GAMEFUND

GameFund Price Today & AI Analysis

GAMEFUNDSolanaAnalysis as of May 24, 2026

Price

$0.053104

+4.84% 24h · FDV $3,089

Contract

Live
2ETdRmbeW39Q3Z8RX6NfinYZyDPayKCuVvpqXrmjpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

219

Market cap

$3,089

More tokens on Solana

TEPETEPETroll Pepe$0.053857+8.2%MC $3.8KPEEKOPEEKOPeeko The Meerkat$0.052861+16.6%MC $2.8KMultipadMultipadMultipad.fun$0.052788+8.0%MC $2.8KShuppetShuppetShuppet$0.052243+14.5%MC $2.2KDaemonDaemonDaemon$0.057804-0.4%MC $7.8KSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.3161-4.3%MC $260.36M

GameFund: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-24 23:17 UTC

Holder addresses

779

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is GameFund ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 779 addresses (2026-05-24 23:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling GameFund?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GameFund liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-24 23:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about GAMEFUND

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 24, 11:17 PM UTC

FDV

$97,437

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

779

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GameFund (GAMEFUND) is a newly launched Solana memecoin/utility token on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$97,437. The token experienced a dramatic 322% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by a sudden influx of 728 new holders in a single day after weeks of complete stagnation at 51 holders. Trading activity is heavily sell-dominated (68.3% sell pressure), liquidity is reported at $0, and the token is unverified. The data presents a highly speculative, high-risk profile with several red flags including zero reported liquidity, extreme sell pressure, and a sniper cohort that is largely in profit and actively distributing.

Key points

  • 322% 24h price spike from near-zero base, suggesting coordinated pump activity
  • 728 new holders acquired in a single day after 30+ days of complete stagnation at 51 holders
  • Zero reported on-chain liquidity despite active trading volume (~$293K combined 24h)
  • 68.3% sell pressure with 2,883 sells vs 1,224 buys in 24h
  • 20 identified snipers, majority in significant profit (several >200% realized PnL), indicating early buyer distribution risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) shows a sharp rejection from a high of $0.0001997 down to a close of $0.0000973, a ~51% intra-candle drop. The 5-minute price change is -34.18%, confirming aggressive selling momentum. With 68.3% sell pressure, zero liquidity depth, and snipers actively taking profits, the short-term outlook is bearish. The token is likely in a post-pump distribution phase.

Target low

$0.000020

Target high

$0.000140

Support

$0.000097 (current close / recent low area), $0.000020 (candle [2] absolute low)

Resistance

$0.000140 (candle [2] high / candle [1] open area), $0.000200 (candle [1] all-time high within window)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the token spent 30+ days completely dormant at 51 holders before a sudden pump, and now faces heavy sell pressure from snipers with realized PnLs of 95%–464%, sustained price appreciation is unlikely without genuine utility adoption or new catalysts. The medium-term outlook is bearish unless the project demonstrates real game developer partnerships or exchange listings.

Catalysts

  • Verified contract or audit publication
  • CEX listing announcement
  • Demonstrated game developer partnerships
  • Liquidity pool deepening above $50K

Bullish factors

  • 322% 24h price appreciation demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • 429 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine interest
  • Token is mutable=false, reducing certain manipulation vectors
  • Social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis) provides some legitimacy signal

Bearish factors

  • 68.3% sell pressure (2,883 sells vs 1,224 buys)
  • Zero reported liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful trade
  • Snipers with 95%–464% realized PnL are actively distributing
  • 30+ days of complete dormancy before sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • 5-minute price already down -34.18% from recent peak
  • Unverified contract, update authority unknown
  • Top holder concentration data unavailable — opacity risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (2) zero reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (3) highly anomalous holder data (728 holders added in one day after 30 days of zero growth) suggesting possible data anomaly or coordinated activity, and (4) missing sniper entry cost data preventing precise PnL modeling.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2ETdRm...pump
Total Supply
999,999,999.999999 (1 billion tokens)

Key Risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — extreme exit risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Snipers actively distributing at 95%–464% profit into retail buyers
  • 30 days of complete dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000338, H=$0.0001498, L=$0.0000200, C=$0.0001279 — a strong bullish candle with a large lower wick, indicating a volatile pump from extreme lows with buyers stepping in. Volume: $139,244. Candle [1] (23:00 UTC): O=$0.0001382, H=$0.0001997, L=$0.0000962, C=$0.0000973 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. Price opened near candle [2]'s close, pushed to a new high of $0.0001997, then collapsed to close near the low at $0.0000973, a ~51% intra-candle reversal. Volume: $128,682. This two-candle sequence is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: explosive upward move followed by sharp rejection at the high.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend has reversed to downtrend after the shooting star/bearish engulfing candle [1] rejected at $0.0001997. Medium-term is effectively sideways given 30+ days of dormancy prior to this event. The 5-minute change of -34.18% confirms the downtrend is accelerating.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

32%

Sell

68%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000097 (candle [1] close and near-low)

Major support

$0.000020 (candle [2] absolute low — extreme downside if support fails)

Immediate resistance

$0.000140 (candle [1] open / candle [2] high area)

Major resistance

$0.000200 (candle [1] all-time high within the observed window)

The $0.000097 level is critical near-term support — it represents both the current price and the candle [1] close. A break below this opens a path to $0.000020. Resistance at $0.000140 aligns with the prior candle's high and candle [1]'s open. The $0.000200 level is the session high and would require significant new buying to reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1]: price rejected sharply from $0.0001997 high back to $0.0000973 close — strong reversal signal
  • Pump-and-dump two-candle sequence: explosive bullish candle followed by immediate bearish reversal
  • Large lower wick on candle [2] suggests initial capitulation buyers, but follow-through failed
  • Volume declining on the down-close candle suggests distribution rather than panic selling

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,999.999999 (1 billion tokens)

FDV

$97,436.67

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    322% 24h price spike followed by -34.18% in 5 minutes. Only 2 hourly candles show a ~51% intra-candle reversal. Extreme volatility makes position sizing nearly impossible.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — extreme exit risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Snipers actively distributing at 95%–464% profit into retail buyers
  • 30 days of complete dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status
  • Top holder concentration data entirely unavailable — opacity risk
  • 68.3% sell pressure with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.5:1
  • Anomalous holder growth (728 in one day) may indicate coordinated/artificial activity
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($97K) and trading analytics ($0) suggests data/liquidity issues

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable=false, reducing certain on-chain manipulation vectors
  • Social presence exists (Twitter, website, Moralis) — not a completely anonymous project
  • 429 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market interest
  • Not flagged as possible spam by the data provider
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline discoverability

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap PumpSwap tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid entry/exit execution. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin dynamics. Position sizes should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

GameFund (GAMEFUND) is a high-risk, speculative micro-cap token that has experienced a classic pump event. The token sat dormant for 30+ days before a sudden 322% price spike accompanied by 728 new holders and $293K in 24h volume. However, the overwhelming majority of trading activity is sell-side, snipers are actively distributing at large profits, and liquidity is reported at zero. The investment case is almost entirely speculative momentum trading with no fundamental support visible in the current data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the GameFund project delivers on its stated mission of connecting game developers with early-stage funding/awareness, and if the pump attracts genuine community attention leading to a CEX listing or partnership announcement, the token could sustain elevated prices and grow its holder base organically.

  • Verified partnership with a known game developer or gaming platform
  • CEX listing (even Tier 3) providing liquidity and legitimacy
  • Liquidity pool deepening above $100K reducing slippage risk
  • Community-driven marketing sustaining holder growth beyond the initial pump

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 50–70% from its pump high as sniper selling pressure subsides. A small community of ~500–800 holders remains, with occasional trading activity. The token trades in a low-liquidity range between $0.000040–$0.000100 without a clear catalyst for the next move.

  • Sniper selling pressure exhausts within 24–72 hours
  • A small core community forms around the gaming narrative
  • Liquidity pool is established at a modest level ($10K–$50K)
  • No major negative events (rug pull, authority exploit) occur

Bear Case

High probability

The pump was coordinated by early snipers and insiders who have now largely exited. Retail buyers who entered during the 322% spike are left holding a depreciating asset with no liquidity to exit. Price returns to pre-pump levels (~$0.000020–$0.000034) or lower as sell pressure continues.

  • Continued sniper distribution into thin liquidity
  • Zero liquidity pool making large exits impossible without catastrophic price impact
  • No fundamental utility demonstrated — pure speculative momentum
  • Historical pattern of 30-day dormancy suggests no organic development activity
  • Sell pressure at 68.3% with sellers outnumbering buyers 2.5:1

Analysis details

Generated

May 24, 11:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-24 23:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, supply, authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap pair data (Amn3FHJNpVBcqMUbSa6C9Fsyo1JVSz9Tdk9yAJ6dz345)
  • Moralis trading analytics API (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 wallets)
  • Price feed (USD and WSOL native)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data feed lag or genuine absence of LP
  • Top 20 holder list unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper entry cost (sniped USD) unknown for all 20 wallets — precise PnL calculation impossible
  • Top 10/100 concentration reported as 0% — almost certainly a data gap
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status all unknown
  • Holder growth anomaly (728 in one day after 30-day stagnation) may reflect data artifact
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($97,437) and trading analytics ($0.00) unresolved
  • No order book depth data available to assess true liquidity

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly micro-cap tokens on decentralized exchanges, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data presented reflects a snapshot in time and market conditions can change rapidly. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is GameFund ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 779 addresses (2026-05-24 23:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling GameFund?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is GameFund liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for GameFund (GAMEFUND)?

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) shows a sharp rejection from a high of $0.0001997 down to a close of $0.0000973, a ~51% intra-candle drop. The 5-minute price change is -34.18%, confirming aggressive selling momentum. With 68.3% sell pressure, zero liquidity depth, and snipers actively taking profits, the short-term outlook is bearish. The token is likely in a post-pump distribution phase. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000020 to $0.000140.

Is GAMEFUND a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap PumpSwap tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid entry/exit execution. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin dynamics. Position sizes should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding GAMEFUND?

Zero reported liquidity — extreme exit risk and price manipulation vulnerability • Snipers actively distributing at 95%–464% profit into retail buyers • 30 days of complete dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump signature

← Back to all predictions

Track GAMEFUND