IMD

Identity.md Price Today & AI Analysis

IMDEthereumAnalysis as of Nov 5, 2026

Price

$0.000296

+46.83% 24h

Contract

Live
0x2fb42c711da7a92e11402d7ac64fd6ea136a9ee4

Holders

276

Market cap

$295.79K

Liquidity

$23.52K

At a $1M market cap, $IMD would be $0.001000 (3.38x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is IMD a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 5

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 75% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesA test sell went through

Buy tax

0%

Launch wallets hold

75%41 snipers, 41 bundlers still holding
  • Much of the trading comes from a farm of related wallets.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about IMD

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Ethereum

Identity.md: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-11-05 20:30 UTC

Holder addresses

241

Top 10 supply share

28.09%

Reported liquidity

$23,055.00
How concentrated is Identity.md ownership?
As of 2026-11-05 20:30 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 28.09% of supply. It reports 241 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Identity.md?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-11-05 20:30 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $54,643.00 in buys and $30,449.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Identity.md liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +24.93%, from $18,455.00 (2026-11-05 14:00 UTC) to $23,055.00 (2026-11-05 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-11-05 20:30 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-11-05 14:00 UTC$18,455.00
2026-11-05 15:00 UTC$18,303.00
2026-11-05 16:00 UTC$19,021.00
2026-11-05 17:00 UTC$18,425.00
2026-11-05 18:00 UTC$19,645.00
2026-11-05 19:00 UTC$21,267.00
2026-11-05 20:00 UTC$23,055.00

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Nov 5, 2026, 08:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$285.23K

24h Volume

$85.09K

Liquidity

$23.05K

FDV

—

Holders

241

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Identity.md (IMD) is an Ethereum token trading on Uniswap that is 6 hours old, with a market cap of about $285,234 and liquidity of $23,055. Price is up 41.6% in 24h, but no project description, category or social links are available. Unhosted's scam check returned NEUTRAL (30/100) with a FLOW_WALLET_FARM warning, and launch-wallet clusters are shown holding 75.18% of supply. It is an extremely early, high-risk speculative asset.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Nov 5, 2026, 08:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Only 6 hours old, with no price history or project information
  • Trading flagged as coming largely from a farm of related wallets
  • Launch-wallet clusters (snipers and bundlers) shown holding 75.18% of supply

Identity.md AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

The token is only 6 hours old and has already risen 41.6% in 24h and 47.6% in 4h, with no daily OHLC history to confirm a trend. Launch-wallet clusters hold 75.18% of supply (snipers and bundlers, which may overlap) and the scam check flags a farm of related wallets, so a sharp reversal is the more probable path than a sustained advance.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Tokens with launch-wallet clusters holding about three quarters of supply and wash-style trading flags tend to fade once organic demand fails to replace the coordinated flow. With $23,055 of liquidity and no project description or social links, there is little visible to sustain a 30d-90d advance.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy volume of $54,643 exceeded sell volume of $30,449 over 24h (64.2% buy pressure).
  • 238 unique buyers against 41 unique sellers in 24h shows broad participation, although the scam check says part of this flow may come from related wallets.

Bearish Factors

  • Unhosted's scam check reports FLOW_WALLET_FARM: much of the trading comes from a farm of related wallets, which undermines the reliability of volume and buyer counts.
  • Snipers (41 wallets) and bundlers (41 wallets) are each shown holding 75.18% of supply, a large block that could be sold into thin liquidity.
  • A rise of 32% in 1h and 47.6% in 4h on a 6-hour-old token is a parabolic launch move with no price history to anchor it.
  • Liquidity of $23,055 against a $285,234 market cap is very thin, so moderate selling could move price sharply.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

IMD call history

Full track record →

Nov 5bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x2fb4...9ee4
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Trading is flagged as coming largely from a farm of related wallets, so volume and buyer counts may not reflect real demand.
  • Launch-wallet clusters (snipers and bundlers) are shown holding 75.18% of supply and could sell into thin liquidity.
  • Liquidity of $23,055 makes large exits difficult and price highly sensitive.
  • Token is 6 hours old with no price history, project information or social presence.

Trading Insight

bearish

Raw buy pressure is 64.2%, but the scam check indicates much of the flow comes from related wallets, so the buy-side figures are unreliable as a sentiment signal. Given the parabolic move and launch-wallet concentration, sentiment is treated as cautious.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Short-term momentum is sharply positive (+32% in 1h, +47.6% in 4h), but with only 6 hours of life there is no medium-term trend to measure, so it is marked sideways by default. No daily OHLC is available.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

Gains of 47.6% in 4h and 41.6% in 24h are extreme for any asset. The 5-minute gain of 6.1% shows momentum still active, but moves of this size on a new token commonly retrace.

Volume Analysis

Buy

64.2%

Sell

35.8%

Volume Trend

Increasing

Activity is concentrated in the last 4 hours (302 of 371 transactions), consistent with a launch-phase spike. Buy volume of $54,643 exceeds sell volume of $30,449, though the wallet-farm flag lowers confidence in these figures.

Recent Price Action

A near-vertical advance across the 1h, 4h and 24h windows after launch.

Vertical launch moves on thin liquidity are often followed by sharp mean reversion, particularly when large launch-wallet blocks remain unsold.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

85/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 41.6% gain in 24h and 47.6% in 4h on a 6-hour-old token indicates extreme volatility in both directions.

  • LiquidityHigh

    $23,055 of liquidity is very thin relative to a $285,234 market cap, so exits can move price significantly.

  • ConcentrationHigh

    Top 10 hold 28.1% in aggregate, and launch-wallet clusters are shown holding 75.18%. Individual wallets cannot be classified.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    An unidentified, undescribed token with no known team carries general uncertainty around how such assets are treated, and its purpose is unclear.

Key Risks

  • Trading is flagged as coming largely from a farm of related wallets, so volume and buyer counts may not reflect real demand.
  • Launch-wallet clusters (snipers and bundlers) are shown holding 75.18% of supply and could sell into thin liquidity.
  • Liquidity of $23,055 makes large exits difficult and price highly sensitive.
  • Token is 6 hours old with no price history, project information or social presence.

Mitigating Factors

  • Test trade succeeded on the sell side with 0% buy tax.
  • Scam check verdict is NEUTRAL rather than SCAM or HIGH_RISK.

Investor Suitability

Only for experienced speculators who can afford a total loss and understand launch-phase risks. Not suitable for those seeking fundamentals or stability.

There is no identifiable fundamental thesis. The price move is launch-phase and trading is partly flagged as coordinated, so the setup leans toward a reversal rather than durable growth.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Genuine independent demand develops, liquidity grows and launch-wallet holders distribute slowly, allowing price to hold gains.

  • Project information and community emerge
  • Liquidity deepens well beyond $23,055

Base Case

Volatile retracement from the launch spike with declining volume as the initial hype fades.

  • No fundamental catalyst or project information emerges
  • Liquidity remains thin and launch-wallet holders retain selling capacity

Bear Case

High probability

Launch-wallet clusters sell into thin liquidity as coordinated buying fades, driving a sharp retracement of the launch gains.

  • 75.18% of supply shown in sniper and bundler wallets
  • Wallet-farm trading flag suggests demand may not be organic

Analysis Details

Generated

Nov 5, 2026, 08:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-11-05 20:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000285233650975

Market Cap

$285.2K

24h Volume

$85.1K

Holders

241

Liquidity

$23,055.00

Data Sources

Unhosted DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentrationUnhosted automated risk check and test trade

Limitations

  • Holder-growth and whale-transaction data were unavailable.
  • The contract check is Unhosted's automated assessment — a warning signal, not a guarantee.
  • No daily OHLC history exists, so no support or resistance levels were computed.
  • Token is 6 hours old, so trend analysis is extremely limited.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

Questions about IMD?