GAYLON

Gay Jew Copycat Price Today & AI Analysis

GAYLON
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 16, 2026

pu4obkGGCvfpKwDFcrt22qFpggdkCExkYREDS45pump

$0.057347

-5.85%

FDV $7,345

LiveContract:pu4obkGGCvfpKwDFcrt22qFpggdkCExkYREDS45pumpChain:SolanaHolders:169Market cap:$7,345

More tokens on Solana

MySpace

MySpace

MySpace

$0.0418203.2%
MC $17.5K
Pumployed

Pumployed

Pumplоyed

$0.0537397.7%
MC $3.6K
sharkdog

sharkdog

sharkdog

$0.0564514.7%
MC $6.1K
MINER

MINER

MINER

$0.0060912.8%
MC $9.5K
Tony

Tony

Tony

$0.05358610.2%
MC $3.5K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.196425.2%
MC $166.42M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GAYLON

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 16, 10:19 PM
FDV

$77,592

Liquidity

$28,993

Holders

384

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

GAYLON (Gay Jew Copycat) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana memecoin with a total supply of ~1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $77.59K. The token exhibits extreme red flags: 24h sell volume ($285.71K) dwarfs buy volume ($22.50K) at a 92.7%/7.3% sell-to-buy ratio, liquidity is razor-thin at $28.99K, no price data is available, no top holder data is provided, and the historical holder series shows the token sat at just 7 holders for the entire 30-day window before a sudden spike to 384 holders within the last 24 hours. The token has no verified contract, no social links, and unknown update authority. All signals point to a high-risk, likely post-launch dump scenario.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K sell vs $22.50K buy)
Holder count exploded from 7 to 384 in under 24 hours — highly anomalous
Historical holder data shows zero growth for 30 days prior to the spike
Liquidity of only $28.99K against $285.71K in sell volume — severe slippage risk
No price data, no OHLC candles, no top holder data — critical data gaps
No social links, unverified contract, unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

No price data is available, making precise targets impossible. However, the 92.7% sell pressure ratio, thin $28.99K liquidity, and 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions in 24h strongly imply severe downward price pressure. Any remaining liquidity is at high risk of being drained.

Target lowUnknown — liquidity drain / near-zero risk
Target highUnknown — no price data available
Support: $28.99K total liquidity pool floor (effectively the last line of support)
Resistance: FDV-implied price ceiling (~$77.59K FDV / 1B supply)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without a fundamental catalyst, community, or social presence, sustained recovery is unlikely. The token's 30-day stagnation at 7 holders followed by a sudden spike and dump pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch-and-exit scheme.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media attention
  • Listing on a mid-tier CEX (no evidence of this)
  • Community-led buyback campaign (no community infrastructure visible)

Bullish factors

  • FDV of $77.59K is very low, meaning a small amount of buying could move price significantly
  • 384 holders acquired in under 24h shows some initial interest
  • Thin liquidity cuts both ways — small buy pressure could spike price

Bearish factors

  • 92.7% sell pressure in 24h ($285.71K sells vs $22.50K buys)
  • Only $28.99K total liquidity — easily drained
  • 3,060 sells vs 242 buys — overwhelming distribution
  • Zero holder growth for 30 days prior to launch spike — no organic build-up
  • No social links, no verified contract, no community infrastructure
  • Unknown update authority — potential rug vector
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the complete absence of price data, OHLC candles, and top holder information. All directional signals are inferred from volume ratios, liquidity depth, and holder anomalies rather than price action.

Deep Analysis

No OHLC candle data is available for GAYLON. Technical analysis based on price action cannot be performed. All technical observations are derived from volume and trading analytics only.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 7%Sell 93%

With 92.7% of 24h volume being sell-side and 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions, the implied price trend is strongly bearish. No candle data is available to confirm chart patterns.

Key Price Levels

Support
ImmediateUnknown — no price data; liquidity pool of $28.99K represents the practical floor
MajorUnknown — no historical price data available
Resistance
ImmediateUnknown — no price data available
MajorUnknown — FDV-implied ceiling (~$77.59K FDV)

Without OHLC data, precise support and resistance levels cannot be identified. The $28.99K liquidity pool is the only quantifiable floor reference. Any significant sell order could breach this level entirely.

Notable patterns

  • No candle patterns available — OHLC data absent
  • Volume pattern: extreme sell-side dominance (92.7%) consistent with post-launch dump
  • Holder spike from 7 to 384 in <24h with simultaneous sell dominance — classic pump-and-dump signature
  • Price change reported as 0% across all timeframes — possible data feed anomaly or price at effective floor

Total holders384
24h Δ+377
7d Δ+377
30d Δ+377
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

No price data is available to correlate with holder growth. However, the simultaneous spike in holders (+377 in 24h) and extreme sell pressure (92.7% of volume) suggests the holder growth is driven by distribution — sellers are fragmenting supply into many small wallets — rather than organic accumulation.

The historical holder data shows GAYLON sat at exactly 7 holders every single day for the entire 30-day window (May 17 – June 15, 2026) before a sudden spike to 384 holders within the last 24 hours (+377, +98%). This is a highly anomalous pattern. Zero organic holder growth for 30 days followed by a near-instantaneous explosion is inconsistent with natural community building. Combined with 92.7% sell pressure on the same day, this pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch event where initial holders (the 7) distributed tokens to many wallets, generating artificial holder count metrics while dumping value.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Data unavailable — top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for GAYLON. The data reports top10=0% and top100=0% supply concentration, which is likely a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. With only 384 total holders and the token having sat at 7 holders for 30 days, the actual concentration is almost certainly very high among the original 7 wallets. The overwhelming sell pressure (92.7% of 24h volume) further supports a distributing sentiment among large holders. Without top holder data, precise whale mapping is impossible, but all circumstantial evidence points to a very concentrated, actively distributing holder base.

Liquidity$28.99K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$22.50K
Sell$285.71K
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers117
Unique sellers1,156

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $28.99K is extremely shallow relative to the $285.71K in 24h sell volume — sellers have moved nearly 10x the available liquidity in a single day, implying severe price impact and slippage. The net flow is strongly negative (outflow), with 1,156 unique sellers vs only 117 unique buyers. The sell-to-buy ratio of 92.7%/7.3% is one of the most extreme distributions possible, indicating near-total capitulation or a coordinated exit. Any position of meaningful size would face catastrophic slippage attempting to exit through the $28.99K liquidity pool. The FDV of $77.59K against $28.99K liquidity means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 37%, which is low but not the primary concern — the sell pressure is.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,991.892234 (approximately 1 billion)
FDV$77.59K

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

GAYLON has a total supply of approximately 1 billion tokens with a FDV of $77.59K, implying a very low per-token price. The token was launched via Pump.fun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address). Update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, meaning mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a minor positive signal, but without confirmed authority renouncement, rug risk from authorities remains unknown. No social links or project documentation exist to provide additional tokenomics context. The Pump.fun launch mechanism typically burns LP tokens and renounces mint authority upon graduation, but it is unclear if this token has graduated or what its current authority state is.

Volatility
high

No price data available, but 92.7% sell pressure and $285.71K in sell volume against $28.99K liquidity implies extreme volatility and likely severe price decline. Any buy order faces massive slippage.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $28.99K is critically shallow. Sell volume in 24h ($285.71K) is nearly 10x the available liquidity. Exiting any meaningful position would be extremely difficult without catastrophic price impact.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, but the token sat at exactly 7 holders for 30 days before spiking to 384. This strongly implies extreme concentration among the original 7 wallets. Supply concentration data (top10=0%, top100=0%) appears to be a data artifact.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the pattern of 7 holders for 30 days followed by a sudden 384-holder spike with 92.7% sell pressure is highly consistent with early holders (potential snipers) executing a coordinated dump into retail buyers.

Authority
medium

Update authority is unknown, contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked mutable:false which is a minor positive, but insufficient to reduce authority risk to low without confirmed renouncement.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K vs $22.50K buys)
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($28.99K) — high slippage risk for any exit
  • Anomalous holder pattern: 7 holders for 30 days, then +377 in 24h — consistent with coordinated dump
  • No price data, no OHLC data, no top holder data — severe information asymmetry
  • No social links, no community, no verified contract
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
  • 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions in 24h — overwhelming distribution
  • Token name and description contain potentially offensive content — reputational and platform risk

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable:false — minor positive for metadata integrity
  • FDV of $77.59K is very low — limited absolute dollar downside for the market cap
  • Pump.fun launch mechanism provides some baseline structure
  • Not flagged as spam by data provider
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder patterns, missing data, and no community infrastructure makes this an extremely high-risk asset consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

GAYLON presents no credible investment thesis at this time. The data profile is consistent with a coordinated launch-and-dump scheme: 30 days of dormancy at 7 holders, a sudden spike to 384 holders, and simultaneous 92.7% sell pressure. There is no community, no social presence, no verified contract, and no price transparency. The risk-reward profile is deeply unfavorable.

Bull case (low)

Viral memecoin moment drives unexpected retail FOMO

  • Unexpected viral social media attention (no current evidence)
  • Low FDV ($77.59K) means small capital inflows could generate large percentage gains
  • Thin liquidity amplifies upside if buying pressure materializes

Base case

Token stagnates at near-zero value with minimal trading activity

  • Sell pressure gradually exhausts available buyers
  • Liquidity pool shrinks further as LPs withdraw
  • Holder count stabilizes at current levels with no new organic growth
  • Token remains tradeable but effectively worthless in practical terms

Bear case (high)

Liquidity drain and effective token death

  • 92.7% sell pressure continues until liquidity pool is drained
  • Original 7 holders complete distribution and abandon the token
  • No community or social infrastructure to sustain interest
  • Reputational risk from token name/content limits mainstream adoption

GeneratedJun 16, 10:19 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of June 15, 2026. Historical holder series covers May 17 – June 15, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Pump.fun mint)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Liquidity pool data
  • FDV and supply data

Limitations

  • No price data available — all price-based analysis is impossible
  • No OHLC candle data — technical analysis is severely limited to volume inference only
  • No top holder data — whale mapping and concentration analysis are based on circumstantial evidence only
  • No sniper data — smart money analysis cannot be performed quantitatively
  • Update/mint/freeze authority status is unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • Token is unverified — on-chain metadata may be incomplete or misleading
  • Holder distribution data (top10=0%, top100=0%) appears to be a data artifact and should not be taken at face value
  • Token name and description are supplied by the creator and treated as untrusted data per analysis ground rules

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party analytics providers. Past performance and on-chain patterns do not guarantee future results. Cryptocurrency investments carry extreme risk, including total loss of capital. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,991.892234 (approximately 1 billion)

Key Risks

•Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K vs $22.50K buys)
•Critically shallow liquidity ($28.99K) — high slippage risk for any exit
•Anomalous holder pattern: 7 holders for 30 days, then +377 in 24h — consistent with coordinated dump
•No price data, no OHLC data, no top holder data — severe information asymmetry

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for GAYLON. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the broader trading data tells a clear story: 1,156 unique sellers vs 117 unique buyers in 24h, with $285.71K in sell volume vs $22.50K in buy volume, strongly implies that early entrants (whether snipers or otherwise) are aggressively exiting positions. The token's sudden holder spike from 7 to 384 in under 24h followed by overwhelming sell pressure is consistent with early holders distributing to retail.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results

Strongly negative — the overwhelming sell pressure (92.7% of volume) and 9.9x more sellers than buyers suggests early buyers are distributing heavily and sentiment is bearish.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Gay Jew Copycat (GAYLON)?

No price data is available, making precise targets impossible. However, the 92.7% sell pressure ratio, thin $28.99K liquidity, and 3,060 sell transactions vs 242 buy transactions in 24h strongly imply severe downward price pressure. Any remaining liquidity is at high risk of being drained. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of Unknown — liquidity drain / near-zero risk to Unknown — no price data available.

Is GAYLON a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The combination of extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, anomalous holder patterns, missing data, and no community infrastructure makes this an extremely high-risk asset consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. Only sophisticated traders with full risk capital they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction, and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

How are GAYLON holders trending?

Gay Jew Copycat currently has 384 holders and is growing (24h: 377, 7d: 377, 30d: 377). The historical holder data shows GAYLON sat at exactly 7 holders every single day for the entire 30-day window (May 17 – June 15, 2026) before a sudden spike to 384 holders within the last 24 hours (+377, +98%). This is a highly anomalous pattern. Zero organic holder growth for 30 days followed by a near-instantaneous explosion is inconsistent with natural community building. Combined with 92.7% sell pressure on the same day, this pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch event where initial holders (the 7) distributed tokens to many wallets, generating artificial holder count metrics while dumping value.

What does sniper activity look like for GAYLON?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding GAYLON?

Extreme sell pressure: 92.7% of 24h volume is sells ($285.71K vs $22.50K buys) • Critically shallow liquidity ($28.99K) — high slippage risk for any exit • Anomalous holder pattern: 7 holders for 30 days, then +377 in 24h — consistent with coordinated dump

← Back to all predictions

Track GAYLON