#animaltwt Price Today & AI Analysis

animaltwtSolanaAnalysis as of May 2, 2026

$0.0₅4778

Contract

Live

2etbhsr85QZEbVvpXeTtvvSuCeMt8FkX3dkYN4fqpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

185

Market cap

$4,776

At a $1M market cap, $ANIMALTWT would be $0.001000 (209x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is animaltwt a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 13% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

13%3 bundlers, 3 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about animaltwt

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MSRMARKET SOFT RUG$0.0₅1489+0.0%MC $1.5K

moomoomoomoo$0.0₅2184+0.0%MC $2.2K

SOLDIKINSSOLdiers Kintara$0.0₅2599+0.0%MC $2.6K

ANTIMATTERantimatter-tax party$0.0₅2473+0.0%MC $2.5K

APMAll Paws Matter$0.0₅4540+0.0%MC $4.5K

ZECZcash$1,230.88-5.1%MC $126.40M

#animaltwt: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-02 17:17 UTC

Holder addresses

641

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$27,634.21

How concentrated is #animaltwt ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 641 addresses (2026-05-02 17:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling #animaltwt?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is #animaltwt liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-02 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $27,634.21. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-02 17:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 2, 05:17 PM UTC

FDV

$406,236

Liquidity

$27,634.21

Holders

641

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

#animaltwt (animaltwt) is an ultra-low-cap Solana memecoin launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.97M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$406K at current prices. The token has experienced an extraordinary 24h price surge of ~13,099% — from ~$0.000004 to ~$0.000406 — driven by a sudden spike in trading activity beginning around 07:00 UTC on May 2, 2026. Despite the explosive price action, the token exhibits severe structural weaknesses: only $27.63K in total liquidity, 78% sell pressure, a holder base that grew from ~51 to 641 in under 24 hours, and no verified contract or renounced authorities. This is a high-risk, speculative memecoin with characteristics consistent with a pump event.

Key points

Extraordinary 13,099% 24h price surge from near-zero baseline
Holder base grew 92% in 24h (from ~54 to 641), almost entirely via swaps
Extremely thin liquidity of only $27.63K on PumpSwap
78% sell pressure vs 22% buy pressure in 24h — heavy distribution underway
No sniper data available; authority status unknown

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped ~13,099% in 24h and is showing 78% sell pressure with $314K in sell volume vs $88.75K in buy volume. With only $27.63K in liquidity, any sustained selling will cause rapid price collapse. The hourly candles show extreme volatility with the price oscillating between two tight levels (~$0.00000478 and ~$0.00000719) in recent hours before the spike, then a massive move. Short-term outlook is bearish as profit-taking dominates.

Target low

$0.000050

Target high

$0.000600

Support: $0.000031 (candle [10] low), $0.000007 (pre-pump consolidation level), $0.000004 (pre-pump baseline)
Resistance: $0.000406 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.000359 (candle [1] low — likely a data anomaly or wick high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without a sustained community, utility, or narrative catalyst, memecoins that pump 13,000%+ in a single day almost universally retrace 80–99% within days to weeks. The thin liquidity, high sell pressure, and lack of verified contract make a sustained rally unlikely. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a major social catalyst emerges.

Catalysts

Viral social media campaign around #animaltwt Twitter narrative
Listing on a centralized exchange (very unlikely at this stage)
Broader Solana memecoin market rally
Whale accumulation reversing current distribution trend

Bullish factors

Explosive momentum: 13,099% 24h gain with 1,112 buys and 348 unique buyers
Holder count surged from ~51 to 641 in 24h — rapid community formation
5m price change still +9.6% and 1h +61.4% suggesting momentum not fully exhausted
PumpSwap listing provides accessible entry for retail

Bearish factors

78% sell pressure ($314.2K sells vs $88.75K buys) — heavy distribution
Only $27.63K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position
Holder base grew almost entirely in last 24h — no established community
No verified contract, unknown mint/freeze authority — rug risk present
Historical holder count was declining from 67 to 51 over the prior 30 days before the pump
Fully diluted valuation of $406K is extremely small — any whale exit is catastrophic

Confidence: low. Price prediction confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (13,099% 24h move), extremely thin liquidity ($27.63K), absence of sniper data, unknown authority status, and the inherently unpredictable nature of memecoin pump events. The OHLC data shows anomalous candle structures (L values larger than O/H in candles [1]–[11]) suggesting possible data feed irregularities.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 2etbhs...pump
Total Supply: 999,974,741.164222

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity risk: $27.63K liquidity cannot support the current $406K FDV — any significant selling will collapse the price
78% sell pressure with 901 sellers vs 348 buyers — distribution is overwhelming demand
Pump-driven holder growth: 92% of holders joined in the last 24h, creating a fragile community with no loyalty
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 21 hourly candles reveal two distinct phases. Phase 1 (candles [21]–[13], May 1 20:00–May 2 05:00 UTC): extremely low volume ($67–$841 per candle) with price ranging tightly between ~$0.00000246 and ~$0.00000553 — essentially dormant. Phase 2 (candles [12]–[1], May 2 06:00–17:00 UTC): a dramatic volume and price explosion. Candle [12] (06:00) shows the first sign of life with volume jumping to $42.94. By candle [11] (07:00), volume hits $4,564 and price reaches $0.00000719. From candle [10] onward, volume surges to $12K–$78K per hour and the price oscillates between two levels (~$0.00000478 and ~$0.00000719) in a tight range while the LOW values in the data (which appear to represent the range extremes including wicks) expand dramatically — reaching $0.000359 in candle [1]. NOTE: The OHLC data appears to have L (low) values that are LARGER than O/H/C values in candles [1]–[11], which is anomalous and may indicate the L field represents the session high/wick rather than the true low, or a data feed issue. Analysis is adjusted accordingly.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short and medium-term trend is technically uptrend given the 13,099% 24h gain, but this is a parabolic pump rather than an organic uptrend. The price action is consistent with a pump-and-dump pattern rather than sustainable trend development. The oscillating O/C values between $0.00000478 and $0.00000719 in recent hours suggest the market is in a tight consolidation at elevated levels while distribution occurs.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

22%

Sell

78%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000031 (candle [10] low-range level, ~$0.0000317)

Major support

$0.000007 (pre-pump consolidation ceiling, now potential support)

Immediate resistance

$0.000406 (current price, 24h high zone)

Major resistance

$0.000600 (psychological round number above current price)

The pre-pump price of ~$0.00000478–$0.00000719 represents the baseline and would be the ultimate support if the pump fully reverses. The current price of ~$0.000406 is the immediate resistance zone. Given the anomalous OHLC data (L > H in multiple candles), precise support/resistance derivation is limited.

Notable patterns

Parabolic pump pattern: near-zero volume for 10+ hours followed by explosive volume surge
Potential distribution pattern: price oscillating in tight range ($0.00000478–$0.00000719) while volume surges — consistent with large holders selling into retail demand
Declining volume on most recent candles (peak $78K at 15:00, declining to $27K at 17:00) — bearish divergence
No higher highs in O/C values despite massive volume — price capped suggesting supply overhang
Anomalous OHLC data: L values exceed H values in candles [1]–[11], suggesting possible data feed error or inverted field labeling

Liquidity

$27,634.21

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at only $27.63K on PumpSwap — this is the sole trading venue. With a fully diluted valuation of ~$406K and only $27.63K in liquidity, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 6.8%, which is extremely low. Any position larger than a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h trading data reveals a deeply unhealthy market: 901 unique sellers vs 348 unique buyers (2.6:1 ratio), $314.2K in sell volume vs $88.75K in buy volume (78% sell pressure), and 2,708 sell transactions vs 1,112 buy transactions. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow of ~$225.45K net). Despite the massive price pump, the market structure shows more participants are exiting than entering, which is a major red flag for sustainability.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,974,741.164222

FDV

$406,236.45

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
13,099% 24h price change with extreme hourly swings. The token moved from ~$0.000004 to ~$0.000406 in hours. Such volatility implies equal potential for catastrophic downside.
Liquidityhigh
Only $27.63K in total liquidity on a single DEX (PumpSwap). Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~6.8%. Any meaningful sell order will cause severe price impact and slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme liquidity risk: $27.63K liquidity cannot support the current $406K FDV — any significant selling will collapse the price
78% sell pressure with 901 sellers vs 348 buyers — distribution is overwhelming demand
Pump-driven holder growth: 92% of holders joined in the last 24h, creating a fragile community with no loyalty
Unknown mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
No verified contract, no audit, no documented tokenomics
Historical holder count was declining before the pump — no organic community base
Single DEX listing on PumpSwap with no CEX presence

Mitigating factors

Token metadata marked as 'mutable: false' — reduces metadata manipulation risk
Not flagged as possible spam by data provider
Rapid holder growth (641 holders) shows some market interest
PumpSwap listing provides transparent on-chain trading
FDV of $406K is small enough that a genuine narrative could sustain it

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every characteristic of a high-risk pump event: parabolic price action, thin liquidity, heavy sell pressure, unknown authorities, and no verified fundamentals. Not suitable for conservative, moderate, or even most aggressive investors. Maximum position sizing should be treated as a lottery ticket.

#animaltwt is a pure speculative memecoin play with no verifiable fundamentals, utility, or established community. The investment thesis is entirely momentum and narrative-driven. The token pumped 13,099% in 24h on PumpSwap, attracting 641 holders almost entirely in the last day. The overwhelming sell pressure (78%), thin liquidity ($27.63K), and unknown authority status make this an extremely high-risk proposition. Any thesis must account for the near-certainty of significant retracement.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The #animaltwt Twitter narrative goes viral, attracting a sustained wave of new buyers. The community organically grows beyond the pump, liquidity deepens, and the token establishes itself as a recognizable Solana memecoin brand. Price stabilizes and builds a new base above $0.0001.

Viral Twitter/social media campaign around the #animaltwt hashtag
Influencer or KOL endorsement driving sustained retail inflows
Broader Solana memecoin season attracting capital to small-cap tokens
Whale accumulation reversing the current distribution trend
Liquidity deepening through additional LP provision

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 60–85% from peak, settling in the $0.00005–$0.00015 range as the initial pump fades but a small residual community remains. Trading volume drops sharply, liquidity thins further, and the token enters a slow bleed phase similar to most PumpSwap memecoins.

Buying demand partially absorbs selling pressure, preventing a full collapse to pre-pump levels
A small subset of the 641 new holders become long-term community members
No major negative catalyst (rug, authority exploit) occurs
Broader Solana market conditions remain neutral

Bear Case

High probability

The pump exhausts buying demand within hours. Sellers overwhelm the thin $27.63K liquidity pool, causing a rapid 90–99% price collapse back toward the pre-pump baseline of ~$0.000004–$0.000007. Most of the 641 FOMO buyers are left holding losses.

78% sell pressure already dominant — distribution is in progress
Only $27.63K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
No verified fundamentals, utility, or established community to sustain demand
Pre-pump holder base (54 holders) sitting on massive gains with strong incentive to exit
Historical holder decline before pump suggests no organic community foundation
Unknown authority status creates additional exit pressure from risk-aware participants

Analysis details

Generated

May 2, 05:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-02 17:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: 2etbhsr85QZEbVvpXeTtvvSuCeMt8FkX3dkYN4fqpump)
PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data (Pair: BsVq2Ujoa4USZYBYNXHFfSCC8zkZJixD1zsmpBFsCvFV)
Hourly OHLC candle data (21 candles, USD-denominated)
24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
Holder metrics and distribution data (641 total holders)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
30-day historical holder series (daily)
Sniper analysis data (not available for this token)

Limitations

No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk cannot be precisely quantified
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
OHLC candle data appears anomalous (L values exceed H values in candles [1]–[11]), suggesting possible data feed issues or inverted field labeling — technical analysis is adjusted but may be imprecise
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement status
No social media engagement metrics available despite Twitter link in metadata
Single DEX listing limits price discovery and liquidity assessment
30-day holder history only goes back to April 2, 2026 — token history before this date is unavailable
FDV discrepancy: metadata shows $406,236.45 but trading analytics shows $139.03K — likely reflects different price snapshots; analysis uses the most recent price-derived FDV

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is #animaltwt (animaltwt) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 13% of the supply. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell #animaltwt (animaltwt)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is #animaltwt ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 641 addresses (2026-05-02 17:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling #animaltwt?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is #animaltwt liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-02 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $27,634.21. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for #animaltwt (animaltwt)?

Is animaltwt a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every characteristic of a high-risk pump event: parabolic price action, thin liquidity, heavy sell pressure, unknown authorities, and no verified fundamentals. Not suitable for conservative, moderate, or even most aggressive investors. Maximum position sizing should be treated as a lottery ticket.

What are the key risks of holding animaltwt?

Extreme liquidity risk: $27.63K liquidity cannot support the current $406K FDV — any significant selling will collapse the price • 78% sell pressure with 901 sellers vs 348 buyers — distribution is overwhelming demand • Pump-driven holder growth: 92% of holders joined in the last 24h, creating a fragile community with no loyalty