ANTI

The Black Bugatti Price Today & AI Analysis

ANTI
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 21, 2026

3Vkgiwv4D7E5HbFsL5NPRkuLfZn7obBdu4qFLzmTpump

$0.052001

FDV $2,001

LiveContract:3Vkgiwv4D7E5HbFsL5NPRkuLfZn7obBdu4qFLzmTpumpChain:SolanaHolders:61Market cap:$2,001

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ANTI

Report snapshotas of Jul 21, 08:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$55,310

Holders

478

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

The Black Bugatti (ANTI) is an extremely new Solana memecoin minted on the pump.fun platform (mint: 3Vkgiwv4D7E5HbFsL5NPRkuLfZn7obBdu4qFLzmTpump). The token has a total formatted supply of 1 (likely 1 with 0 decimals, suggesting a single indivisible unit or a very unusual supply structure), no verified contract, no social links, no description, and a mutable metadata authority listed as 'unknown'. It has experienced an explosive 643.9% price surge in 24 hours, jumping from near zero to $0.000284. The token went from 6 holders for the entire prior 30-day period to 478 holders within the last 24 hours — a near-vertical adoption spike. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $55.31K, and the FDV is only $283.96K. All acquisition has been via swap (478 wallets). The data presents numerous red flags: unknown/mutable authority, no top holder data, no social presence, no verified contract, and a supply structure that is anomalous.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 643.9% 24h price surge on very thin liquidity ($55.31K)
Token had exactly 6 holders for 30 consecutive days before a sudden 99% holder surge in 24h
Total formatted supply of 1 with 0 decimals — highly anomalous tokenomics
No social links, no description, unverified contract, mutable metadata with unknown authority
All 478 holders acquired via swap — zero transfers or airdrops

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already surged 643.9% in 24h and 288.6% in the last hour alone, with a 33.8% spike in the last 5 minutes. This parabolic move on $55.31K liquidity is highly susceptible to a sharp reversal. The OHLC data shows candles in the $0.0000376–$0.0000382 range, far below the current price of $0.000284, suggesting the price feed or candle data may be lagged/inconsistent — itself a red flag. With 1,457 sells vs 1,192 buys in 24h, sell-side pressure is building.

Target low$0.000050
Target high$0.000400
Support: $0.000106 (candle [1] low), $0.0000376 (candle [2]/[3] open/low)
Resistance: $0.000284 (current price / 24h high area), $0.000400 (psychological round level)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token's lack of fundamentals — no description, no socials, unknown authority, anomalous supply, and a 30-day dormancy period before a sudden pump — sustained medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. Most pump.fun tokens with this profile revert to near-zero after the initial hype cycle. The base of only 6 holders for 30 days prior suggests this was a dormant or pre-staged token.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media attention (no evidence currently)
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly unlikely given profile)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all tokens

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h buy volume of $163.85K (52% buy pressure)
  • Rapid holder growth from 6 to 478 in 24h shows viral interest
  • Slightly more unique buyers (528) than sellers (475) in 24h

Bearish factors

  • 643.9% price surge in 24h on only $55.31K liquidity — highly pump-susceptible
  • 1,457 sells vs 1,192 buys in 24h — more sell transactions than buy transactions
  • Token dormant at exactly 6 holders for 30 consecutive days — suggests pre-staged pump
  • No social links, no description, unverified contract, mutable metadata
  • Unknown update authority — metadata can be changed at any time
  • OHLC candle data inconsistent with reported current price — data integrity concern
  • Anomalous total supply of 1 with 0 decimals
  • FDV of only $283.96K with $55.31K liquidity = extremely thin market
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) OHLC candle prices ($0.0000376–$0.0000382) are dramatically inconsistent with the reported current price ($0.000284), suggesting data quality issues; (2) the token's supply structure (total supply = 1, 0 decimals) is anomalous and may indicate data reporting errors; (3) no fundamental data (socials, team, use case) exists to anchor any valuation model; (4) the 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump is a classic manipulation pattern.

ANTI call history

Full track record →
Jul 21bearish
24h-99.4%
7d-99.5%
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available, and they present a significant data integrity concern: all three candles show prices in the $0.0000376–$0.0000382 range, while the reported current price is $0.000284 — approximately 7.5x higher than the candle highs. This discrepancy suggests either a data lag, a price feed mismatch, or a reporting anomaly. Within the available candles: Candle [3] (06:00 UTC) opened and closed at $0.0000376–$0.0000382 with low volume ($12.47K). Candle [2] (07:00 UTC) showed a tight range ($0.0000376–$0.0000376) with higher volume ($206.76K). Candle [1] (08:00 UTC) shows an anomaly where Low ($0.000106) > Open ($0.0000376), which is technically impossible in standard OHLC — this is a data error. Volume is declining from candle [2] to candle [1] ($206.76K → $82.63K).

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 52%Sell 48%

The 24h price change of +643.9% and 1h change of +288.6% confirm a violent short-term uptrend. However, the 6h and 24h percentage changes both show 0% in the analytics section, which contradicts the price change data — another data inconsistency. The medium-term trend (30-day view) was flat/sideways at near-zero price with only 6 holders before today's sudden spike.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000106 (candle [1] anomalous low — treat as approximate)
Major$0.0000376 (candle base / pre-pump level)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000284 (current price / recent high)
Major$0.000400 (psychological level above current price)

Support levels are derived from the available OHLC data, though the candle data inconsistency with current price reduces reliability. The pre-pump base around $0.0000376 represents the major support floor. Current price of $0.000284 acts as both a recent high and immediate resistance. Note: OHLC data quality issues significantly limit technical analysis reliability.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic price spike — 643.9% in 24h on thin liquidity
  • 30-day price dormancy followed by vertical breakout — classic pump pattern
  • OHLC data anomaly: candle [1] Low > Open (impossible in standard OHLC — data error)
  • Volume declining in most recent candles ($206.76K → $82.63K) despite price surge — potential exhaustion signal
  • Near-balanced buy/sell volume (52%/48%) but sell transaction count exceeds buy count (1,457 vs 1,192)

Total holders478
24h Δ+99
7d Δ+99
30d Δ+99
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is perfectly correlated with the price spike — both occurred simultaneously within the last 24 hours. The token had exactly 6 holders for 30 consecutive days (June 21 – July 20, 2026) with zero net change each day. Then, within a single 24-hour window, holders surged from 6 to 478 (+472 holders, +99% growth) coinciding with the 643.9% price pump. This simultaneous explosion in both price and holders is consistent with a viral pump event, whether organic or coordinated.

The historical holder data is stark: exactly 6 holders for every single day from June 21 to July 20, 2026 — 30 days of perfect stasis. This is highly unusual and suggests the token was either dormant, held by a small group of insiders, or not yet publicly known. The sudden +472 holder surge in 24h (reported as +130 in the last hour alone, +27%) shows the growth is accelerating rapidly. The 1-hour data shows +130 new holders, meaning the pace of adoption is still increasing at time of analysis. However, the distribution data shows 0% for all categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) and top10/top100 concentration both at 0% — this is almost certainly a data reporting artifact given the anomalous total supply of 1, and should not be interpreted as genuinely equal distribution.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Data unavailable — top holders list returned empty

0.00%

No top holder data is available from the data source. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data artifact related to the anomalous total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — standard concentration metrics break down when total supply is reported as 1. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' by default given: (1) the token had only 6 holders for 30 days prior to the pump, suggesting extreme early concentration; (2) no top holder breakdown is available to verify current distribution; (3) the 6 original holders likely hold the majority of whatever supply exists. The absence of top holder data is itself a significant risk factor, as it prevents assessment of whale dump risk.

Liquidity$55,310
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$163,850
Sell$151,460
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers528
Unique sellers475

Liquidity is critically shallow at $55.31K on PumpSwap (pair AMGe7dvSNrCfHBErbcwseYYg9WaXTETWepLRSyh8DxHx). The 24h combined trading volume of ~$315.31K represents approximately 5.7x the total liquidity pool — an extremely high turnover ratio indicating severe slippage risk for any meaningful position. A net inflow is indicated (buy volume $163.85K > sell volume $151.46K, difference of ~$12.39K), but the margin is thin. With 528 unique buyers vs 475 unique sellers, buyer count slightly exceeds seller count, but sell transactions (1,457) significantly outnumber buy transactions (1,192), suggesting sellers are executing more frequently or in smaller increments. Any large sell order on $55.31K liquidity would cause catastrophic price impact. The FDV of $283.96K vs $55.31K liquidity means liquidity represents only ~19.5% of FDV — a very low ratio.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals — anomalous; likely a data reporting artifact or intentional unusual structure)
FDV$283.96K

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of ANTI are deeply anomalous. The total formatted supply is reported as 1 with 0 decimals — this is either a data reporting error, or the token was intentionally structured with an unusual supply. Standard pump.fun tokens have 1 billion supply with 6 decimals; a supply of 1 with 0 decimals is highly irregular. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the metadata is marked as 'mutable: true' — meaning whoever controls the update authority can change token metadata at any time, including name, symbol, and URI. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be determined from available data ('unknown'). The contract is unverified. There are no social links and no description. The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authority, unverified contract, and anomalous supply structure creates a HIGH rug risk from authorities. The FDV of $283.96K is extremely low, making this a micro-cap token with all associated risks.

Volatility
high

643.9% price surge in 24h and 288.6% in 1h on $55.31K liquidity. Extreme volatility with no fundamental anchor. A reversal of similar magnitude is plausible.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $55.31K. 24h volume of ~$315K is 5.7x the liquidity pool. Any position above a few hundred dollars faces severe slippage. Exit liquidity is critically limited.

Concentration
high

No top holder data available. Token had only 6 holders for 30 days — those early holders likely control significant supply. Top10/top100 concentration reported as 0% is a data artifact, not genuine distribution. True concentration is likely very high.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data available. The 6 original holders who held for 30 days are the primary dump risk — they are sitting on massive unrealized gains from the 643.9% pump. Their sell behavior cannot be tracked from available data.

Authority
high

Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status unknown. Unverified contract. Token creator can potentially modify metadata, freeze accounts, or mint additional supply. This represents a significant rug pull vector.

Key risks

  • Unknown and mutable update authority — metadata can be changed at any time
  • No top holder data — cannot assess whale dump risk
  • Token dormant for 30 days at 6 holders before sudden pump — classic pre-staged pump pattern
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($55.31K) with 5.7x daily volume turnover
  • Anomalous total supply of 1 with 0 decimals — data integrity or intentional obfuscation
  • No social links, no description, no verified contract — zero accountability
  • OHLC candle data inconsistent with reported current price — data quality concerns
  • Sell transaction count (1,457) exceeds buy transaction count (1,192) despite net buy volume inflow

Mitigating factors

  • Slight net buy volume inflow ($163.85K buys vs $151.46K sells)
  • More unique buyers (528) than unique sellers (475) in 24h
  • All holders acquired via swap — no pre-distribution via transfers/airdrops
  • Rapid holder growth to 478 shows genuine market interest, however short-lived it may be
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand pump.fun memecoin dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits on thin liquidity. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi mechanics. This is NOT an investment — it is a high-risk speculative trade with characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

ANTI (The Black Bugatti) is a high-risk, zero-fundamental memecoin on Solana's pump.fun platform that has experienced a violent 643.9% price pump in 24 hours. The token exhibits multiple characteristics of a coordinated pump: 30 days of dormancy at 6 holders, sudden viral explosion, unknown mutable authority, no social presence, and anomalous tokenomics. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative momentum — there is no underlying utility, team, roadmap, or community to support sustained value.

Bull case (low)

Viral memecoin momentum continues to attract new buyers, driving the holder count well beyond 478 and pushing price toward $0.0005–$0.001 range. The 'Black Bugatti' branding catches on in Solana memecoin communities, generating organic social media attention. Early buyers (the original 6 holders) do not dump, and the token graduates to a larger DEX with deeper liquidity.

  • Continued viral social media spread without any current social presence
  • Early holder restraint from profit-taking despite massive unrealized gains
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • Liquidity deepening via new LP providers

Base case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 40-70% from current levels as initial excitement fades and some early holders take profits. It stabilizes at a lower price with a small community of 200-400 holders but fails to develop any real utility or sustained narrative. Liquidity remains thin and the token slowly fades into obscurity over 1-4 weeks.

  • Some but not all early holders sell into the pump
  • No new major catalysts emerge to sustain momentum
  • Liquidity does not significantly deepen
  • No rug pull or authority exploit occurs

Bear case (high)

The original 6 holders (who held for 30 days and are now massively in profit) begin selling into the thin $55.31K liquidity pool. Price collapses 80-95% within hours. New holders who bought during the pump are left holding near-worthless tokens with no exit liquidity. The token returns to dormancy or is abandoned.

  • Early holder profit-taking on massive unrealized gains
  • Critically shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure
  • No fundamentals to attract sustained buying interest
  • Mutable metadata authority could change token parameters
  • Sell transaction count already exceeding buy transaction count (1,457 vs 1,192)

GeneratedJul 21, 08:17 AM
Data freshnessData appears current as of approximately 2026-07-21T08:00 UTC based on the most recent OHLC candle timestamp. Price data reflects a 5-minute change of +33.8%, suggesting near-real-time feed.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: 3Vkgiwv4D7E5HbFsL5NPRkuLfZn7obBdu4qFLzmTpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data (pair: AMGe7dvSNrCfHBErbcwseYYg9WaXTETWepLRSyh8DxHx)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles available)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data

Limitations

  • OHLC candle prices ($0.0000376–$0.0000382) are dramatically inconsistent with reported current price ($0.000284) — approximately 7.5x discrepancy, suggesting data feed issues
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is anomalous and may indicate a data reporting error, making concentration metrics unreliable (top10/top100 both show 0%)
  • No top holder data available — whale and concentration analysis is severely limited
  • No sniper data available — smart money analysis is limited
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Only 3 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite 643.9% 24h change reported elsewhere — internal data inconsistency
  • Token has no social links, description, or verified contract — fundamental analysis is impossible
  • Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows suspicious uniformity (exactly 6 holders every day)

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The token analyzed exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics including unknown authority, mutable metadata, anomalous tokenomics, and patterns consistent with pump-and-dump schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals — anomalous; likely a data reporting artifact or intentional unusual structure)

Key Risks

Unknown and mutable update authority — metadata can be changed at any time
No top holder data — cannot assess whale dump risk
Token dormant for 30 days at 6 holders before sudden pump — classic pre-staged pump pattern
Critically shallow liquidity ($55.31K) with 5.7x daily volume turnover

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The token's behavior — 30 days of dormancy at 6 holders followed by a sudden viral pump — is consistent with either organic viral discovery or a coordinated pump. The fact that all 478 holders acquired via swap (zero transfers, zero airdrops) suggests no pre-distribution to insiders via transfers, but this does not rule out coordinated buying from multiple wallets.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 6 original holders who held the token for 30 days before the pump are the closest proxy for 'early buyers,' but their current positions and PnL cannot be determined from available data. These early holders are now sitting on massive unrealized gains if they have not sold.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Black Bugatti (ANTI)?

The token has already surged 643.9% in 24h and 288.6% in the last hour alone, with a 33.8% spike in the last 5 minutes. This parabolic move on $55.31K liquidity is highly susceptible to a sharp reversal. The OHLC data shows candles in the $0.0000376–$0.0000382 range, far below the current price of $0.000284, suggesting the price feed or candle data may be lagged/inconsistent — itself a red flag. With 1,457 sells vs 1,192 buys in 24h, sell-side pressure is building. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000400.

Is ANTI a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand pump.fun memecoin dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid exits on thin liquidity. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana DeFi mechanics. This is NOT an investment — it is a high-risk speculative trade with characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are ANTI holders trending?

The Black Bugatti currently has 478 holders and is growing (24h: 99, 7d: 99, 30d: 99). The historical holder data is stark: exactly 6 holders for every single day from June 21 to July 20, 2026 — 30 days of perfect stasis. This is highly unusual and suggests the token was either dormant, held by a small group of insiders, or not yet publicly known. The sudden +472 holder surge in 24h (reported as +130 in the last hour alone, +27%) shows the growth is accelerating rapidly. The 1-hour data shows +130 new holders, meaning the pace of adoption is still increasing at time of analysis. However, the distribution data shows 0% for all categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) and top10/top100 concentration both at 0% — this is almost certainly a data reporting artifact given the anomalous total supply of 1, and should not be interpreted as genuinely equal distribution.

What does sniper activity look like for ANTI?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding ANTI?

Unknown and mutable update authority — metadata can be changed at any time • No top holder data — cannot assess whale dump risk • Token dormant for 30 days at 6 holders before sudden pump — classic pre-staged pump pattern

Track ANTI