method, distribution tiers)
  • Historical daily holder count series (30 days)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price change intervals)

Limitations

  • Sniper cost basis (total sniped USD) is unknown — PnL percentages are provided but absolute amounts sniped are missing, limiting precise smart money analysis
  • Mint and freeze authority status is unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm if renounced
  • Historical holder data shows suspicious flat periods (1,937 holders for 15 consecutive days April 14–28) that may indicate data gaps or anomalies
  • Current price in trading analytics ($0.0000595) appears to reflect the spike high while OHLC candles show collapse back to $0.0000044 range — price discrepancy may reflect data timing
  • No social sentiment data, team information, or whitepaper available for fundamental analysis
  • FDV discrepancy: metadata shows $59,489 while trading analytics show $75.11K — likely reflects different price snapshots

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is UNICEF ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 407 addresses (2026-05-14 20:48 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling UNICEF?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is UNICEF liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-14 20:48 UTC, reported liquidity was $21,420.66. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for UNICEF (UNICEF)?

The token is already reversing sharply from its pump peak. The 1h price change is -25.7% and the 5m change is -10.3%, indicating momentum has flipped decisively bearish. With 72.8% sell pressure, only $21.4K in liquidity, and 506 sellers vs 236 buyers in 24h, further downside is highly probable in the near term. The OHLC data shows the price peaked around candle [1]'s high of ~$0.0000515 and has since collapsed back toward the $0.0000044–$0.000006 range. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000003 to $0.000010.

Is UNICEF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in high-risk micro-cap speculation, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and have the tools to monitor on-chain activity in real time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with pump-and-dump dynamics on Solana.

What are the key risks of holding UNICEF?

Catastrophic liquidity: $21.4K total — a single whale exit could collapse the price • Extreme sell pressure: 72.8% of 24h volume is selling; 506 sellers vs 236 buyers • Holder count collapsed 82% from peak (2,215 → 407) — mass exodus already occurred

← Back to all predictions

Track UNICEF