Oris

Play Oris Price Prediction 2026

Oris
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 7, 2026

Fo328gk3ZPm8aHDPFoxhqwTJKdJRVQvYjKARsopwpump

$0.051526

FDV $1,525

LiveContract:Fo328gk3ZPm8aHDPFoxhqwTJKdJRVQvYjKARsopwpumpChain:SolanaHolders:158Market cap:$1,525

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Oris

Report snapshotas of Jul 7, 03:17 AM
FDV

$61,992

Liquidity

$42,274

Holders

505

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Play Oris (Oris) is a PumpFun-launched Solana meme/micro-cap token (mint: Fo328gk3ZPm8aHDPFoxhqwTJKdJRVQvYjKARsopwpump) with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $62K–$94K (discrepancy between metadata and trading analytics data). The token has experienced a sharp 77% 24h price spike but exhibits deeply concerning structural signals: extreme sell pressure (70.3% sell volume), a tiny liquidity pool of $42.27K, and a highly anomalous holder data set — the historical series shows only 14 holders for the entire prior 30-day period, then a sudden +491 holder jump in the last hour. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics return 0%, and no sniper data is provided. The contract is unverified and update authority is unknown. This combination of signals warrants a very high risk classification.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 77% 24h price pump on very thin $42.27K liquidity
Anomalous holder data: 14 holders for 30 days then +491 in 1 hour — likely data artifact or coordinated wallet creation
Severe sell-side dominance: 70.3% sell pressure, 2,037 sells vs 744 buys in 24h
No top holder data, no supply concentration data, no sniper data — critical transparency gaps
Unverified contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has pumped ~77% in 24h on extremely thin liquidity ($42.27K). The most recent hourly candle (03:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000678, spiked to a high of $0.0000953, and closed at $0.0000889 — a strong upper wick relative to body suggesting distribution. Sell pressure is 70.3% of volume. A retracement toward the prior candle's open (~$0.0000343) or lower is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low$0.0000209 (candle [2] low)
Target high$0.0000953 (candle [1] high)
Support: $0.0000575 (candle [1] low), $0.0000343 (candle [2] open), $0.0000209 (candle [2] low — absolute recent floor)
Resistance: $0.0000889 (candle [1] close), $0.0000953 (candle [1] all-time recent high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

With only $42.27K in liquidity, an unverified contract, unknown update authority, and overwhelming sell pressure, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token sat dormant at 14 holders for 30 days before a sudden spike — a pattern consistent with coordinated pump activity followed by distribution. Medium-term outlook is bearish absent any fundamental catalyst.

Catalysts
  • Unexpected viral social media traction
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (very unlikely at this market cap)
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps

Bullish factors

  • 77% 24h price gain demonstrates short-term momentum
  • 244 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine demand
  • Token migrated to PumpSwap suggesting bonding curve completion

Bearish factors

  • 70.3% sell pressure (2,037 sells vs 744 buys)
  • Only $42.27K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • 30-day holder stagnation at 14 then sudden +491 spike is anomalous
  • No top holder transparency — cannot assess distribution or dump risk
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($62K) and analytics ($94K) suggests data inconsistency
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) top holder and supply concentration data are entirely missing; (3) the holder anomaly (14 → 505 in one hour) makes on-chain behavioral analysis unreliable; (4) no sniper data available. Price action on micro-cap tokens with $42K liquidity is highly unpredictable.

Oris call history

Full track record →
Jul 7bearish
24h-96.7%
7d-97.5%
30d-97.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000343, H=$0.0000862, L=$0.0000209, C=$0.0000677 — a large-range bullish candle with a long lower wick, indicating a volatile recovery from intraday lows. Volume was very high at $112,014. Candle [1] (03:00 UTC): O=$0.0000678, H=$0.0000953, L=$0.0000575, C=$0.0000889 — a bullish candle with a notable upper wick (high $0.0000953 vs close $0.0000889), suggesting selling pressure near the top. Volume dropped sharply to $14,815, indicating fading momentum. The two-candle sequence shows a pump with declining volume — a classic distribution warning sign.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 30%Sell 70%

Short-term trend is technically upward based on the 2 available candles (higher close, higher high), but the 30-day historical context shows complete price stagnation prior to this spike. Medium-term trend is effectively sideways/unknown given the dormancy period.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000575 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000209 (candle [2] absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000953 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.0000953 (only 2 candles available — no broader resistance history)

Support and resistance levels are derived from only 2 hourly candles, making them highly unreliable. The $0.0000575 level is the nearest downside reference. The $0.0000953 high is the only identifiable resistance. Traders should treat these levels with extreme caution given the data scarcity.

Notable patterns

  • Upper wick on candle [1] — potential shooting star / distribution signal
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] — pump exhaustion pattern
  • Large-range candle [2] with long lower wick — initial capitulation/recovery
  • Two-candle higher-high, higher-close sequence — short-term uptrend, but insufficient data for confirmation

Total holders505
24h Δ+491
7d Δ+491
30d Δ+491
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The +491 holder increase occurred simultaneously with the 77% price pump, suggesting the holder growth is directly correlated with the price spike event. However, the historical data shows exactly 14 holders every single day for the prior 30 days with zero net change — this is highly anomalous and may indicate a data tracking artifact, a token that was dormant/private, or coordinated wallet creation timed with the pump.

The holder data presents a deeply anomalous pattern. For the entire 30-day historical window (2026-06-07 to 2026-07-06), the holder count was exactly 14 with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the 1-hour and 24-hour windows, +491 holders appeared simultaneously — representing a 97% increase in reported holders. This is not organic growth. Possible explanations include: (1) the token was recently migrated to PumpSwap and holder tracking only began at migration; (2) coordinated wallet creation to simulate community size; (3) a data pipeline issue. The supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) and missing top holder list further undermine confidence in the holder data quality. This data should be treated with extreme skepticism.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the API returned no results for the top 20 holders. Supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data error rather than a genuine reflection of distribution (a token cannot have 0% concentration in its top 100 holders). Without this data, it is impossible to assess whale positioning, identify team/treasury wallets, or evaluate dump risk from large holders. This is a critical transparency gap that significantly elevates risk. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' as a conservative default given the data absence and the token's micro-cap, newly-launched nature on PumpFun.

Liquidity$42,270
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$40,750
Sell$96,440
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers243
Unique sellers802

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $42.27K on a single PumpSwap pool (9cHEQ63oFQa89ry3GgLwybsTUCtacYUrhb95yy44j5s). With an FDV of ~$62–94K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 45–68%, which appears high but is misleading at this absolute dollar level — any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $96.44K in sell volume vs $40.75K in buy volume, a 2.37:1 sell-to-buy ratio. There are 802 unique sellers vs 243 unique buyers — more than 3x as many sellers. Total 24h transactions: 2,781 (2,037 sells + 744 buys). This market structure is consistent with a token in active distribution phase. The price % change showing 0% across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) in the analytics section contradicts the 77% 24h gain shown in the price section — this discrepancy may indicate a data snapshot timing issue.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)
FDV$62,000–$94,350 (discrepancy between metadata $61,992 and analytics $94,350)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a standard 1 billion supply with 6 decimals, typical of PumpFun launches. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' — this is a red flag as it prevents assessment of whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed, but this does not confirm renouncement of mint/freeze authorities. The contract is unverified. There is a notable FDV discrepancy: metadata reports $61,992 while trading analytics reports $94,350 — this ~52% gap may reflect different price snapshots or calculation methodologies and adds to data reliability concerns. The token launched via PumpFun (pump suffix in mint address) and has migrated to PumpSwap, suggesting the bonding curve was completed.

Volatility
high

77% price gain in 24h on only $42.27K liquidity. Two-candle OHLC shows extreme intraday range (low $0.0000209 to high $0.0000953 — a 4.6x range within 2 hours). Micro-cap tokens on thin liquidity are subject to violent price swings in both directions.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $42.27K is extremely shallow. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will incur significant slippage. A single whale exit could collapse the price. The token trades on a single PumpSwap pool with no secondary markets.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is entirely unavailable and supply concentration metrics return 0% (likely a data error). For a newly launched PumpFun token, concentration in early wallets is typically very high. The inability to verify distribution is itself a major risk factor.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, preventing direct assessment. However, the 70.3% sell pressure (2,037 sells vs 744 buys, 802 sellers vs 243 buyers) strongly suggests significant holders are actively distributing. The anomalous holder spike from 14 to 505 in one hour is consistent with coordinated activity.

Authority
high

Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. Unverified contract. If mint authority is active, unlimited token creation is possible. If freeze authority is active, wallets can be frozen. These represent existential risks.

Key risks

  • Unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential for unlimited minting or wallet freezing
  • No top holder data — impossible to assess dump risk from large wallets
  • Extreme sell pressure: 70.3% of 24h volume is sells, 802 sellers vs 243 buyers
  • Anomalous holder data (14 holders for 30 days → +491 in 1 hour) suggests possible manipulation or data unreliability
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($42.27K) — high slippage and crash risk
  • Unverified contract on PumpFun with unknown update authority
  • FDV discrepancy between data sources ($62K vs $94K) indicates data quality issues
  • Token has been dormant for at least 30 days before sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata marked as 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
  • PumpFun migration to PumpSwap suggests bonding curve completion (some legitimacy signal)
  • 244 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine market participation
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist — some minimal project presence
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of unknown authorities, missing holder data, extreme sell pressure, and anomalous on-chain signals places this in the highest risk category.

Play Oris (Oris) is a high-risk micro-cap PumpFun token exhibiting multiple red flags: extreme sell pressure, unknown contract authorities, missing holder/whale data, anomalous holder growth patterns, and extremely thin liquidity. The recent 77% price pump appears to be driven by speculative momentum rather than fundamentals, with on-chain data suggesting active distribution by existing holders. Any investment thesis must be grounded in speculation only, with no fundamental basis.

Bull case (low)

Short-term momentum trade: If the token gains viral social media traction (Twitter/community), the thin liquidity means even modest buy pressure could push prices significantly higher. A continuation of the pump could see prices test or exceed the $0.0000953 recent high.

  • Viral social media momentum on Twitter/Solana meme communities
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally
  • Coordinated community buying campaign
  • Thin liquidity amplifying upside moves

Base case

Gradual price erosion: Without sustained buying interest, the token slowly bleeds down from current levels as early buyers take profits. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.0000343–$0.0000575 (candle [2] open and candle [1] low) over the next 7 days, with declining volume and holder attrition.

  • No major new catalysts emerge
  • Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels
  • No rug pull or authority exploit occurs

Bear case (high)

Pump-and-dump collapse: The overwhelming sell pressure (70.3%), unknown large holder positions, and classic dormant-then-pump pattern suggest this is a coordinated pump-and-dump. Price could retrace to pre-pump levels near $0.0000209 (candle [2] low) or lower, representing an ~76% decline from current levels.

  • Continued sell pressure from undisclosed large holders
  • Fading volume (87% drop in 1 hour) indicating pump exhaustion
  • No fundamental value proposition beyond speculative narrative
  • Unknown authorities creating existential contract risk
  • Thin liquidity accelerating downside moves

GeneratedJul 7, 03:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-07-07T03:00 UTC. Historical holder data current through 2026-07-06. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: Fo328gk3ZPm8aHDPFoxhqwTJKdJRVQvYjKARsopwpump)
  • PumpSwap pool data (pair: 9cHEQ63oFQa89ry3GgLwybsTUCtacYUrhb95yy44j5s)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, 2026-07-07T02:00–03:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily, 2026-06-07 to 2026-07-06)
  • Holder distribution metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — whale/concentration analysis impossible
  • Supply concentration metrics return 0% — likely a data error, not genuine distribution
  • Sniper analysis endpoint returned no data — early buyer behavior unknown
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unverifiable
  • Anomalous holder data (14 for 30 days → +491 in 1 hour) reduces reliability of holder metrics
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($61,992) and analytics ($94,350) indicates data inconsistency
  • Price % change showing 0% across all timeframes in analytics contradicts 77% 24h gain in price section — possible data snapshot timing issue
  • Contract is unverified — on-chain code cannot be independently audited

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from untrusted on-chain sources and may contain errors, manipulated fields, or adversarial content inserted by the token creator. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

Unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential for unlimited minting or wallet freezing
No top holder data — impossible to assess dump risk from large wallets
Extreme sell pressure: 70.3% of 24h volume is sells, 802 sellers vs 243 buyers
Anomalous holder data (14 holders for 30 days → +491 in 1 hour) suggests possible manipulation or data unreliability

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Per analytical protocol, sniper concentration is set to 0 and related metrics are unknown. The absence of sniper data, combined with missing top holder information, means smart money activity cannot be assessed. The 70.3% sell pressure and 2,037 sells vs 744 buys in 24h suggest that whoever holds significant supply is actively distributing, but this cannot be attributed to specific sniper wallets without the data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Unknown — no sniper or early buyer wallet data is available. The anomalous holder jump from 14 to 505 in one hour may indicate coordinated wallet activity, but cannot be confirmed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Play Oris (Oris)?

The token has pumped ~77% in 24h on extremely thin liquidity ($42.27K). The most recent hourly candle (03:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000678, spiked to a high of $0.0000953, and closed at $0.0000889 — a strong upper wick relative to body suggesting distribution. Sell pressure is 70.3% of volume. A retracement toward the prior candle's open (~$0.0000343) or lower is the most probable near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000209 (candle [2] low) to $0.0000953 (candle [1] high).

Is Oris a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of unknown authorities, missing holder data, extreme sell pressure, and anomalous on-chain signals places this in the highest risk category.

How are Oris holders trending?

Play Oris currently has 505 holders and is growing (24h: 491, 7d: 491, 30d: 491). The holder data presents a deeply anomalous pattern. For the entire 30-day historical window (2026-06-07 to 2026-07-06), the holder count was exactly 14 with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the 1-hour and 24-hour windows, +491 holders appeared simultaneously — representing a 97% increase in reported holders. This is not organic growth. Possible explanations include: (1) the token was recently migrated to PumpSwap and holder tracking only began at migration; (2) coordinated wallet creation to simulate community size; (3) a data pipeline issue. The supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) and missing top holder list further undermine confidence in the holder data quality. This data should be treated with extreme skepticism.

What does sniper activity look like for Oris?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Oris?

Unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential for unlimited minting or wallet freezing • No top holder data — impossible to assess dump risk from large wallets • Extreme sell pressure: 70.3% of 24h volume is sells, 802 sellers vs 243 buyers

Track Oris