BADDIES

Beach Baddies Price Today & AI Analysis

BADDIESSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 3, 2026

Price

$0.052712

FDV $2,711

Contract

Live
HLrmwfYoru7hKEudzjce5hjxYJLwjGUha9ptUQfVpump

Chain

Holders

98

Market cap

$2,711

More tokens on Solana

Beach Baddies: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-03 23:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,659

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is Beach Baddies ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,659 addresses (2026-06-03 23:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Beach Baddies?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Beach Baddies liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-03 23:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about BADDIES

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Jun 3, 11:17 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

1,659

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Beach Baddies (BADDIES) is an extremely new PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: HLrmwfYoru7hKEudzjce5hjxYJLwjGUha9ptUQfVpump) with zero serious fundamentals by its own admission. The token launched within the last 24 hours, has 1,659 holders all acquired via swap, a current price of ~$0.000203, and posted a 67.8% 24h gain. Total reported liquidity is $0.00 on PumpSwap, FDV is effectively negligible, and the metadata is mutable with unknown update authority — all hallmarks of a high-risk micro-cap meme launch.

Key points

  • Launched within the last 24 hours — all 1,659 holders acquired in a single day
  • Self-described as having 'zero serious fundamentals' in its own description
  • 67.8% 24h price surge driven by speculative momentum, not utility
  • 20 identified snipers with majority in profit, indicating early insider advantage
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 despite active trading — extreme slippage risk
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candle (23:00 UTC) shows a dramatic collapse from open $0.000147 to close $0.0000218 — an intra-candle drop of ~85% — before the current price recovered to ~$0.000203. This violent whipsaw, combined with $0 reported liquidity and heavy sniper profit-taking pressure, suggests extreme short-term downside risk. The 5m change of +10.4% shows residual momentum but is unreliable in this context.

Target low

$0.000050

Target high

$0.000350

Support

$0.0000218 (candle 1 low / intra-hour collapse low), $0.000139 (candle 1 low wick)

Resistance

$0.000223 (candle 1 high), $0.000189 (candle 2 high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without real liquidity, utility, or a verified contract, BADDIES is unlikely to sustain its current price level. Sniper profit-taking, mutable metadata risk, and the typical PumpFun meme lifecycle (pump → dump → abandonment) point to significant medium-term downside. A recovery would require sustained community momentum and new buyer inflows.

Catalysts

  • Viral social media traction on Twitter/Telegram driving new buyer inflows
  • Listing on a CEX or aggregator increasing visibility
  • Sniper wallets fully exiting, clearing overhang
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum

Bullish factors

  • 67.8% 24h price gain demonstrates strong speculative demand
  • 2,784 buys vs 2,272 sells in 24h — more buy transactions than sell transactions
  • 1,905 unique buyers vs 867 unique sellers — broader buyer base
  • Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, website)
  • Several snipers still holding positions (e.g., sniper 3 has $325 balance, sniper 8 has $179, sniper 9 has $286)

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — any sell creates extreme slippage
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record
  • Mutable metadata and unknown update authority — rug pull risk
  • Self-described 'zero serious fundamentals'
  • Most snipers are in significant profit and represent a large sell overhang
  • Candle 1 showed an ~85% intra-hour price collapse, indicating extreme volatility
  • Supply concentration data appears anomalous (percentages >100%), suggesting data integrity issues
  • Unverified contract

Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, liquidity is reported as $0.00, the token is less than 24 hours old, and supply concentration percentages in the data appear corrupted (values >100%). These data anomalies severely limit analytical confidence.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
HLrmwf...pump
Total Supply
1 (formatted) — NOTE: This appears to be a display artifact. The raw balances of top holders show values in the trillions (e.g., holder 1 balance: 79,261,514,809,127), suggesting the actual supply is in the quadrillions with 0 decimals. The 'total supply: 1' is almost certainly a formatting error in the metadata.

Key Risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any significant sell
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record
  • 20 snipers mostly in profit representing significant sell overhang

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 2 (22:00 UTC): O=$0.0000218, H=$0.000189, L=$0.0000218, C=$0.000152 — a strong bullish candle with a long lower wick, closing near the upper range (+597% from open). Candle 1 (23:00 UTC): O=$0.000147, H=$0.000223, L=$0.000139, C=$0.0000218 — a severe bearish candle (bearish engulfing / shooting star), collapsing ~85% from open to close, with the high at $0.000223 acting as a key rejection level. The current price of ~$0.000203 sits above candle 1's close, suggesting a partial recovery after the dump.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

With only 2 candles, no reliable trend can be established. The price action shows extreme volatility: a massive pump in candle 2 followed by a near-total collapse in candle 1, then partial recovery. This is consistent with a PumpFun launch pump-and-dump cycle rather than a directional trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000139 (candle 1 low wick)

Major support

$0.0000218 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open — absolute floor seen so far)

Immediate resistance

$0.000189 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000223 (candle 1 high — all-time high in available data)

The $0.000223 level represents the only observed all-time high and is the primary resistance. The $0.0000218 level is the most extreme low seen and represents a catastrophic support failure zone. Current price of ~$0.000203 is sandwiched between these extremes, closer to resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing / shooting star on candle 1 (23:00 UTC) — open near high, close near low
  • Strong bullish recovery candle (candle 2, 22:00 UTC) with long lower wick
  • Extreme intra-candle volatility (>500% range on candle 2)
  • Volume declining from candle 2 to candle 1 — weakening participation
  • Classic PumpFun launch pump-and-dump price structure

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1 (formatted) — NOTE: This appears to be a display artifact. The raw balances of top holders show values in the trillions (e.g., holder 1 balance: 79,261,514,809,127), suggesting the actual supply is in the quadrillions with 0 decimals. The 'total supply: 1' is almost certainly a formatting error in the metadata.

FDV

$0.00 (as reported — consistent with the supply display anomaly; actual FDV cannot be reliably calculated from the provided data)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token experienced an ~85% intra-hour price collapse in candle 1 (23:00 UTC), followed by a recovery. 24h price change of +67.8% with extreme intra-candle swings. This is one of the most volatile asset classes possible.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any significant sell
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record
  • 20 snipers mostly in profit representing significant sell overhang
  • Extreme price volatility — 85% intra-hour collapse observed
  • Unverified contract and possible spam flag proximity
  • Supply/FDV data appears corrupted — true tokenomics unclear
  • No utility, no fundamentals by design

Mitigating factors

  • Active community with social links (Telegram, Twitter, website)
  • 1,905 unique buyers in 24h shows broad interest
  • More buy transactions (2,784) than sell transactions (2,272)
  • Some snipers still holding, suggesting not a complete exit
  • 67.8% price gain shows genuine speculative demand exists
  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some standardization

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, use strict position sizing (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio), and actively monitor positions. Completely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun token dynamics.

BADDIES is a pure speculative meme token with zero utility, launched within the last 24 hours on PumpFun. The investment thesis is entirely momentum-based: buy early, ride the pump, exit before the inevitable dump. The token's own description acknowledges 'zero serious fundamentals.' Any investment is a high-risk speculation on social momentum, not fundamental value.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives sustained buying pressure over 48–72 hours, pushing price to new all-time highs above $0.000223. Community grows rapidly on Twitter/Telegram, attracting influencer attention and new capital inflows. Snipers who haven't exited hold or add, reducing sell pressure.

  • Viral social media spread on Twitter/Telegram
  • Broader Solana meme season tailwind
  • Influencer promotion or KOL attention
  • Sniper holders maintaining positions
  • New buyer FOMO from 67.8% 24h gain visibility

Base Case

BADDIES experiences continued high volatility over the next 24–72 hours, with price oscillating between $0.000050 and $0.000223. Some snipers exit, partially offset by new speculative buyers. The token either finds a small stable community or gradually fades as attention moves elsewhere. No significant liquidity is added to the pool.

  • Speculative trading continues at reduced volume
  • No major influencer promotion or rug pull event
  • Price stabilizes in the $0.000080–$0.000200 range short-term
  • Sniper exits are gradual rather than coordinated
  • Liquidity remains thin throughout

Bear Case

High probability

Liquidity remains near zero, snipers dump remaining positions, and the token follows the typical PumpFun lifecycle of rapid abandonment. Price collapses back toward the $0.0000218 intra-hour low or lower. Community interest fades within 24–48 hours as the next meme token launches.

  • Zero liquidity making price support impossible
  • Sniper profit-taking from remaining $863+ in known balances
  • Mutable metadata exploited for rug pull
  • No utility or fundamental value to attract long-term holders
  • Typical PumpFun token abandonment pattern
  • Broader market rotation to newer launches

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 3, 11:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-03 23:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for reliable technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data lag for new pool
  • Supply concentration percentages in raw data are clearly corrupted (values >100% by many orders of magnitude) — concentration estimates are approximations
  • Total supply displayed as '1' with 0 decimals appears to be a formatting error — true supply and FDV cannot be reliably calculated
  • Sniper sniped amounts and most balances are listed as 'unknown' — sniper concentration cannot be precisely calculated
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics lack historical context
  • Price change percentages for 1h, 6h, 24h all show 0% which is inconsistent with observed price action — likely a data artifact

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. BADDIES (HLrmwfYoru7hKEudzjce5hjxYJLwjGUha9ptUQfVpump) is an extremely high-risk speculative asset. The analyst and this system have no financial interest in this token. Past price performance does not guarantee future results. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries a very high risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Beach Baddies ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,659 addresses (2026-06-03 23:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Beach Baddies?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Beach Baddies liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Beach Baddies (BADDIES)?

The most recent hourly candle (23:00 UTC) shows a dramatic collapse from open $0.000147 to close $0.0000218 — an intra-candle drop of ~85% — before the current price recovered to ~$0.000203. This violent whipsaw, combined with $0 reported liquidity and heavy sniper profit-taking pressure, suggests extreme short-term downside risk. The 5m change of +10.4% shows residual momentum but is unreliable in this context. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000350.

Is BADDIES a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, use strict position sizing (e.g., <0.1% of portfolio), and actively monitor positions. Completely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun token dynamics.

What are the key risks of holding BADDIES?

Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic slippage risk on any significant sell • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug pull vector • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record

← Back to all predictions

Track BADDIES