SCHLONG

SCHLONG Price Today & AI Analysis

SCHLONGSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.000811

+1486.06% 24h · FDV $811,026

Contract

Live
HhXe2PbtXQHzZ5Ch46MBXf7rEbMgnYsCGaEhktyKGZNT

Chain

Holders

1,852

Market cap

$811,026

More tokens on Solana

SCHLONG: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 18:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,852

Top 10 supply share

40.23%

Reported liquidity

$43,483.00
How concentrated is SCHLONG ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 18:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 40.23% of supply. It reports 1,852 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling SCHLONG?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 18:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $917,740.00 in buys and $864,520.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is SCHLONG liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +21.53%, from $40,337.05 (2026-09-23 17:00 UTC) to $49,020.86 (2026-09-23 18:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 18:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 17:00 UTC$40,337.05
2026-09-23 18:00 UTC$49,020.86

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about SCHLONG

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 06:17 PM UTC

FDV

$811,026

Liquidity

$43,483.00

Holders

1,852

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

SCHLONG is a nascent Solana meme token (mint HhXe2Pb...KGZNT) trading on a single Raydium CPMM pair with only ~$43.48K total liquidity and a fully diluted valuation of ~$811K. The token has seen an extreme +1486% price move in the last 1h/24h window, moving from sub-$0.000005 to $0.00081, indicating either a very fresh listing or a violent, thinly-traded pump. Trading volume is high relative to liquidity ($917.7K buy vs $864.5K sell over 24h), suggesting active but potentially unsustainable speculative churn. Holder base is 1,852 addresses with top-10 wallets controlling 40.2% of supply — a meaningful concentration, though no historical trend data exists to confirm whether this is improving or worsening. Mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet data are not available, leaving critical rug and early-buyer risk factors unverified.

Key points

  • Only ~2 hourly candles of price history available, both showing extreme intraday volatility (low of $0.0000048 to high of $0.00095 within the same hour)
  • Liquidity pool is very small (~$43.48K) relative to $811K FDV and ~$1.78M combined 24h volume, implying high slippage and price-impact risk
  • Top-10 holders control 40.23% of supply per a single current snapshot; no history to assess trend
  • No sniper data and no mint/freeze authority data available, meaning key rug-pull risk vectors cannot be assessed and must be treated as unknown, not safe

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

The token just posted a ~1486% move within the observed window with a huge intra-hour range ($0.0000048 to $0.00095), and current price ($0.000811) sits near the most recent hourly high. Given the tiny $43.48K liquidity pool, price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals in either direction on modest trade sizes. Short-term direction is a coin-flip dominated by whoever trades next given thin liquidity.

Target low

$0.00039

Target high

$0.00120

Support

$0.000519 (prior candle close/open), $0.000393 (most recent candle low)

Resistance

$0.000811 (current price), $0.000954 (most recent candle high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Parabolic moves of this magnitude on such shallow liquidity typically mean-revert as early buyers and any concentrated holders (top 10 = 40.2% of supply) take profit. Absent new catalysts, sustained buy pressure sufficient to hold current levels looks unlikely given the pool depth.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions that could stabilize price discovery
  • Social/marketing catalysts via the token's Twitter/website presence could sustain speculative interest
  • Concentration unwind by top holders would be a strong bearish catalyst if it occurs

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles are available, volume/price history is extremely limited, liquidity is very shallow, and key risk data (authorities, snipers, holder history) is missing entirely. Any prediction here is highly speculative and should be treated with low confidence.

SCHLONG call history

Full track record →

Sep 23neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
HhXe2P...GZNT
Total Supply
999,998,838.48 SCHLONG

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.48K) relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling severe price impact and manipulation
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing by the deployer
  • Top-10 holder concentration at 40.23% with no visibility into who controls these wallets
  • Extreme volatility (+1486% with huge intra-hour wick) typical of pump-and-dump-prone low-cap meme tokens

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000477, spiked to a high of $0.0008007, then fell back to close at $0.000519 — a massive wick-and-fade pattern with volume of $1.647M, suggesting an initial pump immediately faded. Candle 2 (18:00 UTC) opened at $0.000519, ranged between $0.000393 and $0.000954, and closed at $0.000811 near the top of its range on much lower volume ($303K) — a bullish recovery candle but on materially thinner participation than the first candle.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The only two candles available show a violent pump-fade-recover cycle rather than a clean trend. Short-term price action (candle 2 closing near its high) looks bullish, but the extremely limited history and one prior full-range wipeout in candle 1 make it impossible to call a reliable medium-term trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000519 (candle 2 open / candle 1 close)

Major support

$0.000393 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000811 (current price)

Major resistance

$0.000954 (candle 2 high)

With only two candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.0000048 low from candle 1 is effectively a tail/wick low unlikely to be structurally relevant, whereas $0.000393-$0.000519 forms a more realistic near-term support band, and $0.000811-$0.000954 the near-term resistance band.

Notable patterns

  • Long lower-wick reversal candle (candle 1): pumped then dumped ~35x off its high within the same hour
  • Bullish recovery candle (candle 2) closing near its high after retesting the $0.000393 low
  • Volume divergence: price recovering on markedly lower volume than the initial pump candle

Liquidity

Liquidity

$43,483.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $43.48K is extremely shallow relative to the $811K FDV and the ~$1.78M in combined 24h trading volume — a ratio implying trades of even modest size can move price substantially, consistent with the huge intra-hour candle ranges observed. 24h buy volume ($917.74K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($864.52K), a slight net inflow (51.5% vs 48.5%), and buyer count (3,970) exceeds seller count (2,957), suggesting more net demand than supply currently, but the imbalance is not large enough to be a strong conviction signal. Slippage risk is high given the shallow pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,998,838.48 SCHLONG

FDV

$811.03K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved +1486% in the observed 24h/1h window with a single-hour range spanning from $0.0000048 to $0.00095 — extreme volatility even by meme-token standards.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $43.48K total liquidity against $811K FDV and ~$1.78M 24h volume creates high slippage and makes the price highly manipulable with relatively small capital.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top 10 holders control 40.23% of total supply per the current snapshot; no wallet labeling exists to know if these are team/insider wallets, and no historical data exists to assess if concentration is worsening.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.48K) relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling severe price impact and manipulation
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing by the deployer
  • Top-10 holder concentration at 40.23% with no visibility into who controls these wallets
  • Extreme volatility (+1486% with huge intra-hour wick) typical of pump-and-dump-prone low-cap meme tokens
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dump risk despite a highly suspicious first-hour pump-and-fade candle
  • Very limited price history (only 2 candles) prevents robust trend or pattern validation

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51.5% vs 48.5%) and unique buyers (3,970) exceed sellers (2,957), indicating some net demand
  • The token has social presence (Twitter, website) which may indicate more than a purely anonymous launch, though this does not verify legitimacy

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, moderate risk exposure, or those unable to independently verify on-chain mint/freeze authority and holder wallet identities before entry.

SCHLONG is an extremely early-stage, highly volatile Solana meme token with shallow liquidity, unknown authority/rug-risk status, and moderately concentrated holdings. Any position here should be treated as speculative and sized accordingly, given the number of critical unknowns (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history).

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If net buy pressure continues (currently 51.5% buy vs 48.5% sell, with more unique buyers than sellers) and social/marketing momentum via its Twitter/website drives sustained new demand, the token could continue an upward push from current $0.000811 levels toward and beyond the recent $0.000954 high, especially if liquidity is added to reduce volatility.

  • Continued net inflow in buy/sell volume and buyer/seller counts
  • Growing social media traction converting into new holder growth beyond the current 1,852 addresses
  • Liquidity providers adding depth to the pool, reducing slippage and enabling more stable price discovery

Base Case

Price continues to oscillate wildly within a wide band (roughly $0.0004-$0.00095) as speculative traders churn the thin liquidity pool, without a clear sustained directional trend forming, until either liquidity materially deepens or a clear catalyst (positive or negative) emerges.

  • No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
  • No confirmed rug event (mint dump or freeze) occurs, though this cannot be ruled out given unknown authority status
  • Speculative trading interest persists at a similar volume level to the last 24h

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme, likely unsustainable +1486% pump, thin $43.48K liquidity, and 40.23% top-10 concentration, a sharp reversion is plausible if any large holder sells or profit-taking accelerates, mirroring the pump-and-fade already seen in the first observed candle.

  • Shallow liquidity means even moderate sell orders from top-10 holders (40.23% of supply) could crash price
  • Volume declined sharply between the two observed candles ($1.65M to $303K), suggesting fading momentum
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status raises the possibility of undisclosed rug mechanisms
  • Pattern already observed once intra-day (candle 1's ~35x pump-to-dump) suggests repeatable volatility/dump behavior

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 06:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 18:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, FDV) provided in prompt
  • OHLC hourly candle data (2 candles) from Raydium CPMM pair
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder aggregates snapshot (Codex) — current holder count and top-10 concentration only
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (no data returned)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical trend analysis
  • No sniper wallet data provided; sniper concentration, PnL, and dump risk are entirely unknown
  • No mint or freeze authority verification data provided; rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) available — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • No wallet classification/labeling data — cannot identify whales, team wallets, or exchange wallets among top holders
  • Top-100 holder concentration not provided
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.48K) makes reported prices and percentage changes highly susceptible to distortion from single trades

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partial on-chain and market data with significant gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history) explicitly noted above. Cryptocurrency and meme tokens, especially low-liquidity newly launched ones, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is SCHLONG ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 18:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 40.23% of supply. It reports 1,852 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling SCHLONG?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 18:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $917,740.00 in buys and $864,520.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is SCHLONG liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +21.53%, from $40,337.05 (2026-09-23 17:00 UTC) to $49,020.86 (2026-09-23 18:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for SCHLONG (SCHLONG)?

The token just posted a ~1486% move within the observed window with a huge intra-hour range ($0.0000048 to $0.00095), and current price ($0.000811) sits near the most recent hourly high. Given the tiny $43.48K liquidity pool, price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals in either direction on modest trade sizes. Short-term direction is a coin-flip dominated by whoever trades next given thin liquidity. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00039 to $0.00120.

Is SCHLONG a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, moderate risk exposure, or those unable to independently verify on-chain mint/freeze authority and holder wallet identities before entry.

What are the key risks of holding SCHLONG?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.48K) relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling severe price impact and manipulation • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet freezing by the deployer • Top-10 holder concentration at 40.23% with no visibility into who controls these wallets

← Back to all predictions

Track SCHLONG