Tuition

Tuition Price Today & AI Analysis

TuitionSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

Price

$0.053018

-94.91% 24h

Contract

Live
12Ww66ef3dXzqVfRZW3bSRsdhMfcVEhh93F7Hnfupump

Chain

Solana

Holders

34

Market cap

$3,000

More tokens on Solana

CODECCODECCodec Flow$0.0127-0.4%MC $12.73MTROLLTROLLTROLL$0.0471-4.1%MC $47.03MPODPODorcapod.fun$0.000245+5619.5%MC $237.7Kai/maxxiai/maxxiai/maxxi$0.000171+96.3%MC $164.8K$1$1Trumpcoin$0.002185+3587.5%MC $2.17Me/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.008889+103.9%MC $8.74M

Tuition: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-28 12:46 UTC

Holder addresses

34

Top 10 supply share

5.90%

Reported liquidity

$2,822.00
How concentrated is Tuition ownership?
As of 2026-09-28 12:46 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 5.90% of supply. It reports 34 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Tuition?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 12:46 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $288,848.00 in buys and $295,640.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Tuition liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -92.61%, from $38,214.12 (2026-09-27 15:00 UTC) to $2,822.80 (2026-09-28 04:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 12:46 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 15:00 UTC$38,214.12
2026-09-27 16:00 UTC$58,409.13
2026-09-27 17:00 UTC$2,824.53
2026-09-27 18:00 UTC$2,822.55
2026-09-27 23:00 UTC$2,822.59
2026-09-28 04:00 UTC$2,822.80

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about Tuition

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 12:48 PM UTC

FDV

$3,000

Liquidity

$2,822.00

Holders

34

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Tuition ($TUITION) is a Solana pump.fun-launched token on PumpSwap with an extremely small footprint: $2.82K total liquidity, $3.00K fully diluted valuation, and only 34 holder addresses. The price collapsed 94.9% in the past 24h, with the OHLC candles showing a violent spike (from ~$0.0000588 to a high of ~$0.0014) followed by an immediate crash to ~$0.000003 that has been flatlined for roughly 18 consecutive hourly candles with mostly zero volume. This pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump / rug-style price action rather than organic price discovery. Despite the flatlined price, trading analytics show meaningful recent 24h buy ($288.85K) and sell ($295.64K) volume with roughly balanced buy/sell pressure (49.4%/50.6%), which is inconsistent with the near-zero-volume candles at the tail end of the OHLC series — this discrepancy should be treated as a data-freshness/aggregation caveat rather than resolved evidence of renewed activity.

Key points

  • Token markets itself as directing pump.fun creator fees to student loan servicers and funding a buy-and-burn 'Scholarship Pool' — an unverifiable, creator-supplied narrative that should be treated as marketing claim, not fact
  • Extremely low FDV (~$3.00K) and liquidity (~$2.82K) place this firmly in micro-cap/high-risk territory
  • Only 34 holder addresses recorded, an unusually thin holder base for a token with meaningful reported 24h volume
  • Price action shows a classic pump-then-collapse candle sequence with a subsequent complete stall (zero-volume candles) for ~18 hours

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-72 hours

bearish

Price has crashed 94.9% from its intraday high and has been pinned at approximately $0.0000030 for roughly 18 consecutive hourly candles with mostly zero volume, indicating the market has essentially stopped trading at meaningful size. With only $2.82K total liquidity, any renewed buying or selling could produce outsized percentage moves in either direction due to thin order books.

Target low

$0.0000015

Target high

$0.0000045

Support

$0.00000302 (flatline level, candles 4-22), $0.00000268 (intraday low of candle 3)

Resistance

$0.00000302-0.0000035 (immediate, current flatline zone), $0.0013-0.0014 (prior spike high, likely unreachable near-term)

Medium term · 1-4 weeks

neutral

Given the negligible liquidity ($2.82K) and FDV ($3.00K), sustained price recovery would require fresh capital inflows and holder growth from a base of just 34 addresses. The token's stated fee-recycling/burn mechanism could theoretically provide some support if functioning as described, but this cannot be verified from on-chain data provided.

Catalysts

  • Verification (or debunking) of the claimed creator-fee-to-loan-servicer and buy-and-burn mechanism
  • Any renewed volume/holder growth off the current thin base
  • Continued inactivity or liquidity withdrawal, which would likely cement the down-move

Confidence: low. The OHLC series shows the token effectively dead (zero volume) for the majority of the most recent 22 hourly candles, yet the trading analytics block reports substantial 24h buy/sell volume ($288.85K/$295.64K) — these two data sources are inconsistent, and no explanation for the discrepancy is available. Combined with an extremely small liquidity pool and holder base, any forward price view carries low confidence.

Tuition call history

Full track record →

Sep 28bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
12Ww66...pump
Total Supply
994,009,173.74

Key Risks

  • 94.9% price crash in 24h with price now flatlined near zero and near-zero trading volume for ~18 consecutive hours
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($2.82K) creates high slippage and high vulnerability to further price collapse or pool withdrawal
  • Only 34 holder addresses recorded — a very thin, easily-manipulated holder base for a token with claimed six-figure 24h volume
  • Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status all unknown — cannot rule out further supply dilution or freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22 hourly candles show an initial low base (~$0.0000588) that exploded upward through candle 2 (high $0.00132) and candle 3 (high $0.00141) — a rapid, likely unsustainable pump — before crashing intraday in candle 3 to a low of $0.00000268 and closing near $0.00000302. From candle 4 onward (18 consecutive hours), price is completely flat at ~$0.0000030185 with volume at or near zero for most candles (a few negligible exceptions: 1.9, 0.03, 0.22 volume units), indicating the market has gone essentially dormant after the crash.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term trend is a sharp downtrend following the spike-and-crash, now flatlined at the bottom. Medium-term (across the full 22-candle window) the trend is a large net decline from the pump high, with no recovery attempt visible in the data provided.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00000302 (current flatline / 18-hour floor)

Major support

$0.00000268 (candle 3 intraday low)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000035-0.0000045 (marginal zone above flatline)

Major resistance

$0.00132-0.00141 (candle 2-3 spike highs)

The token is trading near its all-time low within this dataset, with the only visible support being the current flatline price itself and the slightly lower intraday wick from the crash candle. Major resistance sits nearly 400-450x above current price at the spike highs, which appear to have been a brief, likely manipulated or unsustainable pump unlikely to be revisited without a fundamental change in liquidity/demand.

Notable patterns

  • Vertical pump candle (candle 2) followed immediately by a blow-off top and crash (candle 3) — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Long lower wick on candle 3 (high $0.00141 to low $0.00000268) indicating a sharp intraday reversal
  • Extended flatline/doji sequence (candles 4-22) with near-zero volume, indicating dormant trading or illiquid market freeze

Liquidity

Liquidity

$2,822.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only $2.82K against a reported 24h buy volume of $288.85K and sell volume of $295.64K implies liquidity has turned over roughly 100x+ in a day, which is an extreme ratio typically associated with either very high organic churn on a thin pool or data reporting from a period before the pool collapsed. Sell volume slightly exceeds buy volume ($295.64K vs $288.85K), producing a mild net outflow. With only $2.82K in the pool, any trade of a few hundred dollars can move price dramatically, which aligns with the observed 94.9% price crash. Slippage risk is high and liquidity depth is shallow by any reasonable threshold for a tradable asset. The unique buyer (2,696) and seller (2,371) counts are notably larger than the 34-address holder snapshot, suggesting most participants are not net holders — consistent with rapid in-and-out trading rather than accumulation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

994,009,173.74

FDV

$3,000

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from ~$0.0000588 to a spike high of ~$0.0014 and then crashed to ~$0.000003, a 94.9% 24h decline, with volume subsequently collapsing to near-zero for 18 straight hours — extreme realized volatility followed by an apparent trading freeze.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $2.82K, categorized as shallow. Reported 24h trading volumes (~$288.85K buy / $295.64K sell) vastly exceed the liquidity pool size, meaning large or even moderate trades could cause severe slippage and price impact.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control 5.90% of supply per the current snapshot, but with only 34 total holder addresses, meaningful concentration analysis (e.g., top-100, whale wallet classification, historical accumulation/distribution) is not possible. Treat concentration risk as unknown rather than low, since the underlying evidence base (holder history, wallet labels) is missing.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • 94.9% price crash in 24h with price now flatlined near zero and near-zero trading volume for ~18 consecutive hours
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($2.82K) creates high slippage and high vulnerability to further price collapse or pool withdrawal
  • Only 34 holder addresses recorded — a very thin, easily-manipulated holder base for a token with claimed six-figure 24h volume
  • Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status all unknown — cannot rule out further supply dilution or freezing
  • No sniper-wallet data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a textbook pump-and-dump candle pattern
  • Unverifiable creator narrative (loan-servicer fee redirection, buy-and-burn) that is a marketing claim, not confirmed on-chain functionality
  • Discrepancy between near-zero-volume OHLC candles and much larger reported 24h analytics volume suggests possible data staleness or inconsistency that undermines confidence in any single data source

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration is numerically low (5.90%) per the available snapshot, though this is undermined by the very small total holder count
  • Reported 24h buy and sell volumes are roughly balanced (49.4%/50.6%), showing no overwhelming one-sided dumping in that aggregate window

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. This token exhibits multiple hallmark warning signs of a failed or manipulated micro-cap launch (extreme price collapse, dormant trading, tiny liquidity, thin holder base, unknown authority status) and is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retail investors seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to tolerate a total loss of invested funds.

Tuition ($TUITION) presents as a distressed, likely-failed pump.fun micro-cap token. The available data shows a classic pump-and-dump candle signature (a rapid multi-hundred-percent spike followed by a 94.9%+ crash) and subsequent 18-hour trading freeze, combined with a razor-thin $2.82K liquidity pool, $3.00K FDV, and only 34 recorded holder addresses. While the project markets an interesting narrative around redirecting pump.fun creator fees to student loan servicers and a buy-and-burn scholarship mechanism, none of this can be verified from the on-chain data provided, and key risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper wallets, holder history) are entirely missing. Any investment thesis here is speculative and should be treated with extreme caution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the claimed fee-redirection and buy-and-burn mechanism is genuine and becomes verifiable, and if trading activity resumes off the current dormant base with new liquidity added, the token could stage a recovery from its current near-zero price, especially given the very low FDV base ($3.00K) makes percentage moves easy to generate.

  • Verification of the creator-fee redirection/burn mechanism attracting mission-driven or narrative-driven buyers
  • Fresh liquidity injection reducing slippage and volatility
  • Any renewed organic volume growth from the current 34-holder base

Base Case

The token remains a high-risk, illiquid micro-cap that continues to see sporadic, low-conviction trading around its current depressed price level, with periodic volatility spikes driven by the thin order book rather than fundamental developments.

  • No major liquidity events (additions or removals) occur in the near term
  • No independent verification of the fee-redirection/burn mechanism emerges
  • Holder base remains small and volume stays inconsistent with the pre-crash spike

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues to trade at or near its current flatlined bottom with negligible volume, liquidity is eventually withdrawn entirely, and the token becomes effectively untradeable/worthless, consistent with a completed pump-and-dump cycle.

  • 94.9% price collapse already realized with no recovery signs across 18 hours of data
  • Shallow $2.82K liquidity vulnerable to further withdrawal
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further dilution or manipulation
  • Extremely small holder base (34 addresses) with no evidence of organic community growth

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 12:48 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 12:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price snapshot and 24h % change
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (22 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, buy/sell pressure)
  • Sniper analysis (none available)
  • Holder aggregates (Codex current snapshot: holder count, top-10 supply share)

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing any assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available; only a single current snapshot of 34 holder addresses and top-10 concentration was provided
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown; no on-chain authority data was supplied
  • There is an unresolved inconsistency between the near-zero-volume tail of the OHLC candle series (18 hours of ~0 volume) and the much larger 24h buy/sell volumes reported in the trading analytics block — this could not be reconciled with the data provided
  • Top-100 holder concentration could not be computed since total holder count (34) is below 100
  • The project's descriptive claims (fee redirection to loan servicers, buy-and-burn mechanism) are creator-supplied marketing text and are not verified by any on-chain mechanism data in this dataset

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from a limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data snapshot with significant data gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority status). Cryptocurrency and micro-cap token trading carries substantial risk of total capital loss. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Tuition ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 12:46 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 5.90% of supply. It reports 34 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Tuition?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 12:46 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $288,848.00 in buys and $295,640.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Tuition liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -92.61%, from $38,214.12 (2026-09-27 15:00 UTC) to $2,822.80 (2026-09-28 04:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Tuition (Tuition)?

Price has crashed 94.9% from its intraday high and has been pinned at approximately $0.0000030 for roughly 18 consecutive hourly candles with mostly zero volume, indicating the market has essentially stopped trading at meaningful size. With only $2.82K total liquidity, any renewed buying or selling could produce outsized percentage moves in either direction due to thin order books. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000015 to $0.0000045.

Is Tuition a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 92/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. This token exhibits multiple hallmark warning signs of a failed or manipulated micro-cap launch (extreme price collapse, dormant trading, tiny liquidity, thin holder base, unknown authority status) and is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retail investors seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to tolerate a total loss of invested funds.

What are the key risks of holding Tuition?

94.9% price crash in 24h with price now flatlined near zero and near-zero trading volume for ~18 consecutive hours • Extremely shallow liquidity ($2.82K) creates high slippage and high vulnerability to further price collapse or pool withdrawal • Only 34 holder addresses recorded — a very thin, easily-manipulated holder base for a token with claimed six-figure 24h volume

← Back to all predictions

Track Tuition