three

three.ws Price Today & AI Analysis

three
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 1, 2026

FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump

$0.000743

-13.75%

FDV $742,503

LiveContract:FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpumpChain:SolanaHolders:15,510Market cap:$742,503

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about three

Report snapshotas of May 1, 12:19 AM
FDV

$169,714

Liquidity

$33,858

Holders

487

Snipers

37

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

three.ws (ticker: $three) is a Pump.fun-launched Solana meme/utility token (mint: FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump) with a total supply of ~999.99M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$169.7K. The token has experienced an explosive 24h price surge of ~170% (207% per trading analytics), driven by a sudden burst of holder and trading activity after weeks of complete dormancy. The project is flagged as possible spam by on-chain data providers, the contract is unverified, and update authority is unknown. Liquidity is extremely thin at $33.86K, sell pressure dominates at 77.2%, and the holder base of 487 is nascent. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 170%+ price surge in 24h after ~28 days of zero holder activity
Flagged as possible spam with unverified contract and unknown update authority
Extremely thin liquidity ($33.86K) relative to 24h sell volume ($253.78K)
Sell pressure heavily dominates at 77.2% of 24h volume
Holder base grew from 52 to 487 in just 2 days, entirely swap-driven

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–48 hours

Despite the 170%+ 24h surge, sell pressure is overwhelming (77.2% of volume). The price has already pulled back from the intraday high of ~$0.0001768 (candle [1] high) to ~$0.0001664. With only $33.86K in liquidity and 2,484 sells vs 1,091 buys in 24h, further downside is likely unless new buying catalysts emerge. The 1h momentum is still elevated (+73.8%) but fading.

Target low$0.000080
Target high$0.000177
Support: $0.000128 (candle [1] low), $0.000100 (candle [12] high / psychological), $0.000080 (candle [8] low)
Resistance: $0.000171 (candle [11] high), $0.000177 (candle [1] high / 24h peak), $0.000200 (psychological round number)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

The token was completely dormant for ~28 days (52 holders, zero net change Apr 1–28) before a sudden pump. This pattern is consistent with coordinated pump activity. With dominant sell pressure, thin liquidity, spam flagging, and no verified contract, sustained upside is unlikely without a fundamental catalyst. A reversion toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000040–$0.000060) is the base expectation.

Catalysts
  • New exchange listing or partnership announcement
  • Verified contract and doxxed team reducing spam concerns
  • Significant liquidity injection deepening the pool
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 170%+ 24h price surge with strong momentum in recent candles
  • Holder count grew +435 (89%) in 7 days, entirely in the last 2 days
  • 5m price change still +6.1%, indicating residual buying interest
  • Some snipers booked 146%–283% realized PnL, suggesting early entry was well-timed

Bearish factors

  • Sell pressure dominates at 77.2% of 24h volume ($253.78K sells vs $75.1K buys)
  • Flagged as possible spam; unverified contract; unknown update authority
  • Only $33.86K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful exit
  • Token was dormant for 28 days before sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Top 10 holders control 32.21%; top 100 control 88.02% — highly concentrated supply
  • Multiple snipers have already sold large positions ($4K–$7.4K each)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short active trading history (2 days), spam flagging, unknown update authority, thin liquidity, and the absence of fundamental on-chain data (sniper USD amounts unknown, no verified tokenomics). Price action is highly volatile and manipulable at this market cap.

Deep Analysis

Over the 24 hourly candles analyzed (Apr 30 01:00 UTC through May 1 00:00 UTC), the token traced a clear pump-and-partial-retrace structure. Price bottomed near $0.0000353 (candle [21] low) in the early hours of Apr 30, then formed a sustained series of higher lows and higher highs through the session. The most explosive move occurred between candles [13]–[2], where price surged from a low of ~$0.0000562 to a high of ~$0.0001768. Candle [2] (23:00 UTC) was a massive bull candle with volume of $231,675 — by far the largest volume bar — closing near its high at ~$0.0001402. Candle [1] (00:00 UTC May 1) opened at $0.0001400, reached a new high of $0.0001768, but closed lower at $0.0001601 on sharply reduced volume ($11,520), forming a potential shooting star / bearish wick at the top. This is a classic blow-off candle pattern suggesting near-term exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 23%Sell 77%

Short-term trend is technically an uptrend given the 170%+ 24h gain and series of higher lows from candle [21] onward. However, the most recent candle shows a bearish upper wick at the high, and sell pressure (77.2%) suggests the uptrend may be exhausting. Medium-term context is meaningless given 28 days of dormancy prior to this 2-day pump.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000128 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000080 (candle [8] low / prior consolidation zone)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000177 (candle [1] high / 24h peak)
Major$0.000200 (psychological round number above current price)

Immediate support sits at the candle [1] low of ~$0.0001289. A break below this opens the door to the $0.000100 psychological level and then the $0.000080 zone where price consolidated during candles [6]–[8]. On the upside, the 24h high of ~$0.0001768 is the key resistance; a clean break above would signal continuation of the pump.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish upper wick on candle [1] at 24h high — potential reversal signal
  • Volume climax on candle [2] ($231,675) followed by 95% volume collapse — distribution signal
  • Series of higher lows from candle [21] through candle [2] — confirmed short-term uptrend
  • Candle [11] showed a wide-range bar with high of $0.0001719 and close of $0.0001396 — early sign of selling into strength
  • 28-day dormancy followed by 2-day explosive pump — consistent with coordinated pump activity

Total holders487
24h Δ+24
7d Δ+89
30d Δ+89
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump. The token had exactly 52 holders from April 1 through April 28 — 28 consecutive days of zero net change. On April 29, holders surged by +316 (86%), and on April 30 by +162 (31%), perfectly coinciding with the price explosion. This suggests the holder growth is driven by the price action (FOMO buyers) rather than organic adoption preceding the price move.

The holder base grew from 52 to 487 in just 2 days (Apr 29–30), representing an 837% increase from the dormant baseline. All growth came via swaps (478 of 487 holders acquired via swap; 9 via transfer; 0 via airdrop). The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical at 89% because all growth occurred in the final 2 days of the 30-day window. Growth is technically accelerating (157 new holders in the last hour alone per the 1h metric), but this is characteristic of a pump event rather than sustainable organic growth. The dormancy period (52 holders for 28 days) raises serious questions about the token's legitimacy and whether the pump was coordinated.

Top 10 hold32.21%
Top 100 hold88.02%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

5ByL7MZoLABYnwMPZKPKjf4MGkZ7FeBzrAnos19Pre2z

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address matches trading pair)

10.01%

B4dBgTrDQa5ay5tK9YeHUKiqMg1KRLB1RZtWqPRWVoP1

Individual whale / early holder

3.35%

As7HjL7dzzvbRbaD3WCun47robib2kmAKRXMvjHkSMB5

Individual whale / early holder

2.95%

6F3uyKq6t2pEEfsvYoS68GjFJF66puJ9zPGApWjV4mzV

Individual whale / early holder

2.89%

NSFWgtpXQb7MER3JexiDnossimG7fF5YoiiE5Hoe999

Individual whale — notable vanity address suffix 'NSFW999'

2.61%

The top holder (10.01%, address 5ByL7MZoLABYnwMPZKPKjf4MGkZ7FeBzrAnos19Pre2z) matches the PumpSwap trading pair address, indicating this is the DEX liquidity pool — not a single whale. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders collectively control ~22.2% of supply, with individual positions ranging from 1.98% to 3.35%. The top 100 holders control 88.02% of supply, indicating extreme concentration. The distribution across 138 'whales', 53 'sharks', 161 'dolphins', 77 'fish', and 28 'octopus' suggests the holder base is fragmented but top-heavy. Given the dominant sell pressure (77.2%) and sniper profit-taking, the overall whale sentiment is distributing.

Liquidity$33,860
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$75,100
Sell$253,780
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers307
Unique sellers1,053

Liquidity is critically thin at $33.86K on the PumpSwap pair (5ByL7MZoLABYnwMPZKPKjf4MGkZ7FeBzrAnos19Pre2z). The 24h sell volume of $253.78K is approximately 7.5x the total liquidity pool, meaning any significant sell order will cause extreme price impact and slippage. The ratio of unique sellers (1,053) to unique buyers (307) is 3.4:1, confirming strong net outflow. With 2,484 sell transactions vs 1,091 buy transactions, the market is clearly in distribution mode. The FDV of ~$169.7K vs $33.86K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~20%, which is extremely low and indicates the token is highly illiquid relative to its market cap. Any large holder attempting to exit would face severe slippage and likely crash the price.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,990,340.89
FDV$169,713.55

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.99M (effectively 1 billion), consistent with standard Pump.fun launches. The FDV is $169,713.55 at current prices. Critically, the update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified — this means mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from available data. The token is flagged as 'Mutable: false' which is a mild positive (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, rug risk from authorities remains unknown. The token is flagged as 'possible spam' by the data provider, adding further uncertainty. Fees are described as directed to the creator per the token description, which warrants caution regarding ongoing extraction mechanisms.

Volatility
high

170%+ price surge in 24h after 28 days of dormancy. Extreme intraday volatility with price ranging from ~$0.0000354 to ~$0.0001768 within a single day — a 5x range. Volume collapsed 95% from peak candle to the following hour.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $33.86K against $253.78K in 24h sell volume. Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~20%. Any position above a few hundred dollars will face significant slippage. Exit risk is extreme for larger holders.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 32.21% of supply; top 100 control 88.02%. Excluding the LP pool (10.01%), individual whales hold 2–3.35% each. Coordinated selling by top holders could devastate the price given thin liquidity.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. 12 of 20 are in profit with realized PnL ranging from +10% to +283.2%. Top snipers have already sold $4K–$7.4K each. Continued sniper distribution into any price strength is a significant overhang.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown'; contract is unverified; mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Token is flagged as 'possible spam'. Mutable:false provides minor reassurance on metadata, but overall authority risk remains elevated due to lack of transparency.

Key risks

  • Possible spam/scam token with unverified contract and unknown update authority
  • 28-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Overwhelming sell pressure (77.2%) with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Critically thin liquidity ($33.86K) creating extreme exit risk
  • Snipers actively distributing with $22K+ already sold by top 5 sniper sellers
  • Top 100 holders control 88.02% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Creator fee extraction mechanism described in token description
  • No verified fundamentals, team identity, or use case beyond vague AI description

Mitigating factors

  • Token is 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered post-deployment
  • Holder count growing rapidly (+435 in 7d), indicating some genuine market interest
  • Some snipers still holding (balance > $0), suggesting not all early buyers have exited
  • PumpSwap listing provides basic DEX infrastructure for trading
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) exist, suggesting some project presence
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

three.ws ($three) is a high-risk Pump.fun micro-cap that experienced a coordinated pump after 28 days of dormancy. The bull case relies on momentum continuation and community growth; the bear case (higher probability) is a rapid reversion as snipers and early buyers distribute into thin liquidity. This is a speculative trade, not an investment.

Bull case (low)

Momentum continuation: The token attracts genuine community interest around its 'AI model' narrative, liquidity deepens, and the price sustains above $0.000140 before making a new high above $0.000177.

  • Viral social media traction driving new buyer inflows
  • Liquidity injection from project team or market makers
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all boats
  • Verified contract and team transparency reducing spam concerns

Base case

Gradual bleed: Price consolidates in the $0.000080–$0.000130 range as initial pump excitement fades, sell pressure moderates but remains dominant, and the token slowly loses value over 1–2 weeks as liquidity dries up further.

  • Some residual buying interest from social media exposure sustains short-term floor
  • No major new catalysts emerge to reignite the pump
  • Snipers continue to sell in tranches rather than all at once
  • Liquidity remains thin but does not collapse entirely

Bear case (high)

Pump-and-dump collapse: Snipers and early whales continue distributing into thin liquidity, price retraces to pre-pump levels of $0.000035–$0.000055, and the holder base shrinks as FOMO buyers exit at a loss.

  • 77.2% sell pressure with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio already in place
  • Snipers with 100%–283% unrealized gains have strong incentive to sell
  • Only $33.86K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling without severe price impact
  • Spam flagging and unverified contract deter institutional or informed retail buyers
  • 28-day dormancy pattern is consistent with coordinated pump schemes

GeneratedMay 1, 12:19 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately May 1, 2026 00:00–00:30 UTC. Price and volume data is current to within minutes of analysis.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Pump.fun mint)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair: 5ByL7MZoLABYnwMPZKPKjf4MGkZ7FeBzrAnos19Pre2z)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, May 1 2026 00:00 UTC lookback)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)

Limitations

  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — sniper concentration % is estimated, not precise
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Contract is unverified — no source code analysis possible
  • Only 2 days of active trading history available — technical analysis is limited
  • Historical holder data shows only 30 days, with 28 days of dormancy providing no useful baseline
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Token is flagged as possible spam — data provider metadata may be incomplete or unreliable
  • FDV figures differ slightly between metadata ($169,713.55) and trading analytics ($155,380) — likely due to price sampling time differences

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk of total loss. The token analyzed exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics including possible spam flagging, unverified contract, extreme sell pressure, and thin liquidity. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,990,340.89

Key Risks

Possible spam/scam token with unverified contract and unknown update authority
28-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Overwhelming sell pressure (77.2%) with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
Critically thin liquidity ($33.86K) creating extreme exit risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

Of the 20 identified snipers, the majority are in profit based on realized PnL percentages. 12 of 20 snipers show positive realized PnL, with standout performers at +283.2%, +260.2%, +205.3%, +146.2%, and +70.7%. However, 4 snipers show negative PnL (-6.3% to -40.5%), and 4 show 0% (either held or no data). The high sell-through rate is evidenced by large USD sold figures across multiple snipers. Sniper concentration as a percentage of total supply cannot be precisely calculated as individual sniped amounts in USD/tokens are unknown; the estimate of ~2.1% is based on the small number of snipers (20) relative to total supply. The dominant pattern is early buyers taking profits aggressively into the pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.10%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

20 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks; USD amounts sniped are unknown, but sell activity is significant — top sellers include AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51 ($7,447 sold), Ar2Y6o1QmrRAskjii1cRfijeKugHH13ycxW5cd7rro1x ($6,029 sold), kEFiAX3jo5NmemysQov342TZ9mGh6yp92GDRjhA8XDf ($4,733 sold), STorreSu8X6yPLmiEScNHSGDinqV7j84hWjmvH9SPwk ($4,165 sold), 1aDerPKk87xJHCAqTY5bGxF5Xet2MG476y4Zmq2WJ8Y ($4,077 sold)

Early buyers (snipers) are predominantly profit-taking. The top 5 sellers among snipers have collectively sold over $22,000 worth of tokens. This aggressive selling by informed early participants is a significant bearish signal and likely contributes to the 77.2% sell pressure observed in 24h trading analytics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for three.ws (three)?

Despite the 170%+ 24h surge, sell pressure is overwhelming (77.2% of volume). The price has already pulled back from the intraday high of ~$0.0001768 (candle [1] high) to ~$0.0001664. With only $33.86K in liquidity and 2,484 sells vs 1,091 buys in 24h, further downside is likely unless new buying catalysts emerge. The 1h momentum is still elevated (+73.8%) but fading. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–48 hours), with a target range of $0.000080 to $0.000177.

Is three a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. Absolutely not suitable for retail investors, those with low risk tolerance, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are three holders trending?

three.ws currently has 487 holders and is growing (24h: 24, 7d: 89, 30d: 89). The holder base grew from 52 to 487 in just 2 days (Apr 29–30), representing an 837% increase from the dormant baseline. All growth came via swaps (478 of 487 holders acquired via swap; 9 via transfer; 0 via airdrop). The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical at 89% because all growth occurred in the final 2 days of the 30-day window. Growth is technically accelerating (157 new holders in the last hour alone per the 1h metric), but this is characteristic of a pump event rather than sustainable organic growth. The dormancy period (52 holders for 28 days) raises serious questions about the token's legitimacy and whether the pump was coordinated.

What does sniper activity look like for three?

Snipers hold roughly 2.10% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding three?

Possible spam/scam token with unverified contract and unknown update authority • 28-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern • Overwhelming sell pressure (77.2%) with 3.4:1 seller-to-buyer ratio

Track three