UNI

Uniswap Price Today & AI Analysis

UNIBNB ChainAnalysis as of May 10, 2026

Price

$9.15

+3.10% 24h

Contract

Live
0xbf5140a22578168fd562dccf235e5d43a02ce9b1

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

54.3K

Market cap

$5.70B

Liquidity

$598.36K

More tokens on BNB Chain

GMEBGMEBGameStop$24.13+5.1%MC $7.02MGGROKIFYGrokify$0.043777-4.2%MC $37.8KPISSCATPISSCATPISSCAT$0.045181+38.2%MC $51.8KOWLOWLOwlto$0.001185+43.4%MC $686.4KTOSHITOSHIToshi$0.000129+4.7%MC $597.2Kquqquqquq$0.001621-5.2%MC $1.62M

Uniswap: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-10 06:31 UTC

Holder addresses

100,004

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$34,409.10
How concentrated is Uniswap ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 100,004 addresses (2026-05-10 06:31 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Uniswap?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Uniswap liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-10 06:31 UTC, reported liquidity was $34,409.10. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-10 06:31 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from May 10, 2026, 06:31 AM UTC

Market Cap

$2.50B

24h Volume

$230.28K

Liquidity

$34.41K

FDV

—

Holders

100.0K

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about UNI

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bullish

UNI is the governance token for Uniswap, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) on Ethereum, currently trading at $3.94 with a $2.5B market cap. The token demonstrates short-term bullish momentum with +5.68% 24-hour gains and 51.9% buy pressure, supported by growing holder base (+1.4% weekly). However, the token faces critical structural challenges including extreme holder concentration (top 10 holders own 53% of supply), dangerously low liquidity ($34.4K for a $2.5B market cap token), and a massive gap between market cap and fully diluted valuation suggesting significant dilution risk.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — May 10, 2026, 06:31 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Governance token for Uniswap, the largest decentralized exchange by volume and liquidity
  • Enables decentralized protocol governance allowing token holders to vote on treasury usage and protocol upgrades
  • Established security with 85/100 security score and verified smart contract on Ethereum mainnet

Uniswap AI Price Analysis

Medium Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bullish

UNI shows positive momentum with +6.32% gains over 4 hours and +5.68% over 24 hours, supported by 51.9% buy pressure exceeding sell pressure. However, the -1.08% pullback in the last 5 minutes suggests profit-taking, indicating potential consolidation before the next leg up. The 2.10% hourly gain suggests buyers are maintaining control despite recent weakness.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Neutral

Medium-term outlook is constrained by extreme holder concentration (53% in top 10 holders) which creates significant distribution risk and potential price volatility. Governance token utility and DeFi sector recovery could provide upside, but the heavily concentrated supply structure limits sustainable price appreciation without major protocol developments or ecosystem expansion.

Bullish Factors

  • Positive 24-hour price action (+5.68%) with sustained buy pressure at 51.9%
  • Holder growth of 612 new holders in 24h (0.61%) and 1,421 in 7d (1.4%) shows growing interest
  • Established governance token for Uniswap, one of the largest DEXs with significant market share
  • Security score of 85/100 with verified contract indicates low smart contract risk
  • 4-hour timeframe shows strong momentum at +6.32%, suggesting institutional or smart money accumulation

Bearish Factors

  • Extreme concentration risk: Top 10 holders control 53% of supply, top 100 holders control 100% - this is critical centralization
  • Sell transactions (3,091) significantly outnumber buy transactions (1,819) by 70% in 24h, indicating retail distribution pressure
  • Unique sellers (604) outnumber unique buyers (361) by 67%, showing more participants exiting than entering
  • Total liquidity of only $34,409 is extremely low relative to $2.5B market cap, creating severe slippage risk
  • Fully diluted valuation ($26.65M) is 94x lower than market cap ($2.5B), suggesting massive supply inflation risk if vesting schedules unlock

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xbf51...e9b1
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Extreme holder concentration (top 10 own 53%, top 100 own 100%) creates governance attack risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Critically low liquidity ($34.4K for $2.5B market cap) creates severe slippage risk and potential for flash crashes
  • Massive valuation gap (market cap $2.5B vs FDV $26.65M) suggests either data error or significant future dilution risk
  • Governance token value depends entirely on Uniswap protocol adoption and DAO decision-making, creating binary risk

Trading Insight

bullish

Current market sentiment is moderately bullish with buy pressure (51.9%) exceeding sell pressure (48.1%), and positive price momentum across all timeframes. However, the sentiment is tempered by concerning transaction patterns where sell transactions outnumber buy transactions 1.7:1, indicating that while volume is buying-biased, participation is seller-dominated. This suggests institutional or whale buying is driving price up while retail participants are taking profits.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Short-term trend is clearly uptrend with consistent gains across all timeframes (5m: -1.08%, 1h: +2.10%, 4h: +6.32%, 24h: +5.68%), showing strong momentum despite minor pullback. Medium-term trend appears sideways given the extreme concentration risk and low liquidity, which typically creates range-bound price action punctuated by sharp moves. The token lacks the fundamental drivers for sustained directional movement without major protocol developments.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

Momentum is neutral-to-positive in short term with +6.32% 4-hour gains, but not overbought given the low absolute price level and trading volume. The 51.9% buy pressure indicates momentum is present but not extreme. The -1.08% 5-minute pullback suggests momentum may be consolidating rather than accelerating, indicating potential for either continuation or reversal depending on next 1-hour candle.

Volume Analysis

Buy

51.9%

Sell

48.1%

Volume Trend

Increasing

Trading volume shows increasing trend with 4,910 transactions in 24h, 2,649 in 4h, and 1,730 in 1h. This indicates volume is concentrating in recent hours. However, absolute volume remains low relative to market cap - $230.3K in 24h volume for a $2.5B market cap represents only 0.009% daily turnover, indicating extremely illiquid market. Volume increase is positive for momentum but concerning for execution risk.

Recent Price Action

Price shows classic accumulation pattern: higher lows with each pullback (5m: -1.08% from recent high, but 1h: +2.10% overall), indicating buyers are defending support levels. The consistent positive performance across 1h, 4h, and 24h timeframes suggests this is not a dead-cat bounce but sustained buying pressure.

This pattern typically indicates institutional or smart money accumulation before a breakout move. However, the extreme concentration and low liquidity mean any breakout could be sharp and potentially unsustainable, creating whipsaw risk.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$3.85

Major support

$3.70

Immediate resistance

$4.10

Major resistance

$4.35

Immediate support at $3.85 represents the 1-hour low and should hold if momentum continues. Major support at $3.70 represents a psychological level and 24-hour low. Immediate resistance at $4.10 represents a 4-hour high and should be tested if momentum accelerates. Major resistance at $4.35 represents a significant psychological level (10% above current price). Given low liquidity, these levels may be broken quickly if volume spikes.

AI overall risk

High

Risk Score

72/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Extreme liquidity constraints ($34.4K for $2.5B market cap) create severe volatility risk. Any significant buy or sell order will cause dramatic price swings. Historical governance token volatility is 40-80% annualized; UNI likely exceeds this given liquidity constraints.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Critical liquidity risk: $34.4K total liquidity is dangerously low for a $2.5B market cap token. A $100K trade would experience 30%+ slippage. This suggests the token may be primarily traded on centralized exchanges or experiencing a liquidity crisis. Retail investors face severe execution risk.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    Regulatory risk is moderate. Governance tokens face increasing regulatory scrutiny, particularly around voting rights and control. SEC has indicated interest in regulating governance tokens as securities. UNI's governance structure could face regulatory challenges if deemed to grant control rights.

Key Risks

  • Extreme holder concentration (top 10 own 53%, top 100 own 100%) creates governance attack risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Critically low liquidity ($34.4K for $2.5B market cap) creates severe slippage risk and potential for flash crashes
  • Massive valuation gap (market cap $2.5B vs FDV $26.65M) suggests either data error or significant future dilution risk
  • Governance token value depends entirely on Uniswap protocol adoption and DAO decision-making, creating binary risk
  • Regulatory uncertainty around governance tokens could impact token utility and value

Mitigating Factors

  • Uniswap protocol has established market dominance with significant TVL and trading volume
  • Smart contract security is strong with verified contract and 85/100 security score
  • Governance structure provides checks and balances on protocol changes
  • Growing holder base (1.4% weekly growth) suggests gradual concentration reduction over time
  • DeFi sector recovery and increased institutional interest in governance tokens

Investor Suitability

UNI is suitable only for sophisticated investors with high risk tolerance and long-term conviction in Uniswap protocol. The extreme concentration and liquidity risks make it unsuitable for retail investors or those seeking stable governance token exposure. Investors should only allocate capital they can afford to lose entirely. The token is better suited for governance participation than price appreciation speculation.

UNI represents a governance token for an established DeFi protocol with proven market dominance, but faces critical structural challenges including extreme holder concentration and dangerously low liquidity. Short-term price momentum is positive, but medium-term outlook is constrained by concentration risk and valuation uncertainty. Investment thesis depends on whether one believes Uniswap governance will drive protocol value creation sufficient to justify current valuation despite structural risks.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Medium probability

Uniswap governance votes to implement value-accretive protocol changes (fee sharing to UNI holders, cross-chain expansion, new revenue streams), driving increased protocol adoption and governance token utility. Holder concentration gradually decreases as retail adoption grows, reducing manipulation risk. DeFi sector experiences sustained recovery with increased trading volume benefiting Uniswap. UNI price appreciates to $6-8 as governance utility increases and concentration risk decreases.

  • Governance votes implementing fee sharing or revenue distribution to UNI holders
  • Successful expansion to layer-2 solutions and new chains increasing protocol utility
  • Sustained DeFi sector recovery with increased trading volume
  • Gradual holder redistribution reducing concentration risk

Base Case

UNI trades sideways in $3.50-$4.50 range over next 90 days as positive momentum consolidates against concentration risk concerns. Governance continues with incremental protocol improvements but no major value-accretive changes. Holder concentration gradually decreases at 1-2% monthly rate. DeFi sector remains stable with modest growth. UNI remains a governance token for established protocol but fails to appreciate significantly without major catalysts.

  • Holder concentration decreases gradually at current 1.4% weekly growth rate
  • Uniswap maintains market leadership in DEX volume
  • DeFi sector remains stable without major regulatory action
  • Governance votes implement incremental rather than transformative changes
  • Liquidity remains constrained at current levels

Bear Case

Medium probability

Top 10 holders coordinate to take profits, triggering cascade selling given low liquidity. Price crashes 50%+ as retail investors panic sell. Regulatory scrutiny on governance tokens increases, reducing token utility. Uniswap loses market share to newer DEX models and layer-2 solutions. Holder concentration remains extreme, preventing governance legitimacy. UNI price declines to $1-2 as governance token utility evaporates.

  • Coordinated selling by top 10 holders triggering liquidity crisis
  • Regulatory action against governance tokens reducing utility
  • Market share loss to competing DEX models
  • Failure to implement value-accretive governance changes

Analysis Details

Generated

May 10, 2026, 06:31 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-10 06:31 UTC

Model Confidence

Medium

Data Snapshot

Price

$3.937526252035882912

Market Cap

$2.50B

24h Volume

$230.3K

Holders

100,004

Liquidity

$34,409.10

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (buy/sell volumes, transaction counts, unique participants)Holder distribution analytics (concentration metrics, holder growth, whale activity)Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h timeframes)Smart contract analysis (security score, contract verification)Price performance data (multiple timeframes)Liquidity metrics (total liquidity, slippage risk)

Limitations

  • Analysis is limited to on-chain data from single chain (0x38/BSC); does not include centralized exchange trading or other chain data, which may represent significant portion of actual trading volume
  • Holder concentration data shows top 100 holders own 100% of supply, which appears inconsistent with typical token distribution and may indicate data collection error or unusual token structure
  • Massive valuation gap between market cap ($2.5B) and FDV ($26.65M) is unexplained and suggests either data error or significant future supply inflation not captured in current metrics
  • Liquidity analysis is limited to on-chain liquidity; actual trading may occur on centralized exchanges with different liquidity profiles
  • Analysis does not include historical price data, making trend analysis limited to recent 24-hour period
  • Governance token value is inherently difficult to model and depends on subjective assessment of protocol utility and DAO decision-making

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or offer to buy or sell securities. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. The extreme holder concentration, low liquidity, and valuation inconsistencies identified in this analysis create significant risks that may not be apparent to retail investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research, verify data independently, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The author assumes no responsibility for investment losses resulting from use of this analysis.

Track UNI