Gerald

Gerald The Dolphin Price Today & AI Analysis

Gerald
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 3, 2026

v5g2uxKKpSAUXkCw8d51A2r9jvBJLDJD7jFPkTSpump

$0.055045

+5.01%

FDV $5,043

LiveContract:v5g2uxKKpSAUXkCw8d51A2r9jvBJLDJD7jFPkTSpumpChain:SolanaHolders:696Market cap:$5,043

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Gerald

Report snapshotas of May 3, 02:47 AM
FDV

$36,012

Liquidity

$19,726

Holders

1,029

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Gerald The Dolphin (Gerald) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a current price of ~$0.000036 and a fully diluted valuation of ~$36K–$43K. The token has experienced an extraordinary 586% 24h price surge, but this is accompanied by severe sell pressure (77.7% of 24h volume), shallow liquidity ($19.73K), and highly concentrated ownership. The token is a high-risk, speculative meme asset with very limited fundamental backing.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 586% 24h price pump from a very low base (~$0.000005 to ~$0.000036)
Holder base surged +207 (+20%) in 24h, coinciding with the price spike
Top 10 wallets control 45.37% of supply; top 100 control 87.6% — extreme concentration
Liquidity is extremely shallow at $19.73K, creating very high slippage risk
Sell pressure dominates at 77.7% of 24h volume ($72.61K sells vs $20.84K buys)
Mutable flag is false and contract is verified, offering some baseline trust signals

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is already showing sharp reversion: -6.5% in 5 minutes and -33.4% in 1 hour from the peak. With 77.7% sell pressure, only $19.73K in liquidity, and a -48 holder drop in the last hour, the short-term trajectory is strongly bearish. The pump appears to be unwinding rapidly.

Target low$0.000004
Target high$0.000025
Support: $0.000005 (pre-pump base, candles [4]–[6]), $0.000004 (approximate launch-level floor)
Resistance: $0.000036 (current post-pump price / 24h high zone), $0.000069 (candle [1] high of $0.0000620 rounded up as next resistance if re-tested)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without a sustained catalyst, new liquidity injection, or community-driven narrative, Gerald is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000005). The historical holder data shows the base was slowly declining for most of April before the sudden spike. Meme tokens of this size rarely sustain pumps without continued volume.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media moment or influencer promotion
  • Listing on a mid-tier CEX or aggregator
  • Sustained buy-side volume exceeding current sell pressure
  • New liquidity pool depth increase

Bullish factors

  • 586% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum and attention
  • Holder count grew +207 (+20%) in 24h, indicating new entrants attracted by the pump
  • Verified contract and non-mutable metadata reduce rug-pull risk from authority changes
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap with an active trading pair

Bearish factors

  • 77.7% sell pressure ($72.61K sells vs $20.84K buys) indicates distribution dominates
  • Liquidity is only $19.73K — extremely shallow, high slippage risk for any meaningful exit
  • Top 10 holders control 45.37%; top 100 control 87.6% — extreme concentration risk
  • Historical holder trend was declining throughout April before the pump
  • -48 holders lost in the last hour signals early buyers are already exiting
  • No sniper data available, making smart money behavior opaque
  • FDV of only ~$36K–$43K limits institutional interest
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of meme tokens, absence of sniper data, very shallow liquidity making price easily manipulated, and the fact that the 586% pump occurred within hours with no disclosed catalyst. Price targets are highly uncertain in either direction.

Deep Analysis

The 6 available hourly OHLC candles reveal a dramatic pump-and-dump pattern. Candles [4]–[6] (May 2, 07:00–10:00 UTC) show extremely low volume (2.7–127 USD) and flat price action around $0.0000049–$0.0000052, indicating dormancy. Candle [3] (May 3, 00:00 UTC) shows a breakout open at $0.000004975, high of $0.000006884, close of $0.000006520 on modest volume ($363). Candle [2] (May 3, 01:00 UTC) is a high-volume ($78.2K) bearish candle: open and high both at $0.000006205, close at $0.000004975 — a full bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern indicating aggressive selling at the top. Candle [1] (May 3, 02:00 UTC) shows a confusing OHLC where L ($0.0000304) > O ($0.000004975) and H ($0.000006205) < L — this appears to be a data anomaly or inverted field, but the close matches the high at $0.000006205, suggesting continued volatility. The current price of $0.000036 is significantly above all candle closes, implying the pump continued after the last candle window.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 22%Sell 78%

Short-term trend is technically up given the 586% 24h gain, but the 1h -33% and 5m -6.5% readings confirm the peak has likely passed and a downtrend is beginning. The medium-term (April) trend was a slow holder decline and flat/declining price, making the medium-term outlook bearish.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000006 (candle [2]–[3] close zone)
Major$0.000005 (pre-pump base, candles [4]–[6])
Resistance
Immediate$0.000036 (current price / post-pump high zone)
Major$0.000069 (extrapolated from candle [1] anomalous low field of $0.0000304, suggesting intraday spike territory)

The key support cluster sits between $0.000005–$0.000006, representing the pre-pump consolidation zone. A failure to hold $0.000006 would likely see rapid reversion to $0.000005 or below. Resistance at current levels ($0.000036) is strong given the sell pressure; a re-test of this level would require significant new buy-side volume.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing / shooting star on candle [2]: open = high = $0.000006205, close = $0.000004975 on $78.2K volume — classic distribution signal
  • Dormant price action (flat candles, near-zero volume) in candles [4]–[6] prior to pump — typical of low-liquidity meme token pre-pump accumulation
  • Parabolic price extension: current price ($0.000036) is ~7x the candle [3] close ($0.000006520), suggesting an extreme extension beyond charted candle data
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by price decline — textbook blow-off top pattern

Total holders1,029
24h Δ+20
7d Δ+21
30d Δ+12
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The 24h holder surge of +207 (+20%) is tightly correlated with the 586% price pump, suggesting the new holders were attracted by the price action rather than organic community growth. This is a classic FOMO-driven holder spike. Notably, the 30d growth of +12% is lower than the 7d growth of +21%, which is entirely explained by the single-day event — the underlying 30d trend was actually declining (holders fell from ~899 on Apr 3 to ~820 on May 2 before the pump).

The historical holder data tells a clear story: from April 3 (899 holders) through May 2 (820 holders), the token experienced a steady, slow decline of ~79 holders (-8.8%) over ~29 days. This represents organic holder attrition — a bearish signal for community health. Then, on May 3, coinciding with the price pump, holders surged to 1,029 (+209 in ~24h). The -48 holder drop in the last hour suggests the FOMO wave is already reversing. The 7d and 30d growth figures are misleading as they are dominated by the single-day pump event. True underlying trend prior to the pump was declining.

Top 10 hold45.37%
Top 100 hold87.60%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

VNgsmM1yfzwxYJqnLWRQ7rxwc5wXGbYu8XsY5n2TJej

DEX Liquidity Pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address cited in the price data (Pair: VNgsmM1yfzwxYJqnLWRQ7rxwc5wXGbYu8XsY5n2TJej), holding 25.06% of supply as LP reserves

25.06%

95qaZyKhWpqhLKs8UHkn4DLjayDirFywFNRtQM5RNzp1

Individual whale or early investor — 4.12% concentration with no obvious CEX/protocol pattern

4.12%

4V43MwFqp5miJ1mdyQoTNuRjaa8E693wA6yqy1tqTBsy

Individual whale or team wallet — 2.88% holding, unclassified

2.88%

CfdGdXdj5nRonYQiEobnCjBwSV9hNYmiXAaRGZEDZVLN

Individual whale — 2.24% holding, unclassified

2.24%

5WJ8vABvVHzNwutbtqKBAMPXWENa5Vin2i7FGKinPa9x

Individual whale — 2.10% holding, unclassified

2.10%

The top holder (25.06%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool itself, which is expected and not a concern per se. However, excluding the LP, the remaining top 9 non-LP holders collectively control ~20.31% of supply, and the top 100 hold 87.6% total. This is extremely concentrated. The distribution across holders 2–20 shows a relatively even spread (1.04%–4.12%), suggesting no single dominant non-LP whale, but the aggregate concentration is very high. With 77.7% sell pressure and -48 holders in the last hour, the overall whale sentiment appears to be distributing into the pump.

Liquidity$19,730
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$20,840
Sell$72,610
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers167
Unique sellers482

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $19.73K is extremely shallow — a single sell order of even $5K–$10K would cause severe price impact and slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $72.61K in sells vs $20.84K in buys represents a $51.77K net outflow. The seller-to-buyer ratio is 2.9:1 (482 sellers vs 167 buyers), and sell transactions outnumber buys 2.5:1 (1,101 vs 442). The FDV of $43.14K (per trading analytics) vs $36.01K (per metadata) reflects the price volatility. This token has the hallmarks of a pump-and-dump in progress: explosive price action, thin liquidity, and overwhelming sell-side dominance. Any significant holder attempting to exit will face severe slippage given the $19.73K liquidity pool.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,711,103.456316
FDV$36,011.80

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~999.7M tokens (effectively 1 billion), a standard meme token supply figure. The FDV at current prices is ~$36K, which is micro-cap territory. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the mutable flag is false — an immutable token metadata state is a positive signal, as it prevents the creator from altering token metadata post-launch. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data (both listed as unknown). The contract is verified and not flagged as spam, which are baseline positive indicators. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (v5g2uxKKpSAUXkCw8d51A2r9jvBJLDJD7jFPkTSpump) suggests this token was launched via Pump.fun, where mint authority is typically burned upon bonding curve graduation — but this cannot be confirmed without on-chain authority data. Investors should verify mint/freeze authority status independently before trading.

Volatility
high

586% 24h price surge followed by -33% in 1h and -6.5% in 5 minutes. Extreme intraday volatility typical of micro-cap meme tokens with thin liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $19.73K. Any meaningful sell order will cause severe price impact. 24h sell volume ($72.61K) already exceeds total liquidity 3.7x, indicating the pool is being rapidly drained.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 45.37% of supply; top 100 control 87.6%. Excluding the LP pool (25.06%), non-LP top holders still represent significant concentrated positions capable of crashing the price.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, making it impossible to assess early-buyer dump risk directly. However, the 77.7% sell pressure, 2.9:1 seller-to-buyer ratio, and -48 holder drop in 1h are consistent with early holders dumping into the pump.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The token is immutable (mutable: false) which is positive. The 'pump' suffix suggests Pump.fun origin where authorities are often burned, but this is unconfirmed. Verified contract reduces but does not eliminate risk.

Key risks

  • Extreme liquidity shallowness ($19.73K) makes large exits impossible without catastrophic slippage
  • Overwhelming sell pressure (77.7%) suggests active distribution by early holders
  • Top 100 holders control 87.6% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • No sniper data available — early buyer dump risk cannot be quantified
  • Mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed — potential rug vector if not renounced
  • Historical holder trend was declining for ~29 days before the pump — weak organic community
  • Micro-cap FDV (~$36K) limits institutional participation and price stability
  • Meme token with no described utility or use case (description: none)

Mitigating factors

  • Contract is verified and not flagged as spam
  • Token metadata is immutable (mutable: false), preventing post-launch metadata manipulation
  • Pump.fun origin typically involves burned mint authority upon graduation (unconfirmed)
  • Social links present (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggest some community infrastructure
  • Holder count grew +207 in 24h, showing short-term demand exists
  • Top holder is the LP pool (25.06%), not a single insider wallet
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

Gerald The Dolphin is a micro-cap Solana meme token that has experienced a violent 586% pump within 24 hours, now showing clear signs of distribution and reversal. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, driven by momentum and social attention rather than fundamentals. The risk/reward is highly asymmetric to the downside at current prices given the thin liquidity, sell-side dominance, and concentrated ownership.

Bull case (low)

If the pump attracts sustained viral attention on social media (Twitter/X), a second wave of FOMO buyers could push the price to new highs. A successful community narrative around 'Gerald The Dolphin' as a meme character, combined with influencer promotion, could temporarily sustain or extend the rally.

  • Viral social media moment or influencer endorsement
  • Sustained buy-side volume exceeding current sell pressure
  • New liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum lifting all micro-caps

Base case

The token partially retraces the pump, stabilizing somewhere between $0.000008–$0.000015 as the most aggressive sellers exit and a smaller, committed holder base remains. Volume fades significantly, and the token enters a prolonged low-activity phase similar to its pre-pump state.

  • Some portion of new 24h holders (207) remain long-term
  • Liquidity pool is not fully drained by sell pressure
  • No additional viral catalyst emerges to re-ignite buying
  • Mint/freeze authorities are renounced (assumed from Pump.fun origin)

Bear case (high)

The pump fully unwinds as early holders and snipers continue distributing. With only $19.73K in liquidity and 77.7% sell pressure, the price reverts to pre-pump levels (~$0.000005) or lower. Holder count drops sharply as FOMO buyers realize losses and exit.

  • Continued sell-side dominance (77.7% of volume)
  • Shallow liquidity unable to absorb sell pressure
  • Historical holder decline trend reasserts itself
  • No fundamental utility or catalyst to sustain price
  • Early holder profit-taking into the pump

GeneratedMay 3, 02:47 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of ~2026-05-03T02:00Z. OHLC data covers last 6 hourly candles. Holder history covers 30 days daily. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: v5g2uxKKpSAUXkCw8d51A2r9jvBJLDJD7jFPkTSpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (VNgsmM1yfzwxYJqnLWRQ7rxwc5wXGbYu8XsY5n2TJej)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (6 candles, May 2–3 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis (no data available)

Limitations

  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and PnL cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully evaluated
  • Only 6 hourly OHLC candles provided — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Candle [1] contains apparent data anomaly (L > O) which may indicate data quality issues
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($36,011) and trading analytics ($43,140) reflects price volatility during data collection
  • No on-chain transaction history or wallet behavior data beyond top holder balances
  • Meme token fundamentals are inherently speculative and difficult to model

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,711,103.456316

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($19.73K) makes large exits impossible without catastrophic slippage
Overwhelming sell pressure (77.7%) suggests active distribution by early holders
Top 100 holders control 87.6% of supply — extreme concentration risk
No sniper data available — early buyer dump risk cannot be quantified

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for Gerald The Dolphin. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the trading analytics paint a concerning picture: 1,101 sell transactions vs 442 buy transactions in 24h, with 482 unique sellers vs 167 unique buyers. This 2.9:1 seller-to-buyer ratio and 77.7% sell volume dominance strongly suggest that early holders and/or insiders are distributing into the pump. The -48 holder drop in the last hour further supports active profit-taking.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available

Likely distributing — the sharp sell volume dominance (77.7%) and -48 holder loss in the last hour suggest early buyers are actively exiting into the price spike. Without sniper data, precise PnL of early entrants cannot be confirmed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Gerald The Dolphin (Gerald)?

The token is already showing sharp reversion: -6.5% in 5 minutes and -33.4% in 1 hour from the peak. With 77.7% sell pressure, only $19.73K in liquidity, and a -48 holder drop in the last hour, the short-term trajectory is strongly bearish. The pump appears to be unwinding rapidly. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000004 to $0.000025.

Is Gerald a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

How are Gerald holders trending?

Gerald The Dolphin currently has 1,029 holders and is growing (24h: 20, 7d: 21, 30d: 12). The historical holder data tells a clear story: from April 3 (899 holders) through May 2 (820 holders), the token experienced a steady, slow decline of ~79 holders (-8.8%) over ~29 days. This represents organic holder attrition — a bearish signal for community health. Then, on May 3, coinciding with the price pump, holders surged to 1,029 (+209 in ~24h). The -48 holder drop in the last hour suggests the FOMO wave is already reversing. The 7d and 30d growth figures are misleading as they are dominated by the single-day pump event. True underlying trend prior to the pump was declining.

What does sniper activity look like for Gerald?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Gerald?

Extreme liquidity shallowness ($19.73K) makes large exits impossible without catastrophic slippage • Overwhelming sell pressure (77.7%) suggests active distribution by early holders • Top 100 holders control 87.6% of supply — extreme concentration risk

Track Gerald