Yae

八重 Price Prediction 2026

Yae
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 16, 2026

GbuHq6UTNUp8CaFsoPgUhxpPBnkVXGepDHgFhN2kpump

$0.056529

+3.94%

FDV $6,525

LiveContract:GbuHq6UTNUp8CaFsoPgUhxpPBnkVXGepDHgFhN2kpumpChain:SolanaHolders:2,208Market cap:$6,525

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Yae

Report snapshotas of May 16, 08:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

853

Snipers

29

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

八重 (Yae) is an ultra-low-cap Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: GbuHq6UTNUp8CaFsoPgUhxpPBnkVXGepDHgFhN2kpump). The token has a declared total supply of 1 (with decimals=0), yet on-chain holder balances show values in the tens of trillions — a strong indicator of severe data anomalies or intentional obfuscation in the supply/percentage fields. The token is extremely new: historical holder data shows only 1 holder for the entire prior 30-day period, with 852 holders appearing in a single burst within the last hour. Price surged +411% in 24h but sell pressure dominates at 69.1%. Liquidity is reported as $0.00, raising serious concerns about exit risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 24h price gain of +411% from a near-zero base
852 holders acquired in a single hour — highly unusual viral or bot-driven onboarding
Reported total supply of 1 with decimals=0 conflicts with holder balances in the trillions — severe data anomaly
Zero reported liquidity ($0.00) on PumpSwap despite active trading volume
20 snipers active in first 1000 blocks, majority in significant profit (>100% realized PnL)

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle (08:00 UTC) shows a dramatic reversal: open $0.000110, high $0.000248, but close collapsed to $0.000036 — an 85% intra-candle drop from the high. Sell pressure dominates at 69.1% of volume ($174K sells vs $78K buys). With $0 reported liquidity and snipers largely in profit, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5m price change of +18.9% may represent a brief dead-cat bounce.

Target low$0.000010
Target high$0.000050
Support: $0.000022 (hourly candle low, 07:00 UTC), $0.000010 (psychological floor near launch price)
Resistance: $0.000113 (hourly candle high, 07:00 UTC / close), $0.000248 (all-time high, 08:00 UTC candle)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without verifiable liquidity, a credible use case, social links, or verified contract, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. Sniper profit-taking and the absence of organic holder growth prior to the last hour suggest this is a speculative pump with high dump risk. Unless new catalysts emerge, the token is likely to retrace toward or below its pre-pump levels.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media attention
  • Listing on a DEX aggregator or tracker with high visibility
  • Whale accumulation reversing sell pressure
  • Liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool

Bullish factors

  • Price already up +411% in 24h showing speculative demand exists
  • 853 holders acquired rapidly indicating viral spread
  • 5m price change of +18.9% suggests short-term buying interest
  • Several snipers with 200–500%+ realized PnL indicate early buyers found value

Bearish factors

  • Sell volume ($174K) is 2.23x buy volume ($78K) — heavy distribution
  • 2,513 sell transactions vs 1,231 buy transactions in 24h
  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme exit risk
  • No social links, no verified contract, mutable metadata, unknown update authority
  • All 852 holders appeared in a single hour — likely artificial or bot-driven
  • Snipers active from block 1, most already in profit and likely to dump remaining positions
  • Historical holder count was 1 for 30 consecutive days prior to today
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust TA; (2) $0 reported liquidity creates unreliable price discovery; (3) supply/percentage data appears corrupted, making concentration analysis unreliable; (4) the token is less than 24 hours old with no track record.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available (07:00 and 08:00 UTC on 2026-05-16). Candle [2] (07:00): O=$0.0000362, H=$0.0001133, L=$0.0000221, C=$0.0001133 — a strong bullish candle closing at its high, volume $64.8K. Candle [1] (08:00): O=$0.0001095, H=$0.0002478, L=$0.0001090, C=$0.0000362 — a bearish engulfing / shooting star pattern: price spiked to an all-time high of $0.0002478 then collapsed back to $0.0000362, closing near the open of the prior candle. Volume surged to $176.8K. This two-candle sequence represents a classic pump-and-dump pattern: rapid markup followed by aggressive distribution.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 31%Sell 69%

The 08:00 candle's close at $0.0000362 — well below its open of $0.0001095 and the prior candle's close — establishes a short-term downtrend. With only 2 candles, medium-term trend is extrapolated as downtrend given the bearish engulfing structure and dominant sell pressure.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000022 (07:00 candle low)
Major$0.000010 (estimated launch/pre-pump level)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000113 (07:00 candle high / close)
Major$0.000248 (08:00 candle all-time high)

The $0.000022 level represents the lowest traded price in available data and serves as immediate support. The $0.000113 level (prior candle close) is the first resistance to reclaim. The all-time high of $0.000248 is major resistance and unlikely to be retested without significant new buying pressure.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on 08:00 candle — classic distribution signal
  • Pump-and-dump two-candle sequence: strong bull candle followed by full reversal
  • Volume climax on the reversal candle ($176.8K vs $64.8K prior) — typical of blow-off top
  • Price closed at the low of the 08:00 candle range, indicating sellers in full control at close

Total holders853
24h Δ+852
7d Δ+852
30d Δ+852
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The entire holder base of 852 wallets appeared within a single hour (the same hour as the price pump to $0.000248), showing near-perfect correlation between the price spike and holder acquisition. This suggests the holder growth is driven by the price pump rather than organic adoption — likely a combination of retail FOMO buyers and potentially bot activity.

Historical holder data shows exactly 1 holder for all 30 days prior to 2026-05-16, with zero net change each day. Then, in a single hour on 2026-05-16, 852 new holders appeared — a 85,200% increase in one hour. This is an extreme anomaly. The acquisition method breakdown (849 via swap, 4 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms these are active buyers, not airdrop recipients. However, the sudden single-hour burst is highly suspicious and may indicate coordinated activity, a viral social media event, or bot-driven wallet creation. The distribution categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) all show 0, which conflicts with 853 holders — likely a data classification issue related to the corrupted supply percentage fields.

Top 10 hold27.67%
Top 100 hold76.18%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

C5VpPG9PDwnUHHT75o9tS2AqSs5DETtjFExPes9xN9jG

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data

27.67%

2dsHJfXJgXqDGp4EB2GQuGy9RNqwBhTzaiZ8YDBeQ8tb

Individual whale / early holder

8.96%

BvguT2fk9R8U96AeitgGTxQiJ9hdRv5jNWH7VmYioSmQ

Individual whale / early holder

8.28%

5adnhC2piZLMgzmy9hBQHd2ZvjzppKMWnBjKxNYUUSzD

Individual whale / early holder

7.97%

A8Z1ejQGk45EJibBPJviWnM3UvwKSuYun53nSCkWKM52

Individual whale / early holder

7.32%

NOTE: The percentage figures in the raw data are clearly corrupted (e.g., top holder showing 8,766,264,898,112,100% of supply), almost certainly due to a mismatch between the declared total supply of 1 (decimals=0) and actual on-chain balances in the trillions. The percentages above are re-estimated by dividing each holder's balance by the sum of all top-20 balances as a proxy. The top holder (C5VpPG9PDwnUHHT75o9tS2AqSs5DETtjFExPes9xN9jG) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address, holding ~27.7% of visible supply. The remaining top holders are individual wallets with no identifiable labels. Concentration is extremely high — top 10 wallets hold an estimated ~76%+ of circulating supply. Overall sentiment is distributing given the dominant sell pressure and sniper exit behavior.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$78,030
Sell$174,110
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers429
Unique sellers893

Total liquidity is reported as $0.00, which is a critical red flag. Despite $252K+ in 24h combined trading volume on PumpSwap, the pool shows no measurable liquidity depth. This discrepancy may reflect a data reporting lag or that liquidity was added and removed within the same period. Slippage risk is rated HIGH — any meaningful sell order would face severe price impact. The net flow is clearly outflow: sell volume ($174.1K) is 2.23x buy volume ($78K), sellers (893 unique) outnumber buyers (429 unique) by 2.08x, and sell transactions (2,513) outnumber buy transactions (1,231) by 2.04x. Market health is poor. The token is in active distribution phase.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (declared, decimals=0) — however on-chain balances suggest actual circulating supply is in the hundreds of trillions, indicating a severe metadata/decimals mismatch
FDV$0.00 (as reported — unreliable due to supply data anomaly)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics data for Yae contains critical anomalies. The declared total supply is 1 with decimals=0, yet individual holder balances show values like 87,662,648,981,121 — implying the actual supply is hundreds of trillions of tokens. This is almost certainly a metadata error where the decimals field is set to 0 but the actual token uses a much higher decimal precision, or the supply field is incorrectly reported. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is mutable — meaning metadata can be changed post-deployment, which is a rug risk factor. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from available data. The FDV of $0.00 is a direct consequence of the corrupted supply figure. Investors should treat all supply-derived metrics with extreme caution.

Volatility
high

Price surged +411% in 24h then reversed 85% from the intra-candle high within the same hour. Extreme volatility with only 2 candles of price history available.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity reported as $0.00 on PumpSwap. Any sell order of meaningful size would face catastrophic slippage. Exit risk is extreme.

Concentration
high

Top 10 wallets hold an estimated ~76%+ of visible supply. The PumpSwap LP itself holds ~27.7%. Remaining large holders could dump at any time.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers active from block 1. 16/20 have already realized profits of 12.9%–508.3%. Remaining sniper positions (at least 2 confirmed with balances) represent ongoing dump risk.

Authority
high

Contract is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status unconfirmed. Metadata can be altered post-deployment. No verified contract, no social links.

Key risks

  • Zero reported liquidity makes exit nearly impossible without severe price impact
  • Corrupted supply/tokenomics data prevents reliable valuation
  • All 852 new holders appeared in a single hour — potential coordinated pump
  • Snipers are actively distributing into retail buyers
  • Mutable contract with unknown authorities — rug pull risk
  • No social presence, no description, no verified contract — anonymous team
  • Sell pressure at 69.1% of volume with sellers outnumbering buyers 2:1
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with no track record

Mitigating factors

  • Price has shown ability to attract buyers (853 holders, $252K volume in 24h)
  • PumpSwap listing provides some price discovery mechanism
  • Some snipers have already exited, reducing future sniper dump overhang
  • The 5m price change of +18.9% suggests some residual buying interest
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk pump-and-dump: anonymous team, zero liquidity, corrupted tokenomics, sniper activity, and artificial holder growth.

Yae (八重) is an ultra-high-risk speculative token with severe structural red flags including zero reported liquidity, corrupted supply data, anonymous/unverified team, mutable contract, and a holder base that appeared entirely within a single hour. The 411% price surge is driven by speculation and sniper activity rather than fundamentals. The dominant sell pressure (69.1%) and sniper profit-taking suggest the token is in active distribution. Any investment thesis must be purely speculative and short-term.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media momentum drives continued retail FOMO buying, temporarily overwhelming sell pressure and pushing price toward or beyond the $0.000248 all-time high.

  • Sustained viral attention on social media platforms
  • Liquidity injection into PumpSwap pool enabling larger trades
  • Whale accumulation reversing the sell/buy ratio
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats

Base case

Token experiences continued volatility with brief bounces followed by further decline. Price stabilizes at a fraction of the pump high as speculative interest fades and liquidity remains thin. Most retail buyers who entered during the pump face significant losses.

  • Sell pressure continues to dominate (>60% of volume)
  • No new major catalysts or liquidity events
  • Sniper and whale distribution continues gradually
  • Token survives but trades at 80–95% below its all-time high within 7 days

Bear case (high)

Liquidity remains near zero, snipers and early holders continue distributing, and the token retraces to near-zero as retail buyers exhaust. Potential rug pull if mutable authorities are exercised.

  • $0 liquidity makes price support impossible at scale
  • Snipers with 200–500%+ realized PnL have strong incentive to sell remaining positions
  • No fundamentals, no community, no use case to sustain demand
  • Mutable contract could be exploited by unknown update authority
  • Corrupted tokenomics erode investor confidence upon discovery

GeneratedMay 16, 08:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-05-16T08:xx UTC. OHLC data covers only 2 hourly candles (07:00–09:00 UTC). Historical holder data covers 30 days ending 2026-05-15, with current snapshot at 853 holders.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authorities)
  • PumpSwap DEX price feed and OHLC candles (hourly)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder balances and acquisition methods
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Whale map and supply concentration data

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total supply and all percentage-based metrics are corrupted due to decimals/supply mismatch — all concentration percentages are unreliable
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data lag rather than true zero, but cannot be confirmed
  • Sniper sniped amounts and current balances are largely unknown, preventing precise concentration calculation
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — no historical price data, no established patterns
  • No social links or external data sources available to assess community or team legitimacy
  • All holder distribution categories (whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus) show 0 despite 853 holders — classification system appears broken due to supply data corruption

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data anomalies identified in this report (corrupted supply figures, zero liquidity, single-hour holder spike) make reliable valuation impossible. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (declared, decimals=0) — however on-chain balances suggest actual circulating supply is in the hundreds of trillions, indicating a severe metadata/decimals mismatch

Key Risks

Zero reported liquidity makes exit nearly impossible without severe price impact
Corrupted supply/tokenomics data prevents reliable valuation
All 852 new holders appeared in a single hour — potential coordinated pump
Snipers are actively distributing into retail buyers

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1,000 blocks. The majority have realized profits ranging from 12.9% to 508.3%, with 16 of 20 showing positive realized PnL. Total realized sniper sales visible in data range from $3 to $5,080 per wallet. Only 2 snipers (QCNaknLej with $69 balance, FU7wUhvx with $12 balance) appear to still hold positions. The high sell-through rate among snipers confirms early buyers are actively distributing into retail demand. Sniper concentration as a percentage of total supply cannot be precisely calculated due to corrupted supply/balance data, but their early exit behavior is a strong bearish signal.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper balances are largely unknown; however, 18 of 20 snipers have realized sales ranging from $3 to $5,080. Top realized PnL percentages: DTWhD5ef (508.3%), JBiW8Z6i (423.9%), STorreSu8 (352.9%), GQKq1rqM (318.3%), HpBQZopr (94.6%). Most snipers have already sold significant portions of their positions.

Predominantly bearish — early buyers (snipers) are actively taking profits. 16/20 snipers show realized sales with positive PnL, suggesting they view current prices as exit opportunities rather than accumulation zones.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for 八重 (Yae)?

The most recent hourly candle (08:00 UTC) shows a dramatic reversal: open $0.000110, high $0.000248, but close collapsed to $0.000036 — an 85% intra-candle drop from the high. Sell pressure dominates at 69.1% of volume ($174K sells vs $78K buys). With $0 reported liquidity and snipers largely in profit, further downside is the most probable near-term outcome. The 5m price change of +18.9% may represent a brief dead-cat bounce. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000010 to $0.000050.

Is Yae a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a high-risk pump-and-dump: anonymous team, zero liquidity, corrupted tokenomics, sniper activity, and artificial holder growth.

How are Yae holders trending?

八重 currently has 853 holders and is growing (24h: 852, 7d: 852, 30d: 852). Historical holder data shows exactly 1 holder for all 30 days prior to 2026-05-16, with zero net change each day. Then, in a single hour on 2026-05-16, 852 new holders appeared — a 85,200% increase in one hour. This is an extreme anomaly. The acquisition method breakdown (849 via swap, 4 via transfer, 0 via airdrop) confirms these are active buyers, not airdrop recipients. However, the sudden single-hour burst is highly suspicious and may indicate coordinated activity, a viral social media event, or bot-driven wallet creation. The distribution categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) all show 0, which conflicts with 853 holders — likely a data classification issue related to the corrupted supply percentage fields.

What does sniper activity look like for Yae?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Yae?

Zero reported liquidity makes exit nearly impossible without severe price impact • Corrupted supply/tokenomics data prevents reliable valuation • All 852 new holders appeared in a single hour — potential coordinated pump

Track Yae