PUNDU Price Today & AI Analysis

PUNDUSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 14, 2026

$0.002227

+0.05% 24h

Contract

Live

WskzsKqEW3ZsmrhPAevfVZb6PuuLzWov9mJWZsfDePC

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,246

Market cap

$2,217,788

At a $10M market cap, $PUNDU would be $0.0100 (4.51x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is PUNDU a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about PUNDU

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

HELLO?IS THIS NOT INSANE?$0.0₅4626-0.6%MC $4.6K

PHONEPhone$0.0₅2438+0.2%MC $2.3K

CR7CR7$0.000168-0.2%MC $168.5K

mogsemmogsem$0.0₅3398+0.0%MC $3.4K

QRCATQRCAT$0.0₅2525-0.0%MC $2.4K

FrongusFrongus$0.000212+412.5%MC $204.4K

PUNDU: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-14 10:47 UTC

Holder addresses

10,483

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$3,113,484.84

How concentrated is PUNDU ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 10,483 addresses (2026-06-14 10:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling PUNDU?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is PUNDU liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-14 10:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $3,113,484.84. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-14 10:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 14, 10:47 AM UTC

FDV

$1,859,564

Liquidity

$3,113,484.84

Holders

10,483

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

PUNDU is a Solana-based meme coin self-described as 'the first meme coin fair launched on DAO Maker,' themed around pandas. The token is currently priced at ~$0.001867, having suffered a catastrophic 62.83% 24-hour price decline from a peak near $0.005. Total supply is ~995.9M tokens with a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.86M. The token exhibits extreme supply concentration — the top holder alone controls 86.43% of supply — making it one of the most concentrated tokens observable. Liquidity is relatively deep at $3.11M vs. FDV of $1.86M, which is unusual and warrants scrutiny. The contract is mutable with a non-renounced update authority, adding governance risk.

Key points

Extreme top-holder concentration: single address holds 86.43% of total supply
Liquidity ($3.11M) exceeds FDV ($1.86M) — unusual ratio suggesting possible LP-heavy structure or stale price data
Severe 24h price crash of -62.83% from ~$0.005 to ~$0.00187
Holder base of 10,483 with recent acceleration in growth (82 net new holders on June 13)
Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — rug/upgrade risk present
No sniper data available for early-buyer analysis

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

Price has collapsed ~62.83% in 24h from ~$0.005 to ~$0.00187. Recent hourly candles show a modest recovery attempt (+5.17% in 1h, +6.77% in 6h) but the dominant trend is sharply bearish. The massive sell candle at candle [13–14] (from $0.00402 down to $0.00165) defines the current regime. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure given the extreme concentration risk and post-dump sentiment.

Target low

$0.00155

Target high

$0.00210

Support: $0.00165 (candle [13] low), $0.00174 (candle [5–7] cluster low ~$0.001745–$0.001748)
Resistance: $0.00210 (candle [7] high / recent recovery ceiling), $0.00250 (psychological level), $0.00402 (pre-dump open, candle [13])

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Unless the dominant holder (86.43% of supply) is a locked treasury or burn address, the overhang risk is enormous. Holder growth has been modest and largely flat for most of May before a recent uptick. Recovery to pre-dump levels (~$0.005) would require a 2.7x move against a backdrop of extreme concentration and mutable contract risk.

Catalysts

Clarification or locking of the 86.43% top-holder address (treasury/burn confirmation)
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
DAO Maker community-driven buying campaign
Renouncement of mint/update authority reducing rug risk

Bullish factors

Liquidity pool depth of $3.11M provides some buffer against immediate collapse
Recent 1h and 6h price recovery (+5.17% and +6.77%) suggests short-term buying interest
Holder count growing: +46 in 24h, +261 in 7d, with acceleration on June 13 (+82 in one day)
Verified contract, not flagged as spam
Relatively balanced buy/sell volume (49.2% buy vs 50.8% sell)

Bearish factors

Catastrophic 62.83% 24h price decline
Single address holds 86.43% of supply — extreme dump risk
Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority (address: 26nCUtGJA7NKp2bsTvhQPBq1FW6wtGVHYkRYaAPaBbKA)
Top 10 holders control 90.09% of supply
Meme coin with no clear utility beyond speculative narrative
Price still ~63% below 24h-ago levels with no confirmed reversal structure

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extreme supply concentration in a single address whose nature is unverified, (2) mutable contract with active update authority, (3) no sniper data to assess early-buyer overhang, (4) the 62.83% crash is recent and the full extent of selling may not be complete. Price targets are wide-range estimates only.

PUNDU call history

Full track record →

Jun 14bearish@ $0.00187

24h-1.1%

7d+11.0%

30d-9.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: WskzsK...DePC
Total Supply: 995,877,412.73

Key Risks

Single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holds 86.43% of supply — existential concentration risk
Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority
62.83% price crash in 24h with no confirmed reversal
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply inflation or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 16-candle hourly series reveals a dramatic two-phase structure. Candles [16–15] (June 13, 11:00–12:00 UTC) show price trading in the $0.00500–$0.00508 range with moderate volume (~2,238 and ~9,826 USD). Candle [14] (13:00 UTC) is a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle: open $0.00402, high $0.00416, low $0.001695, close $0.001739 — a ~57% intracandle collapse on $75,499 volume, the highest in the series. This is the defining event. Candles [13–11] show continued selling pressure with lower closes ($0.001654–$0.001717). Candle [12] (16:00 UTC) shows a brief recovery attempt (high $0.001991) that failed, closing at $0.001686. Candles [10–9] show stabilization around $0.00170–$0.00197. Candles [8–7] (June 14, 01:00–02:00 UTC) show a recovery spike to $0.002097 and $0.002086 respectively on elevated volume ($20,668 and $5,134), but price faded back. Candles [6–1] show price consolidating in the $0.001748–$0.001905 range with very low volume, suggesting the bounce has stalled.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The dominant trend is a sharp downtrend established by the crash candle on June 13 at 13:00 UTC. The subsequent price action shows lower highs and a failed recovery attempt. The short-term bounce from ~$0.001654 to ~$0.001905 has stalled, and price is consolidating near the lower end of the post-crash range.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.001654 (candle [13] low — post-crash floor)

Major support

$0.001739 (candle [7] low — $0.001745, cluster support zone $0.001745–$0.001748)

Immediate resistance

$0.001905 (candle [6] open / recent consolidation ceiling)

Major resistance

$0.002097 (candle [8] high — recovery spike peak)

The key support zone is $0.001654–$0.001748, established by the post-crash lows across candles [7], [5], [4], and [13]. Immediate resistance is the $0.001905 level (candle [6] open). Major resistance is the $0.002085–$0.002097 recovery spike zone (candles [7–8]). A break below $0.001654 would open a path toward $0.001500 or lower. Recovery above $0.002097 would be the first sign of a potential trend reversal.

Notable patterns

Massive bearish engulfing/crash candle [14]: open $0.00402, close $0.001739, ~57% intracandle collapse on highest volume in series ($75,499)
Failed recovery: candles [8–7] spiked to $0.002097 but closed lower ($0.001943 and $0.001852) — bearish rejection wicks
Volume exhaustion: post-bounce candles [6–1] show volumes of 2–208 USD — market interest has dried up
Doji-like consolidation in candles [1–6]: very small bodies, price range $0.001748–$0.001905, indecision after crash
Lower highs pattern: $0.002097 (candle 8) → $0.002086 (candle 7) → $0.001905 (candle 6) — descending resistance

Liquidity

$3,113,484.84

Depth

Deep

Slippage risk

Low

Total liquidity of $3.11M is notably higher than the FDV of $1.86M — a ratio of ~1.67x liquidity-to-FDV. This is unusual and may indicate: (1) the liquidity pool was seeded with a large amount of tokens/SOL relative to circulating value, (2) the price crash has reduced FDV while LP value remained partially intact, or (3) data discrepancy. The Raydium pair (7yEXWTjLyXwBEjMhNwP9dWVJp8G68JvY9KXGT83sDCaM) provides the trading venue. 24h volume is relatively balanced: $76.28K buys (49.2%) vs $78.64K sells (50.8%), with 127 buy transactions vs 136 sell transactions. Notably, there are more unique buyers (68) than sellers (49), suggesting individual sellers are executing larger average trades. Slippage risk is low given the deep liquidity relative to 24h volume, but the extreme supply concentration means a large holder exit could overwhelm even this liquidity depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

995,877,412.73

FDV

$1,859,563.61

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
62.83% price decline in 24 hours. Intracandle crash of ~57% in a single hourly candle [14]. Extreme volatility characteristic of low-liquidity meme coins despite the $3.11M LP.
Liquiditylow
Liquidity of $3.11M exceeds FDV of $1.86M, providing relatively deep liquidity for the current market cap. Slippage risk for normal trade sizes is low. However, a large holder exit could overwhelm even this liquidity.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holds 86.43% of supply — existential concentration risk
Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority
62.83% price crash in 24h with no confirmed reversal
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply inflation or account freezing
Meme coin with no utility — value entirely speculative
28.4% of holders acquired via airdrop — potential for artificial holder count inflation
No sniper data available — early buyer overhang cannot be assessed

Mitigating factors

Liquidity depth of $3.11M exceeds FDV, providing some price floor support
Verified contract, not flagged as spam by data provider
10,483 holders with growing base (+261 in 7d)
Relatively balanced buy/sell pressure (49.2%/50.8%) in 24h
DAO Maker association may provide some community backing (unverified)

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/meme coin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. The extreme supply concentration alone warrants maximum caution.

PUNDU is a high-risk Solana meme coin that experienced a severe pump-and-dump event, losing ~63% of its value in 24 hours. The token's fundamental risk profile is dominated by extreme supply concentration (86.43% in one address) and a mutable contract with active update authority. Any investment thesis must be predicated on resolving the top-holder identity question. The liquidity depth is a relative positive, but insufficient to offset the structural risks.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The 86.43% top holder is a verified, time-locked project treasury or DAO Maker escrow contract. The price crash was a temporary liquidity event, and the DAO Maker community drives renewed buying interest. Holder growth accelerates further, and the token establishes a new base above $0.002.

Verification that top holder is a locked/burned treasury address
DAO Maker community marketing campaign
Broader Solana meme coin market rally
Authority renouncement increasing trust
Continued holder growth acceleration

Base Case

Price stabilizes in the $0.0015–$0.0020 range as post-crash selling exhausts itself. The token trades sideways with low volume, slowly losing relevance. Holder count grows marginally but price appreciation is limited by the supply overhang from the dominant holder.

Top holder does not actively sell into the market
Liquidity pool remains intact
No further adverse contract changes
Meme coin narrative maintains minimal community interest

Bear Case

High probability

The 86.43% top holder is a team or insider wallet that begins distributing tokens into the market. The mutable contract is exploited or metadata changed. Price continues declining toward $0.001 or lower as the post-pump selling pressure continues and new buyers fail to materialize.

Top holder begins selling even a small fraction of 86.43% stake
Mutable contract authority used adversarially
Post-pump holder disillusionment and exit
No utility or sustainable demand driver
Broader meme coin market downturn

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 14, 10:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-14 10:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: WskzsKqEW3ZsmrhPAevfVZb6PuuLzWov9mJWZsfDePC)
Real-time price feed (Raydium pair 7yEXWTjLyXwBEjMhNwP9dWVJp8G68JvY9KXGT83sDCaM)
16 hourly OHLC candles (June 13–14, 2026)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
30-day daily historical holder series
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No sniper/early buyer data available — early buyer overhang cannot be assessed
Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — marked as unknown
Top holder (86.43%) identity and lock status unverified — this is the single most important unknown
Update authority address not verified as burn/renounced
Only 16 hourly candles available — limited technical analysis window
Airdrop-acquired holders (2,972) may inflate holder count metrics
FDV > liquidity ratio anomaly not fully explainable from available data
No order book depth data available
Token description and social claims (DAO Maker fair launch) are unverified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme coins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is sourced from on-chain metrics and may contain inaccuracies. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PUNDU a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell PUNDU?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is PUNDU ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 10,483 addresses (2026-06-14 10:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling PUNDU?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is PUNDU liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-14 10:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $3,113,484.84. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for PUNDU (PUNDU)?

Is PUNDU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/meme coin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. The extreme supply concentration alone warrants maximum caution.

What are the key risks of holding PUNDU?

Single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holds 86.43% of supply — existential concentration risk • Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority • 62.83% price crash in 24h with no confirmed reversal