$COLD

Coldstar Price Today & AI Analysis

$COLDSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 6, 2026

Price

$0.058537

-13.53% 24h

Contract

Live
hhB7CZU8rtKgaNoQu8a4DoBkQJTuUZy8Z1nB9CSEASY

Chain

Holders

267

Market cap

$8,537

Ask Unhosted AI about $COLD

Continue in chat

More tokens on Solana

Coldstar: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-06 18:19 UTC

Holder addresses

336

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$78,005.95
How concentrated is Coldstar ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 336 addresses (2026-07-06 18:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Coldstar?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Coldstar liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-06 18:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $78,005.95. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-06 18:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 6, 06:19 PM UTC

FDV

$123,498

Liquidity

$78,005.95

Holders

336

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Coldstar ($COLD) is a newly viral Solana token with a micro-cap FDV of ~$123K–$125K and a total supply of 1 billion tokens. The token is described as a USB-based offline key-signing utility. It launched with virtually no activity for ~30 days (stuck at 16 holders), then exploded in the past 24 hours to 336 holders (+320, +95%) with a 76.4% price surge. The update authority is the system burn address (111...111), indicating the token is immutable and authority is renounced. However, top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10/100 (likely a data gap), and the token is unverified. The combination of a sudden viral spike from near-zero activity, shallow liquidity ($78K), and missing holder distribution data warrants a very high risk classification.

Key points

  • Update authority renounced to system burn address — immutable token metadata
  • Explosive 24h holder growth: +320 holders (+95%) from a base of just 16
  • 76.4% price surge in 24h on meaningful volume ($391K combined buy/sell)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($78K) relative to trading volume ($391K in 24h)
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before sudden viral activity — unusual launch pattern

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle (18:00 UTC) shows a sharp reversal: price opened at $0.0001636, hit a high of $0.0001737, then closed at $0.0001254 — a bearish engulfing/shooting-star pattern with a long upper wick. The 1h price change is -11.2%. With only $78K in liquidity backing $391K in 24h volume, the token is highly susceptible to rapid drawdowns. Short-term bias is bearish as early buyers take profits.

Target low

$0.000053

Target high

$0.000174

Support

$0.000099 (candle [1] low), $0.000054 (candle [3] low — launch-day floor)

Resistance

$0.000174 (candle [1] high — recent peak), $0.000205 (candle [2] high — intraday spike high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term outlook is highly uncertain. The token was dormant for 30+ days before this spike. Sustained price appreciation requires continued community growth, liquidity deepening, and real utility adoption. Without these, mean reversion toward pre-spike levels (~$0.000064 open of candle [3]) is likely. A genuine product launch or exchange listing could change the trajectory.

Catalysts

  • Actual product release or demo of the USB key-signing utility
  • Liquidity pool deepening beyond $78K
  • Continued holder growth sustaining above 500+ wallets
  • Broader Solana ecosystem momentum

Bullish factors

  • 76.4% price surge in 24h with balanced buy/sell pressure (50.9% buys)
  • 1,891 buys vs 1,585 sells — net buyer dominance in transaction count
  • 674 unique buyers vs 510 unique sellers — more unique demand-side participants
  • Update authority renounced — no rug via metadata manipulation
  • Mutable=false — token parameters cannot be changed

Bearish factors

  • Only $78K total liquidity — extremely shallow for $391K daily volume
  • Token dormant for 30+ days before spike — suspicious launch pattern
  • Most recent candle shows sharp reversal with long upper wick (-23% close from high)
  • 1h price change already -11.2% — momentum fading
  • No verified contract, no top holder data available
  • 336 total holders is very low — thin community base

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available, the token has a 30-day dormancy history, top holder data is missing, and sniper data is unavailable. The data set is too thin to support high-confidence price targets.

$COLD call history

Full track record →

Jul 6bearish
24h-1.2%
7d-76.5%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
hhB7CZ...EASY
Total Supply
1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

  • Critically shallow liquidity ($78K) relative to trading volume ($391K/24h) — extreme slippage risk
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden spike suggests coordinated pump activity
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed
  • Only 336 total holders — extremely thin community base

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0000641, H=$0.0001919, L=$0.0000535, C=$0.0001434 — a massive bullish engulfing candle with a 258% range, closing near the upper half. Volume: 140,583. Candle [2] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.0001436, H=$0.0002054, L=$0.0001086, C=$0.0001724 — continued upward momentum, new high at $0.0002054, closing in upper half. Volume: 173,413 (highest of the three). Candle [3] (18:00 UTC): O=$0.0001636, H=$0.0001737, L=$0.0000997, C=$0.0001254 — bearish reversal candle. Price opened near prior close, made a modest new high, then sold off sharply, closing near the lower third of the range. Volume dropped to 25,232 — a significant volume dry-up. This is a classic shooting-star / bearish engulfing pattern signaling exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

The 3-candle sequence shows a rapid pump (candles [3] and [2]) followed by a reversal candle (candle [1]). Short-term momentum has turned bearish as the most recent candle closed well below its open with declining volume. The medium-term trend from the 30-day dormancy base is technically an uptrend given the massive move from ~$0.000064 to a peak of ~$0.000205.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000099 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000054 (candle [3] absolute low — launch floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000174 (candle [1] high)

Major resistance

$0.000205 (candle [2] high — intraday spike peak)

The $0.000099 level is the most recent tested low and serves as immediate support. A break below this opens the path to the $0.000054 launch-day floor. On the upside, $0.000174 is the first resistance (candle [1] high), with $0.000205 as the major resistance representing the intraday spike peak.

Notable patterns

  • Bullish engulfing / massive breakout candle at 16:00 UTC (candle [3]) — 258% intrabar range
  • Shooting star / bearish reversal candle at 18:00 UTC (candle [1]) — long upper wick, close in lower third
  • Volume climax at candle [2] followed by 85% volume drop — exhaustion signal
  • Higher high from candle [3] to candle [2] ($0.0001919 → $0.0002054), but candle [1] failed to make new high — momentum divergence

Liquidity

Liquidity

$78,005.95

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $78K on a Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (pair 7XtHCxoV94rSLLPz6fCUoM3U4BLagjXjdZ5wqCfGM5sg). The 24h trading volume of ~$391K is approximately 5x the total liquidity — an extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio that indicates severe slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The buy/sell volume split is nearly balanced (50.9% / 49.1%), and the net flow is marginally positive (inflow). There are 674 unique buyers vs 510 unique sellers, and 1,891 buy transactions vs 1,585 sell transactions — suggesting slightly more buy-side activity in both unique wallets and transaction count. However, the shallow liquidity means even modest sell pressure could cause outsized price drops. The FDV of $125.42K vs $78K liquidity means the entire market cap could theoretically be drained with a fraction of the liquidity.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

FDV

$123,497.70

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token surged 76.4% in 24h and showed a 3x intraday range within 3 hours. The most recent candle shows a sharp -23% reversal from high to close. With only $78K liquidity, price can move violently on small orders.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of $78K is critically shallow. The 24h volume of $391K is ~5x the liquidity pool. Any significant sell order will cause extreme slippage. Exiting a meaningful position could move the market substantially against the seller.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Critically shallow liquidity ($78K) relative to trading volume ($391K/24h) — extreme slippage risk
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden spike suggests coordinated pump activity
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed
  • Only 336 total holders — extremely thin community base
  • No verified contract
  • Most recent candle shows sharp reversal with declining volume — momentum exhaustion
  • Early holders (16 wallets from dormancy period) likely in significant profit and may sell

Mitigating factors

  • Update authority permanently renounced to burn address — no metadata rug risk
  • Token is immutable (Mutable=false)
  • Balanced buy/sell pressure (50.9%/49.1%) — no extreme one-sided selling
  • More unique buyers (674) than sellers (510) in 24h
  • Described utility (USB offline key signer) provides a conceptual use case narrative
  • Social presence: telegram, twitter, website, moralis links exist

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand micro-cap Solana tokens, can afford to lose their entire investment, and are capable of active position management. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with high-risk DeFi assets. Position sizing should be minimal relative to total portfolio.

Coldstar ($COLD) is a micro-cap Solana token that experienced a sudden viral event after 30 days of complete dormancy, surging 76.4% in 24h to an FDV of ~$123K. The token has genuine safety positives (renounced authority, immutable metadata) but is plagued by critically shallow liquidity, missing holder data, an abnormal launch pattern, and a very thin community. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the viral momentum is sustainable and whether the described USB key-signing utility has real development behind it.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Sustained viral growth drives holder count from 336 to 1,000+ within 7 days. Liquidity deepens as more LPs enter. The USB key-signing utility gains credibility through a product demo or GitHub activity, attracting a niche crypto-security audience. Price recovers from the current reversal and tests the $0.000205 intraday high, with potential to 2–5x from current levels if FDV reaches $250K–$600K.

  • Continued organic holder growth beyond the initial viral spike
  • Liquidity pool deepening to $200K+
  • Credible product development evidence (GitHub, demo, whitepaper)
  • Broader Solana meme/utility token market momentum
  • Community building on Telegram/Twitter

Base Case

The token consolidates in the $0.000080–$0.000140 range over the next 7 days as initial excitement fades but a small community of 300–500 holders remains. Price stabilizes near current levels with low volume. Long-term outcome depends on whether the project delivers any tangible product updates.

  • Some but not all early holders sell into current strength
  • Holder count stabilizes around 300–400 rather than growing further
  • Liquidity remains shallow at $50K–$100K
  • No major catalysts (product launch, exchange listing) in the near term
  • Token does not get listed on any major aggregator or exchange

Bear Case

High probability

The 76.4% pump was a coordinated short-term event. Early holders (the 16 dormancy-period wallets) begin distributing into the new buyer demand. Volume dries up, liquidity remains shallow, and price retraces to pre-spike levels (~$0.000054–$0.000064). With no verified contract and no proven utility, the token fades into obscurity.

  • Early holder profit-taking into thin liquidity
  • Volume exhaustion (already showing -85% drop in most recent candle)
  • No verified contract or proven utility
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying sell-side impact
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggesting lack of organic community

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 6, 06:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-06 18:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data (pair 7XtHCxoV94rSLLPz6fCUoM3U4BLagjXjdZ5wqCfGM5sg)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
  • Hourly OHLC candles (3 candles, 16:00–18:00 UTC July 6 2026)
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Holder acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data explicitly unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10/100 — almost certainly a data gap
  • No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and concentration unknown
  • Token has only 30 days of on-chain history with 29 days of zero activity
  • No verified contract — smart contract code unaudited
  • Holder distribution categories (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0 — data gap
  • FDV figures show slight discrepancy between metadata ($123,497.70) and analytics ($125,420) — minor data inconsistency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Coldstar ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 336 addresses (2026-07-06 18:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Coldstar?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Coldstar liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-06 18:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $78,005.95. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Coldstar ($COLD)?

The most recent hourly candle (18:00 UTC) shows a sharp reversal: price opened at $0.0001636, hit a high of $0.0001737, then closed at $0.0001254 — a bearish engulfing/shooting-star pattern with a long upper wick. The 1h price change is -11.2%. With only $78K in liquidity backing $391K in 24h volume, the token is highly susceptible to rapid drawdowns. Short-term bias is bearish as early buyers take profits. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000053 to $0.000174.

Is $COLD a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.5/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand micro-cap Solana tokens, can afford to lose their entire investment, and are capable of active position management. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with high-risk DeFi assets. Position sizing should be minimal relative to total portfolio.

What are the key risks of holding $COLD?

Critically shallow liquidity ($78K) relative to trading volume ($391K/24h) — extreme slippage risk • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden spike suggests coordinated pump activity • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be properly assessed

← Back to all predictions

Questions about $COLD?