mGDP

Money Machine Price Today & AI Analysis

mGDP
Base·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 9, 2026

$0.051100

-3.98%24h
LiveContract:0x9af5fa8e5c1f34fc7cc7579ad6816d86ddf74ba3Chain:BaseHolders:333Market cap:$109.95KLiquidity:$41.86K

More tokens on Base

BEN

BEN

Ben on Base

$0.0555277.6%
MC $5.5K
SHIB

SHIB

SHIBA INU

$0.0980684.0%
MC $806.8K
CHARLES

CHARLES

Charles AI by Virtuals

$0.0443790.1%
MC $43.8K
COW

COW

CoW Protocol Token

$0.13240.9%
MC $141.3K
BALD

BALD

BALD

$0.0612081.5%
MC $120.8K
C

CP

Cluster Protocol

$0.022729.9%
MC $113.26M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about mGDP

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Jun 9, 2026, 09:30 PM UTC
Market Cap

$120.61K

24h Volume

$525.63K

Liquidity

$78.95K

FDV

—

Holders

230

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

Money Machine (mGDP) is a newly launched token on Base (chain 0x2105) with a market cap of approximately $120,607 and total liquidity of $78,954. The token is fewer than 31 days old, has no verified contract, no project description, and no social presence, placing it firmly in the speculative micro-cap category with significant rug-pull risk. Price action has been extremely volatile — a +196% 24-hour gain followed by a -53.8% 5-minute crash — consistent with coordinated pump-and-dump activity rather than organic price discovery. With 42.3% of supply in dumpable individual-whale wallets and a security score of 51/100, this token carries very high risk for retail participants.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 9, 2026, 09:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bearish
Extreme intraday volatility: +192% in 4 hours followed by -53.8% in 5 minutes signals coordinated price manipulation
Near-total holder base is brand new: 228 of 230 holders (99%) were acquired within the last 31 days, meaning there is no seasoned holder base to provide price stability
Unverified smart contract with a 51/100 security score and no public project documentation creates an unusually opaque risk profile

Money Machine AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

The token launched within the last 31 days and has already experienced a violent intraday reversal: a +192% 4-hour spike followed by a -53.8% collapse in just 5 minutes, a classic pump-and-dump pattern. With sell transactions outnumbering buys 1,848 to 1,187 over 24 hours and 42.3% of supply sitting in dumpable individual-whale wallets, near-term price action is skewed heavily to the downside. No OHLC history exists to anchor support levels, making the floor genuinely unknown.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

The combination of an unverified contract, a security score of 51/100, zero project description, no social presence, and 99% of holders acquired within the last 31 days points to a token with no established fundamental base. Medium-term survival depends entirely on whether the deployer and large individual whales (who collectively hold 42.3% of dumpable supply) choose to hold rather than exit. Historical base rates for tokens with this profile are poor. Without a verifiable use case or community, sustained price appreciation over 30-90 days is unlikely.

Bullish Factors
  • +24-hour buy volume ($278,499) exceeds sell volume ($247,133), producing a net inflow of ~$31,366 and a 53% buy-pressure reading — the only concrete near-term positive signal
  • +Holder count grew from 2 to 230 in 31 days on an accelerating trajectory, indicating genuine new-wallet interest rather than a static distribution
Bearish Factors
  • -Sell transactions (1,848) outnumber buy transactions (1,187) by 56% over 24 hours, meaning more individual exit events are occurring than entry events despite the dollar-volume edge for buys
  • -A -53.8% price collapse in 5 minutes following a +192% 4-hour spike is a textbook pump-and-dump signal, suggesting coordinated exit by early holders
  • -42.3% of total supply is held by identifiable individual whale wallets with no lock-up or vesting evidence, representing immediate sell-side overhang
  • -Contract is unverified and the security score is only 51/100, meaning the code cannot be independently audited and rug-pull or exploit risk is materially elevated
  • -Zero project description, no social links, and an 'Uncategorized' classification indicate no real-world utility or community has been established

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

mGDP call history

Full track record →
Jun 9bearish
24h—
7d-33.4%
30d+21.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBase
Contract0x9af5...4ba3
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Rug pull risk: Unverified contract + anonymous team + 42.3% dumpable whale supply = the three primary conditions for a rug pull. Any of the top individual whales could exit simultaneously with no warning.
•Pump-and-dump completion: The +192%/4h pump followed by -53.8%/5min crash suggests the pump phase may already be complete; the dump phase (sustained sell-off by early holders) may be underway.
•Zero liquidity floor: With no fundamental buyers (no use case, no community, no institutional interest), if whale selling accelerates, there is no natural buyer base to absorb supply, and the price could approach zero.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite a marginal dollar-volume edge for buyers (53% buy pressure), the transaction-count picture is decisively bearish: sellers executed 1,848 transactions versus buyers' 1,187 over 24 hours, meaning more wallets are exiting than entering. The 5-minute -53.8% crash after the 4-hour spike suggests that the buy-volume edge was concentrated in a small number of large buys that have already been absorbed by a larger number of sell orders.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

The only multi-window trend data available is the 24-hour (+196%) and sub-24-hour windows. The 5-minute reading of -53.8% following the 4-hour peak of +192% confirms the short-term trend has reversed sharply downward from the pump high. With no 7-day or 30-day OHLC history to establish a medium-term baseline, the medium-term trend defaults to the post-pump downtrend until evidence of stabilization emerges. No OHLC-derived support or resistance levels can be computed.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A +196% 24-hour gain places the token in deeply overbought territory on any standard momentum oscillator framework. The immediate -53.8% 5-minute reversal confirms that momentum has already begun unwinding from the peak. With sell transactions outnumbering buys by 56% and no fundamental catalyst to sustain elevated prices, momentum is now pointing downward.

Volume Analysis

Buy 53%Sell 47%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

Volume was almost entirely concentrated in the 4-hour pump window (1,184 of 1,187 buy transactions and 1,845 of 1,848 sell transactions occurred within 4 hours). This spike-then-collapse volume profile is characteristic of a manufactured pump event rather than organic accumulation. Post-spike volume is likely to decline sharply as the event fades.

Recent Price Action

Vertical pump (+192% in 4 hours) followed by immediate sharp reversal (-53.8% in 5 minutes) from the peak, with the 1-hour reading still showing -19.7% decline

This V-spike-and-crash pattern is one of the most reliable indicators of coordinated price manipulation in micro-cap tokens. It typically signals that early holders used buy-side pressure to attract retail, then exited into the liquidity, leaving late buyers holding depreciated positions.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders230
24h Change+228
Growth Rate+99%

Holder count grew from 2 to 230 over 31 days, with the 31-day timeseries showing accelerating growth. However, 99% of holders are brand new, meaning the growth reflects speculative inflows attracted by the price pump rather than organic community building. Rapid holder growth during a price spike is a common feature of pump-and-dump tokens and should not be interpreted as a sign of fundamental health.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders81%
Top 100 Holders100%
Retail Holders0.0%
Concentration Risk:
Critical

The top 10 wallets hold 81% of supply, but 42.27% of that is the Uniswap pool contract (non-dumpable). The remaining ~38.73% of the top-10 supply is held by 9 individual whale wallets, with the largest single wallet at 19.36%. Dumpable supply totals 42.3% of all tokens. At a market cap of only $120,607 and liquidity of $78,954, even a partial exit by the 19.36% whale would be catastrophic. Retail holds effectively 0% of supply, meaning price is entirely at the discretion of a handful of wallets.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The largest recent on-chain swaps are modest in absolute terms: a $1,373 sell by 0x579b65, a $1,359 sell by 0x867ab6, a $817 buy by 0xc5b379, a $594 sell by 0xc7507b, and two $495 buys by 0x867ab6. Notably, wallet 0x867ab6 appears on both the sell and buy side, suggesting active trading rather than directional conviction.

  • •SELL $1,373 by 0x579b65 — largest single exit in the recent trade log
  • •SELL $1,359 by 0x867ab6 — second-largest exit; same wallet also bought $495 twice, indicating a scalping or wash-trade pattern

The recent trade log shows sell-side dominance in the largest transactions, consistent with the broader 1.56:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio. The small dollar sizes of even the largest trades ($1,373) confirm that the major individual whales (19.36%, 10.00% holders) have not yet begun exiting — when they do, the impact will be orders of magnitude larger than anything currently visible in the trade log.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money cohort data is unavailable for this token. No profitable-trader dataset has been compiled.

Without smart-money data, early-buyer behavior cannot be quantified. The structural inference is that the original 2 holders (now likely among the top individual whales) hold positions at a near-zero cost basis and are sitting on very large unrealized gains at any current price, creating persistent profit-taking risk.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$78,954.22
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

At $78,954 in total liquidity against a $120,607 market cap, the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is approximately 65% — which sounds reasonable in isolation, but the shallow absolute dollar depth means any trade above ~$5,000-$10,000 will incur severe slippage. The 19.36% whale alone holds notional value of ~$23,400 at current prices; selling even half of that position would likely move the price by 30-50% given current pool depth.

Overall Risk:
Very High
91/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A -53.8% move in 5 minutes and a +192% move in 4 hours within the same day represents extreme volatility. With no OHLC history and no price floor established, drawdowns of 80-99% from any given entry point are plausible.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $78,954 is shallow for a $120,607 market cap token. Trades above ~$5,000 will incur significant slippage, and a coordinated whale exit could drain the pool entirely, leaving remaining holders unable to sell at any meaningful price.

Concentration
High

42.3% of supply is held by individual whale wallets with no disclosed lock-up. The single largest individual whale holds 19.36%, a position worth ~$23,400 at current prices that could be exited in minutes given the token's trading volume, causing catastrophic price impact.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified (source code not publicly available) and scores 51/100 on security assessment. Hidden privileged functions — including mint, pause, or fee-drain capabilities — cannot be excluded without source code review.

Regulatory
Medium

As an uncategorized token with no disclosed jurisdiction, team, or use case, the token faces standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto assets. The pump-and-dump price pattern could attract regulatory scrutiny if volumes scale.

Key Risks

  • •Rug pull risk: Unverified contract + anonymous team + 42.3% dumpable whale supply = the three primary conditions for a rug pull. Any of the top individual whales could exit simultaneously with no warning.
  • •Pump-and-dump completion: The +192%/4h pump followed by -53.8%/5min crash suggests the pump phase may already be complete; the dump phase (sustained sell-off by early holders) may be underway.
  • •Zero liquidity floor: With no fundamental buyers (no use case, no community, no institutional interest), if whale selling accelerates, there is no natural buyer base to absorb supply, and the price could approach zero.

Mitigating Factors

  • •Net dollar inflow of ~$31,366 over 24 hours indicates some genuine buy-side interest exists at current prices, providing a temporary demand buffer
  • •Uniswap liquidity pool holds 42.27% of supply in a non-dumpable contract, meaning the effective circulating float is lower than the headline 100% circulating supply figure suggests

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their position, and are actively monitoring on-chain activity in real time. It is not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible fraction of their portfolio.

Money Machine (mGDP) presents a deeply asymmetric risk profile: the upside is limited by shallow liquidity and whale overhang, while the downside extends to near-total loss. The token has no verified fundamentals, no community, and a price pattern consistent with coordinated manipulation. Any investment thesis must be grounded in speculation rather than fundamental value.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A viral social media moment or influencer promotion drives a second wave of retail inflows, temporarily pushing price back toward the 4-hour spike high. Whales choose to hold or add rather than exit, and the holder base expands to 500+ wallets, providing a broader demand base.

  • +Sustained buy-volume dominance ($278K buys vs $247K sells over 24h) continues into subsequent days
  • +One or more large individual whales publicly commit to holding, reducing perceived dump risk
Base Case

The token experiences continued high volatility with gradual price erosion as early holders take profits into retail buy pressure. Market cap drifts toward $20,000-$50,000 over 30-60 days as speculative interest fades and no new fundamental catalysts emerge.

  • •No major whale exits occur in a single coordinated event
  • •No new project information, social presence, or use case is disclosed to attract fresh capital
Bear Case
High

The 19.36% individual whale begins exiting into the shallow $78,954 liquidity pool, triggering a cascade of stop-loss and panic sells from the 230-wallet holder base. Price collapses 80-99% from current levels, liquidity is drained, and the token becomes effectively untradeable.

  • -42.3% dumpable supply with no lock-up creates persistent and immediate sell-side overhang
  • -Unverified contract and zero fundamentals provide no reason for holders to maintain conviction during a drawdown

Analysis Details

GeneratedJun 9, 2026, 09:30 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000001206949257594
Market Cap$120.6K
24h Volume$525.6K
Holders230
Liquidity$79.0K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain, contract 0x9af5fa8e5c1f34fc7cc7579ad6816d86ddf74ba3)
Holder distribution analytics (31-day daily timeseries)
Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h windows)
Smart contract security assessment (automated scanner, score 51/100)
Notable recent on-chain swap data
Top-holder classification (protocol/exchange contracts vs. individual wallets)

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history available — all technical levels are absent; trend analysis is based solely on intraday percentage changes
  • •Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable, preventing quantitative assessment of early-buyer behavior
  • •Unverified contract means token mechanics (fees, mint authority, ownership) cannot be confirmed from source code
  • •No project documentation exists, making fundamental valuation impossible
  • •Token is fewer than 31 days old, providing insufficient history for reliable pattern recognition

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track mGDP