three.ws Price Today & AI Analysis

threeSolanaAnalysis as of May 1, 2026

$0.000279

-5.81% 24h

Contract

Live

FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

14,963

Market cap

$279,053

At a $1M market cap, $THREE would be $0.001000 (3.58x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is three a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about three

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TMTeleMoney$0.0₄7866-29.8%MC $75.5K

HUGMonkey Hug$0.0₅4963-48.8%MC $4.7K NNFLXNetflix - Backpack Securities$62.52-1.2%MC $260.8K

AIBUBBLEThe AI Bubble$0.0₅7390-18.3%MC $7.2K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.000779-12.7%MC $778.3K

FrongusFrongus$0.000224+441.0%MC $215.7K

three.ws: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-01 00:19 UTC

Holder addresses

487

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$33,858.06

How concentrated is three.ws ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 487 addresses (2026-05-01 00:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling three.ws?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is three.ws liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-01 00:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,858.06. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-01 00:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 1, 12:19 AM UTC

FDV

$169,714

Liquidity

$33,858.06

Holders

487

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

three.ws (ticker: $three) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana meme/utility token (mint: FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump) with a total supply of ~999.99M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$169.7K. The token has experienced an explosive 24h price surge of ~170% (207% per trading analytics), driven by a sudden burst of holder and trading activity after weeks of complete dormancy. The project is flagged as possible spam by on-chain data providers, the contract is unverified, and update authority is unknown. Liquidity is extremely thin at $33.86K, sell pressure dominates at 77.2%, and the holder base of 487 is nascent. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap token.

Key points

Explosive 170%+ price surge in 24h after ~28 days of zero holder activity
Flagged as possible spam with unverified contract and unknown update authority
Extremely thin liquidity ($33.86K) relative to 24h sell volume ($253.78K)
Sell pressure heavily dominates at 77.2% of 24h volume
Holder base grew from 52 to 487 in just 2 days, entirely swap-driven

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

Despite the 170%+ 24h surge, sell pressure is overwhelming (77.2% of volume). The price has already pulled back from the intraday high of ~$0.0001768 (candle [1] high) to ~$0.0001664. With only $33.86K in liquidity and 2,484 sells vs 1,091 buys in 24h, further downside is likely unless new buying catalysts emerge. The 1h momentum is still elevated (+73.8%) but fading.

Target low

$0.000080

Target high

$0.000177

Support: $0.000128 (candle [1] low), $0.000100 (candle [12] high / psychological), $0.000080 (candle [8] low)
Resistance: $0.000171 (candle [11] high), $0.000177 (candle [1] high / 24h peak), $0.000200 (psychological round number)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The token was completely dormant for ~28 days (52 holders, zero net change Apr 1–28) before a sudden pump. This pattern is consistent with coordinated pump activity. With dominant sell pressure, thin liquidity, spam flagging, and no verified contract, sustained upside is unlikely without a fundamental catalyst. A reversion toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000040–$0.000060) is the base expectation.

Catalysts

New exchange listing or partnership announcement
Verified contract and doxxed team reducing spam concerns
Significant liquidity injection deepening the pool
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally

Bullish factors

170%+ 24h price surge with strong momentum in recent candles
Holder count grew +435 (89%) in 7 days, entirely in the last 2 days
5m price change still +6.1%, indicating residual buying interest
Some snipers booked 146%–283% realized PnL, suggesting early entry was well-timed

Bearish factors

Sell pressure dominates at 77.2% of 24h volume ($253.78K sells vs $75.1K buys)
Flagged as possible spam; unverified contract; unknown update authority
Only $33.86K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful exit
Token was dormant for 28 days before sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Top 10 holders control 32.21%; top 100 control 88.02% — highly concentrated supply
Multiple snipers have already sold large positions ($4K–$7.4K each)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short active trading history (2 days), spam flagging, unknown update authority, thin liquidity, and the absence of fundamental on-chain data (sniper USD amounts unknown, no verified tokenomics). Price action is highly volatile and manipulable at this market cap.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: FeMbDo...pump
Total Supply: 999,990,340.89

Key Risks

Possible spam/scam token with unverified contract and unknown update authority
28-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Overwhelming sell pressure (77.2%) with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
Critically thin liquidity ($33.86K) creating extreme exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 24 hourly candles analyzed (Apr 30 01:00 UTC through May 1 00:00 UTC), the token traced a clear pump-and-partial-retrace structure. Price bottomed near $0.0000353 (candle [21] low) in the early hours of Apr 30, then formed a sustained series of higher lows and higher highs through the session. The most explosive move occurred between candles [13]–[2], where price surged from a low of ~$0.0000562 to a high of ~$0.0001768. Candle [2] (23:00 UTC) was a massive bull candle with volume of $231,675 — by far the largest volume bar — closing near its high at ~$0.0001402. Candle [1] (00:00 UTC May 1) opened at $0.0001400, reached a new high of $0.0001768, but closed lower at $0.0001601 on sharply reduced volume ($11,520), forming a potential shooting star / bearish wick at the top. This is a classic blow-off candle pattern suggesting near-term exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term trend is technically an uptrend given the 170%+ 24h gain and series of higher lows from candle [21] onward. However, the most recent candle shows a bearish upper wick at the high, and sell pressure (77.2%) suggests the uptrend may be exhausting. Medium-term context is meaningless given 28 days of dormancy prior to this 2-day pump.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

23%

Sell

77%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000128 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000080 (candle [8] low / prior consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.000177 (candle [1] high / 24h peak)

Major resistance

$0.000200 (psychological round number above current price)

Immediate support sits at the candle [1] low of ~$0.0001289. A break below this opens the door to the $0.000100 psychological level and then the $0.000080 zone where price consolidated during candles [6]–[8]. On the upside, the 24h high of ~$0.0001768 is the key resistance; a clean break above would signal continuation of the pump.

Notable patterns

Shooting star / bearish upper wick on candle [1] at 24h high — potential reversal signal
Volume climax on candle [2] ($231,675) followed by 95% volume collapse — distribution signal
Series of higher lows from candle [21] through candle [2] — confirmed short-term uptrend
Candle [11] showed a wide-range bar with high of $0.0001719 and close of $0.0001396 — early sign of selling into strength
28-day dormancy followed by 2-day explosive pump — consistent with coordinated pump activity

Liquidity

$33,858.06

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $33.86K on the PumpSwap pair (5ByL7MZoLABYnwMPZKPKjf4MGkZ7FeBzrAnos19Pre2z). The 24h sell volume of $253.78K is approximately 7.5x the total liquidity pool, meaning any significant sell order will cause extreme price impact and slippage. The ratio of unique sellers (1,053) to unique buyers (307) is 3.4:1, confirming strong net outflow. With 2,484 sell transactions vs 1,091 buy transactions, the market is clearly in distribution mode. The FDV of ~$169.7K vs $33.86K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~20%, which is extremely low and indicates the token is highly illiquid relative to its market cap. Any large holder attempting to exit would face severe slippage and likely crash the price.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,990,340.89

FDV

$169,713.55

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
170%+ price surge in 24h after 28 days of dormancy. Extreme intraday volatility with price ranging from ~$0.0000354 to ~$0.0001768 within a single day — a 5x range. Volume collapsed 95% from peak candle to the following hour.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $33.86K against $253.78K in 24h sell volume. Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~20%. Any position above a few hundred dollars will face significant slippage. Exit risk is extreme for larger holders.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Possible spam/scam token with unverified contract and unknown update authority
28-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Overwhelming sell pressure (77.2%) with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
Critically thin liquidity ($33.86K) creating extreme exit risk
Snipers actively distributing with $22K+ already sold by top 5 sniper sellers
Top 100 holders control 88.02% of supply — extreme concentration
Creator fee extraction mechanism described in token description
No verified fundamentals, team identity, or use case beyond vague AI description

Mitigating factors

Token is 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
Holder count growing rapidly (+435 in 7d), indicating some genuine market interest
Some snipers still holding (balance > $0), suggesting not all early buyers have exited
PumpSwap listing provides basic DEX infrastructure for trading
Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist, suggesting some project presence

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

three.ws ($three) is a high-risk Pump.fun micro-cap that experienced a coordinated pump after 28 days of dormancy. The bull case relies on momentum continuation and community growth; the bear case (higher probability) is a rapid reversion as snipers and early buyers distribute into thin liquidity. This is a speculative trade, not an investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continuation: The token attracts genuine community interest around its 'AI model' narrative, liquidity deepens, and the price sustains above $0.000140 before making a new high above $0.000177.

Viral social media traction driving new buyer inflows
Liquidity injection from project team or market makers
Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all boats
Verified contract and team transparency reducing spam concerns

Base Case

Gradual bleed: Price consolidates in the $0.000080–$0.000130 range as initial pump excitement fades, sell pressure moderates but remains dominant, and the token slowly loses value over 1–2 weeks as liquidity dries up further.

Some residual buying interest from social media exposure sustains short-term floor
No major new catalysts emerge to reignite the pump
Snipers continue to sell in tranches rather than all at once
Liquidity remains thin but does not collapse entirely

Bear Case

High probability

Pump-and-dump collapse: Snipers and early whales continue distributing into thin liquidity, price retraces to pre-pump levels of $0.000035–$0.000055, and the holder base shrinks as FOMO buyers exit at a loss.

77.2% sell pressure with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio already in place
Snipers with 100%–283% unrealized gains have strong incentive to sell
Only $33.86K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling without severe price impact
Spam flagging and unverified contract deter institutional or informed retail buyers
28-day dormancy pattern is consistent with coordinated pump schemes

Analysis details

Generated

May 1, 12:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-01 00:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (Pump.fun mint)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: 5ByL7MZoLABYnwMPZKPKjf4MGkZ7FeBzrAnos19Pre2z)
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, May 1 2026 00:00 UTC lookback)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Top 20 holder distribution data
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)

Limitations

Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — sniper concentration % is estimated, not precise
Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
Contract is unverified — no source code analysis possible
Only 2 days of active trading history available — technical analysis is limited
Historical holder data shows only 30 days, with 28 days of dormancy providing no useful baseline
No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
Token is flagged as possible spam — data provider metadata may be incomplete or unreliable
FDV figures differ slightly between metadata ($169,713.55) and trading analytics ($155,380) — likely due to price sampling time differences

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk of total loss. The token analyzed exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics including possible spam flagging, unverified contract, extreme sell pressure, and thin liquidity. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is three.ws (three) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell three.ws (three)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is three.ws ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 487 addresses (2026-05-01 00:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling three.ws?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is three.ws liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-01 00:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,858.06. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for three.ws (three)?

Is three a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

What are the key risks of holding three?

Possible spam/scam token with unverified contract and unknown update authority • 28-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern • Overwhelming sell pressure (77.2%) with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio