BLEE

BLEE Price Today & AI Analysis

BLEESolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.000163

+237.64% 24h · FDV $163,440

Contract

Live
GkBZGFgNy9Q6jHjBuYeTqsvugfEMhniACF9ieV8H3TtC

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,447

Market cap

$163,440

More tokens on Solana

APEDAPEDAPED$0.000387+512.7%MC $387.0K+++++++++++++++$0.001048+113.4%MC $1.05MSPXSPXSPX6900 (Wormhole)$0.5257+4.0%MC $43.57MxSOLxSOLxSOL$0.0908-1.1%MC $14.82MGMEXGMEXGameStop xStock$24.27+3.6%MC $17.47MSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.3161-4.3%MC $260.36M

BLEE: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 14:45 UTC

Holder addresses

1,447

Top 10 supply share

35.67%

Reported liquidity

$19,533.00
How concentrated is BLEE ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 14:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 35.67% of supply. It reports 1,447 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling BLEE?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 14:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $845,211.00 in buys and $817,670.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is BLEE liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +31.71%, from $15,572.01 (2026-09-23 06:00 UTC) to $20,510.61 (2026-09-23 14:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 14:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 06:00 UTC$15,572.01
2026-09-23 07:00 UTC$24,931.18
2026-09-23 08:00 UTC$38,099.85
2026-09-23 09:00 UTC$35,621.09
2026-09-23 10:00 UTC$29,564.91
2026-09-23 11:00 UTC$24,845.54
2026-09-23 12:00 UTC$23,125.02
2026-09-23 13:00 UTC$22,457.56
2026-09-23 14:00 UTC$20,510.61

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about BLEE

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 02:46 PM UTC

FDV

$163,440

Liquidity

$19,533.00

Holders

1,447

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

BLEE is a newly-active Solana token (mint GkBZGFgNy9Q6jHjBuYeTqsvugfEMhniACF9ieV8H3TtC) trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with a shallow $19.53K liquidity pool and $163.44K fully diluted valuation. It has already exhibited an extreme pump-and-fade pattern within its most recent 9 hourly candles — surging from near-zero to a high of $0.000683 before fading back to $0.000163 — accompanied by a reported +237.6% 24h price change and heavy but roughly balanced buy/sell volume (~$845K buys vs. ~$818K sells). Critical risk indicators including mint/freeze authority status and sniper activity are unavailable in the data, and holder data is limited to a single snapshot (1,447 holder addresses, top-10 holding 35.67% of supply) with no historical trend.

Key points

  • Stated utility of offline Bluetooth-mesh peer-to-peer USDC/SOL payments, differentiating it narratively from purely speculative tokens (unverified)
  • Already-realized extreme volatility (pump from near-$0 to $0.000683 then fade) within a single 9-hour window
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($19.53K) relative to reported 24h volume (over $1.6M combined) and FDV ($163.44K)
  • Multiple key risk data points (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) are explicitly unavailable rather than confirmed safe

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Given the sharp -18.86% 1h decline following an extreme +237.6% 24h spike, and a fade pattern visible across the last several hourly candles (peak $0.000683 down to consolidation near $0.00013-0.00020), short-term price action looks vulnerable to further mean reversion and profit-taking, though a modest base may be forming near $0.00013-0.00016.

Target low

$0.00010

Target high

$0.00022

Support

$0.0001294 (candle [9] low), $0.0001178 (candle [6] low)

Resistance

$0.000261 (candle [8] high), $0.000603 (candle [4] high), $0.000683 (candle [3] high, ATH in dataset)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only 9 hours of candle history and no longer-term data, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. The token's extreme volatility, shallow $19.53K liquidity pool, and unknown mint/freeze authority status make sustained directional forecasting unreliable without more data (e.g., holder growth trends, sustained volume, authority verification).

Catalysts

  • Resolution of mint/freeze authority status (renounced vs. retained)
  • Continued growth or decline in unique buyer/seller counts
  • Whether top-10 holders (35.67% of supply) accumulate or distribute
  • Liquidity depth changes on the Raydium CPMM pool
  • Any real-world adoption signals for the stated Bluetooth-mesh payment utility

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: extremely limited candle history (only 9 hourly candles), no sniper data, no holder history, unknown authority status, and a very shallow liquidity pool that makes price highly manipulable by small trade sizes. The token's fundamentals (utility claims) cannot be verified from the data provided.

BLEE call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
GkBZGF...3TtC
Total Supply
999,999,120.67 BLEE

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($19.53K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezes cannot be ruled out
  • High price volatility with a pump-and-fade pattern already visible within a single 9-hour window
  • Top-10 wallet concentration of 35.67% with no visibility into who those holders are or their intentions

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Stable

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

unknown

Major support

unknown

Immediate resistance

unknown

Major resistance

unknown

No analysis available for this section yet — refresh in a moment.

Liquidity

Liquidity

$19,533.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $19.53K is extremely thin relative to the $1.66M+ in combined 24h volume (buy+sell) and the $163.44K fully diluted valuation, implying very high slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized trade. Despite the tiny liquidity pool, 24h buy volume ($845.21K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($817.67K), a marginal net inflow, and buyers (4,206) outnumber sellers (3,388), suggesting more numerous but not necessarily larger buy-side participation. This liquidity-to-volume mismatch is a red flag: high volume against shallow liquidity on a Raydium CPMM pool is typical of a highly speculative, low-cap token subject to sharp price swings on relatively small capital flows.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,120.67 BLEE

FDV

$163,440

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price move of +237.6% followed by an -18.9% 1h drop and a clear pump-and-fade pattern across the 9-candle window (from ~$0.0000038 to $0.000683 peak back to ~$0.000163) demonstrates extreme volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $19.53K against $163.44K FDV and over $1.6M in combined 24h volume creates a shallow pool highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation from relatively small trades.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 35.67% of total supply per the current snapshot; top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so the true depth of concentration risk (e.g., beyond top 10) cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($19.53K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezes cannot be ruled out
  • High price volatility with a pump-and-fade pattern already visible within a single 9-hour window
  • Top-10 wallet concentration of 35.67% with no visibility into who those holders are or their intentions
  • No sniper data available, obscuring visibility into early-buyer behavior despite an extreme initial price spike
  • No holder history data, preventing assessment of whether the holder base is genuinely growing or churning

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($845.21K) marginally exceeds sell volume ($817.67K), suggesting slightly more net buying pressure at the aggregate level
  • Buyer count (4,206) exceeds seller count (3,388) in the last 24h, indicating broader buy-side participation by unique wallets
  • Token has a stated real-world utility narrative (Bluetooth-mesh P2P payments in USDC/SOL) which, if executed, could differentiate it from purely speculative tokens — though this claim is unverified

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the unknown authority status, shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and lack of sniper/holder-history transparency. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity pool.

BLEE is an extremely early-stage, highly volatile Solana token that has already demonstrated a dramatic pump-and-fade cycle within a single 9-hour trading window, backed by a thin $19.53K liquidity pool and a $163.44K fully diluted valuation. Its stated utility — Bluetooth-mesh peer-to-peer payments in USDC/SOL — is unverified from on-chain data alone. Multiple critical risk data points (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) are unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative position rather than a well-characterized investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the Bluetooth-mesh payment utility gains real-world traction and liquidity/holder base deepens meaningfully beyond the current 1,447 addresses and $19.53K pool, BLEE could re-test or exceed its recent intraday high of $0.000683, especially if buy-side pressure (currently 50.8% of 24h volume) persists.

  • Demonstrated utility narrative around offline/Bluetooth mesh crypto payments could attract genuine adoption
  • Current 24h data shows buyers (4,206) outnumbering sellers (3,388) with a slight net inflow
  • Low starting FDV ($163.44K) leaves room for growth if liquidity and adoption scale

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate in a wide, volatile range (roughly $0.0001-$0.0003 based on recent candles) as the market digests the initial pump, with continued high volatility and thin liquidity driving large percentage swings in either direction on modest capital flows.

  • Liquidity remains near current shallow levels ($19.53K) absent new capital inflows
  • No major resolution (positive or negative) of authority/mint-freeze status in the near term
  • Trading activity remains dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders given the lack of visible utility adoption metrics

Bear Case

High probability

The pump-and-fade pattern already visible in the candle data (peak $0.000683 fading to $0.000163) repeats or worsens, especially given shallow liquidity that makes the token vulnerable to further sharp drawdowns as early buyers or concentrated top-10 holders (35.67% of supply) take profits.

  • Extremely shallow $19.53K liquidity pool makes the token highly susceptible to large price swings from modest trade sizes
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account restrictions
  • No sniper data visibility despite an obvious early low-liquidity spike in candle [1], raising concern about undisclosed early-holder dumping
  • Top-10 concentration of 35.67% with unknown holder identities or intentions

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 02:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 14:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price and 24h change data
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (9 most recent candles) from a Raydium CPMM pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 supply share)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early-buyer transaction data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, preventing a full rug-risk assessment
  • Only 9 hours of hourly candle data were provided, severely limiting technical trend analysis reliability
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications (team, exchange, sniper, etc.) were not available
  • All data is drawn from provided inputs only and has not been independently cross-verified against live on-chain state

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Solana tokens, especially low-liquidity, newly-launched tokens like BLEE, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Key risk factors including mint/freeze authority status and sniper activity could not be verified from the data provided. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is BLEE ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 14:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 35.67% of supply. It reports 1,447 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling BLEE?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 14:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $845,211.00 in buys and $817,670.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is BLEE liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +31.71%, from $15,572.01 (2026-09-23 06:00 UTC) to $20,510.61 (2026-09-23 14:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for BLEE (BLEE)?

Given the sharp -18.86% 1h decline following an extreme +237.6% 24h spike, and a fade pattern visible across the last several hourly candles (peak $0.000683 down to consolidation near $0.00013-0.00020), short-term price action looks vulnerable to further mean reversion and profit-taking, though a modest base may be forming near $0.00013-0.00016. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00010 to $0.00022.

Is BLEE a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the unknown authority status, shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and lack of sniper/holder-history transparency. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity pool.

What are the key risks of holding BLEE?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($19.53K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezes cannot be ruled out • High price volatility with a pump-and-fade pattern already visible within a single 9-hour window

← Back to all predictions

Track BLEE