fefer Price Today & AI Analysis

feferSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 23, 2026

$0.0₅3079

+0.24% 24h

Contract

Live

13Uhk4Fk3WUeVjx96cWPLqQ4RLAFVkiW5cKqc5TAAiNw

Chain

Solana

Holders

265

Market cap

$2,961

At a $1M market cap, $FEFER would be $0.001040 (338x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is fefer a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 21

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

1.1%1 bundler, 2 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about fefer

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

LOBOThe Black Maned Wolf$0.0₅3344+1.5%MC $3.3K

ewonewon mesk$0.0₅7177-0.6%MC $7.2K

YEPYEP$0.0₅4408+1.1%MC $4.4K

ShikokuShikoku Dog$0.0₅2697+1.1%MC $2.7K

PKMN50PKMN 50 $0.0₅3286+2.4%MC $3.2K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.0275+300.4%MC $27.43M

fefer: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-23 08:19 UTC

Holder addresses

414

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$41,069.03

How concentrated is fefer ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 414 addresses (2026-07-23 08:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling fefer?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is fefer liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-23 08:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $41,069.03. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-23 08:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 23, 08:19 AM UTC

FDV

$106,914

Liquidity

$41,069.03

Holders

414

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

fefer (FEFER) is an extremely new, micro-cap Solana token launched on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$103K. The token has experienced a dramatic 241% price surge in 24 hours, but is characterized by extreme supply concentration — a single wallet holds 99.94% of all tokens — making it one of the most concentrated and highest-risk tokens observable. Holder growth is almost entirely a product of the last 24 hours, with the token sitting dormant at 8 holders for over a month before a sudden activation. The token has no verified contract, no description, and unknown update authority.

Key points

Extreme supply concentration: top holder controls 99.94% of total supply (~999.2M of ~999.9M tokens)
Token was dormant for 30+ days with only 8 holders before sudden activation on 2026-07-22
241% price surge in 24h with 71.4% sell pressure dominating buy pressure
Only 2 unique holders in top 20 — effectively a 2-wallet token
No sniper data available; no verified contract; no social links or description

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has pumped 241% in 24h and 97.5% in the last hour alone, driven by speculative momentum. However, sell pressure dominates at 71.4% of volume ($79.77K sells vs $31.91K buys), and the single whale holding 99.94% of supply represents an existential dump risk at any moment. The price is likely to retrace sharply unless sustained buy pressure emerges.

Target low

$0.000028

Target high

$0.000137

Support: $0.000047 (candle [3] open/low), $0.000028 (candle [4] low)
Resistance: $0.000137 (candle [1] high — 24h peak), $0.000108 (candle [1] close / current price)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without a fundamental catalyst, community, or utility, and given the extreme concentration of supply in one wallet, medium-term price action is expected to be bearish. The token's history of 30+ days of dormancy followed by a sudden pump is a classic pattern for coordinated pump-and-dump schemes. If the top holder begins distributing, price collapse is likely.

Catalysts

Top holder (99.94%) beginning to sell would cause immediate price collapse
Sustained retail buying could temporarily extend the pump
Any social media or influencer attention could drive short-term volatility
Lack of utility or project fundamentals limits organic demand

Bullish factors

Strong 24h price momentum (+241%)
Rapid holder growth from 8 to 414 in ~24 hours (+406 holders)
Active trading with 754 unique wallets in 24h
Price up 97.5% in the last hour suggesting continued momentum

Bearish factors

Single wallet holds 99.94% of supply — extreme dump risk
71.4% sell pressure ($79.77K sells vs $31.91K buys)
Token dormant for 30+ days before sudden activation — classic pump setup
No verified contract, no description, no social links
Shallow liquidity ($41.07K total) amplifies slippage risk
Only 2 holders in top 20 — no organic distribution

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme supply concentration in a single wallet (99.94%), the token's very short active trading history (effectively 1–2 days), the absence of verified contract, project description, or social links, and the dominance of sell pressure. Price action is almost entirely speculative and subject to single-actor manipulation.

fefer call history

Full track record →

Jul 23bearish@ $0.000107

24h-66.3%

7d-83.6%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 13Uhk4...AiNw
Total Supply: 999,876,055.108276

Key Risks

Single wallet holds 99.94% of supply — catastrophic dump risk at any moment
Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden activation — classic pump-and-dump pattern
No verified contract, no project description, no social links — zero transparency
Shallow liquidity ($41.07K) means price is easily manipulated in both directions

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Four hourly candles show a strong upward impulse from a low of $0.0000282 (candle [4] low) to a high of $0.0001366 (candle [1] high), representing a ~4.8x move in 4 hours. Candle [4] (05:00): bullish engulfing-style candle, open $0.0000326, close $0.0000470, with a lower wick to $0.0000282 suggesting initial accumulation. Candle [3] (06:00): narrow-range doji-like candle, open and low both $0.0000475, close $0.0000498 — consolidation. Candle [2] (07:00): breakout candle, open $0.0000488, close $0.0000674, high $0.0000753 — momentum building. Candle [1] (08:00): explosive candle, open $0.0000673, high $0.0001366, close $0.0001078 — long upper wick relative to close suggests distribution/selling into the pump at the highs. Volume peaked in candle [4] ($27.9K) and candle [1] ($14.7K), with lower volume in the middle candles.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is sharply upward over the last 4 hours with higher highs and higher lows across all candles. Medium-term context is sideways/undefined given the token was dormant for 30+ days. The long upper wick on the most recent candle is a warning sign of potential reversal.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

29%

Sell

71%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000067 (candle [2] open / candle [1] open)

Major support

$0.000028 (candle [4] absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000108 (candle [1] close / current price)

Major resistance

$0.000137 (candle [1] all-time high wick)

Immediate support sits at ~$0.000067 (the base of the most recent explosive candle). Major support is the candle [4] low of $0.0000282. Immediate resistance is the current price area around $0.000108. Major resistance is the candle [1] wick high of $0.0001366, which was rejected and represents the 24h peak.

Notable patterns

Higher highs and higher lows across all 4 candles — short-term uptrend
Long upper wick on candle [1] — bearish shooting star / distribution signal
Narrow doji-like candle [3] — consolidation before breakout
Volume declining on price advance — bearish divergence
Explosive gap-up open on candle [1] relative to candle [2] close

Liquidity

$41,069.03

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $41.07K on PumpSwap pair EzXEcQDVGag2fVKyToFGJ1NHLNM88irmq2dUaEfEEJCF. With a FDV of ~$103K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 40% — while this ratio appears reasonable, the absolute dollar amount is tiny and any significant sell order would cause massive slippage. Sell volume ($79.77K) is 2.5x buy volume ($31.91K), with 686 unique sellers vs 353 unique buyers — a clear net outflow. The 24h buy/sell ratio of 882 buys to 1,514 sells confirms persistent selling pressure. Despite the price being up 241%, the volume dynamics show more participants are exiting than entering, which is a bearish divergence. The shallow liquidity means the price pump was achieved with relatively small capital, and a reversal could be equally swift.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,876,055.108276

FDV

$106,913.90

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price has moved +241% in 24h and +97.5% in 1h. Extreme volatility with a 4.8x range in 4 hours. Long upper wick on the most recent candle signals potential sharp reversal.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $41.07K on a single PumpSwap pool. Any significant sell order will cause severe slippage. The shallow pool cannot absorb meaningful selling from the 99.94% whale.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Single wallet holds 99.94% of supply — catastrophic dump risk at any moment
Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden activation — classic pump-and-dump pattern
No verified contract, no project description, no social links — zero transparency
Shallow liquidity ($41.07K) means price is easily manipulated in both directions
71.4% sell pressure with 2:1 sellers to buyers ratio despite price being up 241%
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation
Only 2 wallets in top 20 holders — no organic distribution

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false suggests metadata cannot be altered
Rapid holder growth to 414 suggests some organic retail interest
Token is trading on PumpSwap with an active market pair
FDV is small (~$103K) limiting absolute dollar loss exposure for small positions

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration, dormancy-then-pump pattern, and lack of transparency make this a very high-risk speculative instrument.

fefer is a micro-cap Solana meme token with no stated utility, no verified contract, and extreme supply concentration in a single wallet (99.94%). The token exhibits a classic dormancy-then-pump pattern, having sat at 8 holders for 30+ days before a sudden price explosion of 241% in 24 hours. While short-term momentum traders may find opportunity in the volatility, the structural risks are severe and the probability of a sharp reversal or complete collapse is high.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative momentum drives further price appreciation as retail FOMO accelerates holder growth beyond 414. The dominant wallet holder does not sell, and the token gains social media traction, pushing FDV toward $500K–$1M range.

Sustained retail buying momentum and social media virality
Dominant wallet holder refraining from selling
Broader Solana meme coin market in risk-on mode
Rapid holder growth continuing to attract attention

Base Case

The token experiences continued high volatility with the price retracing 50–70% from current levels as sell pressure continues to dominate. The dominant wallet does not immediately dump but gradually reduces position, causing a slow bleed. Holder count stabilizes or declines as early buyers exit.

Dominant wallet sells gradually rather than in one transaction
Retail interest fades as momentum slows
No major catalyst emerges to sustain buying pressure
Liquidity remains shallow, amplifying price swings

Bear Case

High probability

The dominant wallet (99.94% of supply) begins distributing tokens into the current price pump. Given the shallow $41.07K liquidity pool, even a small fraction of their holdings being sold would collapse the price by 80–99%. Most retail buyers would be left holding near-worthless tokens.

Single wallet dump of even 1% of their holdings (~10M tokens) would overwhelm liquidity
71.4% sell pressure already dominating despite the price pump
No fundamental value, utility, or community to support price floor
Classic pump-and-dump pattern with 30-day dormancy preceding activation

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 23, 08:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-23 08:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair EzXEcQDVGag2fVKyToFGJ1NHLNM88irmq2dUaEfEEJCF)
Hourly OHLC candle data (4 candles)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Top 20 holder distribution data
Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

No sniper data available — smart money analysis is limited to observable on-chain patterns
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — tokenomic risk cannot be fully assessed
Only 4 hourly candles available — technical analysis is based on very limited price history
Token has no verified contract, description, or social links — fundamental analysis is not possible
Top holder classification is inferred (not confirmed) — the 99.94% wallet could be a DEX pool, burn address, or creator wallet
6h and 24h price change shown as 0% in analytics data despite clear price movement — possible data artifact
FDV figures show slight discrepancy between metadata ($106,913.90) and analytics ($102,910) — minor data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst and platform bear no responsibility for investment decisions made based on this report. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before investing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is fefer a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell fefer?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is fefer ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 414 addresses (2026-07-23 08:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling fefer?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is fefer liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-23 08:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $41,069.03. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for fefer (fefer)?

Is fefer a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The extreme supply concentration, dormancy-then-pump pattern, and lack of transparency make this a very high-risk speculative instrument.

What are the key risks of holding fefer?

Single wallet holds 99.94% of supply — catastrophic dump risk at any moment • Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden activation — classic pump-and-dump pattern • No verified contract, no project description, no social links — zero transparency