Boop

Boop Price Prediction 2026

Boop
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 3, 2026

G9Z4t4Vam9zBzonwKobGGig9sQdkjxUYtnQ1H2oYpump

$0.051492

FDV $1,489

LiveContract:G9Z4t4Vam9zBzonwKobGGig9sQdkjxUYtnQ1H2oYpumpChain:SolanaHolders:37Market cap:$1,489

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Boop

Report snapshotas of May 3, 01:47 AM
FDV

$1,629

Liquidity

$0

Holders

55

Snipers

37

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Boop (BOOP) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with mint address G9Z4t4Vam9zBzonwKobGGig9sQdkjxUYtnQ1H2oYpump. The token launched on or around April 30, 2026, experienced a rapid spike in holders (1 → 77 in a single day), and has since collapsed — shedding 94.69% of its USD value in 24 hours. With $0 reported liquidity, 100% sell pressure, zero buyers in the last 24 hours, and only 55 remaining holders, the token exhibits all the hallmarks of a failed pump-and-dump micro-cap. The FDV stands at a negligible ~$1,629 USD.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme supply concentration: the top holder (likely the PumpSwap liquidity pool address 3aAFWJPPHFtYobrJZh6JGocWw7WUuAbiud8JQuc2hoeu) controls 95.41% of supply
Zero buy-side activity in the last 24 hours — 6 sells, 0 buys
Reported total liquidity of $0.00 despite an active PumpSwap pair
Token launched ~April 30, 2026 and peaked within 1–2 days before rapid holder exodus
20 snipers active in the first 1,000 blocks; majority are at a realized loss

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

With zero buy pressure, $0 reported liquidity, and a 94.69% 24h price decline, the short-term outlook is deeply bearish. The price has been grinding lower across all four available hourly candles (from ~$0.00000179 at candle [4] down to ~$0.00000163 at candle [1]). Without any new buyers entering, further price deterioration or complete illiquidity is the most probable outcome.

Target low$0.0000000 (effectively zero / illiquid)
Target high$0.00000175
Support: $0.00000163 (current price / candle [1] close), $0.00000000 (liquidity floor — effectively zero)
Resistance: $0.00000175 (candle [4] low), $0.00000179 (candle [4] open/high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token's micro-cap FDV (~$1,629), absence of liquidity, no verified contract, no project description, and a rapidly declining holder base (77 → 55 in two days), medium-term recovery is highly unlikely without a significant catalyst such as a new marketing push or exchange listing — neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts
  • Any new liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool
  • Viral social media attention (Twitter/website links exist but no traction data provided)
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting micro-caps

Bullish factors

  • Token has social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggesting some community intent
  • A small number of snipers (e.g., sniper #20 at +94.6% realized PnL, sniper #6 at +33.7%) are still profitable, indicating some early buyers found value
  • Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

  • 94.69% price decline in 24 hours
  • Zero buy volume in the last 24 hours; 100% sell pressure
  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — effectively illiquid
  • Holder count declining rapidly: 77 → 61 → 55 over two days
  • Top holder controls 95.41% of supply (likely LP pool, but concentration is extreme)
  • FDV of only ~$1,629 — negligible market size
  • Majority of snipers (14 of 20 with known PnL) are at a realized loss
  • No project description, unverified contract
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely thin data set (only 4 hourly OHLC candles), $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, and the token's micro-cap / meme nature which makes price movements highly unpredictable and susceptible to single-wallet manipulation.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available (candles [4] through [1], covering roughly 2026-05-02 12:00–20:00 UTC). All four candles show open = high = low = close or very tight ranges, indicating extremely low trading activity and near-zero volatility in absolute terms. Candle [4] (12:00): O/H $0.00000179, L $0.00000177, C $0.00000177 — a small bearish candle with volume $20.45. Candle [3] (14:00): O/H/L/C all $0.000001744 — a doji/single-print candle with volume $1.39, suggesting no meaningful trading. Candle [2] (17:00): O/H $0.000001690, L/C $0.000001634 — a bearish candle, down ~3.3% on volume $51.96 (the highest volume candle in the set). Candle [1] (20:00): O/H/L/C all $0.000001630 — another doji/single-print with volume $5.77. The overall pattern is a series of lower highs and lower lows (downtrend), with the highest-volume candle being bearish, confirming distribution pressure.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 0%Sell 100%

The price has made consistent lower highs and lower lows across all 4 available candles: from $0.00000179 (candle [4] high) down to $0.00000163 (candle [1] close). The medium-term trend is also clearly down given the 94.69% 24h price collapse reported in the metadata.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00000163 (candle [1] close / current price)
Major$0.00000000 (liquidity floor — effectively zero given $0 reported liquidity)
Resistance
Immediate$0.00000175 (candle [4] low / prior support turned resistance)
Major$0.00000179 (candle [4] open/high — recent local top)

Support levels are largely theoretical given the near-zero liquidity. The $0.00000163 level is the current price floor but has no meaningful buy-side support. Resistance at $0.00000175–$0.00000179 represents the range of the most recent higher-volume candle and would require significant new buying interest to reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Consistent lower highs and lower lows across all 4 candles — confirmed downtrend
  • Doji/single-print candles at [3] and [1] indicate near-zero trading activity and price discovery failure
  • Highest-volume candle ([2]) is bearish — volume confirming the downtrend (distribution signal)
  • No bullish engulfing, hammer, or reversal patterns present in the available data

Total holders55
24h Δ-11
7d Δ+98
30d Δ+98
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder count and price are strongly correlated in decline. The token launched around April 30, 2026, with holders spiking from 1 to 77 (+76 in one day) coinciding with the initial pump. Since then, holders have declined from 77 → 61 (-16, -26%) on May 1 and 61 → 55 (-6, -11%) on May 2, tracking the price collapse. The 7d and 30d growth figures of +98% are misleading — they reflect the initial launch spike, not sustained organic growth.

The historical holder data reveals a classic pump-and-dump lifecycle: the token sat dormant with 1 holder from April 3–29 (27 days of inactivity), then exploded to 77 holders on April 30 during the launch/pump phase, before rapidly losing holders as the price collapsed. The 24h change of -11% (losing 6 holders) and the prior day's -26% (losing 16 holders) indicate accelerating holder exodus. The 30d growth of +98% is entirely attributable to the launch event and does not reflect healthy organic adoption. Growth is NOT accelerating — it is decelerating sharply into negative territory.

Top 10 hold99.52%
Top 100 hold100.06%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

3aAFWJPPHFtYobrJZh6JGocWw7WUuAbiud8JQuc2hoeu

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

95.41%

F7M1PeZACBHAntBrPXLcmRT1qJuJaJSC1iApQrCn4XCa

Individual whale / possible team or early investor

2.98%

EhymUiFEjQHeibof6As6TPPkSQkBqqn16GNyaWbd5yLA

Individual whale / retail holder

0.33%

46rKWuwkoA7jvuMZw8q6QjCSoiwCTfpWNfKLbpKnkips

Individual whale / retail holder

0.21%

EqR5CW6jpYmS2P9TJxpRpG35TFmX1jz561tMksJWA1MC

Individual whale / retail holder

0.14%

Supply distribution is extremely concentrated. The #1 holder (3aAFWJPPHFtYobrJZh6JGocWw7WUuAbiud8JQuc2hoeu) controls 95.41% of supply and matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data — this is almost certainly the liquidity pool contract holding the token-side of the LP. The #2 holder (F7M1PeZACBHAntBrPXLcmRT1qJuJaJSC1iApQrCn4XCa) holds 2.98%, which is the largest non-LP wallet and may represent a team/dev wallet or large early buyer. Holders #3–#10 each hold between 0.04% and 0.33%, representing a thin long tail of retail participants. The top 10 hold 99.52% of supply (top 100 = 100.06%, a rounding artifact). Excluding the LP pool, effective non-LP concentration is extreme. Overall sentiment is distributing — holders are exiting, not accumulating.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported — effectively illiquid)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$0.00
Sell$79.57
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers0
Unique sellers6

The trading analytics report $0.00 total liquidity despite an active PumpSwap pair (3aAFWJPPHFtYobrJZh6JGocWw7WUuAbiud8JQuc2hoeu). This likely reflects that the liquidity pool has been drained or is at near-zero depth. In the last 24 hours, there were 0 buys and 6 sells totaling $79.57 — 100% sell pressure. The 6h price change of -0.25% and 24h change of -9.9% (per analytics) contrast with the metadata's -94.69% figure, suggesting the metadata captures a longer or differently-calculated window. With zero buyers, any sell order — no matter how small — will face extreme slippage or fail to execute. The market is effectively broken.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,353,673.23 BOOP
FDV~$1,629 USD

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.35 million BOOP with 6 decimals, consistent with a standard PumpFun launch. The FDV is negligible at ~$1,629 USD. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as mutable=false — meaning the metadata itself cannot be changed, which is a minor positive. However, mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically renounces mint authority upon bonding curve completion, but this cannot be confirmed from the available data. The contract is unverified and has no project description, increasing uncertainty. Rug risk from authorities is classified as unknown due to insufficient data.

Volatility
high

The token lost 94.69% of its USD value in 24 hours. With only 4 hourly candles available and $79.57 in total 24h volume, price discovery is unreliable and any single trade can move the price dramatically.

Liquidity
high

Total reported liquidity is $0.00. The PumpSwap pool appears drained. Any attempt to sell remaining holdings will face extreme slippage or complete inability to execute. Exit liquidity is effectively nonexistent.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 99.52% of supply. Even excluding the LP pool (95.41%), the #2 holder controls 2.98% — a single wallet that could significantly impact price if it sells. The distribution is among the most concentrated possible.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were active in the first 1,000 blocks. Most have already sold (high sell-through rate), with 14 of 20 realizing losses. The remaining sniper with a confirmed balance (FLqQMRPBTydhJDdL8czpNy5KqKWFUNm9Y8Ja4rARPBn4, 0.13%) poses limited additional dump risk given the tiny position size. The primary sniper dump has likely already occurred.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The token is mutable=false (metadata cannot be changed), which is positive. The update authority is listed as unknown. PumpFun tokens typically renounce mint authority, but this cannot be confirmed from available data. Unverified contract adds uncertainty.

Key risks

  • Complete illiquidity — $0 reported liquidity makes exit impossible for most holders
  • Extreme price collapse (-94.69% in 24h) with no buy-side recovery
  • Holder exodus accelerating (77 → 55 in 2 days, -29%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation
  • Unverified contract with no project description or whitepaper
  • Micro-cap FDV (~$1,629) makes the token trivially easy to manipulate
  • Token was dormant for 27 days before launch — suggests pre-planned pump

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false metadata reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • Most snipers have already exited — primary dump pressure may be exhausted
  • Social links (Twitter, website) suggest at least minimal community infrastructure
  • PumpFun launch mechanism typically includes automatic mint authority renunciation upon bonding curve completion
Suitable for: This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire position. Given current liquidity conditions, even experienced traders may be unable to exit positions.

Boop (BOOP) is a failed micro-cap meme token on Solana that launched via PumpFun around April 30, 2026. It experienced a brief pump attracting 77 holders before collapsing 94.69% in 24 hours. With $0 liquidity, zero buyers, and a rapidly declining holder base, the token is effectively in a terminal decline phase. There is no investment thesis that supports buying at current levels without extraordinary new catalysts.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media revival drives new buyers into the PumpSwap pool, liquidity is restored, and the token re-enters a speculative pump cycle.

  • Successful viral marketing campaign on Twitter/social media
  • New liquidity injection into the PumpSwap pool by the team or a whale
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Token rebranding or utility announcement

Base case

The token stabilizes at current depressed price levels with minimal trading activity, maintaining a small community of ~30–50 holders but with no meaningful price appreciation. Occasional small sell orders continue to push price lower over weeks.

  • A small number of holders remain committed and do not sell
  • No new liquidity is added but no further major sell events occur
  • The PumpSwap pair remains technically active but illiquid
  • No external catalysts (positive or negative) materialize

Bear case (high)

The token continues its current trajectory to near-zero, liquidity remains at $0, remaining holders are unable to exit, and the token becomes a zombie with no trading activity.

  • Zero buy-side interest persists — no new buyers enter
  • Remaining holders (55) continue to exit, further depressing price
  • LP pool remains drained with no liquidity restoration
  • No project development or community activity to catalyze recovery

GeneratedMay 3, 01:47 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-02T20:00:00 UTC. OHLC data covers the most recent 4 hourly candles (2026-05-02 12:00–20:00 UTC). Holder history covers 30 days (2026-04-03 to 2026-05-02).
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, update authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair address, price, liquidity)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (4 candles, USD-denominated)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price change intervals)
  • Holder metrics (total holders, acquisition method, distribution tiers, historical daily series)
  • Top 20 holder wallet addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers, realized PnL percentages and sold amounts)

Limitations

  • Only 4 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Sniper sniped amounts and current balances are 'unknown' for most snipers — PnL calculations are based on realized PnL percentages only
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data reporting issue or reflect genuinely drained LP
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot fully assess rug risk
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renunciation
  • No project description, whitepaper, or tokenomics documentation available
  • FDV reported as $0.00 in analytics but $1,628.86 in metadata — discrepancy noted; metadata figure used
  • Historical holder data shows only 1 holder for 27 days prior to launch — may reflect data collection artifact or genuine dormancy

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,353,673.23 BOOP

Key Risks

Complete illiquidity — $0 reported liquidity makes exit impossible for most holders
Extreme price collapse (-94.69% in 24h) with no buy-side recovery
Holder exodus accelerating (77 → 55 in 2 days, -29%)
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
Low risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1,000 blocks. Of the 20 snipers with known realized PnL data, 14 are at a realized loss (ranging from -8.2% to -85.6%), 5 are at a realized gain (ranging from +5.5% to +94.6%), and 1 shows 0% PnL. The majority of snipers have already sold (high sell-through rate), with total sell proceeds across all snipers summing to approximately $1,337 — consistent with the token's micro-cap nature. The dominant sniper sentiment is negative, with most early buyers having exited at a loss. Only sniper #14 (FLqQMRPBTydhJDdL8czpNy5KqKWFUNm9Y8Ja4rARPBn4, also a top-10 holder at 0.13%) retains a meaningful balance.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.13%
PnL stateMostly At Loss
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
low

Sniper #14 (FLqQMRPBTydhJDdL8czpNy5KqKWFUNm9Y8Ja4rARPBn4) holds ~$50 balance and 0.13% of supply — the only sniper with a confirmed remaining balance. All other snipers with known sold amounts appear to have exited or partially exited.

Predominantly negative — 14 of 20 snipers realized losses, with several suffering losses exceeding 50% (snipers #2 at -58.3%, #9 at -51.9%, #13 at -74.4%, #15 at -51.7%, #18 at -85.6%). Only 5 snipers realized gains, suggesting the token pumped briefly after launch before rapidly declining.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Boop (Boop)?

With zero buy pressure, $0 reported liquidity, and a 94.69% 24h price decline, the short-term outlook is deeply bearish. The price has been grinding lower across all four available hourly candles (from ~$0.00000179 at candle [4] down to ~$0.00000163 at candle [1]). Without any new buyers entering, further price deterioration or complete illiquidity is the most probable outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000000 (effectively zero / illiquid) to $0.00000175.

Is Boop a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire position. Given current liquidity conditions, even experienced traders may be unable to exit positions.

How are Boop holders trending?

Boop currently has 55 holders and is declining (24h: -11, 7d: 98, 30d: 98). The historical holder data reveals a classic pump-and-dump lifecycle: the token sat dormant with 1 holder from April 3–29 (27 days of inactivity), then exploded to 77 holders on April 30 during the launch/pump phase, before rapidly losing holders as the price collapsed. The 24h change of -11% (losing 6 holders) and the prior day's -26% (losing 16 holders) indicate accelerating holder exodus. The 30d growth of +98% is entirely attributable to the launch event and does not reflect healthy organic adoption. Growth is NOT accelerating — it is decelerating sharply into negative territory.

What does sniper activity look like for Boop?

Snipers hold roughly 0.13% of supply with PnL state "mostly_at_loss" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Boop?

Complete illiquidity — $0 reported liquidity makes exit impossible for most holders • Extreme price collapse (-94.69% in 24h) with no buy-side recovery • Holder exodus accelerating (77 → 55 in 2 days, -29%)

Track Boop