4Chan

4ChanToken Price Today & AI Analysis

4ChanSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

Price

$0.004863

+8107.89% 24h

Contract

Live
SeMgfmop2GcNNikqvMSSnzPvFLBJk5gRpvm1uVBpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,718

Market cap

$4,834,434

More tokens on Solana

P(DOOM)P(DOOM)p(doom)$0.046292-77.7%MC $61.7KBARRONBARRONBARRON TRUMP$0.053873-93.5%MC $3.9KMrBeastMrBeastMrBeast Official Coin$0.054760-92.0%MC $4.7KBOTBOTRoboStrategy - Backpack Securities$29.18+1.0%MC $1.77MBARSTOOLBARSTOOLBarstool Sports Fund$0.000184+277.7%MC $179.3Ke/acce/accEffective Accelerationism$0.008889+103.9%MC $8.74M

4ChanToken: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-28 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

2,718

Top 10 supply share

13.43%

Reported liquidity

$113,696.00
How concentrated is 4ChanToken ownership?
As of 2026-09-28 14:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 13.43% of supply. It reports 2,718 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling 4ChanToken?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 14:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $558,192.00 in buys and $451,640.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 4ChanToken liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +123.26%, from $50,926.37 (2026-09-28 12:00 UTC) to $113,696.06 (2026-09-28 14:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 14:17 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-28 12:00 UTC$50,926.37
2026-09-28 13:00 UTC$98,484.02
2026-09-28 14:00 UTC$113,696.06

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about 4Chan

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 02:19 PM UTC

FDV

$4,834,434

Liquidity

$113,696.00

Holders

2,718

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

4ChanToken (4Chan) is a newly-surging Solana meme token on PumpSwap with a $4.83M fully diluted valuation and only $113.70K in total liquidity. It has experienced an extreme +8107.9% price move in the past 24 hours (accelerating to +231.2% in just the last hour) on strong but decelerating volume, with 2,750 unique buyers versus 622 unique sellers in the period. Critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, and holder history — is unavailable, leaving major unresolved unknowns alongside the visible momentum.

Key points

  • Parabolic +8107.9% 24h price move with three consecutive higher-high/higher-low candles, indicative of a fresh speculative launch rather than an established trend
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($113.70K) relative to both FDV ($4.83M) and 24h trading volume (>$1M combined), creating high slippage and volatility risk
  • Buyer count (2,750) vastly exceeds seller count (622) in the last 24h, though buy/sell volume split is only modestly skewed (55.3%/44.7%)
  • Complete absence of sniper data and holder-history data, and unknown mint/freeze authority status, leaving major rug and dump risks unquantified rather than confirmed safe
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 13.43% is the only concentration metric available, with no top-100 or entity-level visibility

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-72 hours

bearish

Given the decelerating volume on the latest candle despite continued price gains, combined with extremely thin liquidity ($113.70K) and an already-extended +8107.9% 24h move, a short-term pullback or high-volatility consolidation is more likely than continued uninterrupted upside. However, given the momentum and buyer dominance, a brief extension toward new highs before reversal is also plausible.

Target low

$0.00200

Target high

$0.00650

Support

$0.00363 (immediate), $0.00099 (deeper)

Resistance

$0.00488 (recent high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the absence of holder-history data, authority-renouncement confirmation, and sniper visibility. Tokens exhibiting this launch pattern on PumpSwap frequently either fade sharply back toward pre-pump levels or, less commonly, sustain elevated valuations if social/community momentum persists.

Catalysts

  • Resolution of mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, materially negative if not)
  • Continued or waning social media attention tied to the '4Chan' branding
  • Liquidity additions or removals on the PumpSwap pool
  • Emergence of large holder sell-offs if concentrated wallets exist beyond the visible top-10 13.43%

Bullish factors

  • Net positive 24h buy pressure (55.3%) with buyers far outnumbering sellers (2,750 vs 622)
  • Strong recent momentum and brand recognition could attract continued speculative flows
  • Low absolute FDV ($4.83M) leaves theoretical room for further upside if hype persists

Bearish factors

  • Volume declining sharply on the most recent candle (~63% drop) even as price continued to rise — a bearish divergence signal
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($113.70K) makes both upside continuation and downside collapse highly likely to be exaggerated
  • Parabolic, unsustainable price pattern typical of pump.fun-style tokens that often retrace most gains after initial spikes
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and lack of sniper visibility introduce unquantified tail risks

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset includes only 3 hourly candles (an extremely short price history), no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. Price predictions for a token this new and volatile, with such large data gaps, carry substantial uncertainty.

4Chan call history

Full track record →

Sep 28bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
SeMgfm...pump
Total Supply
994,052,730.75 (formatted)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($113.70K) relative to FDV ($4.83M) and 24h trading volume (over $1M combined), creating high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Parabolic +8107.9% 24h price move with decelerating volume on the latest candle, raising risk of a sharp reversal/correction after the initial pump exhausts
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm the contract has renounced the ability to mint new supply or freeze holder accounts
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available, so bot-driven dump risk from early holders cannot be assessed or ruled out

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-28 12:00–14:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.0000588 and closed at $0.000990 (a ~1585% intra-candle move) on volume of ~$421K. Candle 2 opened at $0.000990 and closed at $0.00366 (a further ~270% move) on volume of ~$441K. Candle 3 opened at $0.00366 and closed at $0.00486, with a high of $0.00488 and low of $0.00363, on lower volume of ~$161K. This is a parabolic, near-vertical melt-up across all three candles with each candle printing a higher high and higher low than the last.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both the short-term (last few hours) and the only available medium-term window show an aggressive uptrend — price has risen roughly 8,200% over the visible 3-hour window per the 24h change figure of +8107.9%. This is characteristic of a brand-new pump.fun/PumpSwap listing experiencing an initial speculative launch spike rather than a mature, sustainable trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

55%

Sell

45%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00363 (low of most recent candle)

Major support

$0.000990 (open of candle 2 / prior consolidation level)

Immediate resistance

$0.00488 (high of most recent candle)

Major resistance

No established resistance above current all-time-high print of $0.00488; price is in uncharted territory on this dataset

With only 3 candles of history, support and resistance levels are provisional and based purely on the recent price path. Immediate support sits at the most recent candle's low ($0.00363), with a deeper support zone near the prior candle's opening level around $0.00099. On the upside, $0.00488 (most recent high) is the only visible resistance/ceiling since price has been making new highs continuously; there is no historical resistance to reference above this level.

Notable patterns

  • Three consecutive candles of higher highs and higher lows — a strong parabolic/melt-up pattern typical of new token launches
  • Sharp deceleration in volume on the third candle despite price still closing higher, a potential bearish divergence / exhaustion signal
  • Extremely wide intra-candle ranges (e.g., candle 1 low $0.0000588 to high $0.000998 — a ~17x range) indicating extreme volatility and possible thin order book/low liquidity price discovery

Liquidity

Liquidity

$113,696.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $113.70K against a $4.83M FDV is very shallow, meaning even moderately sized trades can cause significant slippage and price impact — consistent with the extreme intraday price swings seen in the candle data. 24h buy volume ($558.19K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($451.64K), giving 55.3% buy pressure vs 44.7% sell pressure and a net inflow bias. Notably, buyer count (2,750 unique buyers) vastly outnumbers seller count (622 unique sellers), and buy transaction count (12,166) dwarfs sell transaction count (3,640), suggesting broad-based new buyer interest chasing the move, likely driven by momentum/FOMO rather than organic two-sided market depth. This buyer/seller and volume/liquidity mismatch (volume is many multiples of total liquidity) is a hallmark of a thin, high-volatility market susceptible to sharp reversals.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

994,052,730.75 (formatted)

FDV

$4,834,434 (also reported as $4.83M in trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved +8107.9% in 24h and +231.2% in the last hour alone, with candle ranges showing multiples-of-price swings within single hours. This level of volatility makes the token extremely risky for any position sizing and timing.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $113.70K against a $4.83M FDV and 24h volume exceeding $1M combined (buy+sell), implying large price impact on entry/exit and high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 concentration (13.43%) is available; top-100 concentration, wallet clustering/entity analysis, and any historical accumulation pattern are unavailable. 13.43% for top 10 alone appears moderate, but without top-100 or entity-level data, true concentration risk cannot be reliably assessed and should not be treated as low.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($113.70K) relative to FDV ($4.83M) and 24h trading volume (over $1M combined), creating high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Parabolic +8107.9% 24h price move with decelerating volume on the latest candle, raising risk of a sharp reversal/correction after the initial pump exhausts
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm the contract has renounced the ability to mint new supply or freeze holder accounts
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available, so bot-driven dump risk from early holders cannot be assessed or ruled out
  • Concentration risk beyond top-10 holders (13.43%) is unknown; true whale/entity concentration could be materially higher
  • Token name/symbol references an unrelated, controversial internet forum brand with no confirmed official affiliation, description is 'none', and verification/spam status is unknown — classic characteristics of a low-effort speculative meme launch

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($558.19K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($451.64K), and unique buyers (2,750) substantially outnumber unique sellers (622), suggesting net demand in the immediate term
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 13.43% is not extreme on its own compared to many newly launched tokens, though this is only a partial picture

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders explicitly seeking short-term momentum exposure to newly launched, low-liquidity meme tokens, and only with position sizes small enough that a total loss would be inconsequential. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or any medium/long-term thesis given the total absence of verified authority renouncement, sniper visibility, or holder-history data.

4ChanToken is a brand-new, extremely low-liquidity Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap that has undergone a parabolic +8107.9% price move in the past 24 hours on genuinely elevated buy-side participation (2,750 buyers vs 622 sellers), but with critical data gaps — unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper visibility, and no holder history — that prevent a confident risk-adjusted verdict. This is a momentum/speculation-only setup, not a fundamentals-backed investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral/social momentum (leveraging the well-known '4Chan' brand association, even if unofficial) combined with sustained buyer dominance (currently 55.3% buy pressure, 2,750 vs 622 unique participants) could drive further short-term price appreciation as new speculative capital chases the trend on PumpSwap.

  • Strong recent buyer-to-seller ratio (2,750 buyers vs 622 sellers in 24h)
  • Net positive buy pressure (55.3% vs 44.7%)
  • Recognizable/provocative brand name could attract speculative social-media-driven attention
  • Low FDV ($4.83M) leaves room for further speculative upside if demand continues

Base Case

Price likely experiences elevated volatility with a high probability of a meaningful pullback/consolidation from the recent highs (~$0.00486) as the initial speculative surge cools, while remaining highly sensitive to social sentiment and thin order-book dynamics in either direction.

  • No major exchange listing or liquidity injection occurs in the near term
  • Buy/sell pressure normalizes toward more balanced levels as initial momentum fades
  • Underlying authority and sniper risks remain unresolved and unverified
  • Trading activity continues to be dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move exhausts as volume decelerates (third candle volume down ~63% from prior candles despite price still rising) and early holders/snipers, if present, take profits into thin liquidity ($113.70K), triggering a sharp price collapse similar to typical pump.fun-style boom-bust cycles.

  • Decelerating volume on the most recent candle despite continued price appreciation (bearish divergence)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to trading volume and FDV, amplifying downside moves
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority creates tail risk of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data means potential large early holders could dump undetected
  • Classic pattern of pump.fun-style tokens reverting sharply after initial hype spikes

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 02:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 14:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (3 most recent candles) from PumpSwap pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, buy/sell transaction counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly candles were provided, severely limiting technical analysis depth and reliability of support/resistance levels
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing any assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, preventing any trend or accumulation/distribution analysis
  • Mint authority and freeze authority renouncement status were not provided, leaving a critical rug-risk gap unresolved
  • Verified-contract and possible-spam flags were marked unknown, preventing a definitive assessment of contract legitimacy
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet-level entity classification were not available, limiting concentration risk assessment to the top-10 figure only
  • All figures are point-in-time and subject to rapid change given the extreme observed volatility

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. It is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain data with significant gaps (authority status, sniper data, holder history) and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency, and particularly newly launched low-liquidity meme tokens, carry very high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is 4ChanToken ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 14:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 13.43% of supply. It reports 2,718 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling 4ChanToken?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-28 14:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $558,192.00 in buys and $451,640.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is 4ChanToken liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +123.26%, from $50,926.37 (2026-09-28 12:00 UTC) to $113,696.06 (2026-09-28 14:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for 4ChanToken (4Chan)?

Given the decelerating volume on the latest candle despite continued price gains, combined with extremely thin liquidity ($113.70K) and an already-extended +8107.9% 24h move, a short-term pullback or high-volatility consolidation is more likely than continued uninterrupted upside. However, given the momentum and buyer dominance, a brief extension toward new highs before reversal is also plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-72 hours), with a target range of $0.00200 to $0.00650.

Is 4Chan a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders explicitly seeking short-term momentum exposure to newly launched, low-liquidity meme tokens, and only with position sizes small enough that a total loss would be inconsequential. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or any medium/long-term thesis given the total absence of verified authority renouncement, sniper visibility, or holder-history data.

What are the key risks of holding 4Chan?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($113.70K) relative to FDV ($4.83M) and 24h trading volume (over $1M combined), creating high slippage and price-manipulation risk • Parabolic +8107.9% 24h price move with decelerating volume on the latest candle, raising risk of a sharp reversal/correction after the initial pump exhausts • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm the contract has renounced the ability to mint new supply or freeze holder accounts

← Back to all predictions

Track 4Chan