MIM

MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin) Price Today & AI Analysis

MIMSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.001118

+95.55% 24h · FDV $23,486,207

Contract

Live
M1M6sdffCs3ozzhpRveweRCWdZhxth4mvVujPtYEC3h

Chain

Holders

2,547

Market cap

$23,486,207

More tokens on Solana

MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin): holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 11:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,547

Top 10 supply share

98.41%

Reported liquidity

$64,353.00
How concentrated is MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin) ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 11:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 98.41% of supply. It reports 2,547 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin)?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 11:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $446,367.00 in buys and $428,402.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin) liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +78.72%, from $56,066.28 (2026-09-22 12:00 UTC) to $100,204.30 (2026-09-23 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 11:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 12:00 UTC$56,066.28
2026-09-22 13:00 UTC$56,065.34
2026-09-22 14:00 UTC$56,055.92
2026-09-22 15:00 UTC$56,768.14
2026-09-22 16:00 UTC$56,602.46
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$57,728.94
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$57,815.83
2026-09-22 19:00 UTC$56,829.91
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$56,976.95
2026-09-22 21:00 UTC$56,738.19
2026-09-22 22:00 UTC$56,612.09
2026-09-22 23:00 UTC$57,217.68
2026-09-23 00:00 UTC$57,544.91
2026-09-23 01:00 UTC$57,576.71
2026-09-23 02:00 UTC$56,811.01
2026-09-23 03:00 UTC$57,268.71
2026-09-23 04:00 UTC$57,166.21
2026-09-23 06:00 UTC$57,212.40
2026-09-23 08:00 UTC$57,212.40
2026-09-23 09:00 UTC$55,111.96
2026-09-23 10:00 UTC$101,136.36
2026-09-23 11:00 UTC$100,204.30

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about MIM

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 11:16 AM UTC

FDV

$23,486,207

Liquidity

$64,353.00

Holders

2,547

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

MIM (Magic Internet Money, Bitcoin-themed meme token bridged to Solana) is currently experiencing an extreme, volume-driven price spike (+95.6% in 24h, briefly +109.6% in 1h) atop a very shallow $64.35K liquidity pool and against a backdrop of extreme holder concentration (top 10 addresses hold 98.41% of supply). Critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history — is unavailable, leaving significant unresolved unknowns in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Cross-chain narrative: originally a Bitcoin Runes token bridged to Solana via a stated 'Mine Labs bridge', an unusual provenance for a Solana meme token
  • Extremely concentrated holder base (98.41% in top 10) far above typical healthy distribution thresholds
  • Massive, sudden 24h volume/price spike following a long near-zero-volume consolidation period, indicating a high-risk, potentially unsustainable pump pattern
  • Very thin liquidity ($64.35K) relative to $23.49M FDV, creating outsized slippage and manipulation risk

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

After a parabolic +95.6% 24h move culminating in a breakout candle with a $0.00158 high, price has already pulled back -6.3% in the most recent 5 minutes, suggesting near-term consolidation or further retracement is likely before any renewed directional move. Given the shallow $64.35K liquidity pool, short-term price action will likely remain highly volatile and choppy.

Target low

$0.00095

Target high

$0.00135

Support

$0.00105 (immediate), $0.000534-0.000567 (pre-breakout range)

Resistance

$0.00127 (candle 24 high), $0.00158 (breakout high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain without visibility into holder trend history, authority status, or sustained volume patterns. If liquidity remains thin and no new catalysts emerge, mean reversion toward pre-spike levels is plausible; if buy-side momentum and narrative interest persist, the new range could become a base for further gains.

Catalysts

  • Whether liquidity providers add meaningful depth to the Meteora DAMM pool
  • Continued marketing/narrative traction around the Runes-to-Solana Bitcoin meme bridge
  • Any resolution of currently unknown mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, negative if not)
  • Behavior of the top-10 concentrated holders (98.41% of supply) — any large sell would be highly impactful

Bullish factors

  • Net positive buy pressure (51% vs 49%) and more unique buyers than sellers in 24h
  • Large volume spike shows genuine trading interest exists
  • Cross-chain Bitcoin meme narrative could sustain speculative attention

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume and FDV, prone to sharp reversals
  • 98.41% top-10 holder concentration with unknown lock status
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status
  • Immediate pullback (-6.3% in 5 minutes) right after the spike, suggesting exhaustion
  • No sniper or holder trend data available to corroborate sustainability of the move

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because several critical inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper data, holder history) are entirely missing, the token has only 24 hourly candles of history to analyze, and the most recent price action is a highly anomalous volume/price spike that make extrapolation unreliable.

MIM call history

Full track record →

Sep 23neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
M1M6sd...EC3h
Total Supply
20,999,992,656.71 (2 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extreme top-10 holder concentration (98.41% of supply) with no visibility into whether these wallets are locked/contractual or freely tradable whale positions
  • Very shallow liquidity ($64.35K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
  • Sudden, massive volume/price spike (+95.6% 24h, breakout candle ~3x range) following near-zero-volume consolidation — a pattern consistent with pump activity that may not be sustainable
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unverified, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by a privileged party

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles, price was largely range-bound between roughly $0.000534 and $0.000617 for the first ~21 hours (candles 1-22), with several flat/zero-volume candles (candles 11, 18, 20, 21) indicating very thin trading during that window. Then in candle 23 (2026-09-23T10:00Z) price exploded from an open of $0.000534 to a high of $0.00158 (nearly 3x) on volume of 1,365,673 — by far the largest volume bar in the set — before closing at $0.00109. Candle 24 continued elevated volatility, ranging between $0.00105 and $0.00127, closing at $0.00111. This is a classic sharp breakout/spike pattern likely driven by a large buy or news catalyst, following an extended consolidation base.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (last 2 hours) trend is sharply upward due to the breakout spike, up ~95.5% over 24h and ~109.6% in just the last 1h reading. However, the medium-term picture (first 21 of 24 hours) was essentially sideways/rangebound before the spike, so the 'uptrend' label reflects a very recent, volatile, low-liquidity-driven move rather than sustained trend confirmation.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00105 (candle 24 low)

Major support

$0.000534 (pre-breakout consolidation low, candles 1-22)

Immediate resistance

$0.00127 (candle 24 high)

Major resistance

$0.00158 (candle 23 high, all-time high in this window)

The breakout candle's high of $0.00158 stands as major resistance; a pullback that holds above $0.00105 (immediate support) would suggest consolidation of gains, while a break below the pre-spike range near $0.000534-0.000567 would signal the breakout has fully failed and reverted to prior levels.

Notable patterns

  • Extended flat/near-zero-volume consolidation for ~21 hours prior to breakout
  • Explosive breakout candle (candle 23) with ~3x range on massive volume spike — classic pump signature
  • Immediate partial retracement in candle 24 and a -6.3% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes, suggesting exhaustion after the spike
  • Several zero-volume candles indicating illiquid, thinly-traded conditions outside of the spike window

Liquidity

Liquidity

$64,353.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $64.35K is very shallow relative to a fully diluted valuation of $23.49M and 24h traded volume exceeding $874K combined (buy+sell). This mismatch (24h volume ~13.6x total liquidity) implies high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and signals that recent price action (a >95% 24h spike) could be exaggerated by thin order books rather than durable demand. Buy volume ($446.37K, 51.0%) slightly exceeds sell volume ($428.40K, 49.0%), indicating a marginal net inflow, with more unique buyers (2,087) than sellers (1,765) in the 24h window. However, given the shallow liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM, even this level of volume can produce outsized price swings, as seen in the candle data.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

20,999,992,656.71 (2 decimals)

FDV

$23,486,207 (Fully Diluted Value reported ≈ $23.49M via trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +95.6%, with a single-hour +109.6% move and a recent -6.3% 5-minute pullback. The breakout candle alone saw a ~3x intraday range. This is extreme volatility even by meme-token standards.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $64.35K against a $23.49M FDV and >$874K in combined 24h volume — a very thin pool that can produce large slippage and makes the token vulnerable to sharp price manipulation with relatively small capital.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top 10 holder addresses control 98.41% of total supply per the current snapshot. No wallet labels or lock information were provided, so it cannot be confirmed whether this concentration is benign (e.g., locked LP/bridge contract) or represents unlocked whale supply that could be dumped.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme top-10 holder concentration (98.41% of supply) with no visibility into whether these wallets are locked/contractual or freely tradable whale positions
  • Very shallow liquidity ($64.35K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
  • Sudden, massive volume/price spike (+95.6% 24h, breakout candle ~3x range) following near-zero-volume consolidation — a pattern consistent with pump activity that may not be sustainable
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unverified, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by a privileged party
  • No sniper or historical holder data available, removing visibility into early-buyer behavior and holder trend trajectory
  • Token description includes promotional/narrative claims (bridge legitimacy, historical Bitcoin lore) supplied by the token creator that cannot be independently verified from the data given and should be treated skeptically per adversarial-data handling rules

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($446.37K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($428.40K), suggesting net inflow rather than a one-sided dump during the spike window
  • More unique buyers (2,087) than sellers (1,765) in the 24h window, indicating broad participation in the move rather than a single actor
  • Token trades on a known DEX aggregator pairing (Meteora DAMM) with public price/volume data available for tracking

Suitable for

Only suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital; not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation or reliable fundamentals-based exposure, given the unresolved authority risk, extreme concentration, and shallow liquidity.

MIM is an extremely high-risk, high-volatility Solana meme token riding a Bitcoin-meme narrative bridged from Runes, currently in the midst of a sharp, volume-driven price spike (+95.6% 24h) atop a very thin liquidity base ($64.35K) and an extremely concentrated holder base (top 10 = 98.41% of supply). Core risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history — is entirely unavailable, meaning this thesis rests on incomplete information and should be treated cautiously.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the current volume surge reflects genuine new demand (e.g., renewed narrative interest in the Bitcoin-meme bridge concept) and buy pressure continues to outweigh sell pressure (currently 51% vs 49%), the token could sustain higher price levels and attract further speculative inflows, especially if liquidity is added to reduce slippage risk.

  • Slight net buy pressure (51% buy vs 49% sell) and more unique buyers than sellers in the 24h window
  • Novel cross-chain narrative (Bitcoin Runes-to-Solana bridge) could attract speculative attention if marketing continues
  • High volume during the spike shows there is real trading interest, not just a dead token

Base Case

Price likely remains highly volatile and choppy, oscillating between the new spike-established range ($0.00105-$0.00158) and a partial retracement toward pre-spike levels, without clear directional conviction, given the token's fundamental data gaps and thin liquidity.

  • No new material catalysts beyond the current spike in the near term
  • Liquidity remains near current shallow levels ($64.35K) without significant new LP additions
  • No sniper or authority data emerges to change the risk picture

Bear Case

High probability

The breakout is a short-lived, thin-liquidity-driven pump that reverses sharply once early spike participants take profit; the 5-minute -6.3% pullback already observed could be the start of a broader retracement back toward the $0.000534-0.000567 pre-spike range, especially given how easily a $64.35K pool can be moved.

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($64.35K) cannot support the current trading volume without major slippage
  • 98.41% top-10 concentration creates acute dump risk if any large holder decides to sell
  • Unverified mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply-side manipulation
  • Parabolic move followed immediately by a pullback is a classic exhaustion pattern in low-liquidity tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 11:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 11:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana mint M1M6sdffCs3ozzhpRveweRCWdZhxth4mvVujPtYEC3h)
  • 24-hour hourly OHLCV candle data (24 candles) from Meteora DAMM pair 7KtcdeJheMeFcqyGboYZprHAUSSGbkiwvzAYds3UwSL5
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change at multiple intervals)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder address count and top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data for this token)

Limitations

  • No mint or freeze authority verification available — authority-based rug risk cannot be assessed
  • No sniper wallet data available for this token, preventing analysis of early-buyer behavior or coordinated dumping
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) available — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • No wallet classification or labeling data available, so notable/whale holders cannot be identified
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting the full picture of distribution beyond the top 10
  • Token metadata fields (verified contract, mutability, update authority) are all listed as unknown, limiting security verification
  • Description and narrative claims in the token metadata originate from the token creator and are unverified third-party claims, not independently confirmed facts

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data, and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity meme tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Always conduct independent due diligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin) ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 11:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 98.41% of supply. It reports 2,547 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin)?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 11:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $446,367.00 in buys and $428,402.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin) liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +78.72%, from $56,066.28 (2026-09-22 12:00 UTC) to $100,204.30 (2026-09-23 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for MAGIC INTERNET MONEY (Bitcoin) (MIM)?

After a parabolic +95.6% 24h move culminating in a breakout candle with a $0.00158 high, price has already pulled back -6.3% in the most recent 5 minutes, suggesting near-term consolidation or further retracement is likely before any renewed directional move. Given the shallow $64.35K liquidity pool, short-term price action will likely remain highly volatile and choppy. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00095 to $0.00135.

Is MIM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Only suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital; not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation or reliable fundamentals-based exposure, given the unresolved authority risk, extreme concentration, and shallow liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding MIM?

Extreme top-10 holder concentration (98.41% of supply) with no visibility into whether these wallets are locked/contractual or freely tradable whale positions • Very shallow liquidity ($64.35K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility • Sudden, massive volume/price spike (+95.6% 24h, breakout candle ~3x range) following near-zero-volume consolidation — a pattern consistent with pump activity that may not be sustainable

← Back to all predictions

Track MIM