Gay Jew Copycat Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell Gay Jew Copycat (GAYLON)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: What is the short-term price outlook for Gay Jew Copycat (GAYLON)?

No price data is available, making precise targets impossible. However, the 92.7% sell pressure ratio, thin $28.99K liquidity, and 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions in 24h strongly imply severe downward price pressure. Any remaining liquidity is at high risk of being drained. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of Unknown — liquidity drain / near-zero risk to Unknown — no price data available.

Q: Is GAYLON a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder patterns, missing data, and no community infrastructure makes this an extremely high-risk asset consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

GAYLONSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 16, 2026

$0.0₅4200

Contract

Live

pu4obkGGCvfpKwDFcrt22qFpggdkCExkYREDS45pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

150

Market cap

$4,199

At a $1M market cap, $GAYLON would be $0.001000 (238x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GAYLON a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

8.1%1 sniper, 2 bundlers, 1 insider still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GAYLON

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BankBankcoin$0.0₅4351+0.0%MC $4.3K

OASISOasis Land$0.0₅2205+0.0%MC $2.2K

PUMPIPumpilians$0.0₅3711+0.0%MC $3.7K

PatriotThe Patriot$0.0₅2163+0.0%MC $2.2K

AnthropicAnthropic$0.0₅1851+0.0%MC $1.8K

ZECZcash$1,319.41+2.2%MC $135.59M

Gay Jew Copycat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-16 22:19 UTC

Holder addresses

384

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$28,993.21

How concentrated is Gay Jew Copycat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 384 addresses (2026-06-16 22:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Gay Jew Copycat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Gay Jew Copycat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-16 22:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $28,993.21. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-16 22:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 16, 10:19 PM UTC

FDV

$77,592

Liquidity

$28,993.21

Holders

384

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GAYLON (Gay Jew Copycat) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana memecoin with a total supply of ~1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $77.59K. The token exhibits extreme red flags: 24h sell volume ($285.71K) dwarfs buy volume ($22.50K) at a 92.7%/7.3% sell-to-buy ratio, liquidity is razor-thin at $28.99K, no price data is available, no top holder data is provided, and the historical holder series shows the token sat at just 7 holders for the entire 30-day window before a sudden spike to 384 holders within the last 24 hours. The token has no verified contract, no social links, and unknown update authority. All signals point to a high-risk, likely post-launch dump scenario.

Key points

Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K sell vs $22.50K buy)
Holder count exploded from 7 to 384 in under 24 hours — highly anomalous
Historical holder data shows zero growth for 30 days prior to the spike
Liquidity of only $28.99K against $285.71K in sell volume — severe slippage risk
No price data, no OHLC candles, no top holder data — critical data gaps
No social links, unverified contract, unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

Target low

Unknown — liquidity drain / near-zero risk

Target high

Unknown — no price data available

Support: $28.99K total liquidity pool floor (effectively the last line of support)
Resistance: FDV-implied price ceiling (~$77.59K FDV / 1B supply)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without a fundamental catalyst, community, or social presence, sustained recovery is unlikely. The token's 30-day stagnation at 7 holders followed by a sudden spike and dump pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch-and-exit scheme.

Catalysts

Unexpected viral social media attention
Listing on a mid-tier CEX (no evidence of this)
Community-led buyback campaign (no community infrastructure visible)

Bullish factors

FDV of $77.59K is very low, meaning a small amount of buying could move price significantly
384 holders acquired in under 24h shows some initial interest
Thin liquidity cuts both ways — small buy pressure could spike price

Bearish factors

92.7% sell pressure in 24h ($285.71K sells vs $22.50K buys)
Only $28.99K total liquidity — easily drained
3,060 sells vs 242 buys — overwhelming distribution
Zero holder growth for 30 days prior to launch spike — no organic build-up
No social links, no verified contract, no community infrastructure
Unknown update authority — potential rug vector

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the complete absence of price data, OHLC candles, and top holder information. All directional signals are inferred from volume ratios, liquidity depth, and holder anomalies rather than price action.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: pu4obk...pump
Total Supply: 999,999,991.892234 (approximately 1 billion)

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K vs $22.50K buys)
Critically shallow liquidity ($28.99K) — high slippage risk for any exit
Anomalous holder pattern: 7 holders for 30 days, then +377 in 24h — consistent with coordinated dump
No price data, no OHLC data, no top holder data — severe information asymmetry

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

No OHLC candle data is available for GAYLON. Technical analysis based on price action cannot be performed. All technical observations are derived from volume and trading analytics only.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

With 92.7% of 24h volume being sell-side and 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions, the implied price trend is strongly bearish. No candle data is available to confirm chart patterns.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

Sell

93%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

Unknown — no price data; liquidity pool of $28.99K represents the practical floor

Major support

Unknown — no historical price data available

Immediate resistance

Unknown — no price data available

Major resistance

Unknown — FDV-implied ceiling (~$77.59K FDV)

Without OHLC data, precise support and resistance levels cannot be identified. The $28.99K liquidity pool is the only quantifiable floor reference. Any significant sell order could breach this level entirely.

Notable patterns

No candle patterns available — OHLC data absent
Volume pattern: extreme sell-side dominance (92.7%) consistent with post-launch dump
Holder spike from 7 to 384 in <24h with simultaneous sell dominance — classic pump-and-dump signature
Price change reported as 0% across all timeframes — possible data feed anomaly or price at effective floor

Liquidity

$28,993.21

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $28.99K is extremely shallow relative to the $285.71K in 24h sell volume — sellers have moved nearly 10x the available liquidity in a single day, implying severe price impact and slippage. The net flow is strongly negative (outflow), with 1,156 unique sellers vs only 117 unique buyers. The sell-to-buy ratio of 92.7%/7.3% is one of the most extreme distributions possible, indicating near-total capitulation or a coordinated exit. Any position of meaningful size would face catastrophic slippage attempting to exit through the $28.99K liquidity pool. The FDV of $77.59K against $28.99K liquidity means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 37%, which is low but not the primary concern — the sell pressure is.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,991.892234 (approximately 1 billion)

FDV

$77.59K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
No price data available, but 92.7% sell pressure and $285.71K in sell volume against $28.99K liquidity implies extreme volatility and likely severe price decline. Any buy order faces massive slippage.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $28.99K is critically shallow. Sell volume in 24h ($285.71K) is nearly 10x the available liquidity. Exiting any meaningful position would be extremely difficult without catastrophic price impact.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K vs $22.50K buys)
Critically shallow liquidity ($28.99K) — high slippage risk for any exit
Anomalous holder pattern: 7 holders for 30 days, then +377 in 24h — consistent with coordinated dump
No price data, no OHLC data, no top holder data — severe information asymmetry
No social links, no community, no verified contract
Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions in 24h — overwhelming distribution
Token name and description contain potentially offensive content — reputational and platform risk

Mitigating factors

Token marked as mutable:false — minor positive for metadata integrity
FDV of $77.59K is very low — limited absolute dollar downside for the market cap
Pump.fun launch mechanism provides some baseline structure
Not flagged as spam by data provider

Suitable for

This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder patterns, missing data, and no community infrastructure makes this an extremely high-risk asset consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

GAYLON presents no credible investment thesis at this time. The data profile is consistent with a coordinated launch-and-dump scheme: 30 days of dormancy at 7 holders, a sudden spike to 384 holders, and simultaneous 92.7% sell pressure. There is no community, no social presence, no verified contract, and no price transparency. The risk-reward profile is deeply unfavorable.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral memecoin moment drives unexpected retail FOMO

Unexpected viral social media attention (no current evidence)
Low FDV ($77.59K) means small capital inflows could generate large percentage gains
Thin liquidity amplifies upside if buying pressure materializes

Base Case

Token stagnates at near-zero value with minimal trading activity

Sell pressure gradually exhausts available buyers
Liquidity pool shrinks further as LPs withdraw
Holder count stabilizes at current levels with no new organic growth
Token remains tradeable but effectively worthless in practical terms

Bear Case

High probability

Liquidity drain and effective token death

92.7% sell pressure continues until liquidity pool is drained
Original 7 holders complete distribution and abandon the token
No community or social infrastructure to sustain interest
Reputational risk from token name/content limits mainstream adoption

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 16, 10:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-16 22:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Pump.fun mint)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Liquidity pool data
FDV and supply data

Limitations

No price data available — all price-based analysis is impossible
No OHLC candle data — technical analysis is severely limited to volume inference only
No top holder data — whale mapping and concentration analysis are based on circumstantial evidence only
No sniper data — smart money analysis cannot be performed quantitatively
Update/mint/freeze authority status is unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
Token is unverified — on-chain metadata may be incomplete or misleading
Holder distribution data (top10=0%, top100=0%) appears to be a data artifact and should not be taken at face value
Token name and description are supplied by the creator and treated as untrusted data per analysis ground rules

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party analytics providers. Past performance and on-chain patterns do not guarantee future results. Cryptocurrency investments carry extreme risk, including total loss of capital. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gay Jew Copycat (GAYLON) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Gay Jew Copycat (GAYLON)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Gay Jew Copycat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 384 addresses (2026-06-16 22:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Gay Jew Copycat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Gay Jew Copycat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-16 22:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $28,993.21. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Gay Jew Copycat (GAYLON)?

No price data is available, making precise targets impossible. However, the 92.7% sell pressure ratio, thin $28.99K liquidity, and 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions in 24h strongly imply severe downward price pressure. Any remaining liquidity is at high risk of being drained. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of Unknown — liquidity drain / near-zero risk to Unknown — no price data available.

Is GAYLON a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder patterns, missing data, and no community infrastructure makes this an extremely high-risk asset consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

What are the key risks of holding GAYLON?

Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K vs $22.50K buys) • Critically shallow liquidity ($28.99K) — high slippage risk for any exit • Anomalous holder pattern: 7 holders for 30 days, then +377 in 24h — consistent with coordinated dump