APED

APED Price Today & AI Analysis

APEDSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.000387

+512.71% 24h · FDV $386,985

Contract

Live
FiyPnPU7nPgx73A94pntqUPhyfBPhMM54u25DWMzTwkH

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,867

Market cap

$386,985

More tokens on Solana

QUILLQUILLQuill Company$0.049156+91.2%MC $90.0KMETMETMeteora$0.2855+11.6%MC $284.89M+++++++++++++++$0.001048+113.4%MC $1.05MAidenAidenThe Day Trader$0.000404-58.9%MC $393.3KFartcoin Fartcoin Fartcoin $0.1814+10.8%MC $181.41MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

APED: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 18:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,867

Top 10 supply share

29.90%

Reported liquidity

$31,352.00
How concentrated is APED ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 18:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 29.90% of supply. It reports 1,867 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling APED?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 18:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $970,669.00 in buys and $928,535.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is APED liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.85%, from $36,877.04 (2026-09-22 17:00 UTC) to $47,147.33 (2026-09-22 18:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 18:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$36,877.04
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$47,147.33

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about APED

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 06:17 PM UTC

FDV

$386,985

Liquidity

$31,352.00

Holders

1,867

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

APED is a low-cap Solana token (FDV ~$386.99K) trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with only $31.35K of total liquidity. It has shown extreme volatility, with a reported +512.7% 24h price move alongside a -16.7% pullback in just the last 5 minutes, and hourly candle ranges spanning two orders of magnitude. Holder data shows 1,867 addresses with the top 10 holding 29.9% of supply, but no historical trend, wallet classification, sniper, or mint/freeze authority data is available, leaving major risk dimensions unverifiable.

Key points

  • Very shallow liquidity ($31.35K) relative to both its 24h trading volume (~$1.9M) and FDV (~$387K)
  • Extremely volatile, whipsaw price action within the same trading session
  • Critical data gaps: unknown mint/freeze authority, no sniper coverage, no verified-contract status, no social presence
  • Snapshot-only holder data (1,867 holders, top-10 at 29.9%) with no way to assess trend or holder quality

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · next 1-24 hours

bearish

After a parabolic move from ~$0.0000076 to a high of $0.000734, price has already pulled back to $0.000379 and shows a further -16.7% decline in the most recent 5-minute window. This pattern — a sharp spike followed by immediate rejection from highs — is typical of unsustainable pumps in thin-liquidity pools and suggests near-term downside or high-volatility consolidation is more likely than continuation of the parabolic move.

Target low

$0.00021

Target high

$0.00045

Support

$0.000322 (candle #2 low), $0.0000076 (candle #1 open, extreme tail risk floor)

Resistance

$0.000586 (candle #1 high), $0.000734 (candle #2 high, all-time high in dataset)

Medium term · next 3-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data and no longer-term OHLC history, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. The token's sustainability will hinge on whether liquidity deepens, whether buy pressure (currently ~51.1%) persists, and whether authority/sniper risks resolve favorably. Absent new catalysts or liquidity growth, thin pools like this often see volatility decay and gradual liquidity drain.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions to the Raydium pool that reduce slippage risk
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, negative if not)
  • Continued net buy pressure vs. a shift toward net selling
  • Broader Solana meme-token market sentiment given APED's speculative positioning

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($970.67K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($928.53K), a 51.1%/48.9% split favoring buyers
  • 4,453 unique buyers vs 3,372 unique sellers in 24h, indicating broader buyer participation
  • Large 24h price appreciation reflects strong recent speculative demand

Bearish factors

  • Sharp -16.7% drop in the most recent 5 minutes suggests the pump is already reversing
  • Total liquidity of only $31.35K cannot support the ~$1.9M in 24h volume without significant price impact
  • Wide intra-hour candle ranges (low $0.0000076 to high $0.000734 in candle 1) reflect extreme instability rather than healthy price discovery
  • Unknown authority status leaves open the possibility of adverse token actions

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles and a single snapshot of holder/trading data are available — insufficient history to establish a reliable trend, volatility regime, or support/resistance structure with confidence. Multiple risk-relevant data points (authorities, snipers) are entirely missing.

APED call history

Full track record →

Sep 22bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
FiyPnP...TwkH
Total Supply
999,991,920.13 APED

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($31.35K) relative to trading volume (~$1.9M/24h) and FDV (~$387K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — the possibility of further minting or freezing of accounts cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk is entirely unquantified
  • Extreme, erratic price action (+512.7% 24h, -16.7% in the last 5 minutes) typical of thinly-traded, newly launched or heavily manipulated tokens

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000076, spiked to a high of $0.000586, dipped back to its open as the low, and closed at $0.000367 — a massive bullish expansion candle with volume of ~1.84M. Candle 2 (18:00 UTC) opened at $0.000367, pushed to a new high of $0.000734, pulled back to a low of $0.000322, and closed slightly higher at $0.000379, with volume falling to ~625K. The pattern shows a parabolic breakout followed by a wide-range reversal candle with a long upper wick, suggesting sellers stepped in aggressively near the highs.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is nominally up given the +512.7% 24h move, but the most recent candle's long upper wick and the -16.7% 5-minute move suggest momentum is stalling. With only two candles of data, a medium-term trend cannot be established; price is best characterized as consolidating after an initial spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000322 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000076 (candle 1 open/low, extreme downside)

Immediate resistance

$0.000586 (candle 1 high)

Major resistance

$0.000734 (candle 2 high, session ATH)

With only two candles, these levels are provisional. The $0.000322 level is the most recently tested support; a break below it would open room toward the $0.0000076 tail low seen in candle 1, though that print looks like an anomalous open/low print rather than a defended level. On the upside, $0.000586 and the session high of $0.000734 represent the nearest resistance zone, both of which showed rejection.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick rejection candle at session high ($0.000734), suggesting seller absorption near highs
  • Bearish volume divergence: second candle made a higher high on ~66% less volume than the first
  • Parabolic breakout candle in candle 1 with an extremely wide range, typical of thin-liquidity, low-cap token launches
  • Sharp -16.7% 5-minute reversal following the 24h spike, indicating momentum exhaustion

Liquidity

Liquidity

$31,352.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $31.35K is very shallow relative to both the $386.99K FDV (~8%) and the ~$1.9M in combined 24h volume (liquidity is only ~1.6% of 24h volume), implying high price impact for trades of even modest size. 24h buy volume ($970.67K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($928.53K), producing a mild net inflow (51.1% vs 48.9%), and unique buyers (4,453) outnumber unique sellers (3,372). However, with a pool this small, large single trades — buys or sells — can move price dramatically, as evidenced by the wide OHLC ranges in both available candles.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,991,920.13 APED

FDV

$386.99K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from an open of $0.0000076 to a high of $0.000734 and back to $0.000379 within two hourly candles — an intra-candle range exceeding 9,600%. 24h change is reported at +512.7% while 5m change is -16.7%, indicating extreme, whipsaw-like volatility inconsistent with a stable market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $31.35K against a fully diluted valuation of ~$386.99K (~8% of FDV), and this sits in a single Raydium CPMM pool. Despite this shallow pool, 24h buy+sell volume totals ~$1.9M, implying volume is roughly 60x the pool's liquidity — a setup prone to severe slippage and price impact on even modest trade sizes.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 29.9% of supply across 1,867 holder addresses. This is a snapshot-only figure with no historical trend, no wallet classification (cannot distinguish exchanges, LPs, team, or bots), and no data on how concentration has evolved. Address count also does not equal number of unique people.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($31.35K) relative to trading volume (~$1.9M/24h) and FDV (~$387K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — the possibility of further minting or freezing of accounts cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk is entirely unquantified
  • Extreme, erratic price action (+512.7% 24h, -16.7% in the last 5 minutes) typical of thinly-traded, newly launched or heavily manipulated tokens
  • No social links, unknown verification status, and description referencing a third-party 'tracker' deployer tool rather than an established project
  • Token symbol/name 'APED' and generic launch description suggest a speculative, meme-style token with no disclosed utility or roadmap

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($970.67K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($928.53K), suggesting marginally more net buying pressure than selling in the last 24h
  • Holder base of 1,867 addresses is not negligible for a token at this market cap, though this does not confirm distribution quality
  • Top-10 concentration of 29.9% is not among the most extreme levels seen in low-cap tokens, though it remains a meaningful minority-control figure

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits hallmarks of an early-stage, highly speculative, low-liquidity meme/launch token with several critical unknowns (authorities, sniper activity, verification). Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement-oriented allocations, or those seeking fundamentals-based exposure.

APED is a highly speculative, newly volatile Solana token with a small FDV (~$387K) and very shallow liquidity ($31.35K). The data shows a violent price spike (+512.7% 24h) that is already reversing in the near term, combined with several unresolved risk factors — unknown authority status, no sniper data, and only a snapshot of holder concentration (top-10 at 29.9%). Any position taken here is a short-term, high-risk speculative trade rather than a fundamentals-driven investment, given the near-total absence of verifiable project fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum re-accelerates (buyers already outnumber sellers 4,453 to 3,372 with 51.1% buy-volume share) and liquidity providers add depth to the pool, APED could see continued speculative upside, potentially retesting or breaking the $0.000734 session high.

  • Sustained or growing unique buyer count outpacing sellers
  • New liquidity added to the Raydium pool reducing slippage and enabling larger buy-side flows
  • Positive resolution of authority unknowns (e.g., confirmed renounced mint/freeze authority) reducing perceived risk
  • Broader meme-token/Solana market rally providing tailwind

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate with high volatility in a range roughly between the $0.000322 recent low and the $0.000586-$0.000734 resistance zone, with liquidity remaining shallow and susceptible to large swings from individual trades, absent new information on authorities or sustained volume growth.

  • No material change in the $31.35K liquidity pool size in the near term
  • Buy/sell pressure remains roughly balanced (near the current 51.1%/48.9% split) without a decisive shift
  • No new sniper, authority, or holder-history data becomes available to materially change the risk picture
  • General Solana meme-token market conditions remain neutral to moderately volatile

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority risk, absence of sniper visibility, and the already-visible reversal (-16.7% in the last 5 minutes off a rejected high), APED could see a sharp continued decline back toward or below the candle-2 low of $0.000322, with tail risk toward the extreme low print of $0.0000076 if liquidity is pulled or large holders exit.

  • Parabolic pump-and-dump pattern typical of thin-liquidity meme tokens
  • Volume divergence (declining volume on the second candle's higher high) signaling weakening conviction
  • Concentrated top-10 holder base (29.9%) able to materially move price with a single large sell
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and lack of verified contract status increasing rug-pull uncertainty

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 06:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 18:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
  • Current USD price and 24h/5m/1h percentage change data
  • Two most recent hourly OHLC candles from Raydium CPMM pair 9fLwvhBYLcbQvDtitpoX9jApQXGVBGdAdigHsmpnJ67h
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 supply share)
  • Sniper analysis feed (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust technical trend or pattern analysis
  • No sniper data was provided, so sniper concentration, PnL, and dump risk are entirely unassessed
  • No mint/freeze authority data was provided; authority-based rug risk is unknown, not confirmed safe
  • Holder data is a single snapshot with no historical time series, so growth/trend/accumulation claims cannot be made
  • No wallet classification data exists, so 'notable holders' and whale behavior (accumulating vs. distributing) cannot be identified
  • Token verification status, contract audit status, and social presence are unknown, limiting fundamental due diligence
  • 6h price change data was unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment recommendation, or a guarantee of future performance. Cryptocurrency assets, particularly low-liquidity and newly-launched tokens like APED, carry very high risk of significant or total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is APED ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 18:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 29.90% of supply. It reports 1,867 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling APED?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 18:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $970,669.00 in buys and $928,535.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is APED liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +27.85%, from $36,877.04 (2026-09-22 17:00 UTC) to $47,147.33 (2026-09-22 18:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for APED (APED)?

After a parabolic move from ~$0.0000076 to a high of $0.000734, price has already pulled back to $0.000379 and shows a further -16.7% decline in the most recent 5-minute window. This pattern — a sharp spike followed by immediate rejection from highs — is typical of unsustainable pumps in thin-liquidity pools and suggests near-term downside or high-volatility consolidation is more likely than continuation of the parabolic move. Short-term outlook is bearish (next 1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00021 to $0.00045.

Is APED a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits hallmarks of an early-stage, highly speculative, low-liquidity meme/launch token with several critical unknowns (authorities, sniper activity, verification). Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement-oriented allocations, or those seeking fundamentals-based exposure.

What are the key risks of holding APED?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($31.35K) relative to trading volume (~$1.9M/24h) and FDV (~$387K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — the possibility of further minting or freezing of accounts cannot be ruled out • No sniper coverage available, so early-buyer dumping risk is entirely unquantified

← Back to all predictions

Track APED