bnbs

bnbs Price Today & AI Analysis

bnbsBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 13, 2026

Price

$0.052820

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x3d3426f58a016c7c2b8fd9ea06ed62fced8c7777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

136

Market cap

$2.82K

Liquidity

$2.49K

More tokens on BNB Chain

SStockCatStock Cat$0.055201+0.0%MC $5.2KUBFUNDUBFUNDUtu Bora CBO FUND$0.053069+0.0%MC $3.1KsDogsDogDezik Space Dog$0.053692+0.0%MC $3.7KPasteurPasteurPasteur$0.054725+0.0%MC $4.7KNVBNVBNVB$0.064732+0.0%MC $47quqquqquq$0.001609+3.2%MC $1.61M

bnbs: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-13 21:15 UTC

Holder addresses

345

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$17,998.14
How concentrated is bnbs ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 345 addresses (2026-08-13 21:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling bnbs?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is bnbs liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-13 21:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $17,998.14. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-13 21:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 13, 2026, 09:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$35.58K

24h Volume

$103.32K

Liquidity

$18.00K

FDV

—

Holders

345

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about bnbs

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

This token, launched just 1 hour ago on BNB Chain (BSC), uses the name 'Tether Gold' and symbol 'XAUt' to impersonate the legitimate Tether Gold asset — a well-documented scam tactic. The contract is unverified, carries a security score of 34/100, and genesis forensics confirm the deployer pre-distributed supply to multiple insider wallets before any public trading began. With only $17,998 in liquidity, no social presence, no project description, and a deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet, this token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a rug-pull or honeypot scheme and should be treated with extreme caution.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 13, 2026, 09:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Brand impersonation of legitimate Tether Gold (XAUt) — a deliberate deception tactic targeting unsuspecting buyers
  • Pre-launch insider supply distribution: deployer allocated tokens to at least four wallets at genesis before any DEX trading occurred
  • Critically low liquidity of $17,998 relative to market cap, making the token highly susceptible to price manipulation and exit liquidity traps

bnbs AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

This token is only 1 hour old with no OHLC price history to establish any trend. The token impersonates the well-known Tether Gold (XAUt) brand on BSC, a classic scam pattern. With only $17,998 in liquidity, a security score of 34/100, an unverified contract, and the majority of notable recent trades being sells, the short-term outlook is bearish.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The combination of a brand impersonation, an unverified contract, a deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled wallet, and insider-allocated supply distributed at genesis creates a high-probability rug-pull profile. Tokens with this forensic fingerprint rarely sustain value beyond days. Without a verified contract, legitimate utility, or any social presence, medium-term value retention is extremely unlikely.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy pressure is marginally dominant at 51.1% of 24h volume ($52,793 buys vs $50,524 sells), suggesting some initial demand from retail participants.
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8) has been active since 2024-07-01 — 773 days old — which is atypical for a purely disposable deployer wallet, though it recorded zero contract deployments in its first 100 transactions.

Bearish Factors

  • The token is only 1 hour old with no price history, no verified contract, and a security score of just 34/100 — all critical red flags for a newly launched asset.
  • The token name 'Tether Gold' and symbol 'XAUt' directly impersonate a legitimate, well-known asset, a hallmark of scam tokens designed to deceive buyers.
  • Genesis forensics show the deployer (0xe2ce6ab8) received the full 1,000,000,000 supply at mint and immediately distributed chunks to at least four addresses (0x904974, 0x6c1dfe, 0x58fbb3, 0x4411db), indicating pre-planned insider allocation before any public trading.
  • The deployer wallet was funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x4deaae93), a disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk.
  • Total liquidity is only $17,998 against a stated market cap of $35,584 — a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of ~50%, meaning even modest sell pressure will cause severe price impact.
  • Five of the six notable recent trades are sells, and the largest single trade is a $611 sell, suggesting early holders are already exiting.
  • The three largest individual whale wallets (2.81%, 2.20%, 2.12% of supply) all acquired their positions via transfer or airdrop — not market buys — confirming insider distribution at genesis rather than organic accumulation.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

bnbs call history

Full track record →

Aug 13bearish
24h-100.0%
7d—
30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0x3d34...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull / exit scam: The deployer pre-allocated supply to insider wallets at genesis, the contract is unverified, and the largest whale (0xd50c6a) is already selling within the first hour — all consistent with a planned exit scam.
  • Honeypot risk: Without a verified contract, the token may contain code that allows buying but prevents selling, trapping retail investors' funds permanently.
  • Brand impersonation liability: The use of 'Tether Gold' and 'XAUt' branding without authorization from Tether Operations Limited exposes the project to legal action and could result in sudden abandonment by the deployer.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite a marginally positive buy/sell ratio (51.1% buy pressure), the trading pattern is consistent with a newly launched token attracting uninformed retail buyers drawn in by the Tether Gold brand impersonation. The fact that 5 of the 6 largest recent trades are sells, and that transaction counts are identical across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows, suggests all activity occurred within a very compressed timeframe — likely the first hour of launch.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

With only 1 hour of trading history and no OHLC data available, no meaningful trend can be established. The token has not existed long enough to form any technical structure. All trend assessments are based on the absence of data rather than directional price movement.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

No momentum indicators can be calculated without OHLC history. The 24h price change of -0.079% is noise from a single hour of trading and carries no analytical weight.

Volume Analysis

Buy

51.1%

Sell

48.9%

Volume Trend

Stable

All volume was generated in the token's first hour, making trend assessment impossible. The $103,317 total 24h volume against $17,998 liquidity represents a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 5.7x, which is extremely high and typical of launch-day speculation rather than organic trading depth.

Recent Price Action

The token launched at approximately $4,348.79 and has moved less than 0.1% in either direction within its first hour. No candlestick patterns, support/resistance levels, or trend lines can be derived from a single hour of price data.

The near-flat price action in the first hour, combined with high transaction volume, suggests the price is being managed or that buy and sell pressure are roughly offsetting each other at launch — a pattern sometimes seen in coordinated token launches.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The token is 1 hour old with no price history. At $17,998 liquidity, even small sell orders cause outsized price impact. Insider wallets holding 23.4% of dumpable supply can collapse the price at any moment.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $17,998 is critically shallow. A coordinated exit by any of the top individual whale wallets (each holding 1.2–2.8% of supply) would significantly deplete the pool and cause severe slippage for remaining sellers.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryHigh

    Impersonating Tether Gold, a regulated financial product, may constitute securities fraud or consumer deception in multiple jurisdictions. Regulatory action against the deployer could result in immediate token abandonment.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull / exit scam: The deployer pre-allocated supply to insider wallets at genesis, the contract is unverified, and the largest whale (0xd50c6a) is already selling within the first hour — all consistent with a planned exit scam.
  • Honeypot risk: Without a verified contract, the token may contain code that allows buying but prevents selling, trapping retail investors' funds permanently.
  • Brand impersonation liability: The use of 'Tether Gold' and 'XAUt' branding without authorization from Tether Operations Limited exposes the project to legal action and could result in sudden abandonment by the deployer.

Mitigating Factors

  • The deployer wallet is 773 days old, which is slightly atypical for a purely disposable wallet — though this does not eliminate rug risk.
  • The largest holder (24.34%) is a protocol/contract rather than an individual whale, reducing the immediately dumpable supply to 23.4% rather than the full top-10 concentration of 42%.

Investor Suitability

This token is not suitable for any investor seeking capital preservation or legitimate exposure to gold-backed assets. It may only be considered by highly experienced traders who fully understand the rug-pull risk profile, can afford total loss of capital, and are not misled by the Tether Gold branding. This is not financial advice.

There is no credible investment thesis for this token. It impersonates a legitimate asset, has an unverified contract, pre-allocated insider supply, critically low liquidity, and zero community infrastructure — all within its first hour of existence. The forensic evidence points overwhelmingly toward a rug-pull or honeypot scheme.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

In an extremely unlikely scenario, the deployer is a legitimate operator who chose poor branding and failed to verify the contract before launch. If the contract is subsequently verified, liquidity is deepened, and the impersonation branding is corrected, the token could attract genuine interest. However, this scenario requires the deployer to reverse multiple simultaneous red flags.

  • Contract verification and source code audit revealing no malicious functions
  • Deployer publicly addressing the brand impersonation and establishing legitimate utility

Base Case

The token experiences a brief launch-day pump driven by brand recognition confusion, followed by a rapid decline as early participants exit and the impersonation is identified by the broader community. The token likely becomes illiquid and abandoned within days.

  • No honeypot function exists and retail holders can sell (though at severe slippage given low liquidity)
  • The deployer does not take active steps to build legitimate utility or community

Bear Case

High probability

The most probable scenario: insider wallets continue selling into retail buy pressure, the deployer removes liquidity or executes a honeypot function, and the token price collapses to near zero within 24-72 hours. Retail buyers who cannot sell (honeypot) or who hold through the dump face near-total loss.

  • Insider wallets (23.4% dumpable supply, all zero-cost basis from genesis transfers) executing coordinated sells
  • Unverified contract containing a honeypot or owner-controlled liquidity removal function

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 13, 2026, 09:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-13 21:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$4348.792599538707690954

Market Cap

$35.6K

24h Volume

$103.3K

Holders

345

Liquidity

$17,998.14

Data Sources

On-chain transaction dataHolder distribution analyticsTrading volume metricsSmart contract analysisToken genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysis

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this token — all technical analysis is based on forensic and on-chain signals rather than price trend data
  • Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, limiting insight into sophisticated investor positioning
  • The unverified contract means the full risk profile (honeypot, hidden mint, blacklist) cannot be assessed without source code review

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track bnbs