TRENCHES

Trenches Tokens Price Today & AI Analysis

TRENCHESSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 18, 2026

Price

$0.052920

+2.52% 24h · FDV $2,918

Contract

Live
3NMQuwg7WGqzqjqwUnR3Ciwo3AoVE39yYQnTqK49pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

320

Market cap

$2,918

More tokens on Solana

NNIKENike Tyson$0.055599+2.1%MC $5.6KDUCKDUCKThe Duck$0.056634-1.2%MC $6.6KButcherButcherThe Demon Dog$0.053095-6.6%MC $3.0KDIVVYDIVVYDivvy$0.053452-4.0%MC $3.4KDiaryDiaryThe Fauci Diary$0.056381+0.2%MC $5.7KPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0211+77.2%MC $20.39M
Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about TRENCHES

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 18, 09:17 PM UTC

FDV

$125,492

Liquidity

$38,961

Holders

749

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

TRENCHES (Trenches Tokens) is a micro-cap Solana token on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$125K–$130K and only ~$39K in liquidity. The token claims to be the in-game currency for 'The Trenches Game.' On-chain data reveals a highly anomalous holder picture: the historical series shows only 6 holders for the entire prior 30-day window, with 743 new holders appearing in the last hour — a pattern consistent with a coordinated launch event or bot activity. Sell pressure dominates heavily (72.4% sell volume vs 27.6% buy volume), and the most recent candle shows a sharp price reversal from a high of $0.000266 down to $0.000130. Top holder data is unavailable, and sniper data is absent. Overall risk is very high.

Key points

  • Extreme holder anomaly: 6 holders for 30 days, then +743 in 1 hour — highly suspicious
  • Dominant sell pressure: 72.4% of 24h volume is sells, with 4,747 sells vs 963 buys
  • Very shallow liquidity: only ~$38.96K total liquidity against $130K FDV
  • Sharp intra-hour price spike and reversal: high of $0.000266, close of $0.000130 in the most recent candle
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown'; contract unverified; top holder data unavailable

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.000211, spiked to $0.000266, then collapsed to close at $0.000130 — a bearish shooting-star/reversal pattern. The 5-minute change is -45.97%, confirming aggressive selling. With 72.4% sell pressure and 4,747 sells vs 963 buys in 24h, the short-term bias is strongly bearish. Immediate support is the candle low of $0.000108; a break below that opens a path toward the prior candle open of $0.0000258.

Target low

$0.000026

Target high

$0.000213

Support

$0.000108 (recent candle low), $0.0000258 (prior candle open/low)

Resistance

$0.000213 (prior candle high / recent open), $0.000266 (all-time high in data)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

With only ~$39K liquidity, an unverified contract, unknown update authority, absent top-holder data, and a 30-day history of just 6 holders before a sudden spike, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Sustained price appreciation would require genuine project development, liquidity deepening, and organic holder growth — none of which are evidenced in the current data.

Catalysts

  • Actual game launch or verifiable development milestone
  • Liquidity pool deepening above $200K
  • Organic holder growth sustained over multiple days
  • Contract verification and authority renouncement

Bullish factors

  • 24h price is up 33.28% from the prior day's close
  • 963 buy transactions in 24h shows some genuine demand
  • 355 unique buyers participated in 24h
  • Token is mutable=false, reducing one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

  • 72.4% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($343.84K sells vs $130.79K buys)
  • 4,747 sells vs 963 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 4.9:1
  • Most recent 5-minute price change: -45.97%
  • Only $38.96K total liquidity — extremely shallow
  • 30-day holder history flat at 6, then +743 in 1 hour — highly anomalous
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Contract unverified; update authority unknown

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top-holder data, unknown update authority, absent sniper data, and highly anomalous holder metrics that make it difficult to assess true distribution or insider activity. The two available OHLC candles provide very limited technical context.

TRENCHES call history

Full track record →

Jun 18bearish
24h-24.9%
7d-68.9%
30d-96.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
3NMQuw...pump
Total Supply
999,999,989.575117

Key Risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 72.4% of volume is sells; sellers outnumber buyers 4.9:1 by transaction count
  • Anomalous holder spike: 6 holders for 30 days, then +743 in 1 hour — possible coordinated manipulation
  • Top holder data unavailable — insider/team concentration cannot be assessed
  • Unknown update authority and unverified contract — rug-pull risk cannot be ruled out

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidenceLow risk

No sniper data is available for TRENCHES. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data is telling: 4,747 sell transactions vs 963 buy transactions in 24h, with 1,576 unique sellers vs 355 unique buyers, suggests that early participants (whoever they are) are aggressively distributing. The anomalous holder spike from 6 to 749 in a single hour, combined with dominant sell pressure, is consistent with coordinated early-holder distribution into retail buyers.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration
0.00%
PnL state
Unknown
Sell-through rate
Unknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Cannot be determined from sniper data (unavailable). Inferred from trading analytics: early participants appear to be distributing heavily given 72.4% sell volume and 4.9:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 2 (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000258, H=$0.000213, L=$0.0000258, C=$0.000212 — a strong bullish candle with a massive range, closing near the high. Candle 1 (21:00 UTC): O=$0.000211, H=$0.000266, L=$0.000108, C=$0.000130 — a bearish shooting-star/reversal candle that opened near the prior close, spiked to a new high of $0.000266, then collapsed to close at $0.000130, well below the open. This two-candle sequence shows a classic pump-and-dump pattern: explosive move up followed by sharp rejection.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend has reversed sharply bearish after the shooting-star candle at 21:00 UTC. Medium-term trend is indeterminate given only two candles of data; classified as sideways pending more history.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

28%

Sell

72%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000108 (candle 1 low)

Major support

$0.0000258 (candle 2 open/low — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000213 (candle 1 open / candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000266 (candle 1 all-time high in dataset)

The pre-pump base at $0.0000258 represents the most significant support level. A failure to hold $0.000108 would likely see price retrace toward that level. Resistance at $0.000213–$0.000266 represents the pump zone and will be difficult to reclaim given current sell pressure.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish reversal candle at 21:00 UTC — opened near high, closed near low
  • Pump-and-dump two-candle sequence: explosive bullish candle followed by bearish reversal
  • Volume declining on reversal (distribution pattern)
  • Price closed below the midpoint of candle 1's range, confirming bearish control

Holder growth

Total holders

749

24h Δ

+743

7d Δ

+743

30d Δ

+743

Accelerating Growth

Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was flat at 6 for the entire 30-day historical window (May 19 – June 17, 2026), then surged by +743 (99% of current holders) within the last hour, coinciding precisely with the price pump. This is a highly anomalous pattern — genuine organic growth does not manifest as 30 days of 6 holders followed by a 124x spike in one hour. This is consistent with a coordinated launch, bot activity, or airdrop/transfer event that inflated holder counts alongside the price pump.

The historical holder data shows an absolute flat line at 6 holders from May 19 through June 17, 2026 — 30 consecutive days of zero change. Then, in the most recent reporting period, 743 new holders appeared simultaneously. This is not organic growth. The acquisition breakdown (740 via swap, 9 via transfer, 0 airdrop) suggests these are real swap transactions, but the timing and volume are suspicious. The supply concentration data shows top10=0% and top100=0%, which is likely a data artifact given the missing top-holder information rather than a genuine reflection of distribution.

Concentration

Top 10 hold

0.00%

Top 100 hold

0.00%

Sentiment

Mixed

Top holder data is explicitly unavailable in the provided dataset. The reported top10=0% and top100=0% concentration figures are almost certainly data artifacts rather than genuine readings, as a token with 749 holders and ~$1B supply cannot have zero concentration in the top 100. Without this data, whale behavior cannot be assessed. The 'very_concentrated' distribution health classification reflects the high uncertainty and the anomalous holder spike pattern, not confirmed data. Investors should treat the absence of top-holder data as a significant red flag — it prevents assessment of insider/team concentration risk.

Notable holders

  • Top holder data unavailable — cannot classifyN/A0.00%

Liquidity

Liquidity

$38,960

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at ~$38.96K against a $130K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of roughly 30%, which is low for a healthy market. Any meaningful position size will incur significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $343.84K in sell volume vs $130.79K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$213K. Sellers outnumber buyers 4.4:1 by unique wallet count (1,576 sellers vs 355 buyers) and 4.9:1 by transaction count (4,747 sells vs 963 buys). The PumpSwap pair (YbUsfAWsGaPiAr4Emnv2sG1V3o8SoWMACyPJZNPYgRT) is the sole liquidity venue, concentrating all exit risk in one pool. Market health is poor.

Flow (24h)

Buy volume

$130,790

Sell volume

$343,840

Net flow

Outflow

Unique buyers

355

Unique sellers

1,576

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,989.575117

FDV

$125,491.71

Mint authority

Active

Freeze authority

Active

Total supply is effectively 1 billion tokens. The FDV is ~$125K–$130K at current prices. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the provided metadata — this is a significant gap. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed mint and freeze authority status, the risk from authorities cannot be properly assessed. The contract is unverified. The token originates from the 'pump' address suffix (3NMQuwg7WGqzqjqwUnR3Ciwo3AoVE39yYQnTqK49pump), consistent with a PumpFun launch. PumpFun tokens typically have mint authority burned at graduation, but this cannot be confirmed from the available data. Investors should verify authority status independently before committing capital.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token moved from $0.0000258 to $0.000266 and back to $0.000130 within two hours — a ~10x range in 120 minutes. The 5-minute change of -45.97% confirms extreme volatility. This level of price action is consistent with a low-liquidity pump-and-dump event.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $38.96K in total liquidity. With 24h sell volume of $343.84K already exceeding liquidity by ~8.8x, the pool is under severe stress. Large exits will cause catastrophic slippage. The single PumpSwap pool concentrates all exit risk.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top holder data is entirely unavailable, making concentration risk unassessable. The 30-day flat holder count of 6 followed by a sudden +743 spike strongly implies that a small number of insiders held all supply before the public launch. True concentration is likely very high.

  • Sniper Dumphigh

    No sniper data is available. However, the trading pattern — 4,747 sells vs 963 buys, 1,576 sellers vs 355 buyers, and dominant sell volume — is consistent with early holders (potential snipers or insiders) distributing into the pump. The risk of continued dumping is high.

  • Authorityhigh

    Update authority is listed as 'unknown.' Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The contract is unverified. These unknowns represent meaningful rug-pull vectors that cannot be ruled out.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 72.4% of volume is sells; sellers outnumber buyers 4.9:1 by transaction count
  • Anomalous holder spike: 6 holders for 30 days, then +743 in 1 hour — possible coordinated manipulation
  • Top holder data unavailable — insider/team concentration cannot be assessed
  • Unknown update authority and unverified contract — rug-pull risk cannot be ruled out
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($38.96K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) — no alternative exit routes
  • Sharp price reversal (-45.97% in 5 minutes) after pump — distribution pattern

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
  • 355 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market interest
  • PumpFun-origin tokens typically have mint authority burned at graduation (unconfirmed here)
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist — project has some public presence
  • 24h price is up 33.28% from prior day despite sell pressure

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap PumpFun tokens and can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with on-chain Solana trading. The combination of unknown authorities, missing holder data, anomalous holder metrics, and dominant sell pressure makes this one of the highest-risk profiles possible.

TRENCHES presents as a high-risk micro-cap PumpFun token with a claimed gaming utility narrative. The on-chain data reveals a deeply concerning picture: 30 days of dormancy with only 6 holders, followed by a sudden pump and +743 holder spike in one hour, combined with overwhelming sell pressure (72.4% of volume). The investment thesis is speculative at best and consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump at worst. Any bull case depends entirely on unverifiable claims about a game that has no on-chain evidence of development.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The Trenches Game is a legitimate project that launches successfully, driving genuine demand for TRENCHES as an in-game currency. The initial pump attracts attention, liquidity deepens, and the holder base grows organically over weeks.

  • Verifiable game launch with active player base
  • Liquidity deepening beyond $200K
  • Contract verification and authority renouncement
  • Sustained organic holder growth over multiple days
  • Broader Solana gaming sector momentum

Base Case

The token stabilizes at a significantly lower price than the pump peak as sell pressure exhausts itself, but fails to attract sustained organic demand without verifiable game development. Price drifts lower over weeks as liquidity slowly exits.

  • Some genuine buyers remain after the initial pump
  • No catastrophic rug-pull event (authorities not exercised maliciously)
  • Game development is real but slow, providing no near-term catalyst
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping price volatile and unpredictable

Bear Case

High probability

The token follows the classic PumpFun pump-and-dump trajectory: insiders/early holders dump into the retail pump, liquidity drains, and the price retraces to near-zero. The 'game' narrative is never substantiated on-chain.

  • Already -45.97% in 5 minutes post-pump peak
  • 72.4% sell pressure with 4,747 sell transactions
  • Only $38.96K liquidity to absorb continued selling
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden activity is a classic insider-launch pattern
  • Top holder data unavailable — cannot rule out extreme insider concentration

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 18, 09:17 PM UTC

Data freshness

Data reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-06-18T21:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers May 19 – June 17, 2026 (30 days).

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: 3NMQuwg7WGqzqjqwUnR3Ciwo3AoVE39yYQnTqK49pump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (YbUsfAWsGaPiAr4Emnv2sG1V3o8SoWMACyPJZNPYgRT)
  • Hourly OHLC candles (2 candles, 2026-06-18T20:00–21:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily, May 19 – June 17, 2026)
  • Holder distribution metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • Top holder data (top 20) is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully evaluated
  • Mint and freeze authority status are unconfirmed
  • The anomalous holder spike (+743 in 1 hour after 30 days of 6) may reflect data lag or indexing issues rather than actual on-chain events — cannot be confirmed
  • Supply concentration showing top10=0% and top100=0% is likely a data artifact
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Token description and social links are creator-supplied and unverified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Trenches Tokens (TRENCHES)?

The most recent hourly candle (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.000211, spiked to $0.000266, then collapsed to close at $0.000130 — a bearish shooting-star/reversal pattern. The 5-minute change is -45.97%, confirming aggressive selling. With 72.4% sell pressure and 4,747 sells vs 963 buys in 24h, the short-term bias is strongly bearish. Immediate support is the candle low of $0.000108; a break below that opens a path toward the prior candle open of $0.0000258. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000026 to $0.000213.

Is TRENCHES a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap PumpFun tokens and can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with on-chain Solana trading. The combination of unknown authorities, missing holder data, anomalous holder metrics, and dominant sell pressure makes this one of the highest-risk profiles possible.

How are TRENCHES holders trending?

Trenches Tokens currently has 749 holders and is growing (24h: 743, 7d: 743, 30d: 743). The historical holder data shows an absolute flat line at 6 holders from May 19 through June 17, 2026 — 30 consecutive days of zero change. Then, in the most recent reporting period, 743 new holders appeared simultaneously. This is not organic growth. The acquisition breakdown (740 via swap, 9 via transfer, 0 airdrop) suggests these are real swap transactions, but the timing and volume are suspicious. The supply concentration data shows top10=0% and top100=0%, which is likely a data artifact given the missing top-holder information rather than a genuine reflection of distribution.

What does sniper activity look like for TRENCHES?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding TRENCHES?

Extreme sell pressure: 72.4% of volume is sells; sellers outnumber buyers 4.9:1 by transaction count • Anomalous holder spike: 6 holders for 30 days, then +743 in 1 hour — possible coordinated manipulation • Top holder data unavailable — insider/team concentration cannot be assessed

← Back to all predictions

Track TRENCHES