WAR

HOOK OF WAR Price Today & AI Analysis

WAREthereumAnalysis as of Aug 7, 2026

Price

$0.0254

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0xe3215ca555d0b79f5ea5f520885a7fe3c14f7dbc

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

22

Market cap

$25.43K

Liquidity

$25.16K

More tokens on Ethereum

MMoziMozi$0.093199+0.0%MC $0FfwSNXFew Wrapped Synthetix Network Token$0.2167+0.0%MC $304.4KJUANJUANJuan$0.072337+0.0%MC $9.8KNBISonNBISonNebius Group (Ondo Tokenized)$222.36+0.0%MC $497.0KVv0v0$0.000357+0.0%MC $357.4KUSDSUSDSUSDS$0.9999+0.0%MC $6.52B

HOOK OF WAR: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-07 22:00 UTC

Holder addresses

83

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$76,356.88
How concentrated is HOOK OF WAR ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 83 addresses (2026-08-07 22:00 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling HOOK OF WAR?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is HOOK OF WAR liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-07 22:00 UTC, reported liquidity was $76,356.88. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-07 22:00 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Ask Unhosted AI about WAR

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since report

report from Aug 7, 2026, 10:00 PM UTC

Market Cap

$79.17K

24h Volume

$101.35K

Liquidity

$76.36K

FDV

—

Holders

83

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

HOOK OF WAR (WAR) is an Ethereum-based token launched approximately 1 hour ago via Uniswap v4, with a market cap of $79,173 and a total supply of 1,000,000 tokens fully in circulation. The token has surged over 103% in its first hour, but this price action is occurring against a backdrop of severe red flags: an unverified contract, a disposable deployer wallet created at the same moment as the token with unknown funding, and a whale cohort that received supply at genesis via transfer rather than open-market purchases. With 83 total holders — all acquired within the last hour — and 34.1% of supply in the hands of individual whales who paid nothing for their positions, the risk profile is extremely high. No project description, social presence, or verifiable use case exists to support any fundamental investment thesis.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 7, 2026, 10:00 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Deployer wallet is exactly 1 hour old with zero prior deployments and unknown funding source — a disposable-deployer pattern
  • All individual whale positions were transferred at genesis, not purchased, giving insiders a zero-cost basis on 34.1% of dumpable supply
  • Two of three profiled whale wallets were created just 34 minutes before the token launched, indicating coordinated sybil insider wallet setup

HOOK OF WAR AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

WAR is only 1 hour old and has already posted a +103% gain in its first hour of trading, a classic pump pattern in newly launched tokens. With 8 individual whales collectively holding 34.1% of dumpable supply — all of whom received their positions via transfer rather than market buys — the risk of coordinated selling into this initial price spike is very high. The absence of any OHLC history, unverified contract, and a security score of 46/100 compound the downside risk significantly.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a deployer wallet that is itself only 1 hour old with no prior deployment history and unknown funding source, there is no fundamental basis for sustained medium-term price appreciation. The token's entire 83-holder base was acquired within the last hour, and the whale cohort received supply directly at or near genesis rather than through open-market accumulation, suggesting this is a coordinated launch with high exit-scam or rug-pull probability. Survival beyond 30 days as a tradeable asset is uncertain.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy pressure is 56.6% over the first 24h window (234 buys vs. 123 sells), indicating more buyers than sellers are currently active in the market.
  • The Uniswap v4 liquidity pool holds $76,357, which is non-trivial for a token launched 1 hour ago and provides some initial trading depth.

Bearish Factors

  • The deployer wallet (0xa3c3f273…) was created at the exact same timestamp as the token — 2026-08-07T20:46:59Z — is only 1 hour old, has zero prior contract deployments, and was funded by an unknown source, a textbook disposable-deployer pattern associated with rug pulls.
  • All 8 individual whales (collectively 34.1% dumpable supply) received their positions via transfer at genesis, not through market buys — meaning they hold zero-cost basis tokens and face no loss from selling at any price.
  • Two of the three profiled whale wallets (0x135a1d… and 0x91bb54…) were first active on 2026-08-07T20:13:35Z — less than 34 minutes before the token launched — strongly suggesting sybil/insider wallet creation.
  • The contract is unverified (source code not published), earning a security score of only 46/100, making it impossible to audit for hidden mint functions, blacklists, or transfer taxes.
  • The token has no project description, no social links, and no category classification — there is no identifiable use case or community to sustain demand after the initial launch pump.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

WAR call history

Full track record →

Aug 7bearish
24h-64.2%
7d-74.8%
30d-67.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0xe321...7dbc
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: The deployer wallet is 1 hour old, unverified, funded by an unknown source, and has zero prior deployment history — this is a textbook disposable-deployer pattern. The deployer may retain admin keys or hidden contract functions enabling a rug pull at any time.
  • Insider dump risk: Eight individual whale wallets collectively hold 34.1% of supply, all received via genesis transfer at zero cost basis. These wallets face no financial loss from selling at any price, and the notable trades already show five of the six largest transactions are sells into the launch pump.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: The $76,357 liquidity pool is thin relative to the 34.1% dumpable supply. If whales begin exiting simultaneously, the pool could be drained rapidly, leaving remaining holders unable to exit at any meaningful price.

Trading Insight

neutral

Surface-level trading metrics show a mild buy-side lean with 56.6% buy pressure and 234 buy transactions versus 123 sells in the first hour of existence, but this pattern is typical of coordinated launch pumps where insiders seed initial buy activity. The largest recent on-chain swaps are predominantly sells — five of the six notable trades are sells ranging from $942 to $1,789 — suggesting that early recipients are already distributing into the initial demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The short-term price action shows a sharp uptrend with a +103.5% move in the first hour of trading, but this is entirely a launch-pump phenomenon with no prior price history to contextualize it. Medium-term trend is assessed as bearish given the structural insider distribution risk: zero-cost-basis whales holding 34.1% of supply have every incentive to sell into the current elevated price, and there is no fundamental catalyst to sustain the move.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A +103.5% move in the first hour of a token's existence with no prior price history, driven by a holder base of 83 wallets, represents extreme overbought conditions relative to any sustainable demand base. The five largest individual trades in the notable transactions are all sells, indicating that the wallets with the largest positions are already taking profits into this momentum.

Volume Analysis

Buy

56.6%

Sell

43.4%

Volume Trend

Stable

All volume is concentrated in the token's single hour of existence, making trend assessment impossible. The $101,351 total 24h volume against a $79,173 market cap is a 1.28x volume-to-market-cap ratio, which is extremely elevated and typical of speculative launch activity. The 56.6% buy pressure is positive on the surface but is being offset by the largest individual transactions being sells.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch pump: price rose approximately 103.5% within the first hour of the token's existence from its initial listing price, with a slight -1.67% pullback in the most recent 5-minute window suggesting the initial momentum may be stalling.

First-hour vertical pumps on newly launched tokens with insider-allocated supply and unverified contracts most commonly precede sharp reversals once insider wallets begin distributing. The 5-minute pullback may be an early signal of this distribution phase beginning.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

91/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A +103.5% move in the first hour of existence on a token with 83 holders and $76,357 in liquidity demonstrates extreme price volatility. The thin liquidity means even modest sell pressure can produce double-digit percentage price drops.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $76,357 liquidity pool is shallow and is already being turned over at a rate exceeding 1x per hour. A coordinated exit by whale wallets holding 34.1% of dumpable supply could drain the pool and make the token effectively untradeable.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an unclassified token with no disclosed project or team, WAR faces standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto tokens. The lack of any identifiable issuer or use case does not reduce regulatory risk and may complicate any future compliance efforts.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: The deployer wallet is 1 hour old, unverified, funded by an unknown source, and has zero prior deployment history — this is a textbook disposable-deployer pattern. The deployer may retain admin keys or hidden contract functions enabling a rug pull at any time.
  • Insider dump risk: Eight individual whale wallets collectively hold 34.1% of supply, all received via genesis transfer at zero cost basis. These wallets face no financial loss from selling at any price, and the notable trades already show five of the six largest transactions are sells into the launch pump.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: The $76,357 liquidity pool is thin relative to the 34.1% dumpable supply. If whales begin exiting simultaneously, the pool could be drained rapidly, leaving remaining holders unable to exit at any meaningful price.

Mitigating Factors

  • 48.30% of supply is locked in the Uniswap v4 liquidity pool contract and cannot be unilaterally dumped by any individual wallet, providing a structural floor on the circulating supply available for sale.
  • The token is deployed on Ethereum mainnet via Uniswap v4, meaning the DEX infrastructure itself is secure and audited, even if the token contract is not.

Investor Suitability

This token is not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing capital they cannot afford to lose entirely. Given the combination of an unverified contract, disposable deployer, zero-cost-basis insider whales, and no identifiable project fundamentals, WAR is appropriate only for highly experienced traders who fully understand the rug pull and dump risks, are trading with minimal speculative capital, and have a clear and immediate exit strategy.

WAR presents no credible fundamental investment thesis at this time: there is no project description, no verified contract, no social presence, and no use case. The only thesis available is purely speculative — that retail momentum from the launch pump continues long enough for a trader to enter and exit profitably before insiders distribute their zero-cost-basis holdings.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The launch pump attracts significant organic social media attention, driving a wave of retail buyers that sustains or extends the price above current levels. Insiders delay their exits, the project team publishes a roadmap and verifies the contract, and the token develops a genuine community that provides ongoing demand.

  • Unexpected viral social media traction that brings in a large new buyer cohort beyond the initial 83 holders
  • Contract verification and publication of a legitimate project roadmap that differentiates WAR from typical launch-and-dump tokens

Base Case

The initial launch pump fades as retail buying momentum exhausts itself. Insider whales gradually distribute their zero-cost-basis holdings over the next several hours to days, causing a sustained price decline from current levels. The token persists as a low-liquidity, low-activity asset with no fundamental development, eventually becoming dormant.

  • Insider whales act rationally and sell their zero-cost-basis holdings into any remaining retail demand
  • No new fundamental catalyst (contract verification, project announcement, or viral social traction) emerges to sustain buyer interest

Bear Case

High probability

Insider whale wallets — all holding zero-cost-basis supply from genesis transfers — begin systematically selling into the retail demand generated by the launch pump. The thin $76,357 liquidity pool is unable to absorb the selling pressure, price collapses, and the token becomes illiquid. The deployer, consistent with the disposable-wallet pattern, abandons the project.

  • Eight individual whales with 34.1% dumpable supply and zero cost basis have no financial incentive to hold and every incentive to sell at current elevated prices
  • Unverified contract and disposable deployer wallet pattern are consistent with tokens that are abandoned or rugged within hours to days of launch

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 7, 2026, 10:00 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-07 22:00 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.079173422098736498

Market Cap

$79.2K

24h Volume

$101.4K

Holders

83

Liquidity

$76,356.88

Data Sources

On-chain transaction dataHolder distribution analyticsTrading volume metricsSmart contract analysisDeployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysisToken genesis transfer records

Limitations

  • Token is only 1 hour old — there is no OHLC price history, no medium-term trend data, and no established trading patterns to analyze; all technical analysis is based on a single hour of data
  • Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable for this token, limiting the ability to assess informed capital flows
  • The unverified contract means the full token mechanics (transfer taxes, mint functions, blacklists) cannot be confirmed from source code review

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track WAR