SENDING

SENDING Price Today & AI Analysis

SENDING SolanaAnalysis as of Sep 20, 2026

Price

$0.042755

-39.04% 24h · FDV $26,827

Contract

Live
24G6fv23pPg3UTKAAA4dnC7UBe9SgEoj8HXscHJRpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

933

Market cap

$26,827

More tokens on Solana

KMNOKMNOKamino$0.0277-1.8%MC $276.50MCYPHCYPHCypherpunk Technologies - Backpack Securities$5.09+36.0%MC $608.5KXCryptoXCryptoXCrypto$0.044478-3.0%MC $42.7KMEMEMANMEMEMANMEMEMAN$0.000191+309.8%MC $190.6KLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG$0.000289+481.8%MC $288.9KNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA$0.042359+275.8%MC $2.36M

SENDING : holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-20 10:45 UTC

Holder addresses

933

Top 10 supply share

16.45%

Reported liquidity

$7,749.00
How concentrated is SENDING ownership?
As of 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.45% of supply. It reports 933 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling SENDING ?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $579,816.00 in buys and $576,469.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is SENDING liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +339.71%, from $2,487.20 (2026-09-20 02:00 UTC) to $10,936.47 (2026-09-20 10:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 02:00 UTC$2,487.20
2026-09-20 03:00 UTC$27,921.15
2026-09-20 04:00 UTC$23,588.45
2026-09-20 05:00 UTC$23,736.73
2026-09-20 06:00 UTC$23,167.73
2026-09-20 07:00 UTC$17,249.46
2026-09-20 08:00 UTC$12,023.36
2026-09-20 09:00 UTC$12,912.23
2026-09-20 10:00 UTC$10,936.47

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about SENDING

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 20, 10:46 AM UTC

FDV

$26,827

Liquidity

$7,749.00

Holders

933

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

SENDING is a newly-launched, extremely small-cap ($26.8K FDV) Solana meme token trading on a single PumpSwap pair with only $7.75K in liquidity. Recent hourly candle data shows a violent parabolic spike (~100x within one hour) immediately followed by an ~89% collapse, with the token currently down -39% over 24h and -43% in just the last hour. Key risk-relevant data -- mint/freeze authority, sniper wallet activity, holder history, and top-100 concentration -- are all unavailable, meaning this analysis rests on a thin evidentiary base and unresolved unknowns should be treated as risk, not comfort.

Key points

  • Extreme, confirmed pump-and-dump candle pattern within a 9-hour window rather than steady price action
  • Liquidity ($7.75K) is drastically smaller than 24h trading volume (>$1.15M combined), implying severe slippage risk
  • Multiple critical due-diligence data points (authorities, snipers, holder history, top-100 concentration) are entirely unavailable, not merely low-risk
  • Only top-10 holder concentration (16.45%) is measurable, and even that lacks historical context

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-6 hours

bearish

Price is in a steep, high-volatility downtrend after a parabolic spike-and-dump. The small +5.6% 5m move could indicate an attempted dead-cat bounce, but with volume collapsing (down to ~$4.8K in the latest candle from a peak of ~$789K) and shallow liquidity ($7.75K), any bounce is likely to be fragile and quickly reversed absent fresh buying interest.

Target low

$0.0000180

Target high

$0.0000450

Support

$0.0000247 (candle 9 low), $0.0000309 (candle 8 low)

Resistance

$0.0000390 (candle 9 high), $0.0000552 (candle 7 high), $0.0000922 (candle 6 high)

Medium term · 1-3 days

bearish

Without sustained new buy volume and given the extremely thin liquidity base, the token is likely to continue drifting lower or trade in a highly volatile, low-liquidity range. A recovery toward earlier spike levels ($0.0001+) would require a significant renewed catalyst (e.g., viral social attention) that is not evident in the current data.

Catalysts

  • Potential renewed social/twitter-driven speculative interest (only social link is twitter, no evidence of current activity provided)
  • Further liquidity additions or removals on the single PumpSwap pool
  • Continued high-frequency buy/sell churn (13,248 buys vs 9,993 sells in 24h) that could either stabilize or further destabilize price

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%), and buyer count (4,223) exceeds seller count (3,779), showing some persistent buy-side interest despite the crash
  • A small +5.5% 5m price uptick suggests possible short-term stabilization or bounce attempt
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 16.45% is not unusually high for this token category, reducing (but not eliminating) single-wallet dump risk

Bearish factors

  • Price down -39.0% in 24h and -43.4% in the last 1h alone, indicating strong ongoing bearish momentum
  • Volume has collapsed from a peak of ~$789K to under $5K per hour, showing fading market interest after the initial spike
  • Liquidity is extremely shallow at $7.75K versus over $1.15M in 24h combined volume, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Classic pump-and-dump candle pattern: instant ~100x wick spike followed by sustained lower highs/lower lows over subsequent hours
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown -- cannot rule out further supply dilution or account freezes

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the available OHLC window is only 9 hourly candles capturing a single extreme pump-and-dump event, there is no sniper, holder-history, or authority data to corroborate directional conviction, and liquidity is razor-thin, making the price highly susceptible to sharp non-fundamental swings that defy short-term technical projection.

SENDING call history

Full track record →

Sep 20bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
24G6fv...pump
Total Supply
973,709,626.66 SENDING

Key Risks

  • Extreme volatility with a -39% 24h decline and -43% in the most recent hour following a parabolic spike-and-dump pattern
  • Very shallow liquidity ($7.75K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and pool-manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or wallet freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing key visibility into early-buyer behavior and potential coordinated dumping

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Stable

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

unknown

Major support

unknown

Immediate resistance

unknown

Major resistance

unknown

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Liquidity

Liquidity

$7,749.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity is only $7.75K against a 24h traded volume exceeding $1.15M combined (buy+sell), implying a liquidity turnover ratio above 140x -- an extremely thin pool relative to trading activity. This mismatch means large orders will incur severe slippage and the pool can be moved dramatically by relatively small trades, consistent with the observed intra-hour price swings of over 90% in the OHLC data. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.1% vs 49.9%), and buyer/seller counts are similar (4,223 vs 3,779), suggesting no strong one-sided directional flow at the aggregate 24h level, even though the price has cratered -39% over the same 24h window -- indicating the decline happened in sharp early bursts rather than sustained one-sided selling throughout the day. Slippage risk is high given the shallow $7.75K liquidity depth on a single PumpSwap pair.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

973,709,626.66 SENDING

FDV

$26.83K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from a sub-$0.0000032 open to a $0.000328 intra-hour high (roughly 100x) and then collapsed ~89% from that peak within a handful of hours, with the most recent hour alone down -43.4%. This is extreme, casino-like volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $7.75K on a single PumpSwap pair against over $1.15M in 24h combined trading volume, meaning even modest trades can cause significant price impact and slippage; the pool could also be pulled with little warning.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 concentration (16.45%) is available; top-100 concentration, wallet labels, and any historical distribution/accumulation data are missing, so true concentration risk (e.g., insider or team wallets beyond the top 10) cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme volatility with a -39% 24h decline and -43% in the most recent hour following a parabolic spike-and-dump pattern
  • Very shallow liquidity ($7.75K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and pool-manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or wallet freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing key visibility into early-buyer behavior and potential coordinated dumping
  • FDV (~$26.8K) is a very small micro-cap, typical of speculative pump.fun-style tokens with high failure rates
  • Contract verification and spam status are both unknown, adding further due-diligence uncertainty

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration (16.45%) is not extremely elevated on its face, though this cannot be fully contextualized without top-100 or historical data
  • 24h buyer count (4,223) modestly exceeds seller count (3,779) and buy/sell volume is roughly balanced, suggesting some continued organic trading interest rather than pure one-sided exit

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for conservative or risk-averse investors given the confirmed extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history).

SENDING is a micro-cap pump.fun-style Solana token (~$26.8K FDV) that has already experienced a violent ~100x spike followed by an ~89% collapse within hours, and is currently down -39% on the day with shallow liquidity of only $7.75K. Critical due-diligence data -- mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet behavior, top-100 concentration, and holder history -- are all unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative position rather than an evidence-backed investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If renewed social/speculative attention (the token's only listed social presence is a single twitter link) drives a fresh wave of buying, the extremely thin liquidity could allow for another rapid upward price spike, and the roughly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.1%/49.9%) with more buyers (4,223) than sellers (3,779) suggests some persistent demand even after the crash.

  • A viral social media moment reigniting speculative buying
  • Thin liquidity amplifying any renewed buy pressure into fast price appreciation
  • Continued high buyer count relative to sellers in 24h data

Base Case

Absent a strong new catalyst, SENDING most likely continues to trade in a highly volatile, low-liquidity range near current depressed levels ($0.0000180-$0.0000450), with sporadic sharp moves in either direction driven by the small pool size rather than fundamental developments, and a gradual bleed of participant interest typical of pump.fun-style tokens post-spike.

  • No major new liquidity injections or social catalysts materialize in the near term
  • Trading activity continues to be dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders
  • Existing top-10 concentration (16.45%) does not shift dramatically, though this cannot be fully verified without top-100/historical data

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues its post-spike downtrend as the initial hype fades, volume keeps collapsing (already down from ~$789K to under $5K per hour), and thin liquidity combined with unknown authority permissions leaves the token vulnerable to further sharp declines or a total loss of tradability.

  • Established lower-highs/lower-lows pattern across the last 6+ candles
  • Volume collapse signaling fading market interest post-pump
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status raising possibility of dilution or frozen accounts
  • Shallow $7.75K liquidity pool vulnerable to withdrawal or further destabilization

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 20, 10:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-20 10:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m price change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (9 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot only: holder count, top-10 supply share)

Limitations

  • No mint or freeze authority verification data available -- rug/dilution risk from authorities is genuinely unknown
  • No sniper wallet data available at all -- early buyer/sniper behavior cannot be assessed
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) or wallet classification data -- holder trend and whale accumulation/distribution claims cannot be substantiated
  • Top-100 holder concentration not provided -- only top-10 (16.45%) is known
  • Only 9 hourly candles were provided, limiting the technical analysis window to a single volatile event rather than a broader price history
  • Contract verification and spam-flag status are unknown, limiting confidence in the token's legitimacy assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, possibly incomplete on-chain and market data that may not reflect the full picture of the token's risk profile. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap and newly-launched tokens, carry a high risk of total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is SENDING ownership?

As of 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.45% of supply. It reports 933 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling SENDING ?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $579,816.00 in buys and $576,469.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is SENDING liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +339.71%, from $2,487.20 (2026-09-20 02:00 UTC) to $10,936.47 (2026-09-20 10:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for SENDING (SENDING )?

Price is in a steep, high-volatility downtrend after a parabolic spike-and-dump. The small +5.6% 5m move could indicate an attempted dead-cat bounce, but with volume collapsing (down to ~$4.8K in the latest candle from a peak of ~$789K) and shallow liquidity ($7.75K), any bounce is likely to be fragile and quickly reversed absent fresh buying interest. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.0000180 to $0.0000450.

Is SENDING a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 92/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for conservative or risk-averse investors given the confirmed extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history).

What are the key risks of holding SENDING ?

Extreme volatility with a -39% 24h decline and -43% in the most recent hour following a parabolic spike-and-dump pattern • Very shallow liquidity ($7.75K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and pool-manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or wallet freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track SENDING