PUNDU

PUNDU Price Today & AI Analysis

PUNDU
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 14, 2026

WskzsKqEW3ZsmrhPAevfVZb6PuuLzWov9mJWZsfDePC

$0.002245

+0.57%

FDV $2,235,340

LiveContract:WskzsKqEW3ZsmrhPAevfVZb6PuuLzWov9mJWZsfDePCChain:SolanaHolders:3,283Market cap:$2,235,340

More tokens on Solana

expensive

expensive

You can’t afford this coin

$0.05918412.0%
MC $9.0K
GACHA

GACHA

PowerGacha

$0.0495385.4%
MC $94.7K
TINY

TINY

Tiny Humans AI

$0.0004771.5%
MC $466.5K
42069K

42069K

The Retirement Token

$0.0485722.7%
MC $85.5K
USDP

USDP

USDP

$0.04108114.9%
MC $10.8K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about PUNDU

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 14, 10:47 AM
FDV

$1,859,564

Liquidity

$3,113,485

Holders

10,483

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

PUNDU is a Solana-based meme coin self-described as 'the first meme coin fair launched on DAO Maker,' themed around pandas. The token is currently priced at ~$0.001867, having suffered a catastrophic 62.83% 24-hour price decline from a peak near $0.005. Total supply is ~995.9M tokens with a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.86M. The token exhibits extreme supply concentration — the top holder alone controls 86.43% of supply — making it one of the most concentrated tokens observable. Liquidity is relatively deep at $3.11M vs. FDV of $1.86M, which is unusual and warrants scrutiny. The contract is mutable with a non-renounced update authority, adding governance risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme top-holder concentration: single address holds 86.43% of total supply
Liquidity ($3.11M) exceeds FDV ($1.86M) — unusual ratio suggesting possible LP-heavy structure or stale price data
Severe 24h price crash of -62.83% from ~$0.005 to ~$0.00187
Holder base of 10,483 with recent acceleration in growth (82 net new holders on June 13)
Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — rug/upgrade risk present
No sniper data available for early-buyer analysis

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

Price has collapsed ~62.83% in 24h from ~$0.005 to ~$0.00187. Recent hourly candles show a modest recovery attempt (+5.17% in 1h, +6.77% in 6h) but the dominant trend is sharply bearish. The massive sell candle at candle [13–14] (from $0.00402 down to $0.00165) defines the current regime. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure given the extreme concentration risk and post-dump sentiment.

Target low$0.00155
Target high$0.00210
Support: $0.00165 (candle [13] low), $0.00174 (candle [5–7] cluster low ~$0.001745–$0.001748)
Resistance: $0.00210 (candle [7] high / recent recovery ceiling), $0.00250 (psychological level), $0.00402 (pre-dump open, candle [13])

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Unless the dominant holder (86.43% of supply) is a locked treasury or burn address, the overhang risk is enormous. Holder growth has been modest and largely flat for most of May before a recent uptick. Recovery to pre-dump levels (~$0.005) would require a 2.7x move against a backdrop of extreme concentration and mutable contract risk.

Catalysts
  • Clarification or locking of the 86.43% top-holder address (treasury/burn confirmation)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • DAO Maker community-driven buying campaign
  • Renouncement of mint/update authority reducing rug risk

Bullish factors

  • Liquidity pool depth of $3.11M provides some buffer against immediate collapse
  • Recent 1h and 6h price recovery (+5.17% and +6.77%) suggests short-term buying interest
  • Holder count growing: +46 in 24h, +261 in 7d, with acceleration on June 13 (+82 in one day)
  • Verified contract, not flagged as spam
  • Relatively balanced buy/sell volume (49.2% buy vs 50.8% sell)

Bearish factors

  • Catastrophic 62.83% 24h price decline
  • Single address holds 86.43% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority (address: 26nCUtGJA7NKp2bsTvhQPBq1FW6wtGVHYkRYaAPaBbKA)
  • Top 10 holders control 90.09% of supply
  • Meme coin with no clear utility beyond speculative narrative
  • Price still ~63% below 24h-ago levels with no confirmed reversal structure
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extreme supply concentration in a single address whose nature is unverified, (2) mutable contract with active update authority, (3) no sniper data to assess early-buyer overhang, (4) the 62.83% crash is recent and the full extent of selling may not be complete. Price targets are wide-range estimates only.

PUNDU call history

Full track record →
Jun 14bearish
24h-1.1%
7d+11.0%
30d-9.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 16-candle hourly series reveals a dramatic two-phase structure. Candles [16–15] (June 13, 11:00–12:00 UTC) show price trading in the $0.00500–$0.00508 range with moderate volume (~2,238 and ~9,826 USD). Candle [14] (13:00 UTC) is a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle: open $0.00402, high $0.00416, low $0.001695, close $0.001739 — a ~57% intracandle collapse on $75,499 volume, the highest in the series. This is the defining event. Candles [13–11] show continued selling pressure with lower closes ($0.001654–$0.001717). Candle [12] (16:00 UTC) shows a brief recovery attempt (high $0.001991) that failed, closing at $0.001686. Candles [10–9] show stabilization around $0.00170–$0.00197. Candles [8–7] (June 14, 01:00–02:00 UTC) show a recovery spike to $0.002097 and $0.002086 respectively on elevated volume ($20,668 and $5,134), but price faded back. Candles [6–1] show price consolidating in the $0.001748–$0.001905 range with very low volume, suggesting the bounce has stalled.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

The dominant trend is a sharp downtrend established by the crash candle on June 13 at 13:00 UTC. The subsequent price action shows lower highs and a failed recovery attempt. The short-term bounce from ~$0.001654 to ~$0.001905 has stalled, and price is consolidating near the lower end of the post-crash range.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.001654 (candle [13] low — post-crash floor)
Major$0.001739 (candle [7] low — $0.001745, cluster support zone $0.001745–$0.001748)
Resistance
Immediate$0.001905 (candle [6] open / recent consolidation ceiling)
Major$0.002097 (candle [8] high — recovery spike peak)

The key support zone is $0.001654–$0.001748, established by the post-crash lows across candles [7], [5], [4], and [13]. Immediate resistance is the $0.001905 level (candle [6] open). Major resistance is the $0.002085–$0.002097 recovery spike zone (candles [7–8]). A break below $0.001654 would open a path toward $0.001500 or lower. Recovery above $0.002097 would be the first sign of a potential trend reversal.

Notable patterns

  • Massive bearish engulfing/crash candle [14]: open $0.00402, close $0.001739, ~57% intracandle collapse on highest volume in series ($75,499)
  • Failed recovery: candles [8–7] spiked to $0.002097 but closed lower ($0.001943 and $0.001852) — bearish rejection wicks
  • Volume exhaustion: post-bounce candles [6–1] show volumes of 2–208 USD — market interest has dried up
  • Doji-like consolidation in candles [1–6]: very small bodies, price range $0.001748–$0.001905, indecision after crash
  • Lower highs pattern: $0.002097 (candle 8) → $0.002086 (candle 7) → $0.001905 (candle 6) — descending resistance

Total holders10,483
24h Δ+0.44
7d Δ+2.5
30d Δ+2.5
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth was essentially flat throughout May 2026 (oscillating between 10,214–10,225, net changes of -4 to +2 per day). Growth began accelerating in early June, with notable jumps on June 9 (+54), June 10 (+82), June 12 (+52), and June 13 (+82). This acceleration in holder count coincides with the price spike to ~$0.005 and subsequent crash, suggesting new buyers entered during the pump event. The 24h holder change of +46 during a -62.83% price day is notable — some buyers are accumulating at lower prices even as price collapses.

Total holders stand at 10,483. The 30-day growth of +258 holders (+2.50%) was almost entirely driven by the last 2 weeks of June, as May showed near-zero net growth (flat at ~10,215–10,225). The recent acceleration (82 new holders on June 13 alone) correlates with the price pump-and-dump event, suggesting speculative interest attracted new participants. Acquisition breakdown: swap (4,351), transfer (3,160), airdrop (2,972) — the significant airdrop component (28.4% of holders) may indicate manufactured holder count inflation. Distribution shows 18 whales, 25 sharks, 254 dolphins, 871 fish, and 1,566 octopus-tier holders.

Top 10 hold90.09%
Top 100 hold94.76%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1

Project treasury or team wallet — holds 86.43% of total supply (860.7M tokens). This address is the dominant risk factor for the entire token. Its nature (locked treasury, burn address, team, or whale) is unverified from available data and must be independently confirmed.

86.43%

KFgTgH9G5KFBMf4G43PRFtdZwsFbH4mXCDjwYwTrPkZ

Individual whale — holds 1.06% of supply (10.5M tokens). Second largest holder but dwarfed by #1.

1.06%

u6PJ8DtQuPFnfmwHbGFULQ4u4EgjDiyYKjVEsynXq2w

Individual whale — holds 0.60% of supply (6.0M tokens).

0.60%

AtCZma9U3miNhPpK2mT2nBYTY54xqAjD8MMw7BN3EHcB

Individual whale — holds 0.49% of supply (4.9M tokens).

0.49%

ASTyfSima4LLAdDgoFGkgqoKowG1LZFDr9fAQrg7iaJZ

Individual whale or early participant — holds 0.31% of supply (3.1M tokens).

0.31%

The whale map is dominated by a single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holding 86.43% of total supply — an extraordinary concentration that represents the single largest risk factor for this token. The top 10 holders collectively control 90.09% of supply, and the top 100 control 94.76%. This leaves only ~5.24% of supply in the hands of the remaining 10,383+ holders. If the top holder is not a verified locked treasury or burn address, the dump risk is existential. Holders #2–#20 each hold between 0.09%–1.06%, suggesting no secondary whale has meaningful influence relative to the dominant holder. The distribution is classified as very_concentrated.

Liquidity$3,110,000
Depth
Deep
Slippage risk
low

Volume (24h)

Buy$76,280
Sell$78,640
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers68
Unique sellers49

Total liquidity of $3.11M is notably higher than the FDV of $1.86M — a ratio of ~1.67x liquidity-to-FDV. This is unusual and may indicate: (1) the liquidity pool was seeded with a large amount of tokens/SOL relative to circulating value, (2) the price crash has reduced FDV while LP value remained partially intact, or (3) data discrepancy. The Raydium pair (7yEXWTjLyXwBEjMhNwP9dWVJp8G68JvY9KXGT83sDCaM) provides the trading venue. 24h volume is relatively balanced: $76.28K buys (49.2%) vs $78.64K sells (50.8%), with 127 buy transactions vs 136 sell transactions. Notably, there are more unique buyers (68) than sellers (49), suggesting individual sellers are executing larger average trades. Slippage risk is low given the deep liquidity relative to 24h volume, but the extreme supply concentration means a large holder exit could overwhelm even this liquidity depth.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply995,877,412.73
FDV$1,859,563.61

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~995.9M PUNDU with 9 decimals. The FDV is ~$1.86M at current price. The update authority is held by address 26nCUtGJA7NKp2bsTvhQPBq1FW6wtGVHYkRYaAPaBbKA — this is NOT a burn address (not 11111... or similar), meaning the contract is mutable and the authority has not been renounced. The token is marked as 'Mutable: true', confirming the metadata can be changed. Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data, so they are marked as unknown. However, the mutable contract and active update authority represent meaningful rug/upgrade risk. The description claims 'fair launch on DAO Maker' but this cannot be verified from on-chain data alone. The airdrop acquisition method for ~2,972 holders (28.4%) may indicate a distribution mechanism, but could also be used to inflate holder counts artificially.

Volatility
high

62.83% price decline in 24 hours. Intracandle crash of ~57% in a single hourly candle [14]. Extreme volatility characteristic of low-liquidity meme coins despite the $3.11M LP.

Liquidity
low

Liquidity of $3.11M exceeds FDV of $1.86M, providing relatively deep liquidity for the current market cap. Slippage risk for normal trade sizes is low. However, a large holder exit could overwhelm even this liquidity.

Concentration
high

Single address holds 86.43% of total supply. Top 10 holders control 90.09%. Top 100 control 94.76%. This is extreme concentration — if the top holder is not locked/burned, a single decision could destroy the token's value entirely.

SniperDump
low

No sniper data available. Cannot assess early-buyer overhang. Risk rated low by default per methodology, but this should not be interpreted as confirmation of safety — it reflects data absence.

Authority
high

Contract is mutable (Mutable: true). Update authority (26nCUtGJA7NKp2bsTvhQPBq1FW6wtGVHYkRYaAPaBbKA) has not been renounced. Mint and freeze authority status unknown. This means the token's metadata, and potentially its supply, could be altered by the authority holder.

Key risks

  • Single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holds 86.43% of supply — existential concentration risk
  • Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority
  • 62.83% price crash in 24h with no confirmed reversal
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply inflation or account freezing
  • Meme coin with no utility — value entirely speculative
  • 28.4% of holders acquired via airdrop — potential for artificial holder count inflation
  • No sniper data available — early buyer overhang cannot be assessed

Mitigating factors

  • Liquidity depth of $3.11M exceeds FDV, providing some price floor support
  • Verified contract, not flagged as spam by data provider
  • 10,483 holders with growing base (+261 in 7d)
  • Relatively balanced buy/sell pressure (49.2%/50.8%) in 24h
  • DAO Maker association may provide some community backing (unverified)
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/meme coin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. The extreme supply concentration alone warrants maximum caution.

PUNDU is a high-risk Solana meme coin that experienced a severe pump-and-dump event, losing ~63% of its value in 24 hours. The token's fundamental risk profile is dominated by extreme supply concentration (86.43% in one address) and a mutable contract with active update authority. Any investment thesis must be predicated on resolving the top-holder identity question. The liquidity depth is a relative positive, but insufficient to offset the structural risks.

Bull case (low)

The 86.43% top holder is a verified, time-locked project treasury or DAO Maker escrow contract. The price crash was a temporary liquidity event, and the DAO Maker community drives renewed buying interest. Holder growth accelerates further, and the token establishes a new base above $0.002.

  • Verification that top holder is a locked/burned treasury address
  • DAO Maker community marketing campaign
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Authority renouncement increasing trust
  • Continued holder growth acceleration

Base case

Price stabilizes in the $0.0015–$0.0020 range as post-crash selling exhausts itself. The token trades sideways with low volume, slowly losing relevance. Holder count grows marginally but price appreciation is limited by the supply overhang from the dominant holder.

  • Top holder does not actively sell into the market
  • Liquidity pool remains intact
  • No further adverse contract changes
  • Meme coin narrative maintains minimal community interest

Bear case (high)

The 86.43% top holder is a team or insider wallet that begins distributing tokens into the market. The mutable contract is exploited or metadata changed. Price continues declining toward $0.001 or lower as the post-pump selling pressure continues and new buyers fail to materialize.

  • Top holder begins selling even a small fraction of 86.43% stake
  • Mutable contract authority used adversarially
  • Post-pump holder disillusionment and exit
  • No utility or sustainable demand driver
  • Broader meme coin market downturn

GeneratedJun 14, 10:47 AM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of June 14, 2026 ~10:00 UTC. Holder data current as of June 13, 2026. Historical holder series covers May 15 – June 13, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: WskzsKqEW3ZsmrhPAevfVZb6PuuLzWov9mJWZsfDePC)
  • Real-time price feed (Raydium pair 7yEXWTjLyXwBEjMhNwP9dWVJp8G68JvY9KXGT83sDCaM)
  • 16 hourly OHLC candles (June 13–14, 2026)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early buyer data available — early buyer overhang cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — marked as unknown
  • Top holder (86.43%) identity and lock status unverified — this is the single most important unknown
  • Update authority address not verified as burn/renounced
  • Only 16 hourly candles available — limited technical analysis window
  • Airdrop-acquired holders (2,972) may inflate holder count metrics
  • FDV > liquidity ratio anomaly not fully explainable from available data
  • No order book depth data available
  • Token description and social claims (DAO Maker fair launch) are unverified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme coins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is sourced from on-chain metrics and may contain inaccuracies. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply995,877,412.73

Key Risks

•Single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holds 86.43% of supply — existential concentration risk
•Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority
•62.83% price crash in 24h with no confirmed reversal
•Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply inflation or account freezing

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for PUNDU. Early-buyer concentration, PnL state, and sell-through rate cannot be assessed from the provided data. The absence of sniper data means we cannot determine whether early buyers are sitting on profits and represent an overhang risk. Given the 62.83% price crash, it is plausible that early buyers (if any) who bought near the $0.005 level are now deeply underwater, but this cannot be confirmed without sniper data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 62.83% price crash from ~$0.005 suggests any buyers near the peak are significantly underwater. The modest holder growth (+46 in 24h) during the crash may indicate some accumulation at lower prices, but sentiment overall appears cautious to negative.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for PUNDU (PUNDU)?

Price has collapsed ~62.83% in 24h from ~$0.005 to ~$0.00187. Recent hourly candles show a modest recovery attempt (+5.17% in 1h, +6.77% in 6h) but the dominant trend is sharply bearish. The massive sell candle at candle [13–14] (from $0.00402 down to $0.00165) defines the current regime. Short-term price action is likely to remain under pressure given the extreme concentration risk and post-dump sentiment. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.00155 to $0.00210.

Is PUNDU a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/meme coin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. The extreme supply concentration alone warrants maximum caution.

How are PUNDU holders trending?

PUNDU currently has 10,483 holders and is growing (24h: 0.44, 7d: 2.5, 30d: 2.5). Total holders stand at 10,483. The 30-day growth of +258 holders (+2.50%) was almost entirely driven by the last 2 weeks of June, as May showed near-zero net growth (flat at ~10,215–10,225). The recent acceleration (82 new holders on June 13 alone) correlates with the price pump-and-dump event, suggesting speculative interest attracted new participants. Acquisition breakdown: swap (4,351), transfer (3,160), airdrop (2,972) — the significant airdrop component (28.4% of holders) may indicate manufactured holder count inflation. Distribution shows 18 whales, 25 sharks, 254 dolphins, 871 fish, and 1,566 octopus-tier holders.

What does sniper activity look like for PUNDU?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding PUNDU?

Single address (5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1) holds 86.43% of supply — existential concentration risk • Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority • 62.83% price crash in 24h with no confirmed reversal

← Back to all predictions

Track PUNDU