RDLN

REDLINE Price Today & AI Analysis

RDLN
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 25, 2026

HzdLSN25vVoPJQkdEV8nipBeVmKwc4RrHKYzCxhGpump

$0.054773

+2.79%

FDV $4,699

LiveContract:HzdLSN25vVoPJQkdEV8nipBeVmKwc4RrHKYzCxhGpumpChain:SolanaHolders:833Market cap:$4,699

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about RDLN

Report snapshotas of Jul 25, 03:08 AM
FDV

$6,072

Liquidity

$19,949

Holders

664

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

REDLINE (RDLN) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin with a racing theme and a mint address of HzdLSN25vVoPJQkdEV8nipBeVmKwc4RrHKYzCxhGpump. The token launched on July 24, 2026, experienced an extreme pump-and-dump cycle within hours, collapsing ~99.1% from its intraday high. Current price is $0.00000617, FDV is just $6,072, and total liquidity stands at only $19.95K. Holder count has cratered from a peak of ~4,349 on July 23 to 664 today — a loss of over 3,600 holders in 24 hours. All key indicators point to a post-pump distribution phase with severe structural weakness.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 99.1% price collapse within 24 hours of peak activity
Holder count dropped ~85% from peak (4,349 → 664) in a single day
Massive volume spike ($2.5M+ in 24h) on a token with only $6K FDV — classic pump-and-dump signature
Top holder and supply concentration data unavailable, raising transparency concerns
Token was dormant for ~30 days (741 holders, zero change) before the pump event

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–72 hours

Price is in freefall following a classic pump-and-dump. The token has lost 99.1% in 24h and is now trading at $0.00000617. With only $19.95K in liquidity, any meaningful sell pressure will push price further down. Short-term outlook is deeply bearish with no technical base established.

Target low$0.000003
Target high$0.0000085
Support: $0.000006167 (current close, candle [1] low), $0.000005355 (candle [17] absolute low)
Resistance: $0.000007229 (candle [7] high), $0.000008135 (candle [16] high)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Given the historical pattern of 30 days of zero holder movement prior to the pump, and the near-total collapse of the holder base, medium-term recovery is highly unlikely without a coordinated re-pump. The FDV of $6K and shallow liquidity make sustained price appreciation structurally impossible without new capital inflows.

Catalysts
  • Coordinated community re-pump (speculative)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting micro-caps
  • New exchange listing or influencer promotion (no evidence of either)

Bullish factors

  • Social links (Telegram, Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some community infrastructure
  • 24h buy volume of $2.50M shows speculative interest remains
  • Token is mutable=false, reducing one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

  • 99.1% price collapse in 24 hours
  • Holder count dropped from 4,349 to 664 (-85%) in one day
  • FDV of only $6,072 with $19.95K liquidity — liquidity exceeds FDV, indicating extreme price dislocation
  • Sell volume ($2.66M) exceeds buy volume ($2.50M) in 24h
  • 21,592 sells vs 16,771 buys in 24h
  • Token was dormant for 30 days before pump — classic coordinated pump setup
  • Top holder data unavailable — no transparency on concentration
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility, missing top-holder data, unknown authority status, and the token's clear pump-and-dump profile. Price behavior is driven by speculation and manipulation rather than fundamentals.

RDLN call history

Full track record →
Jul 25bearish
24h-20.1%
7d-36.2%
30d-28.8%
Jul 24bearish
24h-22.4%
7d-39.3%
30d
Jul 23bearish
24h-99.1%
7d-99.4%
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The OHLC data tells a clear pump-and-dump story. Candles [23]–[21] (04:00–06:00 UTC July 24) show the token launching with prices in the $0.000439–$0.001762 range on massive volume ($561K–$711K per candle). Candle [19] marks the absolute high at $0.001762766. From candle [20] onward, price begins a sustained decline. By candle [17] (10:00 UTC), price had collapsed to a low of $0.000005355 — a ~99.7% drop from the peak in under 6 hours. Candles [11]–[1] (16:00 UTC onward) show price stabilizing in a very tight range of $0.000006167–$0.000007229, with dramatically reduced volume (2–366 USD per candle vs. hundreds of thousands earlier). The stabilization candles show small-bodied candles with no clear reversal pattern — more consistent with a dead-cat consolidation than a genuine bottom.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token made a single parabolic spike and has been in a steep downtrend ever since. No higher highs or higher lows have been established in the post-pump phase.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000006167 (candle [1] low / current price)
Major$0.000005355 (candle [17] absolute post-pump low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000007229 (candle [7] high, recent post-pump resistance)
Major$0.000008135 (candle [16] high)

The token is currently sitting at its immediate support level of $0.000006167. A break below $0.000005355 would represent a new post-pump low with no technical support below. Resistance at $0.000007229 and $0.000008135 are the only near-term levels to watch, but given the lack of volume and buyer interest, these are unlikely to be tested meaningfully.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic pump-and-dump: price rose ~285x from launch low to peak ($0.000439 → $0.001762) then collapsed 99.7% within 6 hours
  • Dead-cat consolidation: candles [1]–[11] show tight range consolidation at post-dump lows with minimal volume
  • Bearish engulfing on candle [17]: massive red candle engulfing all prior price action
  • Volume climax at candles [18]–[19] followed by immediate volume collapse — classic distribution top signal
  • 30-day dormancy prior to pump (zero holder change June 25 – July 22) suggests coordinated pre-pump accumulation

Total holders664
24h Δ-550
7d Δ-12
30d Δ-12
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder count and price are strongly correlated in this case. The token was dormant at 741 holders for 30 days (June 25 – July 22) with zero price movement. On July 23, holders spiked to 4,349 (+3,608, +83%) coinciding with the pump. On July 24, holders collapsed by 3,681 (-550%) to 668, perfectly mirroring the 99.1% price crash. This is a textbook pump-and-dump holder pattern.

The holder history reveals a deeply concerning pattern. For 30 consecutive days (June 25 – July 22, 2026), the holder count was frozen at exactly 741 with zero net change — this is statistically abnormal and suggests either data staleness or that the token was effectively inactive/controlled. On July 23, holders surged by 3,608 to 4,349, likely driven by the pump campaign. By July 24, 3,681 holders exited, leaving only 664 — fewer than the pre-pump baseline of 741. The 7d and 30d growth figures of -12% reflect the net loss even accounting for the temporary spike. Holder decline is accelerating sharply.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

N/A

Top holder data unavailable — no top holders returned by data source

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The data source returned no top 20 holders, and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100 — this is likely a data gap rather than a genuine zero-concentration reading. The absence of holder transparency is itself a risk signal. Given the 99.1% price collapse and 85% holder exodus, the dominant sentiment among large holders is almost certainly distributing. The 30-day dormancy period with a fixed 741-holder count prior to the pump is consistent with a small group of coordinated wallets controlling supply before orchestrating the pump.

Liquidity$19,950
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$2,500,000
Sell$2,660,000
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers8,334
Unique sellers10,704

Liquidity is critically shallow at $19.95K on PumpSwap (pair 6dAYoBWpu898T1RKLFsqZMZ6QRSzkuLbcn1fqNB7Uk4R). Paradoxically, the FDV of $6,072 is lower than the liquidity pool value — this extreme dislocation reflects the post-pump price collapse. Any trade of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. The 24h volume of ~$5.16M is astronomically high relative to the $6K FDV, confirming this was a speculative frenzy rather than organic trading. Net flow is negative: 10,704 unique sellers vs 8,334 unique buyers, and sell volume ($2.66M) exceeds buy volume ($2.50M). Market health is extremely poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply984,684,188.67
FDV$6,072.32

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~984.68M tokens. The FDV of $6,072 is negligibly small, reflecting the post-pump price collapse. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as mutable=false — the immutability is a mild positive as it prevents metadata changes. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data, leaving authority-based rug risk as unknown. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. The contract is unverified. No information on token allocation, vesting, or team holdings is available.

Volatility
high

99.1% price collapse in 24 hours. Intraday range from $0.000005355 to $0.001762766 — a 329x spread. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and risk management nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Only $19.95K in total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. FDV ($6,072) is lower than liquidity, indicating severe price dislocation. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause catastrophic slippage.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable. The 30-day dormancy at exactly 741 holders followed by a coordinated pump strongly implies concentrated ownership by a small group of wallets. Post-pump holder count (664) is below the pre-pump baseline.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but behavioral evidence (30-day dormancy, coordinated pump, 85% holder exodus in 24h, $5M+ volume on a $6K FDV token) is consistent with a coordinated sniper/early-buyer dump. The pump-and-dump pattern is textbook.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Token is mutable=false which is a mild positive. PumpFun-launched tokens typically have mint authority burned after bonding curve completion, but this cannot be verified from available data.

Key risks

  • Confirmed pump-and-dump: 99.1% price collapse from intraday high within hours of launch
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($19.95K) — exit risk is extreme for any position
  • 85% holder exodus in 24 hours (4,349 → 664 holders)
  • Top holder and supply concentration data completely unavailable
  • 30-day dormancy prior to pump suggests coordinated manipulation
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status
  • FDV ($6,072) lower than liquidity pool value — extreme price dislocation
  • Sell volume and seller count exceed buy volume and buyer count in 24h

Mitigating factors

  • Token is mutable=false, preventing metadata manipulation
  • Social links (Telegram, Twitter, website) exist — some community infrastructure present
  • PumpFun bonding curve mechanism typically burns mint authority upon graduation
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The pump-and-dump cycle appears complete. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators with money they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction with this token, and only with extreme caution and minimal position sizes. This is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone seeking capital preservation.

REDLINE (RDLN) exhibits all the hallmarks of a completed pump-and-dump scheme. The token was dormant for 30 days, then experienced a coordinated pump to $0.001762 before collapsing 99.7% to current levels of $0.000006167. With a $6K FDV, $19.95K liquidity, 664 remaining holders, and no top-holder transparency, there is no credible investment thesis for new entrants. The only scenario for price recovery involves another coordinated pump, which is speculative and carries extreme risk.

Bull case (low)

A second coordinated pump or viral social media campaign attracts new buyers, temporarily pushing price back toward $0.000007–$0.000010 range. Existing holders who bought post-dump at current levels could see 1.5–2x returns before the next distribution.

  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter/Telegram
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • New influencer promotion or exchange listing

Base case

Token stabilizes in the $0.000005–$0.000008 range with minimal trading activity, similar to the pre-pump dormancy period. Holder count stabilizes around 500–700. No significant price movement in either direction without an external catalyst.

  • Remaining holders are long-term bagholders unwilling to sell at current losses
  • No new coordinated pump activity
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • Broader market conditions remain neutral

Bear case (high)

Remaining 664 holders continue to exit, liquidity dries up further, and the token becomes effectively untradeable. Price drifts toward zero as the PumpSwap pool is drained. Token becomes a zombie with no active community.

  • Continued holder exodus (already -85% in 24h)
  • No new catalysts or community activity
  • Shallow liquidity makes recovery structurally impossible without massive new inflows
  • Post-pump seller fatigue and loss of interest

GeneratedJul 25, 03:08 AM
Data freshnessMost recent candle: 2026-07-25T02:00:00Z. Holder data current as of analysis time. Sniper data: unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: HzdLSN25vVoPJQkdEV8nipBeVmKwc4RrHKYzCxhGpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (6dAYoBWpu898T1RKLFsqZMZ6QRSzkuLbcn1fqNB7Uk4R)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (23 candles, July 24–25 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data

Limitations

  • Top 20 holder data completely unavailable — cannot assess concentration or classify whale wallets
  • Sniper analysis data unavailable — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate cannot be computed
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — cannot fully assess rug risk from authorities
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement
  • Supply concentration metrics (top 10%, top 100%) returned as 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine zero concentration
  • 30-day holder history shows suspicious zero-change periods that may indicate data staleness or token inactivity
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations based on liquidity pool size

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed shows strong indicators of a completed pump-and-dump scheme. Past price action is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply984,684,188.67

Key Risks

Confirmed pump-and-dump: 99.1% price collapse from intraday high within hours of launch
Critically shallow liquidity ($19.95K) — exit risk is extreme for any position
85% holder exodus in 24 hours (4,349 → 664 holders)
Top holder and supply concentration data completely unavailable

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was provided for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. However, the on-chain behavior — 30 days of dormancy followed by a coordinated pump with $2.5M+ in volume on a sub-$10K FDV token — strongly suggests early buyers (likely coordinated wallets) accumulated during the dormant phase and distributed during the pump. The 85% holder count collapse in 24 hours is consistent with mass exit by early participants.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Likely distributed — the 3,681 net holder loss on July 24 and the 99.1% price collapse strongly suggest early buyers sold into the pump. The token attracted 4,349 holders at peak (July 23) but most have since exited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for REDLINE (RDLN)?

Price is in freefall following a classic pump-and-dump. The token has lost 99.1% in 24h and is now trading at $0.00000617. With only $19.95K in liquidity, any meaningful sell pressure will push price further down. Short-term outlook is deeply bearish with no technical base established. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000003 to $0.0000085.

Is RDLN a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investors. The pump-and-dump cycle appears complete. Only highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators with money they can afford to lose entirely should consider any interaction with this token, and only with extreme caution and minimal position sizes. This is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone seeking capital preservation.

How are RDLN holders trending?

REDLINE currently has 664 holders and is declining (24h: -550, 7d: -12, 30d: -12). The holder history reveals a deeply concerning pattern. For 30 consecutive days (June 25 – July 22, 2026), the holder count was frozen at exactly 741 with zero net change — this is statistically abnormal and suggests either data staleness or that the token was effectively inactive/controlled. On July 23, holders surged by 3,608 to 4,349, likely driven by the pump campaign. By July 24, 3,681 holders exited, leaving only 664 — fewer than the pre-pump baseline of 741. The 7d and 30d growth figures of -12% reflect the net loss even accounting for the temporary spike. Holder decline is accelerating sharply.

What does sniper activity look like for RDLN?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding RDLN?

Confirmed pump-and-dump: 99.1% price collapse from intraday high within hours of launch • Critically shallow liquidity ($19.95K) — exit risk is extreme for any position • 85% holder exodus in 24 hours (4,349 → 664 holders)

Track RDLN